1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 | bottom
Quote# 138797

Guest Verified:
Science has not determined that transgenderism is a physical condition with reproduceable results.

it is true. what is not determined is the issue of being gender nonbinary.

Guest Verified:
It is not true. You cannot produce one scientific study that proves it.

there are many papers on it

Guest Verified:
Name one.

ill name you several
Transgender Kids Show Consistent Gender Identity Across Measures - Association for Psychological Science
Landmark study to track ‘pioneer’ generation of transgender children - University of Washington
Landmark paper published on transgender health issues - The Lancet
‘They Aren’t Confused’: Landmark Study Shows Transgender Children Have Consistent, ‘Deeply-Held’ Gender Identity - Psychological Science
Transgender People, Gender Identity and Gender Expression - The American Psychological Association

Guest Verified:
Yeah, you mentioned these before under another handle. Those are all psychology opinion pieces. They are not scientific studies and there is no transgender gene.

i dont have another handle.
psychological opinions are what eventually form scientific consensus and you can see that several of those are landmark papers. do you want more examples, they are easy enough to obtain, or will you just blithly shoot them all down too because you don't believe in psychology?

Guest Verified:
a.) Psychology is not a real science.
b.) The articles you provided do not prove there is a transgender gene. They do, however, prove transgenderism is a mental illness, which is the field psychology attempts to address.

psychology is absolutely a real science, where did you learn it wasnt? and since when is the presence of a transgender gene the only proof of transgenders existing? mental illness is just a tag religious people hang on things they are too lazy to explore.

Guest Verified, Christian News Network 7 Comments [7/12/2018 2:50:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 138796

Just be a police officer theory

Anyone ever dream about becoming a police officer just for the amount of power you can have over normies? Not only that you can do strip searches, plant evidence, shoot people, and the maximum penalty you’ll receive is probably a month paid time off. The police union would be behind your back all the way.

I know the police system is fucked in the USA but maybe incels can take advantage of it?

Just be a police officer theory
Not only that, but a majority of the population would be in support of you, effectively you could do anything you want

0764, incels.me 15 Comments [7/12/2018 2:35:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138816

[On the proposed "Unmasking Antifa Act"]

It adds leverage to the state while weakening a terrorist group. Granted that 'terrorist group' is filled with soyboy faggots, limp wristed university liberals and weak white boys. Seriously, I've seen more black guys on the OTHER side than the ANTIFA side. If the 'fascists' have more blacks than you, you REALLY need to take a look at yourself. I've also only seen ANTIFA do any damage through cheap shots, hitting defenseless targets and shit like that.

When its open street warfare they ALWAYS get fucked. Because they don't have ANY blue collar supporters. Its not like the days of old where union riots involved bombs, lead pipes and men. Now it involves weak, lanky faggots looking to club someone in the back of the head against fucking steel workers and veterans. Its so pathetic.

The mayors that support ANTIFA and call off the cops are doing the opposition a HUGE favor, because we see how weak they are. They spout civil war, but holy shit, if they're putting that out there, the war would be quick, violent and they'd be eradicated in a second. Their enemies are holding back. They don't have a single clue what would happen if the opposition was as violent as they were. There would be bodies on the ground for sure.

Secret Asshole, Kiwi Farms 2 Comments [7/12/2018 2:27:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 138815

Well, it isn't like ANTIFA has a sense of irony. They truly believe they are fighting real Nazis. They honestly do not have a clue they're basically just fighting against blue collar workers, construction workers, veterans, mechanics and other people who do manual labor for a living while most of them are unemployed or living off daddy's dime.

Which is going to be a lot more expensive. I want to see this law go into affect, because these faggot mayors need to see their little pet mobs go to jail. The fact that they are terminally getting blown the fuck out every time they start shit is only icing on the cake.


Yes. Their entire ideology, the entire social justice wave is based on outdated 1960s ideology and injustices that largely do not exist anymore. They dream of being these 'freedom fighters' and 'anarchists against the man', except most people just want to better their lives, not start another civil war or restrict speech, behavior and art.

ANTIFA is a direct threat to creativity, the first amendment, the right to assemble. If it were up to me, I'd gun them down each time they showed with bean-bags, rubber bullets and rubber pellet launching grenades. They're fascist cunts and posers and seeing them get permanently injured from their larping is something we need to see more of. Because these faggots are children throwing a tantrum, and they need to be taught violence is not something you fuck around with.

Secret Asshole, Kiwi Farms 7 Comments [7/12/2018 2:27:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138811

Why Nazi Germany was awesome

* It’s highest leadership were all essentially incel type men, though for different reasons – Goering was a morbidly obese morphine addict, Goebbels was a club footed manlet, Himmler looked like the epitome of a lanky jew and even the Fuhrer himself was very probably a life-long virgin and syphilitic through his mother.Despite these impediments, they acquired immense power and prestige through their intellect and rhetorical brilliance.
* Women were subordinated in every facet of society – they had to attend to the menial tasks which their biology and physiology has suited them for, "kinder, kuchen und kirchen" (kids, cooking and going to Church). No woman ever outranked any man in Nazi Germany, either socially (de facto) or in any of the paramilitary organizations (de jure). Thus, even the lowest ranking man was superior to all women, as it rightly should be.
* Aryan men who could not find or attract women for whatever reason were permitted to rape subhuman untermenschen type females with impunity both in order to satisfy the basic human need as well as to propagate more Aryan blood lines.
* Rank and status were not predicated on money nor were they reinforced by ostentatious displays of material wealth, as in the Jewnited States but rather were acquired by honorable and manly service to the state which all self respecting men should strive for.
* Degeneracy in all of its putrid and corrupting forms was cast out and destroyed by the Nazi party which understood that the people needed to be protected from the perverse influence of modern art, jew propaganda, homosexuality and any other cultural contaminants.

If that’s not enough, also bear in mind that his noble honor, Sir. Elliot Rodger admired the efficiency, glory and power of the mighty Third Reich. Sieg Heil.

Darth_Aurelius, incels.me 8 Comments [7/12/2018 12:57:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138809


The guy holding a knife is saying: You white christ swine die! Allahuakbar!

The woman in the window is saying: He's killing him! Do something Sir prosecutor!

Below there's the message: Why? This is a clear case of self-defense, you racist!

Götz Wiedenroth, Wiedenroth Karikatur 7 Comments [7/12/2018 12:57:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 138808

What is this fear about racism? It is a natural instinct to keep your own group united, it doesnt have to scale in open aggression between two different racial groups but if it does, it is nothing to fear of it, because that is the way things in nature are.?

Gabriel Guttlérrez, Youtube 4 Comments [7/12/2018 12:56:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 138805

Who wants to bet that these IQ-linked genes won't be evenly distributed across "population groups" (aka, races)? I'm willing to bet my entire bank account that the widely observed racial IQ hierarchy that we've known about for decades will line up almost perfectly with these genome-wide polygenic scores. Likewise for socioeconomic class hierarchies (aka, social Darwinism). Is the anti-racist, anti-classist, social constructionist, egalitarian left willing to do the same? Yeah, that's what I thought...

I remember getting into a really heated debate on the old /r/AltRight subreddit about 2 years ago with a couple of the mods at /r/science that claimed to be professional geneticists. They laughed at my argument that we were probably only 5 to 10 years away from being able to create accurate DNA-based IQ predictors. I argued that when that became a reality, all of the "social constructionist" leftists that have completely dominated and corrupted both the scientific and academic community for decades would finally be exposed as the lying frauds that they so obviously are - which, again, they laughed off as being pseudoscientific nonsense.
I linked them some blog posts like this one and some video lectures like this one from Stephen Hsu because I had been following his work for several years, and so I was aware of the pioneering research that he was doing on this topic. But they were too lazy to read the blog posts or watch the lectures, which should give you an idea of how close-minded and politically biased and motivated that sub and the larger scientific community is...
Instead of trying to understand why I thought that Stephen Hsu was on to something, they instead argued that we'll probably never be able to accurately predict IQ based on DNA alone because intelligence is only partially heritable and because the portion of human intelligence that is heritable involves several thousand different genes that are interacting in impossibly complex ways.

Lots of other geneticists and academics felt the same exact way about DNA-based height predictors because height is also only partially heritable and relies on the complex interactions of thousands of different genes. But thanks to the work of a group of researchers that Stephen Hsu was a member of, we now have a DNA-based height predictor that can predict someone's height to within an inch.

And the reason why that's so important is because we can use pretty much the same exact technique that they used to create accurate DNA-based height predictors to create accurate DNA-based IQ predictors. Stephen Hsu argues that we simply need to analyze the genomes of about a million people and give them IQ tests in order to create an accurate DNA-based IQ predictor. Right now researchers are mostly relying on rough proxies for IQ like academic performance and years of completed education, but that's not as good as actual IQ tests.
And another reason why the advent of DNA-based predictors for highly polygenic human traits like height and IQ is so important is because it will allow us to greatly improve the genetic health of our species (aka, eugenics). As I wrote in more detail here, pretty soon we're going to have the ability to walk into a fertility clinic with our wives and then be able to pick the embryo with the highest IQ. And then shit is really going to get wild when we have the technical know-how to utilize precision gene editing in order to safely select all of the genes and alleles linked to intelligence while also avoiding harmful pleiotropic effects, which will produce the smartest people to ever live in all of human history.

And it's fucking sad that we have to rely on based, politically incorrect Asian researchers like Stephen Hsu in order to push through the wall of leftist, social constructionist, anti-racist, and anti-classist biases that completely dominate the West's academic and scientific institutions - which is largely being caused by Jewish and gentile shitlibs. I guess that that will be one of the benefits of China's rise and mass Asian immigration into the West.

I remember reading an article that predicted that China was on track to surpassing America and the West in about 50 years when it came to producing the top 1% of scientific papers which get cited by other scientists. And while China surpassing the West will obviously suck for us overall, one of the benefits for we Alt-Right hereditarians is that both science and academia will lurch back to the hereditarian right - which will move our species forward and rehabilitate the much-maligned reputations of the pioneering Western scientific racists and eugenicists of the late 19th and early 20th century.

CertifiedRabbi, Reddit 1 Comments [7/12/2018 12:56:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138804

Like immigrants being used to undermine the kind of labor negotiations that halted the advance of communism? Unions were critical to keeping the United States together in the mid 20th century. And immigrants (along with other neoliberal policies) are undermining that.

UnexplainedShadowban, Reddit 0 Comments [7/12/2018 12:56:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138803

Nobody on the left in California likes to talk about how the gay marriage ballot referendum was mostly shut down by blacks and Hispanics.

Sometimes I think they are being disingenuous but then sometimes I think the white left really is this dumb.

I encourage intersectionalism because it will inevitably be the left’s undoing.

Their leadership and funding is gay, white and Jewish while their voter base is composed of minorities who hate gays and whites. Sounds like a good plan guys

Shister6022, Reddit 3 Comments [7/12/2018 12:26:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138802

And in fact, the current multiracial experiment of the US has never been done before in history, and certainly not successfully. Historically the rare incidents of racial diversification always resulted in collapse.

The alt right is not really suggesting any 'new' idea that was never tried before while our opponents just want the US to continue being what made it 'great'. It is actually the alt right which would like to stick to old ways and our opponents are engaged in a wild utopian vision that no American politician would have dreamed of prior to world war II.

Fiveos2, Reddit 10 Comments [7/12/2018 12:25:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 138801

The problem is historically wealthy whites have relied too much on cheap non-white labour, this is much of the problem with whites in South Africa too.

A lot of farm murders in South Africa happen as a result of white farmers employing lots of blacks on their farms, and then inevitably a black gets angry and holds a grudge against the farmer and comes back at night with a gang of his black thug friends and tortures and murders him and his family.

If only whites in South Africa didn't employ blacks they'd avoid a huge amount of problems. I can't fathom why white South Africans would employ people they surely are aware are violent and unpredictable, clearly many of them value money over their own wellbeing.

The Chinese get it right in this regard. Chinese in Africa don't employ blacks in their businesses, they bring over workers from China to do the menial labour. It probably costs them more overall, but they get much more intelligent, productive workers than lazy, low IQ blacks who are liable to get angry and murder them.

SmashMarxism, Reddit 2 Comments [7/12/2018 12:24:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138795

God went in my body, as the body of a horny devil.same size. I see jesus in visions nude and he has his penus in hands and rubs and jesus points at me and starts licking me with his sticky tongue.

Bob Hickman, Twitter 18 Comments [7/12/2018 2:04:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 138794

Does it matter? We humans are a compassionate lot. We feel empathy for those who suffer in a completely different part of the world, share their pain and often pull resources together to help them out.

Do you think any of us would truly be happy in heaven, knowing there are friends, family or even strangers being subjected to the harsh punishments that 'Hell' is supposedly full of?

Holy books are so full of contradictions and one among them is the fact that the most righteous person is not one who enjoys the riches of heaven, but rather one who sacrifices riches even in the afterlife to reach out and perhaps even trade places with those in hell.

Yeah but people can't just trads places with those that are going to go to Hell!!
They go to Hell for a reason
That reason is that they are full of sin and they were either too stupid to do something about that or they didn't know what to do, (therefore they aren't stupid), but they can't be with God!!
We are full of sin!! If we don't repent and ask Jesus for forgiveness, we can't be with God!!
It's really quite simple!!!
People don't like that answer so they try and make it seem more complicated or more difficult than that and that's just PLAIN STUPID AND a waste of time!! It JUST is!!

Candy Smith, Quora 5 Comments [7/12/2018 2:04:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 138790

Your points about openness and personal empathy for immigrants are interesting. Your view toward the world likely is similar to mine, but I suspect that you and I – and the many like us – are leading our cultural to its demise.

We object to additional immigration on a policy level, but tolerate it on a personal level. We meet – and, perhaps, become friends – with immigrants. We may live in mixed neighborhoods and enjoy the different peoples. We treat individuals with respect and manners, since they are often good people.

However, this tolerance leads to a welcoming land for immigrants. And what immigrant from a poor and often violent land wouldn’t want to move a rich, safe and tolerant land. Thus, they come. They come and slowly dilute the culture and the country that was built over 300 years. Will that country remain so rich, so safe and so tolerant as those who built it are replaced by Mestizo Mexicans, Indian and Nigerians. Unlikely.

Again, are the vast majority of these people good, decent folk? Yes. Will having them in this country in overwhelming numbers change the middle-class culture that developed over the centuries? Very likely.

In 20 to 50 years, this country will look much like a South American country – and I’m not talking about Argentina. If people think that we have income inequality now, they ain’t seen nothing yet. How tolerant are these newcomers? Not nearly as tolerant as those of us who welcomed them. The world won’t end when the traditional American culture finally dies, but I will miss it.

As I’ve grown older, I’ve gained a much deeper understanding of intolerance. To preserve a culture or a people or a religion, you need to have a certain amount of “unfair” intolerance. It’s ugly. It’s repulsive. But it’s necessary. You can’t just be intolerant to the bad illegal immigrants. You have to be intolerant to all of them. Otherwise, more will come.

Ask people in hundreds of neighborhoods who were tolerant when the first couple of black families moved in. These were good people, good neighbors. We should treat them kindly. But once the neighborhood was seen as open to blacks, more moved in. Cousins and some of the children of those nice parents sometimes weren’t so nice. A decade or two later and the neighborhood is destroyed. I wonder how many of those kind, tolerant whites hiding behind their doors wish that they had been a little less tolerant years before?

Again, I’m one of those nice, tolerant people, so if I’m casting stones, it’s at myself as much as anyone.

Death by Openness, Education Realist 8 Comments [7/12/2018 2:03:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138787

Good catch. Leftoids want to disable our brains so that we can’t detect sex and race patterns or disruptions in our environment, which would make us easy prey for invading tribes. This is why I use the android-like term “leftoid” to describe people like that; they are inherently anti-human, wedded to a sick ideology that envisions utopia only when normal healthy humans have their brains zapped for reduced functionality, all in the name of an equalist compulsion to flood White countries with nonWhites until misery is equitably distributed.

The question now is, do leftoids have brains which are missing some crucial functionality that non-leftoid brains possess which allows the latter to NOTICE THINGS and the former to miss clear and present dangers? Or do leftoids PRETEND (ie virtue signal) to have an inability to notice threats, and in fact they do notice but choose, for social status jockeying and perhaps to alleviate their incrementally growing fear and feeling of powerlessness, to sublimate their threat detection into a useless abstraction of poopytalk and vapid sanctimony?

The answer to these questions will help us find a solution to our leftoid problem and save European Christendom for our posterity.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 7 Comments [7/12/2018 2:03:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 138786

On his “Pass The Salt Live” webcast this morning, Religious-Right activist Dave Daubenmire suggested that “the Christ-hating left” is vehemently opposed to the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court because he could cast a deciding vote to eliminate legal abortion, which is the source of the adrenaline-filled blood that satanists use as the basis of their power.

“Why are they so upset about abortion?” Daubenmire asked, rhetorically. “Why are they so interested about death? Why do they want so much, the most important right they are ever going to have is the right for a woman to be able murder her unborn baby?”

This question prompted one of the participants on the livestream to explain that abortion is “the basis of their power” because “these people are satanists [who] sacrifice children and they use the children’s blood for their drug, adrenochrome.”

Daubenmire agreed, claiming that the left uses abortion and torture to create an “adrenaline rush” in fetuses and young children, who are then killed so that their adrenaline-filled blood can be extracted and consumed

Dave Daubenmire, Right Wing Watch 13 Comments [7/11/2018 3:33:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: heleninedinburgh

Quote# 138785

[SuicideFuel] Fag Chads dont realize how lucky they are and theyre pretty much male Stacys

I think you can tell from the title what I'm about to talk about: Chad Fags, or as I like to call them: Fads. You know what I'm talking about: those 10/10 alpha males that are fucking ripped and have all the women flocking to them (If they're masculine) and from what I've seen are usually white. There are ethnic Fads, but they're usually more effeminate from what ive seen, so less women want them sexually, but still flock to them to bitch about their shit boyfriends and rate straight Chads.
These guys don't realize how fucking lucky they are. They are constantly surrounded by sluts who say shit like "man I wish u were straight so we can fuck," like the whores they are. These guys know the secret of every woman in school and get to see them naked all because they won't get attracted to it. Like dude, ur fucking blessed with high quality genetics but you're wasting it by chasing dicks. I know the Fads say they can't help being gay, but u got to at least try pussy. You have a chance to fuck anyone. Even if you don't like it, at least be happy that u got to have contact with a woman's vagina. Not everyone has that luxury.
Shit, some fags are practically incels, too. They aren't getting any dick cuz these Fads are gobbling em all up. I won't say I'm friends, but I've interacted with one of these Fagcels. He says he gets shit from one of the Fads because he's not good looking and acts like a creep. Apparently he's something called a bear in the fag community, which is pretty much a fat hairy guy. Now that's sad. The fag community have a dating app, which he has used. I've seen videos of fads using it, and from what I've seen it's a hot bed of horny gays. He doesn't even get laid from there either. Almost feel bad for the little homo. Females only use you to bitch about their personal problems and dudes don't even want to fuck with you. Not gonna lie, that sounds tough.
Any thoughts?

Homo_Erectus, incels.me 8 Comments [7/11/2018 2:19:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138781

[Serious] Incels need to learn how to fight

As incels we are bottom of the barrel. We are hated and deemed a threat to society. We need to be able to defend ourselves.

All incels should MMAmaxx and gymmaxx so that normies can't fight us without fear. Incels need to be the toughest individuals around. We have mental resilience but do we have physical resilience.

JFL if you do not see the very REAL threat of a woman ordering a white knight to fight you. You do not even need to be particularly strong or much of a fighter to win (especially blackcels). Just be a dirty fighter you have no reputation to protect anyways.

AfrikanCel, incels.me 7 Comments [7/11/2018 2:04:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138780

(=More on human tampering, mistranslations or errors in the Bible - It's a pretty long discussion=)

Reverend Bill Carey: If I were, for a minute, to believe that God was guiding the translators, I'd have to believe He was totally incompetent, since the translations frequently disagree with each other, all contain deliberate errors of translation, and many contain a verse the translators KNEW was not part of the original text. Does that sound like the work of God or the guidance of the Holy Spirit to you?
Interpretation is scripture is not at issue here. Translation is. You can "interpret" an incorrectly translated verse any way you want, and you are still going to get the wrong understanding.
The importance of the Johannine Comma? Are you kidding? There is not even a shadow of doubt that John never wrote that verse. CENTURIES after John wrote it, some anonymous monk in Europe, charged with copying over the epistle by hand, inserted HIS OWN words into the text. They break the sense of the passage, as they are not pertinent to John's immediate topic. They DO NOT BELONG THERE. Whether one believes the statement or not is irrelevant. Those words are not the word of God, but the word of man, and do not belong in ANY Bible. And the translators ALL knew that.

Alan Minchin: In preparation for either sermons, church magazine articles or notes for a Bible reading discussion group I consult more than one translation of the Bible.
I currently use nine whole Bible translations, of which three are study Bibles. Eight are the work of teams of biblical scholars and one is a "solo" translation.
I also use three "solo" translations of the New Testament alone, alongside various commentaries and dictionaries.
It is noteworthy that all scholars - teams as well as solo academics - have submitted their work to the scrutiny of panels and groups of other biblical scholars, (and involved churches of most denominations), all to guarantee accuracy in what they have produced and which can be seen in today's rich offering of Bibles. We also have the results, since the seventeenth century, of textural criticism the fruits of which can be readily witnessed, not only in modern study bibles and commentaries but on the various Internet Web Sites now available.
In this light, your claims of intentional dishonesty and fraud by scholars over many decades, and that we have today a dishonest and unreliable Bible, such claims are unsustainable. Today's Bibles are more accurate and reliable than at any other time in history. Any discerning reader today can, for themselves, be aware of mistranslations, scribal errors, interpolations as well as cultural influences and practices that came into play in earlier times.
Not only do I see God's "guiding hand" upon the original forty or so biblical authors but it is clearly to be seen in the scholarship that has guided and corrected to where we are today.

Alan Minchin, Disqus 6 Comments [7/11/2018 2:04:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138779

(On a caamib quote)
Now who has proof Carib isn't one of your own pet strawman? Anyone? You know this is ghostwritten by one of your eurocucks.

Pepe, SSTDT comments 12 Comments [7/11/2018 12:11:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138771


I experienced the biggest black pill today.

I met up with a few of my friends to go out. Before that my one friend was going to meet up with a girl he and I are aquatinted with. This girl has all of her friends down. They’re playing never have I ever. My friend jokingly joins in and says “Never have I ever sucked a dick” all the girls put a finger down. I learned today’s these girls have fucked random guys, sucked random guys off, done anal, stripped, been filmed, and one of these girls fucked two guys at the same time.

These girls are 15 years old.

I remember playing truth or dare with friends and slutty girls. They made out for a minute, twerked on one of my friends and even showed their tits to one of them. Whenever they got dared to do anything with me they chose the penalty (cold water down the shirt or a bitchslap to the face) over kissing me on the cheek, sitting on my lap or even flashing me. It was degrading and after the 4th penalty skip I just kicked them out of my truck and went home to play TF2. Nobody gave a shit and they were upset that I took my truck home so they had to sit on the sidewalk. Being the deciding factor of a dare is fucking degrading. I’m glad those two girls ended up welfare whores.

God you just made me remember my worst nightmares. The exact fucking shit happened to me.

I dont believe that girls where such sluts when I was a teen in the late 90s. Something has fundamentaly changed but I cant put my finger on it..


There was no widely available fast internet so it was better hidden than nowadays. But it still happened on a large scale.

You're 100% right. That's why I fucking despise people saying "Oh, but back in our days, X was so much better!", that's complete fucking bullshit and you know it, you just didn't see it happen as often/much.

Yes, perhaps I just wasn't in those circles. I mean there was always talk of girls being more mature and more experienced than boys the same age. And the girls usually also had boyfriends that were a few years older. Me and my boys were more into punk music and lan parties. When I started finding girls interesting they were already far ahead of me..

I remember a couple years back we where playing this on boxing day me, my two mates and a girl abd the girl came out with the most hoe shit imaginable, multiple three ways with guys and girls, if there was anything sexual she'd done, my mates cousin banged her in a hotel bathroom floor while my mate banged her friend (who had a bf at the time and on still with that guy) and now that same girl is dating someone in the RAF (judging by his looks I doubt he's slept with alot of women)

I mean I feel like even most incels have a chance at that age. Who isn't fucking?

You're right I might have had a chance if I wasn't so autistic that I got bullied by my entire class. I had zero clue about social norms back then.

I was even bullied by my teachers lol. I sat next to this fat kid and the teacher told him (I overheard it) "You are misbehaving but it's not your fault, soon we're gonna take care of 'the problem' and you'll be good". Two weeks later he gave me an F and I failed (my grades sucked but I never averaged anywhere close to actually failing).

various commenters, r/Braincels 4 Comments [7/11/2018 12:00:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138777

Slavs seem to be one of the more controversial groups of whites when it comes to whether they are fully white or not, possibly even more so than Spanish and Greeks.

On the whole Slavs seem to be a bit more "savage" and primitive in their mentality than other whites which implies more non-white admixture than other white groups.

Also, Eastern Europe seems to get poorer, more violent and more chaotic the further east you go, suggesting that the level of civilisation decreases the more the non-white admixture increases.

For example, the Czech Republic is a Slavic country but the people have a lot of German influence racially as well as culturally and it is a safe and fairly developed country. However, moving further east if you consider a country like Ukraine, it is much poorer, more violent and more chaotic.

Smashmarxism , Reddit 3 Comments [7/11/2018 11:19:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138772

My question is—If men evolved from apes, then why are there still apes? The folks at Animal Planet continually make reference to humans as "animals." We are not animals. God created animals as animals, and men as men. 1st Corinthians 15:39 declares, "All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds." You see, the Bible makes perfect sense. Evolution is retarded.

Interestingly, there is absolutely no record of any civilization prior to about 4000 B.C., which perfectly corresponds with the Biblical time of creation. If, as evolutionists claim, mankind has evolved over millions and billions of years, then wouldn't it make perfect sense to expect history to go back hundreds-of-thousands of years at least? But, there was no world power before the Egyptian empire mentioned in the book of Genesis. Secular history confirms this.

Do you mean to tell me that it took mankind millions of years to discover vitamins? It was just a couple centuries ago that millions of people were dying from easily preventable diseases (such as scurvy, caused by a lack of vitamin C). Do you mean to tell me that it took mankind millions of years to discover paper and ink? Do you mean to tell me that it took mankind millions of years to discover toilet paper, first sold in the U.S. in 1857? Do you mean to tell me that mankind didn't realize the dangers of NOT washing his hands for millions of years? If you accept the Biblical date of creation (which history supports), then man's educational development makes good sense (i.e., we can trace man's inventions and advancements from 4,000 BC). Please keep in mind that people in 2500 B.C. were writing on rocks.

This is clearly seen in Egyptian and Babylonian hieroglyphics. So do you mean to tell me that for MILLIONS of years, mankind wrote on stones because he was too dumb to figure it out? Don't tell me that mankind has existed for millions of years, but there's no proof of it. The Bible speaks plainly and boldly, with no stone left unturned. In sharp contrast, evolution is a nightmare of missing links, bizarre speculation, and unscientific theories.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 20 Comments [7/11/2018 11:12:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 138762

Wherever a group of people gather under one banner it is the same electric evidence at work. Often they seek security from hostile forces...This is the same in Christianity and Judaism. It is the science that underpins this emotional gathering, that you say doesn't exist, that I find intriguing. You see, it always works in one of two ways...either it is used to create oppression as Satan and his henchmen do, else it is used righteously as Almighty God and Jesus Christ do...and the force that is at work, in every case, is our inner electric/nervous/spiritual energy...and warning you of the terrible problems facing us today because of our abstinence from this knowledge isn't intimidation...it is loving kindness...and Jesus Christ knows all about it because his crucifixion oscillated from his stake like a vibrating transmitter which will never stop vibrating because the science behind his teaching will never stop...which brings us neatly to his resurrection...your resurrection....my resurrection...and the resurrection of all souls who will have to face God's Judgement...but if you interpret this as intimidation then, I'm afraid, your attitude is all wrong.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 5 Comments [7/11/2018 11:10:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: NearlySane
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 | top