1 5 6 7 8 9 10 | bottom
Quote# 139640

This Nigerian girl of 14, after being forced to marry a 35 year old man, cooks a celebratory dinner for him and some buddies. Laces the whole thing with rat poison, and kills a few of his buddies while others present are just taken to the hospital and released.

If you don't like arranged marriages, stop them all. Write to your leaders to go over and put an end & nullify all arranged marriages.

No? But you want to spew on about "freedom of choice".. Yet you don't seem to realize, this isn't the act of 1 crazy man and a bunch of his friends out on the town looking for some 14 yearold girl to rape.
This is a CULTURE who has been practicing arranged marriages, longer than the USA has been a country.

Who are ANY of you to say that it isn't "the right way" to do things? Let me guess, because you believe you're doing it the "right way"? Guess what! People from that culture don't believe YOU are doing it right.. What now?

I bet you think we should just leave people alone now, huh? Yeah.. me too.

Violent, MMO Champion 4 Comments [8/9/2018 7:52:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139620

A vote for Democrats in 2018 means:

1. You care more about illegal immigrants as opposed to law-abiding citizens.

2. You believe criminals should have more Rights than victims.

3. You condone the sexualization of children.


Ghost, Gab 20 Comments [8/9/2018 7:50:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 139617

And even if you were to consider lolicons pedos, if a pedo came out to anyone, they'd get the police called on them. Therapists are required to aren't they? Even if said pedo isn't hurting anyone and has no intention to. Which I think is pretty harsh imo. Furthermore, taking away pedo's outlets is dangerous, because if anything they is going to be illegal, what is stopping them from doing actual harm, other than them wanting to protect children. It might not be a perfect defense against child abuse, and those who rape kids are going to anyway, but at least it gives the ones who do not want to harm kids something safe to rub their rod.

But I really don't think it's fair to everyone who enjoys lolicon a pedo, just as it's not fair to call someone into bdsm or rape porn a rapist, nor do they really wish to be raped. And rape porn is a popular genre. It's a fantasy, an escape. And I think escapism is fine just so long as you don't take the fantasy into real life. The loli porn is not the problem, it's the people who can't tell the difference between reality and fiction.

Either way, I don't think people should care what I wank to if it harms nobody. Also sorry if I seem like a cunt at any point, I am not trying to. I've noticed that I am probably being too bitter in the past comments. Just very passionate about the topic I guess.

Alright bro. I'm going to level here. If anyone is trying really hard here to keep porn where children lookalikes are in, then I think that person is a massive pedo. Murdering another human being is completely different to allowing lolis in porn. And don't get on a high horse about defending fiction and how it shouldn't be messed with. You look like a pedo, defending this. Take a step back, and just reevaluate yourself.

Yea this is an edit just went through your profile a little. I understand why you are defending this so hard. Cause you are a pedo.

Double edit: "17 is more than old enough tho" yea your a pedo

So it's okay to murder another human being but not okay to allow lolis in porn? Do people look gay for defending gays? Do people look like murderers for defending murder in games?

I really don't see how violent video games and lolis are so different that they cannot be compared. Both are fiction and both depict something illegal and wrong, I think that's fair ground for comparison.

The only reason I look like a pedo to you is because you're not willing to accept that fiction isn't reality and enjoying something in fiction doesn't mean you enjoy in real life.

Mizu-neko, reddit 1 Comments [8/9/2018 7:50:02 AM]
Fundie Index: -5

Quote# 139616

It's hypocritical to say that lolicon is wrong because it's immoral or gross, calling it pedophilia, even to say you don't care that they're not underage, and then go on to play some video game where you brutally murder innocent people and children.

Imagine a woman being 30 and looks like a child so she often gets mistaken for one. What is she to do? If she fucks someone, that person she fucks will be deemed a pedo and jailed? Do we care about age then, or just looks? After all, if she looks underage, then she is underage.

Why do so many people care so much about fictional children but never seem to talk about real children being raped? They're just pixels on a screen. If you wanna bitch about pedophilia, go and hunt the real pedos.

The one thing I have to say about most lolicons I've seen, it's that they seem to be a bunch of pussies. To afraid to stand up for themselves. They'd rather others fight for them, but who's going to do that when most non lolicons detest lolicons? You don't get in anything in life by staying idle and nothing easy to obtain is worth having.

Reddit should ban the furry and gaming communities, because that's just immoral and wrong. At least play it fair.

Mizu-neko, reddit 4 Comments [8/9/2018 7:46:56 AM]
Fundie Index: -3

Quote# 139637

Why (((they))) are actually our greatest allies

(((They))), the elite, or whatever you want to call them, is not our enemy, and they are in fact our greatest allies. Here's why:

The (((process))) is simple, and it works like this:

1. (((They))) will infect modern culture with polygamy, rebellion, and drug-use. The so-called degeneracy.

2. Society crumbles and collapses under it's own weight, the weight being "degeneracy".

3. The collapse of society will also cause the collapsation of institutional incel-discrimination, privilege of Stacy and Chad, and the destruction of the unjust systems.

Now, this process is oversimplification, but the message is accurate.

But too many incels fail to see the last two, especially the last one, and only see "(((they))) cause polygamy", and think to themselves "well, if polygamy is bad, and (((they))) cause polygamy, then (((they))) are bad as well". And that does make sense when you first think about it. But on second thought, what (((they))) are doing is actually good for incels, and bad for Chad. Not now, not tomorrow, but eventually. And think about it. Most Jews are ugly, balding, short, and they are often meme'd into oblivion. It would make sense for the balding manlet race to hate the Chad Aryan. This is the true incel rebellion.

TL;DR (((they))) cause the so-called degeneracy, and will destroy society, thus benefitting incels

fellofix, incels.me 8 Comments [8/9/2018 6:26:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139634

The reactionary program is fallen governance for a fallen world: Immanentizing the Eschaton is the progressive program, it is the opposite of the reactionary program. Whosoever claims that the truest and most pure reaction will Immanentize the Eschaton is a progressive entryist, like those telling Muslims that Islam is the religion of peace, therefore the truest Islam is something that is suspiciously progressive sounding, like those telling Christians that single mothers are heroes, and that they should adopt blacks from Saharan Africa.

“hello fellow white male hetero sexual reactionaries. My reaction is purer than your reaction. And yet at the same time we need to be acceptable to moderates in order to obtain the broadest possible outreach.”

Reaction deals with fallen men as they actually are – hence we want our ruling bandit to be a stationary bandit evil overlord, and view the primary problem with government as mobile banditry – that anonymous bureaucrats have, as Taleb says, no stake in the game. We are worried about the evil overlord’s incentives, and not much worried about whether he represents the people, and not much worried whether he is nice and virtuous. We want a good man for Archbishop, but someone mighty like Trump for President, President for Life, King, God King, and Holy American Emperor.

If Trump successfully does a Stalin or a Cromwell, freezes leftism at the current year, that will be great, for the full implementation of the reactionary program is likely to be through all out war, where cities get burned, likely by nuclear fire, women and children get massacred, and the winning side is the side most willing to do the most terrible things.

If he does a Sulla, and rolls leftism back to 1933 that will be even better.

If he rolls leftism back to the leftism of the founders, better still. Best of all if he gets crowned God Emperor of the New Holy American empire, does a Charles the Hammer and a Charles the Second and rolls things back to 1660, in which case we are likely to get one hundred and sixty years of reaction.

The worst case outcome however, and a very likely outcome, is long, bloody, and terrible civil war with our enemies masters of the state. Trump gets impeached, not long after that imprisoned, and not long after that he and his entire family is murdered like the Romanovs as civil war and white genocide begins. In which case we will have to whip up our own state in one hell of a hurry.

Everyone who practices with a gun on the gun range is on our side.
Most men who lift iron are on our side.
Most men who practice the seriously dangerous martial arts on our side.
The great majority of young white males are our side.
Deus Vult. God is on our side.

But as well as that, if our enemies have a state, we will need a state.

Whites are in line for hot genocide. Whites also have more capability for war than any other race. No other race, no other people, have ever shown anything close to the capacity for organized mass violence. Which means that to re-awaken our capability, we need organization and mass.

To re-awaken the sleeping warrior, reward him for victory personally and individually with land, women and power, as well as with land and power for his platoon, his company, and his regiment. He will be back.

Set the status of women back to what it was in eighteenth century England, or better, back to what it was in the Carolingian empire. He will be back.

If the state remains in the hands of people who wish to destroy us, we will have to build our own state, and the quickest way to whip up a state from nothing much is feudalism and freehold – the full reactionary program. Every company and every regiment needs to be largely responsible for its own logistics, and will need its own pool of camp followers, thus will need its own domain of state power.

It would be better if part of the existing state comes over to us, with its existing institutions, in which case we will get something considerably less than the full reactionary program, very likely will get a Cromwellian program. We are not in this to build utopia. Reaction is impure in its essence, being committed to doing the best we can in a regrettably fallen world. The Cromwellian program would be great. Whosoever signals reactionary purity, signals leftism. We are, however, in this to win. If we cannot win with the existing state, or a breakaway part of it, will have to win without, and the full reactionary program is fully optimized for power, war, and the regrettable necessity of dreadful deeds.

Jim, Jim's Blog 7 Comments [8/9/2018 6:20:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139633

Re: Sex Before Kissing: How 15-Year-Old Girls Are Dealing With Porn-Obsessed Boys

Fascinating. I didn't know the US had already degenerated to this level although I suspected something along these lines.

15 year old girls should be kept seperate from boys their age or at least supervised. At that age boys have levels of testosterone exceeding even that of violent adult males. I recall thinking about sex or something sex-related almost all the time when I was that age. It faded as puberty ended of course, but pubescent males are basically drugged up on a powerful aphrodisiac drug that also makes them aggressive and impulsive.

The media and liberalism have made it normal for 15 year olds to have sex. The truth is that as much as the hormones tell them to have sex at that age, they're just not mentally and emotionally ready for it.

I don't know about full segregation, but we at least need to be talking about this on a societal level, in comprehensive sex ed classes, etc... & parents are going to have to get over their squeamishness over talking about sex with their kids. As for the last part, I am grateful that I was strong willed & had strong boundaries at 15, because I ended up hearing too many cautionary tales that involved girls who didn't.

At that age boys want to have sex with anything female that moves. Liberalism has normalised sex for all ages to such a degree that it's now bordering on pedophilia.

These days when a teacher has sex with a student it's not even seen as wrong anymore. It's called a sex romp these days. Even when the kid later comes out and feels seduced and abused, the media will often still speak of it as a sex romp instead of rape. The media has created this sense that rules are meant to be broken, that no means yes if you try hard enough and that 'bad boys' are real men.

Too many women put up with it though. These boys become fuckboys in adulthood and consider relationship gatekeeping as a tool to get women to have sex with them. They don't see women as persons proper, just as delectable creatures with warm, soft and moist holes for them to stick their penises in. It was bound to happen at some point though I mean women are objectified just about all the time. I wonder if women are aware of it.

For example I'm sure a bikini is nice to wear but it's effectively the same as being naked, Almost everything of interest is already on display if women wear it, so any time a man wants to ogle women who are stripped almost bare, he can just go to the beach and have his fill.

While there is definitely a faction of pedos trying to normalize their behavior, I really am not convinced that 'liberalism' is wholly to blame for this- people practice child marriage in many of the most socially conservative societies on earth. Even here in the US, FLDS(a breakaway sect of Mormonism) members practice child marriage, & I myself met several girls under 16 who were married off, legally(with 'parental consent'), to much older men in fundamentalist evangelical christian communities. I am not convinced that any of those marriages turned out well. I can't remember who said it, but there was some quote to the effect that many right wing guys consider women private property, but left wing guys consider women public property. I wish what I have observed in my own life convinced me otherwise, but it doesn't.

I don't believe that all men engage in this or are responsible for it, but then they don't really have to- one of the greatest myths is that it takes a majority to influence social trends or societal expectations. As for swimwear/beachwear, my own choices just aren't centered around men's preferences at all- I don't care for hot, crowded beaches, so I'm usually in swimwear either because I'm going for a relaxing swim, or I'm doing some other sort of activity. Neither bikinis, nor the 'burkinis' that are positioned opposite them are actually optimal for any of the activities I like to do...trying to swim, dive, or stay on a board while I'm having to worry about a boob popping out, or dealing with so much extra fabric I might as well be wearing a beekeeper costume doesn't appeal to me. If I wanted to wear lingerie, I would wear lingerie, & I wouldn't be trying to swim in it.

I'm a nihilist and marxist. I'm not coming from the religious angle here (although most men who blame liberalism are so I understand why you would assume that). I'm not trying to say what came before wasn't extremely bad. I mentioned liberalism because as an ideology it's just bad on almost all fronts. I'm anti totalitarian but do believe in a little bit of authoritarianism/illiberalism when needed. Of course I believe in limits to such authoritarianism, I'm of the opinion that some rights are sacred, including right to bodily integrity, as well as the sovereignty of the self, and should be beyond legislation.

Left wing guys who think women are public property are just crazed tankies. Mao used to force people to do everything communally, including take showers together, sleep (not have sex, just sleep) in same room.

There's this thing called dialectical materialism. Some ideas come from the material realm, that is to say the ideas are thought up to justify the material conditions. Right wingers and left wing traitors will come up with ideas to justify the oppression of certain groups, just like how the rich like to claim the poor are lazy and that they are the parasites of society, etc.

Berniebros and common leftists don't even know what marxism is and have never read Das Kapital let alone excerpts of it. Marx says that society is divided into classes. There are the owner classes and then there are the proletariat classes, or simply the proletariat. These workers are exploited and forced to sell their labour as well as their body in certain conditions, to survive.

In a sense, men women and children alike are objectified. Men and children were worked in mines, used like disposable tools and were discarded of when their bodies were destroyed or outlived their usefulness. Women same thing, but also exploited in sexual manner. Men were sent to war like living meat bags to be shot up and bleed to death and die a few years later of PTSD if they survived.

Marx, meant not just labour but oppression as a class. That's why he makes it so very clear that there are the oppressed classes and the capitalist owner class doing the oppression.

Berniebros and so forth don't know anything about Marx, they just want a bailout for their student loans and useless college degrees. (I do think student loan debt has to be restructured though because it's abundantly clear that it's set up as a slavery ring)

Illustrious_Try, r/GenderCriticalGuys 4 Comments [8/9/2018 6:20:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139632

The first thing we should ask ourselves is, is it possible for there to exist a much more advanced civilization in this universe than we, ourselves...and if the answer is yes...are they hostile or friendly...and if there is any evidence that they may be friendly...are they prepared to divulge the science of the universe to us. Well, you can make your own mind up about that. The Holy Bible says there are and explains how we can ditch the cancer of evil from our midst...but we had better start quickly else we might be seen as part of that cancer as are all those listed in Revelation 21:8...and making ourselves salvageable seems to be so full of promise...as in eternal life...peace...harmony...good will and freedom from all health failures. Imagine leaping around the rocks like a mountain goat...that is what's on offer when we unravel our spiritual distress. Only a solid science can deliver these things and that is what is on offer...lt's all in the Holy Bible

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 4 Comments [8/9/2018 6:19:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 139631

The problem is more complex than 'private corporations can do what they want'. When you get banned from every major platform for nebulous reasons or poor reasons at all, it begs the question if you can get your message out. To people. There are no current notable competitors to YouTube, Apple and Facebook. Or sound cloud and spotify. There was also an agreement that they would never allow what happened with 2018 to happen again, which means purging voices from their platforms.

It also calls into question whether these are platforms or publishers. If they're a platform, they're not responsible for user content. If they're a publisher, then they are legally liable. Can you even speak if all major platforms for it bar you from it? How will you build an audience?

There were also videos that called into question the nature of 'private'. Many of these companies were started with public money and tax breaks, as well as technology developed by the US military (GPS and the internet itself). So can they really be private?

Also this was a business decision as well as political. Alex fucking Jones was kicking the ever loving shit out of CNN and MSNBC. When a man that is mostly treated as a joke is beating your friends, it is very embarrassing. Especially to YouTube, whose dumb cunt CEO thinks they can replace TV. So they booted him. The question is will they continue to purge right wing voices or not? Especially if it benefits your business.

Also, will they just stop there? What about payment processors? What about web hosts or essential services like Cloudflare? Most, if not all, these businesses are leftist owned, far leftist. All are private companies and can defacto ban you from the net entirely. Is that ok justification for banning you for your opinion?

Secret Asshole, Kiwi Farms 3 Comments [8/9/2018 6:19:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 139630


Like other aspects infinity, the concept of infinitesimal offers a powerful way to solve problems and even handle stress. Calculus advanced largely through an understanding and use of the infinitesimal.

The often-scarce resource of time, for example, becomes infinitely abundant if divided into infinitesimal segments.

Jesus introduced the concept of infinite time, or eternity, and infinitesimal time follows from that.

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 6 Comments [8/9/2018 6:18:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139629

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is pointing out a serious problem that is happening in society today. This article will touch upon the horrible, evil, vile, and wicked war on men. That is not the complete focus of this article though. The war on men is a serious problem going on in our culture today. The attacks on these men over and over again is extremely troubling for anyone who cares about freedom. The attitude coming from the extreme left is an attitude of unforgiveness. This is alarming as well. We have all sinned and fallen short. We all make mistakes. We all put our foots in our mouths. When you fail to forgive then you will not be forgiven. Which makes this even more concerning.

It is extremely scary that the entertainment culture has gotten so hostile to men, Christians, and conservatives. The constant attacks from too many in the entertainment industry is creating a backlash against them. There are people looking up anything that was said, or written by people. These busy bodies will go back ten years to find something someone said or did. Then they expect there to be outrage. Then they expect the person in question to be fired. What lesson are they teaching everyone? If you say or do something the extreme radicals on the far left does not like they will not allow you to work. You will have to become homeless living under a bridge because of a mistake that was made a decade ago. Where is the forgiveness from the entertainment industry? Where is the forgiveness from the radicals on the far left?

One of the ways we learn is by making the wrong choices. That is part of being human. The modern day Pharisees and Sadducees are holding us to an unrealistic standard. It is a standard they themselves do not follow. They are trying to force everyone from saying things that go against their rebellion against God. Obey God, and they want to ruin you. Do the right thing, and they want to destroy you. What kind of ethics and morals is that? The level of venom and hatred attacking those obeying God is horrible. How can they sleep at night spreading such destruction? I refuse to join them in this kind of behavior. Instead I take the path less chosen. I forgive them of their attacks. I forgive them of the destruction they create. Why? Because I want to be forgiven for my mistakes. I forgive so I will be forgiven.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.

Paul Bury, Family Friendly Gaming 5 Comments [8/9/2018 6:18:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Sammettik

Quote# 139623

I'm gay and an alt-righter. I think gay people like myself should be accepted in society, especially because sexuality is not really a conscious choice. Both your genes and the environment you find yourself in contribute towards becoming gay over a long period of time, and not in a way you have direct conscious control over, so I find it immoral to strongly persecute people for it if they are not harming anybody else.

That said, homosexuality should not be directly promoted and often encouraged like it is now in western societies. This is because the homosexual lifestyle is one that, to an extent, undermines the traditional family structure that is extremely important for a sustainable society. Also, we've seen that homosexuals are more likely to take issue with other fundamentals to a sustainable society, especially because we've seen they are prone to pushing the narrative about how they are "oppressed" that leads down the road to Marxist thought. It's no coincidence that the vast majority of gay people are leftists that have fallen into various leftist hivemind communities. Therefore, we should be accepted but only to a limited extent and not pushed as role models or anything like that, whereas those practising the traditional family lifestyle should be promoted.

Psyflora, Reddit 8 Comments [8/9/2018 6:14:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 139622

For being a Christian, I was spit upon as a mechanic between 1987 and 1991. I had a hammer thrown at me. Someone put a charged capacitor on top of my toolbox and I jumped a foot in the air when I went to pick it up. The unsaved man who put it there was laughing. My arm hurt for a week in the elbow from the electric jolt. I often found naked centerfolds in my locker, booze bottles in my toolbox, had my uniforms and tools stolen, had my equipment that I was responsible for sabotaged. I was grabbed by the throat, called “baby Jesus!,” had pry bars put between my legs, pushed and shoved, called every horrible name and insult imaginable, all because I stood for THE TRUTH! I have fought a battle my whole life. I am a survivor! The Holy Bible says in 2nd Timothy 2:3-4 that we are “soldiers” for Jesus Christ. A soldier has wounds! A soldier has scars! A soldier has bloodied injuries! A soldier has to fight! A soldier doesn't enjoy hot-tub retreats, 5-star hotels, frequent trips to Israel, fine dining and the good life, which is what many pastors enjoy today. We are in a spiritual war over THE TRUTH!!!

Jesus is outside the gate, and so am I. Again, please listen to Pastor Jack Hyles' precious MP3 sermons titled, “Outside The Gate With Jesus!” I have been outside the gate my whole life. My own beloved father (a Moody Bible Institute graduate) kicked me out of his church (mission) ministry in 2001, whose Lutheran board member horribly said, “You and that King James cult!” I was mailed a letter that said I was out!!! I was outside the gate with Jesus!!! I have been outside the gate my entire life!!!

It is a crying shame that even a witch like Hillary Clinton has remained faithfully married to her husband all these many years, while Christian women quit and divorce! Go figure! What is wrong with Christians? I'll tell you, they are merely going through the motions and not genuinely walking with God. I WALK WITH GOD!!! I have my faults, many of them, but I know God. The senior pastor of harvest wrote to me last year and told me, Always seek God! Isn't that special. Sadly, he cannot even discern between incorruptible seed and corruptible seed. I don't want the God he thinks he knows!

God said it is not good for a man to be alone. Genesis 2:18, “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” We know this verse means exactly what it says, because the solution to the problem was to give Adam a wife. I am only glad that my wife divorced me, and not me her. That is on her. I am only glad that my father disowned me, I didn't hurt him at any time in any way. I was always a good son, honest and choosing the higher path. I always honored my father, forgiving him for his faults because that is what Dr. Jack Hyles taught me to do from the Holy Bible. I would 10,000 times rather be a victim than a perpetrator!!! I have had many people hurt me throughout my life. I have been swindled out of tens of thousands of dollars, literally. I have been taken advantage of financially by shady attorneys, amounting to well over a hundred thousand dollars. I lost my paid home, reluctantly giving the equity to greedy lawyers, and I have rented now for the past 10 years. I doubt if I'll ever own a home again, not without going into debt to the ungodly banksters. Life has taken nearly everything from me, and it hurts when another church rejects me on top of it, while they enjoy the good life, and who cares about truth, right?

I am NOT feeling sorry for myself. I am merely a crying voice in the wilderness of cyberspace, telling the truth for my Lord. God is using my calamity and suffering to help others. My only attitude is to DO GOOD, so it will BE GOOD! I cannot make others do right. If Harvest Baptist Church (or cult) wants to promote the Devil's corruptible seed, promote the heresy of Lordship Salvation, honor devil-dog sinister ministers like Ravi Zacharias, and drop the ball for God, then that is on them. I have done my part to stand for THE TRUTH. That is all God wants me to do. Matthew 10:16, “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” I am a fool for Christ, which means I am wise. The wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. The world is filled with IDIOTS! The secular newsmedia are liars, kooks and fools. I am siding with the King James Bible, as I am commanded to do in Romans 3:4, “God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.” I will be vindicated at the Judgment Seat of Christ, for one reason alone, and that is because I am TELLING THE TRUTH!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 11 Comments [8/9/2018 6:13:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139619

The vagina has three orgasm spot, the G spot, clit and the A spot.
In order to make a girl orgasm you need to hit her A spot which is like 7-8 inches deep.

It's over for averagecels.

Well if your a chad you probably dont need to have a massive dick to make her orgasm

AsiaCel, incels.me 16 Comments [8/8/2018 6:13:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139618

Today's Laugh 8-7-18

Medical scan: Ocasio-Cortez
Test result: Liberal indoctrination

Spirit scan:
(Ocasio-Cortez simultaneously speaking with demon): Support Palestine! Election fraud is justified! Down with police! Free everything!

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 15 Comments [8/8/2018 6:13:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 139613

(Planet-sized disembodied spectral face in space looking at Earth sadly)

He did something about EVIL.

He still weeps over a broken, lost, and foolish, planet.

He will one day eliminate EVIL from His universe...

In the meantime... we groan with longing...

Brian Rice, Pinterest 22 Comments [8/7/2018 10:41:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 139612

Oh, and let me add…

People who say, “Sodom and Gomorrah were condemned, not for homosexual acts, but for lack of hospitality” really need to retire that ridiculous meme. The biblical text is pretty obvious. When the angels come to visit Lot in Sodom, he takes them in. “But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house; and they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.”

“Know” is the Hebraism for sexual intercourse. The story crackles with the menace of gay rape. The mob (whom the writer repeatedly emphasizes were men) “pressed hard against *the man* Lot”.
As Scott Hahn points out, the threat of homosexual rape is a particularly acute form of “inhospitality”.

So don’t kid yourself. Homosexual intercourse was regarded as gravely sinful in the Old Testament and Christianity receives that from the Jewish tradition. Few things are more tortured than the attempt to make the Bible a document in support of gay sex. It just ain’t. Tertullian, who had his own issues, was at least perceptive on this score when he said “What has Athens to do with Jerusalem?” Like it or not, the Christian tradition teaches that homosex is a grave sin.

Mark Shea, Patheos 9 Comments [8/7/2018 10:40:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 139611

The real collusion is between the MSM, the DNC, and the GOP establishment that can't stand that @realDonaldTrump beat them. #MAGA

Amy, Twitter 10 Comments [8/7/2018 10:38:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Daspletosaurus

Quote# 139602

Out of Eden is a Hip-hop/ R&B/Gospel group of soul sisters who are actually sisters! Lisa Kimmey, Andrea Kimmey-Baca, and Danielle Kimmey. I think a more appropriate name for their group would be "OUT OF HELL." These women are imposters, exploiting the name of Jesus to make a fast buck. It is sad, and a clear sign of the apostate condition of America, when professed "Christians" act, dress, and sing just like the unsaved world. The idea that you can put improved lyrics to Satanic music, and then label it as "Christian" is wrong.

Also, look how these women are immodestly dressed. And who stands like that? The woman in the middle looks like she's having a problem or something. She looks like she needs a doctor. I'm not trying to be unkind, I am trying to make a good point—these so-called "Christian" women look and sing like heathens! The Bible, God's Word, states in no uncertain terms that we are to be separated from the Christ-rejecting world, "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? ... Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you" (2nd Corinthians 6:14,17).

Their songs have been used in many screen productions such as Eddie Murphy's "Dr. Doolittle," Christina Aguilera's Diary (a lesbian whore), and The Chris Rock Show. This is evidence enough of their worldly status. They also appeared on the primetime UPN show Moesha (starring Brandy) and have been featured in several major magazine features and cover stories. In the photo to the right, the two sisters on each end are sitting like tramps.

Is this how a Christian woman should sit, like dogs? Don't get mad at me, I have 2 dogs and that's how they sit. These girls are bad news, serving the Devil, and ought to be ashamed of themselves for posing in such a lewd and unladylike manner. It's not just marketing tactics—nudity and sexual advertising are demonic! Clearly, this album cover is sexually suggestive. It's disgusting in the name of morality!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 18 Comments [8/7/2018 1:23:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139596

So...let's explore what you find so offensive Stranger...that I say that there is an invisible, superabundant, indestructible, dynamic energy behind the existence of the universe. That it is owned by Almighty God...in fact it is God and from it, all science, all stars and all life came into being. Now that is what the Holy Bible tells us as well and Jesus taught us how to harness it righteously...now where do I discredit Jesus or his father and where do I not offer great hope by revealing a science that Satan's henchmen would rather we didn't have?.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 5 Comments [8/7/2018 1:22:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 139548

Speaking at GAFCON's conference in Jerusalem, the British evangelist Rico Tice warned God would "take his power, his spirit and his gospel outside of the institution" unless Anglicans "submit to scripture and repent of our sin". He also revealed he stepped down from the Archbishops' Task Group for Evangelism after Bishop Paul Bayes affirmed same sex relationships

I got ordained in the Anglican church yet I’ve had this profound disappointment. It was very interesting yesterday to hear the New Zealand delegate Rev Behan talk about weeping and grieving over his church. I could really relate to that - I weep over the people who have turned their backs on the authority of scripture.

So to come here and see the largest collection of Anglicans for the last 50 years meet together, to have a Nigerian bishop rebuke us about our sin was so refreshing. As we sat there and were told around the world "these are the different issues you’re facing in terms of your idolatry". And to know that every [bishop] I meet will be affirming the authority of scripture – you suddenly start feeling secure. That’s what it is to be a family and be at home.

If the Anglican communion won’t [submit to scripture], the Lord will take his power, his spirit and his gospel outside of the institution and go elsewhere. I think the message here, with the vast numbers that are here is "listen guys, the spirit will depart the traditional Anglican church unless we submit to scripture and repent of our sin and call people to do that." It’s a great warning to be heeded.

I’m speaking as an evangelist, someone who has spent the last 30 years trying to win the lost. I’m here because I know there’s no power in evangelism unless you’re submitted to scripture.

While I was on the Archbishop Task Group’s for Evangelism – and I’ve been to see him in person on this – the Rev Bishop Paul Bayes of Liverpool was affirming same sex relationships, which is putting people on the road to destruction. I don’t know how you could submit to his leadership? I had to leave that committee.

It’s a different religion. Bishop Paul Bayes and I have a different religion and it’s around whether scripture is authoritative in terms of human sexuality.

I think it’s a great wickedness to tell people who are on the road to destruction that they’re not - to tell them they’re safe when it comes to God’s wrath when they’re not.

The road to destruction in Britain is defined by two things. Tolerance and permissiveness - you can do what you please, and you can think what you please. If we have church leaders who are putting people on that road to destruction it’s a salvation issue. That’s why we have to distance ourselves. And that’s why I stepped down from the Archbishops' commission, which was grievous. I wept about it. I was longing to serve and found it a great honour that Archbishop Welby appointed me to that. Then I was having to submit to the leadership of a man who is contrary to scripture. It was agony.

In a way I come to GAFCON partly grieving but also delighted to find a family that is Anglican and that I can trust to submit to the Lord Jesus and to Scripture.

There’s a loss of nerve in the Church because the culture is getting more and more intolerant of people who hold onto the uniqueness of Jesus and his high and holy standards. So what’s happening is clergy are going with congregations, all of whom have a same sex attracted nephew or grandson – suddenly these relationships are there where people emotionally want to try and change position on those things because they have someone they love who is same sex attracted.

This is where the leadership of the Living Out Christians, people like Vaughan Roberts and Sam Allberry has been so magnificent because they’re saying "we are same sex attracted and we’re saying please, celibacy is the way because this is an eternal issue". They are in the midst of that battle saying "we’re celibate because that’s the way of Christ". We’ve got the people in place and the arguments in place. The question is whether church leaders will say to their people "let’s hold the line on scripture".

Rico Tice, Premier 6 Comments [8/7/2018 1:20:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 139608

Firearms are one of the best hobby for an incel

Let me explain, firearms and firearm culture is almost exclusively male, even if you are ugly or deformed it does not matter as the other guys at the range/store don’t care how you look,(beyond you know not being literally covered in filth.). They just care about your guns/skill with said guns, so no need to worry about getting #metoo by some thot,

Second every gun you own makes no-gun normies reeee just a little bit more, they already don’t like us because we’re incels and now they also don’t like us for owning guns, guns that we can use to defend ourselves with,(even if that is not an ‘official’ reason to own a gun in your country.)

Third: there just a lot of fun, they evoke an almost ‘primal’ sensation/euphoria when using them, something that we incels rarely get to feel.

Fourth: if you’re going to Hero it makes it so much easier/ effective (no matter style of ‘hero’ your going to do,(I.e private or public/ large scale hero.))

jimotree, incels.me 13 Comments [8/7/2018 1:18:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139605

Meet one of the 5,000 Brits who become Muslims each year

No one knows why Louise converted to Islam. No one knows why 27% of converts to Islam in North America are white, or why three in four of these white converts are female. It seems logically inconsistent. Many of us, accustomed as we are to the liberties that our pluralistic society confers, find this phenomena difficult to comprehend. Baffling in fact. Why would Louise embrace a backward faith that regards her species as unclean and her gender subordinate? In the absence of definitive answers, we can only speculate.

Perhaps her nocturnal tours of the neighbourhood were less a mission to relieve her bowels than a spiritual odyssey that ultimately led to Allah. Perhaps under the light of a full moon she looked down upon her turd and saw the work of a Divine Creator. Perhaps her stealthy defecation on Mr. Davis’s front lawn engendered a sense of shame and disgust which made her question her permissive upbringing. Perhaps it was the very rigidity of Islam with its strict dos and don’ts that most attracted her.

Perhaps there is a more fundamental reason to account for her shocking conversion. A reason that while compelling, is too politically incendiary for any but the most suicidal among us to mention, never mind consider. Perhaps Louise found Islam enticing because she understood what feminists don’t. She realized that she is a pack animal, and that packs are hierarchical. There is a chain of command. There is the pack leader, and his followers. That understanding is built into her nature. She is hardwired to lead — or submit. And her psychological comfort is dependent on a clear understanding of where she stands on the pecking order, and what her role is in the group. For a pack animal, nothing is more stressful than uncertainty about his or her place in the hierarchy.

It was Louise’s misfortune to have been born and raised in an environment where pathological concepts like democracy and gender equality were thought to be desirable and viable. She was raised to believe that dinner table handouts were her entitlement, and that her over indulgent superiors were to be regarded as “partners”. She was even given cultural signals to the effect that she and her kind should assume leadership positions.

While she embraced these messages on a conscious level, she didn’t on a subconscious level, for they conflicted with her nature. Until her conversion, Louise was a very conflicted individual, and the inner turmoil was killing her. Islam offered her a way out. That is the raw truth of the matter.

When patriarchal Christianity succumbed to progressive secularism, when clerics with lisps and pink shirts took to the pulpit to preach the PC news rather than the Good News, the field was left wide open to Islam. Dogs and people, pack animals both, crave clarity and moral absolutes. They need a clear demarcation of good and evil, right and wrong, dos and don’ts. Plus a sense of purpose. If you don’t give a dog a job, he’ll find one. Or the devil will find it for him.

This unhappy conclusion is a bitter pill for progressives to swallow. It is hard to admit that for Louise, becoming a Muslim was a rational choice made to deal with existential problems that white female retrievers face in Western society.

In a nutshell, conversion to Islam was Louise’s way of coping with the stresses of modernity.

Tim Murray, Eurocanadian  6 Comments [8/7/2018 1:18:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 139533

Gratian, the man who founded Canon law placed the age of consent at 7, marriage at 12. His view on law affected the entirety of Europe and later America. The UK had an age of consent as 10 until 1875. It was considered absolutely normal and socio-economic reasons are part of it, which you attempt to contradict. Another part of it was the Church, Papal law didn't have an age of consent, only an age at which sanctity of marriage could be announced, and that was age 12. This was due to the belief that Mary was 12 or 13 when she gave birth to Jesus.

The mother of Henry the 7th was 9 at her first marriage, 12 when she gave birth to Henry (as part of her 2nd marriage).

Your point about the danger and lack of medical science is the opposite of what was going on. It was necessitated that girls had children as young as possible due to life expectancy and infant mortality rates, the younger you started the more likely you were to succeed in the long term. The majority of upper class children were born to mothers between 13 and 18, this being due to political pressures of producing heirs.

The idea that young mothers is a bad thing is a fairly recent moral construct maybe within the last 100-150 years, which is hilarious considering that precocious puberty is on the rise, we are trying to have children later and our bodies are adapting to have them earlier.

History completely disagrees with you, as far it is concerned young mothers were a good thing until we decided as a society that it wasn't.

Junpei, MMO Champion 9 Comments [8/7/2018 1:08:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 139486

Peter: Read the moon landing conspiracists. Or 9:11. You'd be convinced. The big hole in their and your argument is the utterly risible and totally unconvincing alternative they and you offer. But let's park that for now.

andHarry: Look:) All these frauds and blunders have been widely acknowledged and documented elsewhere. Read what Stephen Jay Gould had to say about the conning of the scientific community for years and years by the Piltdown Man fiasco. Bergman provides extensive footnotes for his sources, etc. You are living a life in denial, Peter:)


Peter: Get real and think the earth is 4000 years old and every species from the poles to the tropics including dinosaurs found their way to a boat in the Middle East and survived there together? Right

andHarry: 6000 years, and a single undivided land mass - Pangea, if you like. Hence no problem with access to the Ark. According to Genesis 10:25 and 1 Chronicles 1:19, the Earth was divided in Peleg's time. Also all creatures still followed man. I would argue that when Noah sent our the most intelligent creature on the Ark to chart the receding water we have the first rebellion in the animal kingdom while the home-seeking dove remained obedient; analogous to the present desertion of the gospel by the 'wise and learned'. The raven and it's kindred kind, jays, magpies, etc. with their birdbrains out-think our supposed ape relatives. Interesting.

andHarry, Premier 7 Comments [8/7/2018 1:06:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CC
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 | top