1 2 3 4 5 10 | bottom
Quote# 139736

In response to the question "How dangerous are same sex marriages?"

Tony Venuti:
Pervs once allowed IN...will never support things that are "square"..just BECAUSE...that's how identity politics works...in stead of all of US BEING AMERICAN.......the isms newly created and or otherwise...being the exceptions to the RULE...NOW RULE....

The media magnifying the minimum while minimizing the maximum.....

and now one fights the media...I say Picket the Media get in their face



TEXT
Alien child: So dad, how did the Earthlings go extinct?
Alien father: Well son, they kept trying to breed with the same gender, males with males and females with females, and they also killed their unborn before they were even born.



TEXT
If battery terminals were man and woman instead of positive and negative, would there still be an argument on same sex marriage?



TEXT
HETEROPHOBIA n. An unrelenting fear of waking up some morning as a heterosexual

Tony Venuti, Disqus - Philosophy 22 Comments [8/11/2018 2:52:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 139729

Wayne Borean:
How we understand (scripture) may differ. I’ve seen some interesting disagreements over what various sections mean.

Amos Moses:
"But how we understand it may differ"
there is Gods understanding ... the rest is garbage and not scripture

Fandango:
Practically all Christians will say they follow God’s understanding.

Amos Moses:
and we are to test those spirits to see if they do ............ so what ..........

Fandango:
Are you willing to be tested yourself by other Christians?

Amos Moses:
every day .....

Fandango:
And what happens when they find you to be incorrect about something pertaining to scripture?

Amos Moses:
many have used false theology here .... thinking they were correct ..... trying to make scripture say what they wanted it to say .... and it happens frequently ...... they do not last long .......... they are no longer here ............…

Fandango:
OK, but my question was about the times you have been corrected because you happened to be incorrect regarding something in scripture.

Amos Moses:
as i said ..... many have tried .... failed ....... go for it champ .............

Fandango:
My intent was not to test you. You have answered my question. Thanks.


Amos Moses, Christian News Network 12 Comments [8/11/2018 1:52:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 139724

fucking hell, my grandmother had 2 babies and 500 head of cattle by the time she was 14, she had 3 babies and was widowed and sold the cattle to open a whore house when she was 16.

tell me again how a 14 year old is not a woman and I'll show 40 generations of my family that married and reproduced before they were 15.

That's great for her, but for every 14 year old girl like her, there are hundreds who get used by much older men and end up being scarred for life by it.


who are you to judge what's good for someone else? who are you to tell other cultures how to transfer land, fortune and DNA? Your judgement of people and desire to place your societal norms on others reeks of fascism.

someone else in this thread pointed it out better, millions of years of evolution can't be overcome by 100 years of societal change, the virility of youth is the whole point of discussion here.

What the fuck are you gonna talk about with a teenager?


Nobody gives a fuck what a young woman says anyway.

What possible fucking common interests could you have?


obviously the only common interest would be procreation, young men are not capable of maintaining a family and older women are not capable of creating a family.

Doesn't make it right. You really think your grandmother appreciated being used like a breed mare that young? Being capable is much different from being physically and emotionally ready.



oh shit, who are you to judge 40 generations of my family? Who are you to determine how mature a woman that died 100 years ago is?

And guess what.. she was the fucking MADAM, (you don't really think the owner of the whore house is turning tricks?), it's actually a pretty good commentary of what she thought of men.. she wrote about what dumb brutes men were controlled only by their sex and how easy it was for her to exploit that. She also killed 8 men over the course of her lifetime.

your judgment is shit, you're ideas are bad and deserve to be ridiculed.




dirtyPirate, Reddit 16 Comments [8/11/2018 1:48:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 139733

Leftists believe diversity is important inasmuch as it disempowers those who they think are unjustly at the top of the socioeconomic hierarchy, that is people of european ancestry.
They couldn't care less about diversity qua diversity, in fact you'll often hear them praise a hypothetical future in which the whole human species is so thoroughly mixed that you can't tell anyone's ethnicity by looking at them, in other words a world with the lowest amount of diversity possible.

Anyone who actually cares about diversity immediately realizes that the only way in which you can guarantee the presence of a great deal of variety in the world is to have different areas for different people.

Now, it's not that leftists are stupid or that they don't know this, it's just that it's a political matter so their brains shut down as soon as you talk about it. They understand pretty much every identitarian talking point as long as it's not about ancestry in humans.

If you tell them that a certain subspecies of rhinos that it's not even clear if it's actually a subspecies or not but it's peculiar enough to stand out, is probably going to die out because of, say, climate change pushing other rhinos in their areas, they immediately mobilize to try to preserve those handful of rhinos: not even one of them goes "but who cares about genes" or "why does it matter if those rhinos die out, there are still going to be other rhinos around!". Not a single one of them says anything of the sort, in fact, those are probably the parodies they're going to create when they satirize the "conservatives" who don't care about the preservation of nature.

Dissidentstuffacc, Reddit 7 Comments [8/11/2018 1:02:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139707

"For the liberal’s view of society, which seems to accord the queer a place, endorses no more than the conservative right’s the queerness of resistance to futurism and thus the queerness of the queer. While the right wing imagines the elimination of queers (or of the need to confront their existence), the left would eliminate queerness by shining the cool light of reason upon it, hoping thereby to expose it as merely a mode of sexual expression free of the all-pervasive coloring, the determining fantasy formation, by means of which it can seem to portend, and not for the right alone, the undoing of the social order and its cynosure, the Child. Queerness thus comes to mean nothing for both: for the right wing, the nothingness always at war with the positivity of civil society; for the left, nothing more than a sexual practice in need of demystification."
- Lee Edelman, queer theorist, and author of No Future
He's a bit ahead of the evolutionary biologists in understanding the purpose of our aberant sexualities and unruly genders.
He understands we're here to corrupt the social order, so that it can be adaptable in the face of change.
We are the gravediggers of society. And yes, our existence influences and alters your society, and thus all of us who live under it.

Honey Crisis, Disqus 5 Comments [8/11/2018 12:44:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 139728

Bruh. If you consume child pornography, you are complicit in the violence involved in producing it.



Welp, close-minded, aren't we? In such case that you can easily tie rape, violence, molesting to just keeping DVD's, then I don't see any salvation in this world. I can really understand where people are coming from. Of course, keeping such things are kinda awful and disgusting, but go easy on the judgment. Watsuki may have admitted he liked young girls, but that doesn't automatically make him a rapist, child molester and anything. There are many kinds of pervert who doesn't go further than just obsessing from afar. Sure, they are pitiful people though.

Again, for argument's sake, as I am a big Watsuki fan, I won't be easily judging him like some others here just to stay relevant on the justified side.

Saku-dono, Anime News Network 6 Comments [8/11/2018 9:51:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139727

Love is a normie cope to keep them wagecucking and to stop society from falling

Love is truly the biggest cope in existence. Think of all the things man have done at the hopes of one day finding their 'one true love'. When a man learns the truth (blackpill), he no longer sees the point in wagecucking. Not only is love false, only 20% of the men get 80% of the women. But men are told there is someone out there just for them, this meme is perpetuated from when we are young children through the likes of disney, which love is the main theme in all of the movies.

Would you slave at the office everyday knowing there is absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel? The vast majority of technological advances we have made as a species is because of this concept of finding love. No matter what the normies tell you, 99% of them do everything based on getting a woman. They go to work to get a woman, they try build status to get a woman, they go to the gym to get a woman (JFL at normies who say they lift for themselves). The absolute driving factor behind men who are NT is this notion of true love that has been conditioned into us from birth. This is the sole reason why society has come as far as it has, and why incels want to give up when they learn the truth. There is no reason to continue without the main force which we were told to believe in all these years.

Monogomous societies managed such rapid advances because it was just enough to stop men checking out of society and LDARing. The women gave just enough duty sex, and the man had to work so many hours that they did not have the time to think about sex that much anyway. The nuclear family is a lie, and again part of the propaganda to keep men wage cucking. Its built on the false pretense that firstly there is a woman who will just love us for us, and secondly they can actually love us in the way we desire. The reality is once the kids are out there is no more sex, and the woman completely checks out of the marriage. You just have to provide for her because society tells you to.

We have the cold hard statistics to prove this. Women are disgusted by most men, and they cannot love like we want them to. Imagine if all men woke up and realised this. Without this driving factor society as we know today would not exist. This is why spreading the blackpill could actually be bad for us. At least now normies keep society functioning while we get to laugh at them for the most part, and they make great copes for us.

tl;dr 'love' is the driving force of society. Without it, society as we know it would cease to exist.

wayshegoes, incels.me 9 Comments [8/11/2018 9:51:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139726

I Think the World of 1984 is a Utopia

I remember thinking it was stupid at the time but now I look back on their attitudes towards sex in that book as genius. The establishment in 1984 HATED sex, made it illegal to have sex unless it was for procreation, and it was actually technically a thoughtcrime to enjoy sex. They even had scientists trying to abolish the orgasm. The world of 1984 would be great for incels as we would not be at the bottom of the social hierarchy, in fact they said due to the lifestyle and nutrition nearly everyone was ugly. 1984 was actually a utopia.

FoidsDeserveCancer, incels.me 6 Comments [8/11/2018 9:51:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139725

DECLARATION

We, antisexuals of [countries], proclaim the foundation of International Antisexual Movement (IAM).

AIM OF IAM

Our ideal is the world free of lust, world of sentient beings, world, where mind, but never genitals, rule human. It's a great and global task, but every long way consists of small steps, and every step gets you closer to the aim. So our current tasks are: to make and develop communications between antisexuals and celibates from all over the world; to search, exchange and broadly distribute useful and true information, to propagandize our ideas, to explain people the benefits of celibacy and disadvantages of sexual life style, to oppose pro-sexual propaganda and break pro-sexual myths and stereotypes; to help each other and other people who suffer from lustful surrounding, to struggle against sexual violence, harrasment and discrimination; to support social and scientific programs which can reduce role of sex in human life.

STRUCTURE

IAM is a non-commercial, non-centralized movement with open membership (both personal and collective). It has no single leader or party discipline (although our collective members may have ones); if you share our ideas and want to join, simply inform us. All IAM actions are voluntarily. Our members may belong to any legal political organisations, may be religious or atheists, and so on. They even may be not strictly antisexual - some people share our ideas, but, for the couple of reasons, cannot remove sex from their life right now; they are also welcome, and maybe we'll help them to liberate themselves from sex.

METHODS

IAM use only legal methods. Appearances in mass-media and public actions are highly encouraged. We may support politicians who offer antisexual laws and programs, and some of us may become politicians or officials themselves. Writing and publishing of antisexual books is also useful. One of our tasks is to prevent children from depravation, so those of us who work with children and teenagers are highly encouraged to oppose pro-sexual propaganda especially on this front.

COORDINATES

Contact us via internet [list of e-mails and sites]

Co-founders: [list of co-founders]

Broad distribution of this document is encouraged.

Antisexual Stronghold, antisex.info 7 Comments [8/11/2018 9:50:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139722

Dickpill

Turns out if you dick is smaller than 8 inches, you are deficient

A common normie argument is that the motion of the ocean, and not the size of the boat, matters the most in bed. This is nothing but bluepill propaganda, designed to give false hope n’ cope to dicklets. As we examine this blackpill, you’ll see that your penis size could fuck you over if you’re not Chad.

http://www.penissizedebate.com/page40_ideal-penis-size.htm

According to the study above, the ideal dick size was found to be between 7 and 8 inches, and the ideal girth of the penis was found to be between 6 and 7 inches.

3D model experiment

A research group from two American universities presented 3D dick models to some 18+ femoids. The average length of the penis chosen was about 6.3 inches for a long term partner. Compare this to the average dick size of just about 5.2 inches in the US. About 20% of the women (old hags included) even “admitted to dumping a guy because his penis was ‘too small’.” Only about 7% of the foids said that they left a guy for a dick that’s “too large” [1].

The importance of dick size during sex

Again, let’s come back to the belief spread around by normalfaggots. They literally think that you can somehow be extremely good in bed by using your baby dick effectively. Further scientific studies show that this is nothing but BS, since women would experience better vaginal orgasms with a BIG penis.

“Three hundred twenty-three women reported in an online survey their past month frequency of various sexual behaviors (including PVI- penis in vagina intercourse-, vaginal orgasm, and clitoral orgasm), the effects of a longer than average penis on likelihood of orgasm from PVI, and the importance they attributed to PVI and to noncoital sex.

RESULTS: Likelihood of orgasm with a longer penis was related to greater vaginal orgasm frequency... In binary logistic regression, likelihood of orgasm with a longer penis was related to greater importance attributed to PVI” [2].

If you wanna hit that G spot more intensely and accurately, you better have a big wang. Dicklets will commonly cope about “muh girth” while completely turning a blind eye to the main factor that makes pussy easily wet in sex- length.

Further interesting statistics

Size matters: http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/study-shows-the-penis-size-most-women-actually-prefer/

81% of the femoids in the study above said that they prefer an average man with a big dick over a chad with a small one.

61% said that they dumped a man for a dick that was too small.

57% say that bigger is better.

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 9 Comments [8/11/2018 6:13:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139721

Heightpill

The heightpill is one of the most important phenomena in looks theory. Originating from the biologically needs of femoids, it concludes that manlets (men under 5 foot 10) are heavily disadvantaged in dating unless they’re at least Chads or have high status. For the depraved female species, the manlet cutoff might as well be under 6 foot even, thanks to hypergamy.

Origins

From the evolutionary psychological overview, foids would want a tall man because they’ll think “he’ll be stronger and better able to ward off physical treats to his family” [1]. While in modern society this might not necessarily be true, we all know that the natural instincts of women are still prevalent in their mating choices. No matter how much manlets gymcel, they’ll always be viewed as “overcompensating” wimps with a napoleon complex. It never even began for them!

Tallfaggot advantage in online dating

Stating your height in an online dating could fuck you over badly if you’re a manlet. According to a particular dating app, firstmet, the ideal height related to most matches in males was 6’2” Specifically, they said:

“A man who is 6’2? is 17% more likely to be contacted than a man of average height (5’8?) and 57% more likely to be contacted than a man under 5’5” “ [2].
Female reaction to manlets on social media[edit]

This thread on incels.me perfectly summarized how foids react when they see manlets, even the hot ones.

https://incels.me/threads/its-over-if-youre-a-manlet-sub6-in-2018.51422/

The twitter account (https://mobile.twitter.com/heightismxposed?lang=en) commonly showed how judge mental women are toward manlets, even being distrustful of their personality or intentions just because they’re vertically disadvantaged.

FHO’s don’t even see us as worthy of any respect.



Manlet disadvantage in dating and even betabuxxing

A marriage is more likely to be successful if the male partner is tall. Women just feel happier about it. Several studies in Asia completely proved this hypothesis [3][4]. If even in not quite hypergamous nations manlets are screwed, then image the horror they have to face in western nations.

A Dutch case

Normies commonly suggest that Europeans, especially the Dutch, became tall due to external factors such as a great supply of nutrients. As we delve deep into evolutionary psychology, we find out that the main reason as to why Dutch men are tall these days is because short Dutch men barely even reproduced. A study which analyzed the number of kids received by men of different heights in the Netherlands concluded that:

“Our results suggest that... taller men have higher fertility compared with shorter men. It therefore seems plausible to suggest that natural selection may have acted on the Dutch population, and helped drive the Dutch toward taller heights” [5].

Incel Wiki, Incel Wiki 10 Comments [8/11/2018 6:13:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139719

Let me explain the obvious. Homosexuals get h.i.v without either partner having the virus Vs heterosexuals getting it only IF the other has the virus.

(in a comment to an answer)

????, Y! answers 17 Comments [8/11/2018 6:13:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 139718

I don't know about everyone else, but I am getting sick of liberals unable to make an honest argument making up untrue claims to put you in a straight jacket. They accuse you of what they are doing. When they can't argue or refute what you are saying, they are INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST and put an untrue label on you to try to get out of answering the discussion honestly...and to try to diminish you so they don't have to back up anything they say. Then they whine if you call them out on it.

Kanye West was actually shaking last night on Jimmy Kimmel, knowing he may lose his career and people would try to destroy him for being black while thinking for himself.

The new Martin Luther King Jr is Kanye, who has the courage to tell other blacks that they don't have to all think alike.

Another example of intellectual dishonesty...Kimmel asked Kanye if Trump liked blacks and before he had a chance to reply, Kimmel went to a commercial. Today headlines say Kanye was speechless after black query.

I can't imagine how much guts that took for Kanye.

It is not conservatives who are shutting down free speech on campuses or hurting people...and yet, liberals do not denounce it. Rather than do so, they call you a racist or white nationalist. When it happens that a conservative does something wrong, conservative groups denounce it.

Shar

****

Shar, Realabortiondebate 6 Comments [8/11/2018 6:13:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 139715

Chads and Staceys will suffer the wrath of God

Christmaxxing is probably the best bet. My 2/10 roomate who is a devout christcuck had 2 girls over our house today for his birthday. They were solid 5's and not fat.

I'm gonna go to church this sunday to hopefully get into a Bible study and impress them with my Bible knowledge. The perks of christian (non-evangelical) women are:
+ Traditional values
+ Loyal to the man of the household
+ Cannot judge you for being a low-life because we're all degenerate sinner pieces of shit anyway
+ Will like the same music as you because christian music is all the same cheap studio music
+ Will want to start a family with you and not bullshit around

This is a revelation from God, boys. Wish me luck

ColdPillow, incels.me 6 Comments [8/11/2018 1:10:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139710

Re: Liberal feminists are so predictable I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

(blairbitchcraft)
This is literally what happened to me when I was younger - well, I recognized the whole trans thing didn’t make sense. “TERF” wasn’t a thing back then. I found more people that agreed with me and then I found a version of feminism that really resonated with me: radical feminism. But everyone hated them. So, I whistled while I walked away and didn’t look back for years.

Liberal feminism has gotten a lot more aggressive than it ever was. You used to be able to find people discussing it, discussing their honest feelings (“I don’t really FEEL like a woman; I just like looking like one,”), and people debating with respect.

It’s so weird.

(FriendlyCommie)
The irony is that the context of the aforementioned thread was I was talking about how anti-feminists claim to support intellectualism and being well-read when talking about how well read St. Jordan Peterson is, but dismiss any literature that contradicts their pre-established conclusions. Everyone in the generally progressive sub was agreeing with me, but once I mentioned rad fem literature everyone... immediately dismissed it, funnily enough.

Lib Fems pretty much forced me to become radical feminist. I remember I had a youtube channel where I used to just post very casual off the cuff videos and one time I made a video literally just saying, "Hey guys... maybe we should actually engage gender critical feminists in debates, rather than just calling them bigots and shutting them out."

The video got loads of thumbs down and some guy who had been I subscriber for ages commented saying I was literally responsible for transgender people committing suicide... just because I said we should actually talk to gender critical people.

By contrast every radical feminist community I've found so far has been incredibly accepting. This is actually one of the few places on the internet where I don't feel like I'm wrong one word away from a downvote avalanche.

Edit: how ironic that I mistyped the phrase "one wrong word"

(Kluannoa)
Yes indeed! And downvotes are one thing, but what I ''feared'' before I found radical feminism was just the abuse that you get if you say one word that's considered wrong. They made me feel like I was walking on egg shells, and that their ideology was suffocating and full of arbitrary rules, that also changed arbitrarily.

One thing that I did learn from that crowd, was the value of basic human respect. You don't make the world any better if you borderline bully someone for some honest, tiny infraction, you don't make the space more pleasant when well-meaning and sincere people get treated like witches because they used the word ''crazy'' or because they wrote ''transwoman'' instead of ''trans woman''.

These people have no respect as I see it; I think that there's something inherently disrespectful about bullying people into compliance, feeling entitled to be incredibly rude and hostile for ridiculous reasons, and always assuming the very worst about people you disagree with.

Thus, I rarely even participated in their discussions. They reminded me of my past abusers.

(afistfulofyen)
The ideologies are straight from The Abuser's Handbook. Same tactics couple with cult strategies to keep people ever guessing, ever trying, ever in line.

Good little libfems *pats heads* good little libfems, you're doing the Lord's mens' work and we appreciate most of all that you do not think for yourselves.

(justhysterical2018)
Yes! And, while they talk about inclusion, they fail to recognize that they are incredible elitists. If someone says something "wrong" (because god forbid they don't spend all their time reading woke thinkpieces) that person is immediately jumped on, rather than engaged in a discussion or provided with resources. Or, if they deign to explain, it is incredibly condescending.

I understand there may always be an elitist aspect to certain feminist discussion. But I think one of the reasons people swing to the extreme right is no one wants to be treated like they're stupid. Or called a bigot for disagreeing or having different ideas. I understand wanting no part a "movement" that forces you to walk on eggshells and allows for zero difference in ideas. I know every movement is vulnerable to ideological puritanism, but I see radical feminists as people who are generally able to disagree respectfully and who actually talk through differences in opinion rather than immediately jumping to "YOU'RE A BAD PERSON" and name calling. It's one of the things I appreciated about this sub when I first started lurking. Even though some things were shocking to me (just being so used to "trans women are women" it was a shock to the system seeing them referred to as males), I kept reading and learning because of the way people conduct themselves here. "Ohhhh these women actually care about putting women first!".

(eccentricvibe)
I'm convinced that libfems have so much anger towards radfems because the majority of us actually do research and have well rounded opinions. A lot of libfems really don't know shit about the history of feminism, all of their talking points come from Tumblr/social media in general and they dismiss 2nd wave feminism as "old TERF bullshit" even though those are the women that helped get the right to vote and better access to healthcare.

(afistfulofyen)
Libfems are the definition of birdbrained. The men need them tho: that water won't carry itself!

How I love that they compare THEMSELVES to the handmaidens when they are the aunts.

various TERFs, r/GenderCritical 4 Comments [8/11/2018 1:08:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 139709

Frankly, the ever expanding acronym of LGBTQetc looks to be a byproduct of a stovepipe system.

A stovepipe system is a term used in engineering. It's what happens when you build a model based on a false conception of an underlying concept the model is based on. So your model has to keep being added to with hacks, kludges, and bag-on-the-side retrofitting as the underlying reality keeps butting heads with the theoretical model, which leads to the model growing and growing as it is desperately modified again and again to keep up with new information that contradicts it.

And that's exactly what happened when western cishet "learned" men, utterly confident in their own benevolence, and utterly clueless about queerness, set out to try to dissect us.

So I call bullshit on the whole sorry affair.

I'm queer. LGBT is a false consciousness.

Honey Crisis, Disqus 3 Comments [8/11/2018 1:08:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139708

"For the liberal’s view of society, which seems to accord the queer a place, endorses no more than the conservative right’s the queerness of resistance to futurism and thus the queerness of the queer. While the right wing imagines the elimination of queers (or of the need to confront their existence), the left would eliminate queerness by shining the cool light of reason upon it, hoping thereby to expose it as merely a mode of sexual expression free of the all-pervasive coloring, the determining fantasy formation, by means of which it can seem to portend, and not for the right alone, the undoing of the social order and its cynosure, the Child. Queerness thus comes to mean nothing for both: for the right wing, the nothingness always at war with the positivity of civil society; for the left, nothing more than a sexual practice in need of demystification."
- Lee Edelman, queer theorist, and author of No Future
He's a bit ahead of the evolutionary biologists in understanding the purpose of our aberant sexualities and unruly genders.
He understands we're here to corrupt the social order, so that it can be adaptable in the face of change.
We are the gravediggers of society. And yes, our existence influences and alters your society, and thus all of us who live under it.

?o???? ???slS , Disqus 5 Comments [8/11/2018 1:08:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 139705

This liberal theme on sex and gender follows no logic. The arguments for each do contradict the other. There's none more foolish than those who choose to remain blind.
This is about breaking down family structures, breaking down all traditions simply because the liberals have decided it is a threat to their "be gay agenda". The next generation of kids are being brainwashed... in school, in movies, on television...
next you will see straight people being accused of "hate" simply because they choose not to have relationships that counter their preferences. Already transgenders are up in arms- when men they chase find out about their gender reassignment - often these men detangle themselves and break up the "relationship"... what utter nonsense !

Disme, The Stream 11 Comments [8/10/2018 2:22:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 139700

Leftism is not a viable, sustainable way to live.

Despite the extensive damage done to society by the left, it is only by resistance and imposition of residual conservatism that has allowed us a semblance of a society. The left should thank conservatism for their continued existence.

fwdude, Free Republic 10 Comments [8/10/2018 2:21:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139704

They are not barred from going to university but if they start proselytizing they are usually removed. That is the law in Iran and they know it yet they insist on breaking it. If they can't keep their mouths shut, it's there problem.

Let me tell you something: Baha'i claim there are about 300,000 Baha'is in Iran. Give each a lifespan of 60 years and you will have about 300,000/60 = 50,000 Baha'is in Iran reaching university age every year. The vast majority of these enter university and finish their studies without a problem. A very very small minority are removed due to proselytizing. These few are immediately used by the Baha'i UHJ as pawns for their game of playing the victim and propaganda against Iran.

hadez803, ShiaChat 6 Comments [8/10/2018 12:24:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139701

Transgenderism is mental illness. When a person becomes so disconnected with reality that they believe themselves to be something other than what they biologically are, it is a sign of psychosis. There is no such thing as a "third sex", and biological sex is binary.

It isn't "assigned" at birth (to use a leftist term that suggests sex is arbitrary), it is confirmed. Our chromosomes (XX, XY, or even XXX, XYY, etc. in rare instances), muscular-skeletal frame (women have a larger pelvis), oxygen levels in the blood (men have more), genitalia, etc., all work to make us male or female. There is NO XYZ sex.

Likewise, homosexuality is a neurosis. It is an illogical attraction to one's own sex due to environmental and maybe genetic factors. It is promoted by the left as an alternative, rebellious lifestyle. So we have a situation where mental illness is normalized in an effort to subvert society.

It is not only against Islam and Christianity, but against reason and science.

Silas, ShiaChat 7 Comments [8/10/2018 12:22:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139695

Something hurtful happened to me the other day. I rarely bring my pedal steel guitar to the beach, but decided to bring it this day to the beach. I set it in the grass before the sand. It's about 500 feet from my car to the area where I was going to perform for free. I love sharing my music and letting the kids try to play the guitar. They learn something new. I always bring a bag full of Gospels of John to give away to others. I have a little portable 2-wheel dolly that I store in my car.

I had my $700 Fender Princeton Reverb amplifier and a milk crate with items inside, like my volume pedal and instrument cables. I tried to roll them both on the dolly over some tree roots, but it all fell over on the ground. My $700 amplifier hit the ground pretty hard but seemed ok. I stacked everything back onto the dolly and started to roll again, but it all fell over again and my amp hit the ground hard again. I heard a group of people burst out in laughter the second time everything fell. I looked right at them and they were starring at me. They were a family having a barbeque.

I walked by and told them that they shouldn't laugh when someone falls down. I quoted the Scripture about doing unto others as you'd have them do unto you. I quoted the Scripture which says if you've done it unto the least of these My brethren, then you've done it unto me. I walked away. I forgot something in the car and went back to get it. As I walked by they were laughing at me, mocking me. I forgot something else and went back again, and I heard them laughing at me again, mocking me. I was so mad and trying to keep my composure. I looked at them. I was so mad.

I grabbed my bag of Bibles and walked right up to their group. I kindly said, “Could I please give you some Gospels of John?” To my surprise they accepted them, but others wouldn't. So I left 4 laying on their portable table. There were about 20 of them, several adults and their children. I passed out about 10 Bibles. I said, “I didn't mean to snap at you before. It's just that nobody likes to be laughed at when they fall down. I know you weren't trying to be mean by laughing. God bless, have a good day” and then I kindly left. I diffused the situation. I overcame evil with good. I don't always do the right thing like that (I wish I did), but I sure want to do better and better with the Lord's help.

Trust The Lord To Avenge, Knowing That God Sees When People Mistreat Us

I love the following passage of Scripture. King David had commit adultery and murder. One of David's subjects and enemies, ran alongside David casting dirt and stones at him, willing to die he was so angry. One of David's men offers to kill the man. But David said to leave him alone. David reasoned that perhaps God would later bless him, seeing that this man had cursed David...

2nd Samuel 16:11-13, “And David said to Abishai, and to all his servants, Behold, my son, which came forth of my bowels, seeketh my life: how much more now may this Benjamite do it? let him alone, and let him curse; for the LORD hath bidden him. It may be that the LORD will look on mine affliction, and that the LORD will requite me good for his cursing this day. And as David and his men went by the way, Shimei went along on the hill's side over against him, and cursed as he went, and threw stones at him, and cast dust.”


I often think about this passage of Scripture when people are abusive, mean and rotten toward me. I know that God sees their evil toward me. God sees their hatred. God sees their jealousy, God sees their hypocrisy. God sees their wickedness. And so I leave the matter alone, trusting the Lord to avenge me as He promised in Romans 12:19, and believing that perhaps God may bless me in His wondrous mercy, in repayment for the unkindness, cruelty and cursing of my enemies. That is exactly what the Bible teaches here. If we avenge ourselves and try to get back at others, hurt them and attack them, then God won't do anything.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 13 Comments [8/10/2018 11:21:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 139693

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Feds spend $140,625 to reduce 'intersectional stigma' of men who want to be women in Nepal"

Original Fox News headline: "Feds spend $140,625 to reduce 'intersectional stigma' of transwomen in Nepal"

(Link to original Fox News story which Lady Checkmate has cut and pasted to her own channel: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/10/feds-spend-140625-to-reduce-intersectional-stigma-transwomen-in-nepal.html)

Bob:
The insanity of the left knows no bounds



Lady Checkmate:
They're confused, lost and in need of the risen Savior, Jesus Christ. He can save and deliver them.

Chela:
"men who want to be women"
The word "want" seems to imply that transgenderism is a desire, and not an intrinsic state into which a person is born. ...so all the money, social upheaval, "men who want to be women" in women's restrooms, etc etc....are all simply just to entertain the desires and "wants" of....men. So "men who want to be women" are actually being sexists by insisting other people's "wants" should be subservient to their "wants".

Lady Checkmate:
Chela, that was my edit added for clarity. Thanks for sharing. You're right.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - News Network 8 Comments [8/10/2018 11:21:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 139690

Also, if a person neglects their animals and the animals die, they are still punished, even though it was "on accident."


Completely different from killing someone (person or animal) on purpose. But actually, it depends on the animal and how it was neglected. Last year, my 6-year-old forgot to feed her goldfish and it died. Do you think she deserves to go to jail?

In my view, it was a good learning experience for her, even though she didn't face any legal consequences. I'm not saying that people should get off scot-free for neglecting other human beings for whom they're responsible, but let's keep in mind that humans and animals are different just like murder and negligence are different.


you could make the logical argument that a fetus is part of a woman's body and a woman should be able to do whatever she wants to her own body, including destroy parts of it, but to excuse a person who killed a fetus with meth by saying "nobody's perfect" sounds inhumane to me.


I don't make that argument, I am pro-life. But I also don't believe that every living being ought to be locked up in a tower somewhere to prevent any possible bad thing from happening to end its life. This is life, there is risk involved, bad things happen to real people. Not every bad decision needs to lead to jail. If doing meth is illegal, then prosecute the woman for that. Not for negligent homicide. Otherwise we will be looking at negligent homicide charges any time any fetus dies for any reason. That's just unreasonable.

identitiee, r/Libertarian 0 Comments [8/10/2018 11:20:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 139689

So if a child stops breathing and a parent decides that it's the lords will or whatever the reason is, it's okay for them to stand by and take no action?



Of course it isn't OK. I don't know anybody who wouldn't condemn that. As an issue of rights, I think it's a violation of a parent's right as an individual to be criminally prosecuted for failing to help someone. But most parents aren't going to watch their children choke to death. I think we're really grasping at improbable hypotheticals, here.

indentitee, r/libertarian 4 Comments [8/10/2018 11:20:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
1 2 3 4 5 10 | top