1 2 3 4 5 6 | bottom
Quote# 141331

JD: So, lets get this straight:
A deity created a male proto-human out of clay. Then it took a male to female genetic clone of it so the two could breed. Thus whole human race was born.
As creation myths go I've always found that one to be one of the silliest. Oddly though, this creation myth suggests that the human body is malleable and that gender is not static and is in fact fluid.
Curiously though there's the second creation myth that says god made humanity in its image; male and female. Which suggests that the god of the bible is both genders thus making it intersex and/ or transgender. Both myths support the reality that 1 in every 1200-2000 are born intersex.
Gender and gender orientation was never set in stone.

Martin: What a load of twaddle. Where does the Bible speak of a genetic clone? it says that God made Adam out of the dust and Eve out of adam's rib. No requirement for a clone, the God who made a man out of dust can equally make a woman from a rib. Nor is there any suggestion that gender can be fluid.
There is no 'second creation myth', not that there is a myth. but of course God made Man in His image and God is a spirit. Thus the image of God has nothing to do with sex. If you bothered to do your research you'd have known that.

Martin, Premier 7 Comments [11/24/2018 1:55:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141330

Try this:

You have heard that it was said, You shall not commit adultery. But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
(Matthew 5:27-28 [ESV])

The problem comes when you deny that temptation that is allowed to grow in the heart, for such is what is called 'orientation' is, and rule your life. To identify with a sin, as those who describe themselves as homosexual do, is to say that it is their master. Those who describe themselves as LGBT have already given way to sin.

Martin, Premier 6 Comments [11/24/2018 1:54:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141329

Those who aren't conservative Evangelicals mostly aren't Christians. You aren't a Christian. Jacqueline has every right to correct you, it's called witnessing.

Martin, Premier 12 Comments [11/24/2018 1:53:43 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141328

Perfect Love casts out fear: We will never agree on this. Suffice to say, I find nothing attractive in a God who condemns non-hetero people to a living hell whilst on this earth and then to eternal torment when they die. It absolutely does NOT fit with the Jesus who came among us, who is Love Incarnate. I pray that, one day soon, you will convicted by this love and amazing grace, rather than your current obsession with demonising a) Christians with a journey different to your own and b) those born of a non-hetero sexuality. Let's just leave this here. I withdraw from dialogue with you.

Martin: You find nothing attractive in God, full stop. There are no 'non hetero' people, nor for that matter are there any 'hetero' people, just sexual sinners rebelling against their maker.
Love does not overlook sin, indeed, sin is the antitheses of love and homosexuality is sin. A homosexual can never be a Christian.
No one is born with a 'non hetero' sexuality, indeed, sexuality does not exist.

Martin, Premier 7 Comments [11/24/2018 1:53:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141325

Hindus all over Hindustan, get up and kick the anti-Hindus from office.
They are enemies of the finest religion of the world. If no one has the
courage to proclaim Hindustan Bharat Raj is Hindu Raj is Manow Raj,
the Sri Hanuman Seva Sena will do that before the election. Hindus take
your rights in your hands. Don’t be the victim of a perfect perverse anti-
Hindu Congress society. The politicians are cowards and cheaters. They
even can’t build the Sri Ram Ji Mandir in Bharat, the land of Hindus.
This is a message of Sri Hanuman Seva Sena.

Samarjit Prasad Ganesh, Hindu Existence 4 Comments [11/24/2018 1:48:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 141322

If going to church is a mere religious activity, where people can sing, fellowship and feel good about themselves, then you are much better off just staying home!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 14 Comments [11/24/2018 1:45:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 141321

Hillary I'd classify as a Leninist. Technically speaking, there really is even a subdivision between Leninist and Marxist-Leninist. Hillary appears to have studied closely Lenin's, Leftwing Communism: An Infantile Disease.

Counterpunch magazine documented how Hillary built a vanguard party of a chosen few which is 100% Leninism. Marx made no such reference to vanguardism or the idea of a "permanent revolution."

I wonder where Trump falls in this scheme. What sort of commie is an isolationist-militarist-federalist with ambitions of outerspace-expansionism who ostensibly supports the previously discarded proletariat?

Good question. I had to point out today to the anti-neocon anti-globalists that Trump's Iranian policy is the same as the neocons. But it's how you phrase it. Instead of saying Trump's bowed to the neocons, you have to say the entire neocon movement suddenly woke up and saw the wisdom of Donald Trump.

[Note: Rob Smith is also a Conservapedia editor.]

Rob Smith, RationalWiki 10 Comments [11/24/2018 1:45:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 141318

Perfect Love casts out fear: well, you choose to worship some writings and I choose to worship God. So be it. I thought we were reaching some sense of accord but, no. I am absolutely staggered that you dismiss God's Holy Spirit so readily. Jesus specifically said, before He ascended back to the Father, that He was leaving His Holy Spirit to intercede for us. Why would you assume, when I pray to God, that I am communing with some fake evil spirit but when YOU pray, you are communing with the real thing? You assume that "my" Holy Spirit is a fake because He interprets in a way that you don't agree with or that doesn't accord with your interpretation of scripture. Please give me some credit for being genuinely on a journey to commune more closely with God.

sandinwindsor: As I asked you, how do you know you are following God's Holy Spirit, if it disagrees with scripture. Christ intercedes for us. The Holy Spirit's job is to teach us and He will not contradict scripture

Perfect Love casts out fear : God's Holy Spirit interprets scripture correctly and currently. If scripture is as obvious and as infallible as you claim, then why did God need to leave us with the Holy Spirit at all? Clearly, it was because we need a current voice in our lives, not just a set of ancient manuscripts that we often interpret incorrectly. As I have mentioned elsewhere, we are 2000 years down the line and STILL don't have a definitive translation of the Bible that we can all agree is authentic and correct. Why, then, be so arrogant to assume it can be read literally and adhered to slavishly when we actually have THE HOLY SPIRIT of God on hand 24/7?

sandinwindsor: but, as I keep telling you, if your "holy spirit" tells you different from scripture, it is not the Holy Spirit.
Secondly, scripture interprets scripture.
The voice in our lives comes from the Lord, and will not contradict scripture
Between the Dead Sea Scrolls and scripture today, there were 6 items that were seen ambiguously - and not on homosexuality
If your difficulty is in understanding scripture: www.biblehub.com They will give you twenty-five interpretations of the verse - not always different - and that is how one interprets scripture, not aside from, but with scripture.
it can be read authoritatively and literally because Christ used it and stated, :Scripture cannot be broken - displaying the authority and validity of scripture.
If your "holy spirit" is teaching you differently than scripture - it is a lie from the pit of Hell
Now, please tell me scripturally how God is not going to allow someone to go to Hell?

Perfect Love casts out fear: Just staggering that you seem to place so little value on the Holy Spirit yet so, so much on a book! But, hey, nothing I have said appears to resound with you. Your view of the trinity is really warped. In essence, you are saying I am possessed of an evil spirit which mimics the Holy Spirit and when I pray to God, it is the evil spirit which answers and not God. Not very nice of you at all. To state that, if someone cries out to God in prayer, they cannot rely on it actually being God that answers is beyond wicked. You have reduced Almighty God to a god. On that basis, our dialogue is at an end.

sandinwindsor: If your "holy spirit" tells you differently than scripture, yes, I would say you are playing with demons. Demons will disguise themselves as angels of light. - learn some scripture.
John 14:25 “These things I have spoken to you while I am still with you. 26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you. " He will teach all that Christ taught - hence, He will not be granting new scripture.
Christ said, "It is finished".

sandinwindsor, Premier 5 Comments [11/24/2018 1:43:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: I

Quote# 141317

(=Regarding Sodom=)

TS (unami): Hetero men who RAPE other men as a show of force and dominance does not mean they are gay! Read some history about how conquering armies did this to humiliate and subjugate their defeated foes. Not even close to a gay relationship -- especially since it was done by HETERO men.

Samdwindsor: They wanted to have sex with them before forcing their homosexuality on the menl

TS (Unami): No no no.
The men outside Lot's door were ALL THE MEN OF THE CITY as the scripture says. ALL OF THE MEN.
This was attempted RAPE as a form of dominance and humiliation by HETEROsexual men toward the visitors!

Sandwindsor: You have had Ezekiel explained to you several times TS. The angels did not bring any homosexuals out of Sodom and Gomorrah. Read the scripture and you will see the obvious reference to homosexuality.

TS (inami): You have had Ezekiel explained to you multiple times, and yet you continue to block the Truth. The sins of Sodom listed do not even mention being gay as a one of them.
You forget that it was HETEROsexual men who were trying to RAPE the visitors as a sign of dominance and humiliation, a despicable practice done by ALL THE MEN OF THE CITY as the scripture says.
You seriously need to read the Bible!

Sandwindsor: Learn your Bible TS. S&G's sins are sexual. This has been explained to you several times.

Sandwindsor, Premier 9 Comments [11/24/2018 1:42:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141316

Christians should not condone homosexuality any more than they should condone adultery. The fact that a particular sin brings you great pleasure doesn't mean it's not a sin. Christianity is about getting rid of your sins, not celebrating them. The secular culture may accept excuses like "This feels good" or "This is who I am," but Christianity has a much higher standard. If you love your sin more than you love God, you are no Christian.

AustinRocks, Premier 7 Comments [11/24/2018 1:41:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141315

Martin You keep ignoring what Jesus said so you can pretend sexual perversion is OK. Tell me, why, when He had the chance to enable all those homosexuals to have loving, monogamous marriages, did Jesus say nothing about homosexuals and marriage? Not once does either Jesus or the Bible say anything good about homosexuality.

Peter: He didn't say lots of things. This is because he didn't give a list of dos and donts. Rather he taught such a 'list of laws' approach to which you seem wedded is wrong.
Instead he taught moral principles. It took us 1500 years to realise how to apply them to slavery and 1900 on equality for women. So it's no surprise it's taken us this long to apply them to LGBT people. That doesn't make it Jesus fault for not mentioning it.

Martin: Funny that, He had opportunity to say that homosexuals should be allowed to marry and not be stoned, but He didn't say a thing. He didn't say that the Old Testament penalty for homosexuality was lifted, yet He did say that if someone slapped us we were not to retaliate. Clearly He wasn't worried about the feelings of the homosexual, if He did think they weren't sinners after all.
Slavery and the equality of women are nothing like the so-called LGBT people. They are addressed in the Bible, homosexuality is only condemned. There is not one place where homosexuality is mentioned with any sort of approval in the Bible.

Peter: There is nowhere where slavery is banned and nowhere where lending with interest is approved. Your reading of the bible leads to inverted morality the polar opposite of Jesus's

Martin: Your problem is that you expect the Bible to be a book of rules.

Martin, Premier 3 Comments [11/24/2018 1:40:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141314

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) appeared to endorse voter suppression during a campaign stop this month, saying efforts to undermine voting among liberals at certain colleges would be a “great idea.”

“And then they remind me that there’s a lot of liberal folks in those other schools who maybe we don’t want to vote,” Hyde-Smith can be heard telling a small crowd of young people outside her campaign bus in a video taken Nov. 3 and posted on online Thursday. “Maybe we want to make it just a little more difficult. And I think that’s a great idea.”

Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, Yahoo 9 Comments [11/24/2018 1:36:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 141313

Alternate thought to Tides:

Does our Flat Earth Breathe with a fixed frequency?

Nikola Tesla 2.0, Twitter 7 Comments [11/24/2018 1:33:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 141312

Study Announces Discovery of New Species of Crocodile, But Speciation Is Not Evolution, Says Christian Geneticist

A study published by Zootaxa recently outlined the discovery of a new species of crocodile, estimating that the creature arrived on the scene eight million years ago due to volcanic activity in Central Africa.

...(cut to avoid it being too damn long)...

However, Dr. Georgia Purdom with the Kentucky-based Answers in Genesis told Christian News Network that while she agrees that there are two distinct crocodile species as concluded by the researchers, she differs with them on the time frame in which the Mecistops leptorhynchus came to be.

“God’s word gives us the truth about the past and since God is a perfect eyewitness and does not lie (Titus 1:2), we can trust His word,” she said. “Around 6,000 years ago, God created the crocodile kind with inherent genetic diversity. About 4,500 years [ago], there was a global Flood that covered the entire world, but God saved Noah and his family and the many different kinds of animals, including the crocodile kind, on the ark. After the Flood, animals migrated to different parts of the world, including crocodiles going to Africa.”

“Many post-Flood catastrophes occurred that caused volcanic eruptions and the formation of mountains that isolated organisms from each other,” Purdom explained. “Natural selection (and other mechanisms) acting on the created genetic diversity that crocodiles already had led to differences in the populations of crocodiles in West and Central Africa, eventually splitting them into two species.”

She said that the speciation occurred within a relatively short period of time, and not over millions of years as the study would suggest.

“This speciation occurred quickly in only a few thousand years, and we see many examples of rapid speciation occurring today even within human lifetimes,” Purdom outlined. “This is only possible because the genetic diversity is already present. Evolutionary ideas predict that species take millions of years to form because the genetic diversity must be generated by random chance mutations. Instead, we observe that organisms must already have this diversity (created by God just several thousand years ago) because species can form so quickly.”

And while Newsweek recently reported that the human-culpable extinction of various mammals, birds and reptiles appears to be “outpacing evolution,” and that in the past, “[m]illions of years of evolution helped replace lost species with new ones,” Purdom contended that speciation is not evolution.

“Crocodiles are still crocodiles, and they aren’t gaining traits that will eventually result in them being a non-crocodile,” she noted. “Species form and become adapted and specialized for their environment. If that environment changes, then they may not be able to survive and [will consequently] die. Thankfully, God created animals with genetic diversity that often allows new species to form that are adapted to the new environments so that His creation is preserved even in a fallen, sin-cursed world.”

Dr. Georgia Purdom, Christian News Network 12 Comments [11/24/2018 1:32:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: KingOfRhye

Quote# 141309

Homosexuals are playing with fire. Homosexuality is known for spreading AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). AIDS didn't exist until the early 1980's, and it began with the homosexual community in New York City. Curse from God? You decide!

One fact is sure—homosexuality and AIDS are synonymous!!! Legendary lead singer, Freddie Mercury, of the rock band Queen, died at age 45 from AIDS. He reportedly had homosexual lovers all over the world. Tragically, he is now burning in Hell, as is Zoroaster, the false prophet he followed.

Homosexuality is a lot more common nowadays that you might think and lesbianism seems to be leading the way in popularity. Pornography and lesbianism are synonymous. Got AIDS yet?

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 15 Comments [11/24/2018 1:26:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 141306

(=An Anti Gay vs Pro Gay argument desolves into an Eternal Torment vs Annihilation argument of Hell=)

Martin: Curiously the penalty for all sin is the same:
Behold, all souls are mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins shall die.
(Ezekiel 18:4 [ESV])
Death is the penalty for any sin.
You reject the fact that homosexuality is simply sexual sin merely to justify yourself.

Guglielmo Marinaro: Ah well, if all those souls are going to die, then they won’t be living on in hell to suffer everlasting torment, will they? So that’s some consolation.
You assert that homosexuality is simply sexual sin merely to justify yourself. I reject the “fact” that homosexuality is simply sexual sin, because it isn’t a fact but simply nonsense.

Martin: Death for the soul of a sinner means an eternity of torment. Keep pretending while you can, one day you'll have to admit you're wrong.

Guglielmo Marinaro: Death does not mean an eternity of torment – except perhaps once again in your Martinian Newspeak lexicon – and an attempt to read such a concept into that verse from Ezekiel is eisegesis par excellence.
You may keep on repeating your ignorant nonsense till kingdom come, and I will continue to recognize it as ignorant nonsense, nothing more. As you have yourself recently observed, it is tedious to have to repeat the same thing over and over again, but – who knows? – God may use it to enlighten you and get you to repudiate your errors.

Martin: Curious then that Jesus speaks of two options, eternal life and eternal punishment:
And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.
(Matthew 25:46 [ESV])

Guglielmo Marinaro: Quite apart from uncertainty regarding the meaning of the Greek word “aionios”, which has been translated in English Bibles by the word “eternal” or “everlasting”, but which does not necessarily mean “of endless duration” – in the Greek Septuagint it is applied, for example, to things which have long since come to an end, e.g. the Aaronic priesthood (Numbers 25:13) and the gates of the Temple at Jerusalem (Psalm 24:7, 9) – it is interesting that Jesus contrasts “eternal punishment” with “eternal LIFE”, which seems clearly to imply that those who go to “eternal punishment” will NOT live on for ever.
This is confirmed by Jesus’s admonition, “Do not fear those who kill the body, but cannot kill the soul; but rather fear him who is able to DESTROY BOTH SOUL AND body in Gehenna.” (Matthew 10:28)

Martin: So you're saying that eternal life doesn't last for ever? I think you'd be hard pressed to maintain that.
As for Matthew 10, it is notable that the same word is not used for the act of one who is able to kill the body but not the soul and the one who is able to destroy both body and soul.

Guglielmo Marinaro : No, I am not saying that eternal life does not last for ever, nor am I implying that. But if the belief that it does has no stronger basis than the use of a Greek word which is applied in the Septuagint to a priesthood which no longer exists and to the doors of a temple which was razed to the ground centuries ago, it rests on a pretty precarious foundation.
Something which has been destroyed no longer exists. If anything, “destroy” bears an even stronger connotation of annihilation than “kill”. The verse in Matthew 10 which speaks of the destruction of both soul and body can, like so many biblical texts, be pulled around in Procrustean fashion to bring it into apparent conformity with preformed dogma, but as the New Testament scholar Kim Papaioannou observes, “It appears that the attempt to understand the meaning of ?p???sa? in Matthew 10:28 as something other than ‘destruction’ in its most obvious meaning is based more on theological considerations than linguistic evidence.” He adds that this conclusion is supported by a survey of the usage of the different forms of that verb in the Synoptic Gospels, elsewhere in the New Testament and in the Septuagint.

Martin: The same word is used of eternal life as to eternal punishment, so if one is not to experience eternal punishment neither will anyone experience eternal life. It matters not what a man who thinks he has invented a whole new understanding of the Bible says

Guglielmo Marinaro: And the very same adjective (a??????) is used of the Aaronic priesthood, which no longer exists, and of the doors of the Temple at Jerusalem, which was razed to the ground centuries ago.

Martin: And the Septuagint was translated hundreds of years before the New Testament was written. Nor is it inspired, the translators were capable of error.
The punishment and life clearly last for the same length of time.

Guglielmo Marinaro: “And the Septuagint was translated hundreds of years before the New Testament was written.”
So what? It is the same Greek adjective, and the Septuagint was good enough for Paul, since it was the version from which he habitually quoted in his epistles.
“Nor is it inspired, the translators were capable of error.”
As were the original biblical writers, and as were all the translators who have produced every translation of the Bible ever made, from the Vulgate to the NIV.
“The punishment and life clearly last for the same length of time.”
Clearly to you perhaps, but clearly not clearly to everyone else.

Martin: You didn't realise languages change over time?
The original biblical writers were caused by God to write as they did, their writing is without error for it is breathed out by God.
When the same word is used of two things in the same sentence it is clear to everyone that the same meaning is given to the two instances. Everyone except you apparently.

Martin, Premier 9 Comments [11/22/2018 11:44:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: I

Quote# 141305

You may well have “already covered this” but that’s a far cry from you being correct.

It’s not me who “invented the division of law” because historically that is how the Mosaic Law has always been understood by theologians through the ages, including Augustine, Aquinas, the Reformers and the Puritans - they all believed that the Bible contains three types of law; the moral, the civil and the ceremonial - that the civil and ceremonial laws have been fulfilled in Christ but the moral law has not been done away with and is still binding to both believers and unbelievers. This notion that Christ replaced the Law with love became fashionable during the 1960s - the era of the ’Lurve Generation’ but it is erroneous.

Eating pork is not a moral issue, but lying, stealing, homosexuality, besti@lity etc. most certainly are, and much as you would like to blur the distinction between the various facets of the law as a cloak for immorality, you are deceiving yourself.

Raptor, Premier 14 Comments [11/22/2018 11:42:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141302

Dear Dr. Peterson,

I'm writing to you not because I know exactly what you should do, but because I have studied the works of Lyndon LaRouche for over a decade, informally, and judge that he is a twentieth century thinker you ought to contend with. I am not ideologically possessed by this man and am not a member of his organization. Nevertheless, if economics is one thing you wish to learn more about, in a heavy intellectual and historical context, then allow me to lay out the case for LaRouche.

The platform for everything LaRouche says is the nature of man as literally being made imago viva Dei, or in the cognitive image of God. He has even said that the human mind is the only important thing in the universe. This quality of man's mind, namely the ability to compose creative hypotheses, test them, and if successful thereby discover (or rediscover) universal principles of morality and physics, is what divides man as by an abyss from all other known life forms. Indeed, if we discovered any life form with this ability other than man, we would be morally obligated to refer to them as “men” as well.

By this yardstick, LaRouche measures whether or not any given thinker contributes to this mission, the mission to liberate and advance man's cognitive capacities, or retards it. This includes specific societies and cultures, whether they represent the development of man (as the best tradition of the United States, including its initial, existential opposition to British imperialist “free trade” indicates) or whether it retards man (as imperialism, including Bolshevik imperialism, does generally).

LaRouche originated as a Quaker, fought in the Second World War, and later become a Marxist, eventually arriving at Hamiltonian economics. He has formerly called himself a Marxist, but just as he transcended Freud in his essay “Beyond Psychoanalysis” he also transcends Marxism. He eschews identity politics, execrates postmodernism, and is interested in government control of capital only in the sense used by John F. Kennedy's science-driver missions and infrastructure. His goal is not equality of outcome, but an increase in human power to exist in the universe, which naturally spills over into an increased consumption of resources by labor, including consumption of luxury goods. He wants every person to have the opportunity to develop their powers of intellect.

Because he opposes the British empire's continued influence on world politics, including the geopolitics of control regarding Asia (whether Russia, China, India, or the Near East), and he opposes the reckless "casino capitalism" of London and Wall Street (sitting on top of the $700 trillion derivatives bubble), and he has made some odd comments on a variety of groups and subjects (whether the Beatles having no (classical) musical talent or the rural Chinese being (culturally) bestialized, etc.), which raises the hackles of the formerly-mainstream media, he has suffered an almost total media blackout accompanied by a wall of slander, punched increasingly through by the Internet.

His economics, then, are Hamiltonian, the idea of sovereign government credit being used to finance infrastructure projects (such as the Chinese New Silk Road initiative which his wife Helga Zepp-LaRouche has boosted for decades), in order to increase man's survival power and enrich the economy. No railroads, no modern America after all.
His morality revolves around the ability of classical art, such as Prometheus Bound and Macbeth, to improve the loving self-consciousness of the audiences, rather than drive animalistic ruts of mere sense-pleasure through the byways of the mind.

He was asked once “Are you ever wrong?” and he replied (paraphrasing), “No. I make errors, but on the core of what I'm talking about I'm not wrong.” When asked “What should I do?” he has said, “I'm not going to tell you what to do, that's up to you.” And, on the subject of the present cultural and economic crisis, he has said, “Fight for truth” which is his ultimate good, as it relates to defending the human mind.

In short, this man gave me the ability to think in terms of principles, rather than floundering in a sea of facts. I realize you are the top of your game and I am a relatively ignorant fan of yours, and I am not a master of economics able to fill LaRouche's shoes (not just yet, anyway), nevertheless if you ever wonder from your 100-foot wave, “Where can I go from here?” Lyndon LaRouche is a way to up your game, and stay usefully controversial. He is the Mission to Mars, he is the World Land Bridge, he is Fusion Energy . . . he is the Jor-El of our planet. Do we repeat the same mistake as Krypton?

That's my recommendation for you to learn economics. Dig past the landfill worth of slander, around the land-mine of "used to be a Marxist" and get at the stratum of futuristic classical humanism underneath.

Thanks for your time. With all respect, P.T. O'Talryn.

PTOTalryn, r/JordanPeterson 8 Comments [11/22/2018 11:36:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 141300

For the longest time Trump was pro-choice, but then all of a sudden announced that was pro-life when he decided to run on the Republican presidential ticket. At one time Bill Clinton said he was “pro-life” while governor of Arkansas. Then when he ran as a Democrat for U.S. President, he said that he was pro-choice. What a fraud! These politicians have no integrity, no honor and no respectability. We live in a nation of gullible and foolish churchgoers (many are not true Christians). As a whole, the churches are a big problem in America today, because they support satanic Bible revisions, support manmade Illuminati Israel, they are woefully ignorant concerning the New World Order, and they are easily duped to support evil candidates simply because someone claims to be against abortion. What a sad testimony!

I actually heard Pastor Robert Jeffress of the First Baptist Church of Dallas, Texas, say publicly that he would vote for an atheist to become U.S. President if he was against abortion. No wonder our nation is in peril! Christians are to give their allegiance to the Lord Jesus Christ, not men. Christians are citizens of Heaven. We are pilgrims passing through here on earth, not settlers. This world is not my home, I'm just-a passing through.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 16 Comments [11/22/2018 11:31:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 141298

Anyone else noticed how pussy-whipped Leftist our country has taken since the mid-terms?

It's as if 2016 never existed!

This demographic shift in the electorate towards products of single mothers, feminists, faggots, dykes, gender-benders, man-children and weak men are taking over right before our eyes.

For all those on the "Right" who were complacent, enjoy your future of faggotry!


Ghost, Gab 26 Comments [11/20/2018 12:56:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 141297


Music can be used to cast spells. This is how they do it.

A Call For An Uprising, Youtube 12 Comments [11/20/2018 12:55:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 141296

f000k CA. Let it burn, let all the leftists burn in hell. That is the Christian way

daibon Ten, Breitbart 15 Comments [11/20/2018 12:54:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Bob J

Quote# 141294

Martin: On the contrary, homosexuality breaks Jesus' command not to lead others into sin. Adultery destroys the joining of the man and woman in marriage.

Peter: Jesus said all morality towards others is founded on agape love. Unfaithfulness breaks that. Either he was right or he wasn't.

Martin : 'Agape love' means you don't entice others into sin, which is what homosexuality is. You clearly hate homosexuals.

Martin, Premier 7 Comments [11/20/2018 12:51:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 141291

The Bible teaches in 1st Timothy 6:8 that we ought to be content with having just food and clothing. This is not a very popular teaching nowadays in America's materialistic society. There have been numerous songs, videos, and children's toy commercials lately featuring the selfish phrase, “I want it all.” The average American child is a spoiled brat nowadays, arrogant, defiant, and brainwashed to hate Christianity in a hateful and ingrate society that loves sin.

If you really stop and think about all the things we pay for in America, we don't need most of them. The definition of “greed” is “the desire to acquire or possess more than one needs or deserves.” We all deserve to burn in Hell; but McDonalds thinks you deserve a break today. People don't need a TV, nor do they need a cellphone, nor do they need a new car, nor do they need all the electronic toys on the market today. What you do need is a King James Bible.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 23 Comments [11/20/2018 12:47:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 141288

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is answering an important question. Are we Moral Guardians? Is Family Friendly Gaming a Moral Guardian? What do you think? The quick and easy answer is we are not Moral Guardians. We freely give out opinions that show diversity of thought from the corrupt gaming media outlets, and the radicals trying to make this industry extremely liberal. In fact if there is any websites claiming we are Moral Guardians you might want to look closely at them. My experience is these accusers are the real Moral Guardians.

Our standardized approach to the video game industry based on honesty, transparency, and hope is a threat to any hardcore haters. There are also those that hate us because we submit to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Persecution against Christians has been around for a long time. There are also those who hate us because they perceive us as being conservative. In reality we are moderates politically. When they keep trying to redefine the scale to move it farther and farther to the left they then are guilty of attempting to redefine us. Family Friendly Gaming has stood up against the redefinition movement for a long time now.

We do not hide our lights. We are open and honest about who we are. We give our opinions on entertainment based on the foundation of the Holy Bible. Our opinions on a particular product should have no impact on your enjoyment of it. If you feel guilty about objectifying women, spreading hatred, spreading violence, or some other evil that is between you and God. We are not judging you. Doctors tell you certain things are bad for your health. You then make the choice to listen or to ignore. We do not brow beat anyone into making choices that are better for their eternal souls. We give you the information and you decide.

Family Friendly Gaming brings a lot of diversity of thought to the extremely slanted and imbalanced video game media outlets. We are constantly looking at products from a variety of different perspectives. We present those in a professional manner that you can embrace and celebrate, or ignore. The attempts to silence us from real and true Moral Guardians does harm to the entire video game industry. I expect these emotional toddlers to throw a tantrum when this article is published.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day

Paul Bury, Family Friendly Gaming 15 Comments [11/19/2018 7:58:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Sammettik
1 2 3 4 5 6 | top