1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 | bottom
Quote# 127223



In this phrase you are directly asking that the Creator of the universe to curse someone or something into hell for eve. It is said in an atmosphere of anger where no love is present, only hate. If you derive some sort of satisfaction from using this expression, that satisfaction means you are under the influence of demonic thought tampering. If saying it gives you a sense of power, you are trapped into the mindset of demons. To a demon, this selfish unholy request means that you have the audacity to ask God to commit an evil act on your command. In essence you are ordering God to do your dirty work!


By saying this you are actually pronouncing a form of a curse on someone else because you are wishing for them to die. When I was in school, I was constantly bullied. There was always a group of girls who would publicly humiliate me and then tell me to drop dead. As I tried to walk away, I would either trip in my nervousness or drop my books. That made them cackle in delight and hurl even more insult my way such as "loser" or "moron". To actually feel delight in someone else's pain is a "character trait" of demons. To laugh at someone else's misfortune after telling them to drop dead is an obvious tell-tale sign that they are under the influence of a cluster of demons. Having "friends" or people support or encourage such behavior means there is a cluster of demons at work within that group.


This expression means that you are making an unbreakable vow in front of God regarding your innocence. Jesus himself warned against swearing to God in Matthew 5:33-37, "Again you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, do not break your oath, but keep oaths you have made to the Lord. But I tell you, do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God's throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. Simply let your 'yes' be 'yes' and your 'no' be 'no'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one."

To use this expression to hide behind a false innocence is disgusting. Not only are you lying but you are manipulating the other person's trust by getting them to believe that God is vouching for your innocence. This expression is a favorite of demons everywhere.


Mainly this phrase is used in magic tricks but every now and then I hear it when someone says something to the effect, "There is a lot of 'hocus pocus' going on there." No Catholic should ever use this phrase as it is a derogatory corruption referring to the Eucharist: "Hoc est Corpus" or "This is my Body". Protestants back in the Middle Ages used this corrupted term to mock the Holy Eucharist...They would hurl this insult not only at clergy but also Catholic lay people on their way to Mass.


I saved this expression last because it is especially vulgar. Sadly it is such a common expression in our society today spoken to show defiance. It is better known to Satanists elsewhere as the "oscularum infame" or "Kiss of Shame". During the traditional black mass this was considered a symbolic requisite towards earthly success. Participants would literally kiss the bare behind of the devil (usually the high priest conducting the mass). Nothing gets a cluster of demons charging headlong towards somebody faster than using excerpts from the satanic mass.

Deborah Lipsky, sense of the sacred 34 Comments [5/17/2017 2:26:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 127222

I would still want abortion because it's too cool to pass up, and you won't have to raise the baby.

NeoMatrix, FSTDT 23 Comments [5/17/2017 2:26:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 127221

(Oboehner, exuding his Christian love towards his fellow Christians:)

Roman Catholicism is such a freakshow of pagan idolatry and garbage. It's amazing people get saved and come to know Christ as Lord and Saviour despite the best efforts of Rome's pagan pope, the satanic vatican and Rome's system of perverted everything.

Wow, that's a lot of hatred for your brothers and sisters in Christ.

I would have to say Lentenlands is correct.
"On August 24, 1527, Roman Catholics in France, by prearranged plan, under Jesuit influence, murdered 70,000 Protestants within the space of two months. The Pope rejoiced when he heard the news of the successful outcome."-Western Watchman, Nov.21, 1912 (Catholic) - now THAT"S hatred!

No, you are both spouting intolerance towards your fellow Christians. And please don't waste anyone's time with things that took place when the church was a ruling body, please.

No comment on the RCC killing Christians? catholics are mary worshipers, not Christians.

Oboehner, Christian News Network 11 Comments [5/17/2017 2:25:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 127220

Daily reminder: Pinochet did nothing wrong.

[On the picture: A man wearing Pinochet's cap says, after being told "you can't just throw someone out a helicopter because they're a commie", that "thet's where you're wrong, kiddo"]

Catholic Nationalist, Facebook 14 Comments [5/17/2017 2:25:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 127219

Modern leftism is such an extreme aberration in that it requires white majorities to support policies explicitly opposed to their own tribal self-interest, that any movement intelligently articulating a return to sanity was bound to be successful absent repression or censorship, which was made impossible by the internet. Rational self interest fused with ethnic/national tribalism of one kind or another is the default mode of being for all peoples throughout world history. Those groups that lacked this sense or the power to assert it were selected out of existence or absorbed into more dominant cultures. The 50 or so year vacation from this in the West is the result of the miserable failure of the disasterous Nazi regime mixed with the unparalleled material wealth that made the moralistic indulgence of mass 3rd world immigration seem tolerable. The west has now reached a tipping point of no return demographically where this continued indulgence will lead to cultural and biological erasure, while finally beginning to threaten the economic security of comfortable bourgiouse that are running out of territory to flee too.
The situation is self evident...it's not complicated or hard to understand. This perspective aligns with natural human tribal intuitions so it's as easy to convince the low IQ as it is the spergy autists once you break their conditioning. Additionally, leftist discourse has degraded to be solely defined by a facile, hysterical identity politics which is every bit as bigoted, racist, and violent as they project onto the far right (if not more so in some respects). The hypocrisy of this is glaringly obvious. In light of this, my view is not "look how perfect the altright movement is" but, "what took so long?"
White (trash) nationalism has been around for a long time. Pre alt-right/European New Right, all it has accomplished is to help Jews and leftists defame white people and the advocacy of white interests by larping as cartoonish boogeyman while cheerleading needlessly inflammatory failed ideologies of the past. Overcoming the stigma of these losers is now the main impediment to white tribalists achieving their goals.
The alt right is successful to the extent that they have chucked this paradigm for something new. They've been extraordinarily successful, with strengths and weaknesses abound. I think this should be less surprising than it may appear given the historical forces at play and the easy victory the left has handed them by abandoning truth for feelings and avoiding debate in favor of shrill moralizing.
Criticizing the alt right is not to reject it as a whole, and much more useful than just mindlessley cheerleading whatever putrid vulgarities are trending on the daily stormer. There are good reasons that the left was able to deconstruct white nationalism 1.0 and any movement that has a chance at victory should be resilient to these critiques.
And don't give me "the enemy doesn't punch left, why should we?" horseshit. Yes they do. Some Marxist whackjob blabbering about beheading landowners would be exiled from all but the most dope soaked antifa squat. There's obviously use in not respecting, or being confined by, leftist taboos. Nazi frog trolling can be funny and may have its limited place. Becoming the monsters the left accuses you of being is just the opposite side of the coin of allowing leftists to define you. You're shucking and jiving for the cameras like a white minstrel show. If the left accuses you of pedophilia, you don't start fucking kids just to piss them off.

Cretus Clawfinger, Reddit 6 Comments [5/17/2017 2:25:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 127218

The wonanish shitlibs who comprise 100% of the Washington Post-Op’s employee roll have torqued themselves into hysterics over a Fake News story about Trump discussing ISIS terrorist plots with the Russian ambassador.

The Fake News: Trump recklessly revealed sensitive classified terror threat info to a foreign adversary, endangering field agents. This was leaked by anonymous sources and reported in a tone of crisis, as if it were the scandal of the century.

The Real News: McMaster contradicted the Bezos Blog’s account of the event, saying Trump revealed no sensitive info. Regardless, no illegality was committed. Trump as President is free to declassify classified information and share it with whomever he pleases, and Trump believes Russia can be an ally to the US in their mutual war against ISIS, instead of the media’s favored characterization of Russia as an adversary.

The Realer News: The Washington Post-Op, before it transitioned to a shrieking anti-Trump cunt on the rag, was perfectly somber reporting the news in 2016 when Obama DID THE EXACT SAME THING they hysterically accuse Trump of doing yesterday.


“Democracy dies in darkness”. Try-hard much?

The Realest News: The Leftoid Legacy Media must be destroyed and culled of every last fucking libcrank obamanaut Globohomoist apostle who churns out pro-Democreep, anti-Trump, anti-nationalist, anti-White propaganda for their Acela zip code globalist whores. Nothing less will suffice.

There will come a time, maybe soon, when all these Gaystream Media clickbait whores have cried “Drumpf!” one too many times, and no one will listen, no one will read, no one will care. Not even their core leftist audience who will finally succumb to amygdalae burnout and recuse themselves from the company of sane people.

The Washington Post-Op is burning through its credibility at a rapid clip, and normally I’d say this means the end of it as a reputable news source, but there are a lot of mentally deranged libfruits who need their drumpf fanfic. Thankfully, the leftmedia has lost its power to steer public opinion, so these manufactured Fake Crises will largely go ignored by Trump’s supporters.

The leaks are the real problem. My advice to Trump: Fire everybody, including Jared Kushner, and start from scratch. No one has your back, President Trump. but The Deplorables, so think about bringing in freelance outside help from parts of the country that actually voted for you.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 19 Comments [5/17/2017 2:22:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 127215

Evidently asteroids are fragile too.

And if an asteroid hit the earth (not the other way around), are they saying the earth is stationary in space?

AV1611VET, Christian Boards  28 Comments [5/16/2017 2:02:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 127214

The worst instinct of liberal democracy, its elevation of the expression of the individual human will to the one remaining sacred good, has thoroughly triumphed. It has reformed from within Christian and religious life along the lines of Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD), where religion is reduced to a therapeutic servicing of our sense of “well being.” It has formed society most prominently through the sexual revolution, where fertility, monogamy, marriage, and now the distinction between man and woman are all to be redefined to conform to whatever so-and-so happens to desire today. Less obviously, but no less consequentially, it has transformed how we educate our children (to acquire means to exercise their will rather than to know what is true, good, and beautiful); how we spend our time (consuming blue light from screens); how we interact with one another (poorly); and how we interact with the natural world (with a mixture of avarice and guilt and seldom with a sense that we are a good part of it ordained to its just rule).

Whether we approve these changes or see them as diabolical, we are part of the society in which they are taking place. Should Christians seek to shore up or gain control of the mechanisms of power of that society? Will that better enable them to practice a good way of life and pass it on to their children and grandchildren? Or is it rather the case that the liberal order has advanced so far in its secular voluntarism that we would better spend our lives entering more consciously into our religious practices, seeking to deepen and renew them all the better to resist their deformation by the corrupt fancies of our age?

Dreher’s answer to these questions is a qualified one. Because orthodox Christians are intrinsically a part of the broader society, they have no choice but to influence its institutional life as best they can, but the forces arrayed against them are rich, formidable, and bloodthirsty. The Christian right has largely failed to redirect our culture after forty years of trying; we will be fortunate now to hold the opposition at bay—and this we must do. Dreher sees, rightly, that the powerful “liquid” liberalism of our age would not be so great if Christians had more truly rallied to Maritain’s vision nearly a century ago to purify the sources of our religious devotion and to renew our political lives so that they conform to and aid our vocation to the knowledge and love of God. Because the times are less propitious now, Dreher summons us to follow the example of the Benedictines, to conceive of new “rules” or disciplines by which we may live so that our days are shaped primarily by our perception of God as our good rather than by the fluid, insidious influences of the mainstream culture.

James Matthew Wilson, Tumblr 6 Comments [5/16/2017 2:02:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 127212

The word "hell" occurs 31 times in the Old Testament in the King James Bible. In the Old Testament of the NIV it occurs - ZERO! The word "hell" is NOT in the Old Testament of the NIV!

And what do they do with "hell"? Take PSALM 9:17 for example: The King James reads, "The wicked shall be turned into HELL. . ." The NIV, reads, "The wicked return to the GRAVE. . ." We ALL "return to the GRAVE"! By removing "hell" the NIV perverts Psalm 9:17 into nonsense!

In the New Testament the NIV zaps out "hell" 9 times. And what "clearer" "easier to understand" word does the NIV "update" hell with? Five times they use - HADES! (Matt 16:18, Rev 1:18, 6:8, 20:13,14) What "common person" understands HADES? Everybody knows what HELL is! Do you know what HADES is? Hades is not always a place of torment or terror. The Assyrian Hades is an abode of blessedness with silver skies called "Happy Fields". In the satanic New Age Movement, Hades is an intermediate state of purification! Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines HADES: "the underground abode of the dead in Greek MYTHOLOGY". The NIV perverts your Bible into MYTHOLOGY!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 26 Comments [5/16/2017 2:02:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 127207


While it is true that in the eyes of God a sexual sin is no different than any other sin, it is a transgression of the law of God. However, sexual sins also have a unique aspect to them. Sexual sins can create a unique set of penalties that remain with you for the rest of your life. Unlike stealing, for example, the memories of a sexual sin will taint your relationship with your spouse. Sexual sins can also eliminate your qualification for certain aspects of the ministry. These sins destroy homes and lives. Since you can never completely recover from a sexual sin, what can you do if you have already committed the sin?

Acknowledge your sin to God. Confess it. 1 John 1:9 says, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” The idea of confession throughout the Word of God is two-part. Confession involves an agreement with God that what you have done (the sin) is wrong. After all, if you haven’t done anything wrong, why do you need forgiveness? Second, confession involves repentance. While we often think of repentance as the guilt associated with sin or as doing something to make up for the sin like a type of punishment, neither is true. Repentance is actually a turning away from the path — literally, to think differently. So, when you confess your sins to God, you agree with Him that they are wrong and you turn from the sins.
You should also find a prayer and accountability partner. Although you do not need to reveal all of the sordid details, you need to find a prayer partner and let him in on the secret. This may be a parent or your youth pastor, but it should be someone you know would not gossip about you. James 5:16 gives us the example here: “Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.” By taking your problem to someone else, you now have someone else who is praying for you, as well as someone who can keep you accountable.

You also need to commit your future dating relationship to the Lord. After you have confessed your sins to God, and repented of them, you need to seek the will of God in your dating relationship. It is likely that you simply are not ready to begin dating. As we have discussed earlier, dating is simply a process for confirming whom the Lord has chosen for you as a spouse. You need to submit yourself to God’s will in this matter. This may mean that you do not date for several years. You should even consider breaking all relationships with anyone of the opposite sex. This way, you can simply avoid any temptation to sin by not being around anyone who can cause you to sin. Finally, you need to take some steps to prevent this mistake from happening again. After you have confessed your sins, you need to cleanse your thought life.

Bro. Randy, Net-4-Christ 18 Comments [5/16/2017 2:01:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 127202

[Commenting under "Nazis get the helicopter too"]

Let's take a look at what the Nazis did:

Not a Nazi, but okay, let's.

Collectivized entire industries

Which would have happened without the Nazis, and would have been indefinitely worse for the German people.

Confiscated privately owned guns From Jews and Non-Germans and distributed them to only Germans.


Propped up a welfare state with high taxes

Yes, However, many of these were necessary for survival of the country at that time, since they were at war with one of the foulest ideologies known to mankind. To highlight this, from wikipedia:

The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.

Further, access to these programs were not given to every single citizen. Only those that worked, received anything.

Sent paramilitary groups to beat and suppress dissenters, not in self defense, but in an offensive preemptive action,

This is a blatant lie. Communists were responsible for the deaths of Hundreds of Thousands over the course of time between the end of World War 1 and the rise of the NatSocs.

based only on the assumption that Jews must be communists because they are Jews, which is a clear violation of the NAP.

Half of the leadership of the Communist Revolution of 1918 in Germany were Jewish. Jews composed a substantially larger number of the Communist party than they should have. This is a trend seen in every European nation + Russia. Even Wikipedia cannot hide this.

Claiming to be against communism while ignoring the fact that jews are over-represented within their ranks shows you don't know what you're talking about. And though some would like to disagree, national socialism is different from marxist socialism, in so much that National Socialism ultimately placed the Good of The People and The Nation above that of The Government and The Party.

I'd advise doing some homework, telling the truth and being less divisive.


inb4 neonazi scumfuck larper

I'm half-anglo, half-arab with an asian girlfriend. I don't think I would fit in very well with such circles.

RareKekistaniBeetle, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 5 Comments [5/16/2017 2:00:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 127205

I hear many preacher's perverting God's promise to bless Abraham. Genesis 12:1-3, “Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” There is absolutely nothing in this passage of Scripture to indicate that this promise to bless those that bless, and to curse those that curse, applies to all Jews unto all generations. Rather, God made these promises to Abram (later named Abraham), because Abraham obeying God's commandments. Genesis 15:6 tells us that Abraham believed the Lord and it was imputed (counted) unto him for righteousness. Abraham believed in the coming Messiah, Jesus Christ.

In sharp contrast to God's promise to bless Abraham, the Lord also promised to CURSE all disobedient Jews (as I have plainly documented Scripturally in this article). God is not done with Israel, but it will be true Israel; not present-day Illuminati Israel established by the United Nations in 1948, as a pretext to World War III and World Government. The crazy idea that Christians ought to support professed “Jews” who blaspheme, disrespect and reject Jesus as the Messiah is totally and absurdly unbiblical. If it is true that Christians ought to bless and support the Jews, then we should all bless, support and praise Hollywood (because it's nearly all Jewish).

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 5 Comments [5/16/2017 2:00:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 127203

Of course a sexual relationship with a child could harm them, just like any other relationship, but my point is that this is not always the case. As for the lack of ability for them to handle such relationships, why does it matter, what should matter is whether or not it harms the individual, if it doesn't harm the individual even if informed consent can't be made, why is it wrong?

UraniumUtopia, DeviantArt 9 Comments [5/16/2017 2:00:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 127200

[On the removal of Confederate statues]

I hope they tell the folks in New Orleans that all of these monuments honor Democrats, and that the Confederacy was led solely by Southern leaders of the Democrat Party. In a Democrat city like New Orleans, I can’t understand why Democrat leaders want old venerated Democrat heroes taken down!

David Barton, WND 17 Comments [5/16/2017 2:00:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 127199

If you can produce an animal capable of contemplating the case for the existence or non existence of God I will concede that there is evidence for their conscious awareness.

Alan Burns, Religion and Ethics 9 Comments [5/16/2017 1:57:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 127197

Actually peodos can love the child. Your incorrect and should read more to the idea of "Raping a child is not love"

[[You sick fuck]]

You need proper education! Pedo's can love the child they are abusing.

[[That isn't love. It's lust.]]

It is love to some of them...There is a difference between child molesters and pedophiles. A child molester is often a stranger to the family. He is the one who targets a child he sees and often acts almost immediately on his impulse. He will grab the child, perform sexual acts, and sometimes will then murder the child...Pedophiles, on the other hand, genuinely like kids.

FireFlyExposed, DeviantArt 16 Comments [5/16/2017 5:31:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 127195

(Sounds like someone NeoMatrix would get along with...)

I think atheists need a state of their own, where anyone who is an atheist can become a citizen (similarly to Israel's Law of Return) while religious belief is treated as a mental illness and proselytizing is criminalized.

One solution would be to form an atheist paramilitary group and then attack either ISIS in Syria, or AQAP in Yemen, seizing enough of the terrorists' territory to form a state. It would be like Call of Duty, but for real. The international community wouldn't exactly intervene to stop us, since they oppose the terrorists too.

TakeYerPills, /r/POLITIC 38 Comments [5/16/2017 5:31:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 127193

I hate trespassers.FUCKING HATE THEM. They disrupt my privacy,make my insurance rates go up, and they often either litter or disrupt my KEEP OUT signs. If a homeowner(that pays property taxes,mind you) has the legal right to kill a person breaking into their home, why shouldn't they have the legal right to rape a person caught trespassing on their property(considering that the individual is not under 16)?The homeowner one way or another is having to pay for these assholes,money that could be spent on more important things and I believe that a law like this would deter trespassers and bring prices down. What do you guys think?

Sand-Script, Deviantart forums 18 Comments [5/16/2017 5:31:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 127192

I honestly don't have anything against bestiality, as long as neither the human or animal are being hurt.

FleetAdmiralChurch, Deviantart forums 6 Comments [5/16/2017 5:31:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 127188

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” ? Dietrich Bonhoeffer

“He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetuate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.” -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

“Jesus Christ lived in the midst of His enemies. At the end all His disciples deserted Him. On the Cross He was utterly alone, surrounded by evildoers and mockers. For this cause He had come, to bring peace to the enemies of God. So the Christian, too, belongs not in the seclusion of a cloistered life but in the thick of foes.” ? Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Not a single one of those quotes actually refers to abortion.

They are ALL applicable to abortion and any other human rights atrocity, because at their core, crimes against humanity share one common theme: the de-humanization of a certain class of humans. The fact that your moral compass is so far out of calibration that you cannot recognize this is no warrant against those magnificent quotes applied to abortion, RC.

You are taking old texts which pertain to unrelated things and trying to mold them to fit your situation. I would guess that all the people you quoted would be utterly disgusted.

Why should we trust you projection of what people might think when you do not even know it is wrong to apply the death penalty to innocent humans?
And, of course, old quotes on crimes against humanity apply to new crimes against humanity because of the common element of de-humanizing the human. If they did NOT apply, then we could never learn from our mistakes.
Like you seem incapable of doing.
Finally, the two quotes by Jesus are both meant to apply to anyone who is "the least of these," in need, and not limited by examples given.
In fact, Dr. King relied on the writings of the slavery abolitionists, and both relied on the Words of Jesus. So that, right there, proves you wrong, unless you are going to say that Dr. King and slavery abolitionists were not allowed to go back in time to retrieve quotes from similar situations and Jesus Himself. :-)

WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet, Christian News Network 8 Comments [5/16/2017 5:30:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 127187

[OP of "Abortion"]

This is why I don't have a problem with abortion. It's just leftists aborting future leftists. Since Leftists or future leftists aren't people, under a pro-Life perspective it's not murder but Physical Removal and self defence against a future leftist that will vote to strip your rights, redistribute your money and import more Leftists.

TheGreatRoh, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 7 Comments [5/16/2017 5:30:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 127186

Intellectual terrorism is a million times more dangerous than IEDs. Marx, Freud, Trotsky. "Equality" is the mainstay of intellectual terror.

nontolerantman, Twitter 46 Comments [5/16/2017 5:30:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 127185

Evolution is based in science, intelligent design is an attempt to make superstition sound like science.

Jason Todd:
Evolution is a theory. And the idea of humans evolving from monkeys is part of it.
The problem with evolution is simple: Why, if we evolved from monkeys, do monkeys co-exist?

Firstly, you are using the term "theory" but mean "hypothesis", they are not the same thing. Humans have a common ancestor with modern apes, but, as I said previously, no credible scientist would contend humans evolved from monkeys.

Jason Todd:
No, I mean theory. Evolution is merely a guess, ruined by your own admission that we didn't evolve from monkeys. Intelligent design merely suggests a creator. This makes sense because the idea everything came from nothing is logically absurd.

How can you discuss anything related to science without even understanding the terms and concepts? Try learning the difference between theory versus a hypothesis. Hypothesis = a guess explaining observable phenomena & theory = a tested model to explain a proven set of factors. What you explain regarding evolution is a hypothesis, and evolution is a scientific model of facts.

Jason Todd:
Science always changes. God never does. Why can't you grasp that concept?

Jason Todd, Christian News Network 16 Comments [5/16/2017 5:30:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 127184

regarding an article titled "Bioethicist Fears Saving Babies’ Lives Could Make People Oppose Abortion.

SJWs: “SCIENCE!!!!!!!”

Scientist: “I’ve invented a device that might make abortion obsolete!”

SJWs: “Kill the heretic! Burn his device!”

Right Hand Path, Right Hand Path 9 Comments [5/16/2017 5:30:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 127182

If all premature babies could survive outside the mother’s womb via this process, who would actually still want an abortion besides the incurably bloodthirsty?

a-path-beyond84,  Gere Curam Mei Finis 16 Comments [5/16/2017 5:29:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 | top