1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 | bottom
Quote# 126361

Over the last several weeks, Christians angry and upset with me for not supporting Donald Trump have emailed to tell me my wife has lung cancer because I am opposing God's chosen candidate. The other day I got an email from a man who wrote, "I have come to learn after listening to so many prophesies that God DOES have his hand on DJT! You, of all people, who are studying the Bible, KNOW about CYRUS, DAVID, SAUL OF TARSUS, etc. were used for God's purposes! God can even use a donkey." The all-caps were his. I agree with him that God can use even donkeys, just like Hillary Clinton.

Various e-mailers, Townhall 8 Comments [4/16/2017 4:52:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 126358

And no man who claims he has a "husband" can be trusted to speak correctly about logic, let alone morals. You are not married anymore than you are a crocodile.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 21 Comments [4/16/2017 4:51:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: David

Quote# 126356

Dinosaurs never existed, it's all a fabricated lie to fool the world into thinking God doesn't exist. There were never any dinosaur bones found, not one society who's job entailed excavating the earth, ever found dino bones, but all of a sudden, in the 18 hundreds a supposed dino tooth was found.
All these supposed dino skeleton's are nothing but the mixed bones of other animals mixed with mammals. The whole thing was started by a bunch of Freemasonic Satanists and it's funny that it happened around the same time as Satanic Charles Darwin another freemason.?

David Fleming, youtube 8 Comments [4/16/2017 4:51:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126355

Henry Johnson and Joe Tylor, Omniology.com 6 Comments [4/16/2017 4:50:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126349

as many of the heavy metal rock bands of today are doing. “Satan, we give you our soul—now you give us popularity! You give us money! You give us power!” And that’s happening today. And our young people are flocking to Satanism now in unprecedented….

Johanna Michaelsen, John Ankerberg show 22 Comments [4/15/2017 11:28:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126347

The reality of your conscious choice is aptly demonstrated by your ability claim that cognitive science suggests that it is an illusion. The fact that cognitive science is unable to fully define how conscious choice occurs does not prove that it does not exist. Our demonstrable ability to make conscious choices is clear evidence of our spiritual nature which is currently beyond the realms of human understanding.

Alan Burns, Religion and Ethics 8 Comments [4/15/2017 11:27:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 126345

Voodoo - not Christianity - is the number one influence over the African-American community right now. (The same goes for African and Caribbean cultures too.)

Many of today's youth - and adults - are under the direct demonic influence of African voodoo; and they don't even know it.

I'll be talking more about this in my upcoming ebook. Because many are totally ignorant to the greatest spiritual warfare in our generation taking place right in front of them. And they haven't the slightest clue.

Voodoo influences just about all of modern day black culture: including our music, festivals, college frats and sororities, street gangs, the drug culture and our entertainment; especially the rappers and singers.

Take the recent photo shoot by this popular rapper in the image above. To the untrained mind this is just some guy posing with a weird dark background. But I've been studying the occult influence within the entertainment industry long enough to know what this photo shoot REALLY represents.

This rapper is letting you know exactly what spiritual influence he's placed himself under; and he's giving honor to the deity he most likely serves the most. He's paying respect to the voodoo god called Eleggua.

And he's not the only one. A lot of your favorite rappers - both male and female - pay homage to various voodoo gods and spirits. When you know what to look for you can easily see it, even in the colors of the beaded bracelets that they quietly wear.

The Church has to get more astute at recognizing the demonic spiritual influences that are over our youth. Many of you reading this are raising children in church: and while your kid sits in church every Sunday, they're really under the dark spiritual influence of these voodoo practicing entertainers.

Some of you are under this influence yourself. And once that door gets opened it's only a matter of time before your child is entertaining demonic spirits in their life.

So you need to make it your business to know what's influencing your child and more importantly how to nullify that influence by covering your household under the blood of Jesus Christ.

Start taking your Christian faith and the power it contains seriously. These are not the days to get caught slipping. And if you find yourself being entertained by demons, you need to clean up your act.

Stop straddling the fence and make an affirmative decision to roll with Christ till the end. The bible makes it clear that you cannot be influenced by Jesus Christ and demonic spirits at the same time!

"You cannot drink from the cup of the Lord and from the cup of demons, too. You cannot eat at the Lord's Table and at the table of demons, too." 1 Corinthians 10:21

Be informed, be faithful, be aware and be educated. That's how you escape the deadly traps of the enemy in this hour.

"So that Satan will not outsmart us. For we are familiar with his evil schemes." 2 Corinthians 2:11

"If the Good News we preach is hidden behind a veil, it is hidden only from people who are perishing. Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don't understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God." 2 Corinthians 4:3-4

Mack Major, Facebook 17 Comments [4/15/2017 11:25:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126340

Pope Francis: who am I to judge?

More on this fundie:

Emily Thomes, Facebook (mirrored at ChristianForums.com) 13 Comments [4/15/2017 11:24:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126338

AIG, Answer In Genesis 20 Comments [4/15/2017 11:23:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: P.E..T.F

Quote# 126337

Modern, young, metrosexual, multicultural, social justice mongering lefties are idiots. They are idiots wherever found, all over the world. They are spoiled children; ill-mannered, ill-bred, weak, ignorant, and stupid. They are historically illiterate. They have no idea of how the world really works. The only ideas they have outside of the fever swamps contained within their neutronium-dense skulls, filled to the brim with professorial sewage, are the kind of ideas that can only survive inside the echo chamber of a safe space. They are, frankly, disgusting, and the similarities between them and actual human beings are minimal. Morally, intellectually, spiritually, they are cockroaches. Were it not that some of them are possibly larval stage human beings, creatures who may eventually grow up to be actual human beings, there would be little or no moral component to gassing them.

Tom Kratman, EveryJoe 17 Comments [4/15/2017 11:23:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 126335

May we repent on behalf of our nation for turning from God and looking to Big Government to be our lawgiver, judge, and king and provider, rather than our Jealous God, who alone has the power to heal, prosper, bless, and guide ours or any nation. May God give our president, Speaker Paul Ryan, Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, the entire GOP majority in both Houses, and the Democrats who are willing to work with the majority, wisdom, patience, guidance, and the ability to come to united agreement over this initiative. May God work miracles in our legislative branch to heal the breach between the parties and personalities, and allow enough cooperation for our nation to move forward.

Watchmen on the Wall, Family Research Council 14 Comments [4/15/2017 11:23:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126334

When I hear Christian voices undermining Cyrus Trump or confusing people’s minds I want to block them before they poison more people.

Lance Wallnau, Facebook 10 Comments [4/15/2017 11:15:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126332

Arthur Belling:
Listen Sedagive, I had a real life blood disease. It was called Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura or TTP for short. The treatment involved getting plasma infusions - I was given fresh frozen plasma in a process called plasmapheresis. There was no "bloodless" option for me. It was that or DIE. How very sweet and compassionate of you and members of your faith to tell me that I should HAVE ELECTED TO DIE rather than have this procedure done. So don't tell me my views are "archaic", practically everyone who got this disease before the 1950s died from it. Your heartless standpoint is so utterly horrible I can't even find the words for your lack of compassion.

Dude that's harsh. He would have died without the transfusion, and you're saying that's what he should have done?

Re-read what I said. I said for anyone who remotely cares about God, about God's laws, and has a grasp on God's promise of the resurrection for those faithful, they'd have properly refused a transfusion. Since none of that applies to him, it doesn't matter, does it?

So you think he should have chosen to die...really?

Yep, I would have.

Are you even listening to yourself? A life can be saved with a simple medical procedure and you think he should choose to die?

Are you even listening to YOURSELF? A life may be saved temporarily, only to be lost permanently because of disobeying God. I'd rather die than lose out on that promise of living forever. Hmmm.....MAYBE live a little longer now but lose out on living forever. Or....MAYBE dying now, but promised to be restored to life with the chance to live forever. It's not even a question of the sane choice.

Sedagive, Disqus - Religion 15 Comments [4/15/2017 11:15:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 126330

Evidence proves nothing, and Dr. Lisle knows this and teaches this. He is merely pointing out that all observable objects or "evidence" is judged according to one's worldview. DNA does show we Christians evidence of God's mighty work. The unbeliever has no choice but to assign some other explanation. It is a fallacy to believe that anyone can be "objective", unbiased, as the self-declared "rationalist" or "reasonable" person claims. The critic of creationism is delusional to believe that this ordered universe came about accidently by random chance. Darwinian evolution is a mere attempt to explain the origin of everything with the insistence that there is no god. To say that there is no god is to insist that one has been everywhere in the universe, has access to all knowledge, and that if there is a God, He must appear to them on their terms. No wonder the Scriptures record God's judgment of such people as fools.?

Pastor Matthew, youtube 11 Comments [4/15/2017 11:14:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126329

On his radio program last month, rabidly anti-LGBTQ pastor Kevin Swanson railed against the current remake of “Beauty and The Beast,” not only for featuring a gay character but also for supposedly promoting “inter-species breeding.”

Swanson said that the movie was an “insidious” effort to “homosexualize the next generation of eight and ten-year-old kids” and ensure that they are “indoctrinated into the homosexual lifestyle.”

“This is how revolutions take place,” he said. “You are in the middle of a cultural revolution in the United States of America. No, this is not the cultural revolution that Mao Tse-tung brought to China; this is a different kind of cultural revolution, but I’m going to say it’s just about as dangerous … though a bit more insidious.”

Even worse, Swanson said, the film is promoting inter-species breeding, which he said Hollywood has been pushing since the days of Star Trek.

“Christians, I don’t believe, can allow for this,” Swanson stated. “Humans are made in the image of God. Humans are assigned a spouse which happens to be a member of the opposite sex. Friends, God’s law forbids it … Christians should not allow for this, man. We cannot allow for humans to interbreed with other species. It’s just wrong, wrong, wrong. It’s confusion, it’s unnatural.”

“We are in some of the most radical, most anti-biblical, the most immoral, the most unethical, the most wicked sexual environment that the world has ever known, right now,” he warned.

Kevin Swanson, Right Wing Watch 18 Comments [4/15/2017 11:14:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126328

Evolution is just a testament to the cult/zealot/sheep mentality of man. No evidence yet I BELIEVE

M Taylor, youtube 8 Comments [4/15/2017 11:13:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126325

Muslim men are allowed to hit their wives if they disobey them and domestic violence is a 'beautiful blessing', according to the women's branch of a radical Islamic group.

Sydney primary school teacher Reem Allouche told the women's arm of hardline political group Hizb ut-Tahrir that men are permitted to hit women with sticks.

During the 30-minute discussion at a meeting in Sydney's west, Ms Allouche and fellow panellist Atika Latifi - who are both wearing headscarves - describe how beating women is a 'symbolic act'.

At one point they even demonstrated how to use a small stick called a 'sivaak' to hit 'disobedient' women.

In a video of the debate, which has been posted on Facebook, Ms Allouche says men should use the sivaak to punish their wives.

She then uses one of the sticks to hit Ms Latifi while the pair laugh.

Other permissible methods to punish women involve using a twisted scarf or piece of fabric, the women say.

Ms Allouche says the act is 'symbolic', while Ms Latifi claims it's 'a beautiful blessing'.

The women agree that they should only be beaten if they are caught 'committing sin' - pointing out that this means seriously disrespecting Allah or their husbands.

'Disobedience to the husband. Immoral acts or cheating. Admitting anyone to the home that the husband doesn't like,' Ms Latifi explains.

Ms Allouche smiles as she adds that does not mean a man can beat his wife simply for not cooking dinner, with the women agreeing that violence should only be used to 'promote tranquility'.

The pair agree that men have the right to beat their wives because husbands take a 'leadership' position within the family.

'It goes hand in hand that he would have the right to undertake disciplinary ­measures,' Ms Allouche says.

Ms Latifi adds: 'He is permitted - not obliged, not encouraged - but permitted, to hit her. That is what everyone is talking about. It should not cause pain. Not harsh.'

During the debate, Ms Allouche says wives who disobey Muslim teachings could face a beating from their husband, but only because 'he loves his wife, he fears for his wife'.

'It's almost a natural consequence,' she adds.

'He's not responding through anger or frustration or rage. He's responding in obedience to Allah's commands, in a measured and staged way, because we know when people talk about violence against women, often it happens in the heat of the moment, in anger, in frustration and what-not, whereas here, it's managed.'

Ms Latifi claims violence should be a last resort for husbands, saying they should admonish them first.

If that does not work, he should 'refuse to share the bed with her, not being intimate with her'.

Finally, if that does not work, he 'is permitted to hit her'.

'And what a beautiful blessing, that he said not to take the steps at the one time, but one after the other,' she continues.

'And what is the third option all about? What kind of hitting? It should not cause pain.'

The all-women meeting was held in Lakemba in Sydney's inner west, The Australian reported.

The government considered banning Hizb ut-Tahrir in 2007 but eventually deemed it to be a political group.

Islamic leader Keysar Trad apologised at the weekend for saying hitting women was a 'last resort', admitting to Sky News presenter Andrew Bolt that he had made a 'slip up'.

Reem Allouche and Atika Latifi, The Daily Mail 11 Comments [4/15/2017 11:13:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126324

While ya being dramatic , keep in mind that white slave owners use to rape black men in front of there families and peers to emasculate them. Man up tho

Purpplemasterog, Tumblr 5 Comments [4/15/2017 11:12:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 126323

The great and the good of the “intelligentsia” assure us that all “educated” people accept Charles Darwin’s Evolution as a indisputable fact of science that is "not open for debate." Oh those superstitious "straw-men" bible-thumpers portrayed in the propaganda film Inherit the Wind may have a hard time accepting it, but even the slightest doubt can never be tolerated within the elite confines of the academic cool-kids club. Woodrow Wilson Warmonger of World War I fame, a former Princeton professor himself, put it this way:

“Of course, like every other man of intelligence and education I do believe in organic evolution. It surprises me that at this late date such questions should be raised.”

And yet, neither Darwin, nor Wilson, nor the Communist ACLU Attorney Clarence Darrow (played by Spencer Tracy), nor any other “scientist” (bow your head in solemn reverence when you say that word) has ever adequately addressed the gaping holes of Darwin’s Dogma. The best rebuttal the "smart people" can muster consists of scorn, ridicule, charges of "stupidity" and even government force -- but never any true scientific substance. Many of these holes are blown wide-open in the book: “God vs Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design Creationism” (by yours truly). But for this particular piece, let us focus on what is perhaps the single biggest flaw of all regarding trans-species “Evolution” – which should not be confused with minor variations / adaptations of existing characteristics already present in a gene pool (Darwin’s finches, peppered moths, stickleback fish, "super rats" etc.) We refer to this gaping hole as the “complex integration” of multiple parts that is found in all living organisms (even “simple” single-cell bacteria).

Darwin and his deluded devotees maintain that tiny “imperceptible” and "innumerable" blind and random mutations, favored by environmental circumstances, added up over very long periods of time to the point that an evolved species (such as us humans) became unrecognizable from our direct lineal “ancestors” (single-cell oceanic bacteria). Apart from the obvious fact that none of these transitions from millions of years ago were observable, how do the Evolutionists explain away the “complex integration” of our body parts? One part of any given creature could not have blindly “evolved” without so many other parts coming into existence at the exact same moment in time. How can hundreds or even thousands of complex parts -- functioning in sync with one another in a scientific symphony in which each component can only function if all the others are in place -- have “blindly” appeared, without intelligent guidance, one piece-of-the-puzzle at a time, over “millions of years?”

To better illustrate this problem, let’s have a closer look at the integration of the digestive system.

To start the digestive process, we need an oral cavity -- that is, a mouth to put the food in. The mouth needs teeth, both upper & lower sets, deeply anchored into our gums, which are attached to a jaw-bone, which is attached to a skull which is etc., etc., etc., Without all of this in place at the same time, the first step of the digestive process comes to a halt. But our gums and 32 perfectly-matching teeth alone, which come if different shapes and sizes for certain functions, won’t ensure survival. We still need saliva to begin the breaking down of the food, as well as the preservation of our teeth and the gums which hold them. And we also need mucous producing cells in the mouth to help form the saliva mix.

Remove any of those elements (oral cavity, teeth (upper & lower), gums, jaw-bone, salivary glands, mucous) and humans (and many other animals) never make it out of the box. Each of the elements is part of an integrated system in which one element cannot function, and serves no purpose, without all of the others already in place. Then of course there is the tongue – a complex multi-faceted organ in its own right, which is vital for chewing and swallowing food. In the back of the mouth, the tongue is anchored into the hyoid bone – which itself is anchored by various muscles and ligaments. Once swallowed, the pre-digested food passes through the pharynx (part of the throat) -- which is lined by more essential membranes and muscles – and moves down to the esophagus (food pipe).

Let’s review the pre-digestion process: oral cavity, teeth (upper & lower), gums, jaw bone, skull, saliva, mucous, tongue, hyoid bone, muscles, ligaments, pharynx, membranes, muscles, and esophagus. That’s 15 systems in all, each of them also highly complex, and each of them integrated with the other systems. Remove just one, and there can be no digestive system and hence, no species. Therefore, the elements of this grand orchestra had to have come into play at the same time – which implies, no, proves deliberate design. But we’re just getting started.

1. Just the individual contents of the mouth alone form a complex integrated system in which each part is useless without all others in place. 2. Complex Integration: Remove just component, and the whole structure becomes non-viable. 3. For that reason alone (although there are many other flaws) Darwin's ridiculous paper gets an "F."

Moving right along, gravity and contraction (more muscles) push the mix into the stomach where digestive enzymes really begin to break down the food. To block these powerful enzymes from literally “eating” the stomach itself, membranes called b]gastric mucosa[/b] produce a protective coating of mucous which lines the stomach. How genius is that? On to the duodenum -- the first section of the small intestine which leads to the large intestine. Along the journey there are more enzymes produced by the pancreas. Then it is down to the colon, (there is an ascending colon, a descending colon and a sigmoid colon) rectum, anal canal and out the anus -- where Darwin's stinky work-of-fiction truly belongs. Assisting the expulsion of bodily waste is the diaphragm -- a sheet of internal skeletal muscle made up of no fewer than a dozen different parts. Though it is mainly part of the respiratory system, the diaphragm also generates the pressure needed for waste disposal.

Key contributions to the process are also rendered by the liver, the gall bladder, the spleen, the cecum, and many more muscles and many more glands to numerous to name. And holding those muscles in place are a complex system of more ligaments fastened to more bones which are fastened to other bones etc. etc. etc. As for the liquids that we ingest, that speaks to a whole other complex integrated system of complex integrated systems involving [b]kidneys, renal arteries, renal veins, urinary tracts, collecting ducts, bladder, pelvis etc[/b. Of course, all of this digestion is pointless without blood-flow to carry the food's nutrients throughout the body – which means that even more complex systems had to have been be put in place at the same time: blood, veins, arteries, capillaries. But the nutrient-carrying blood can’t flow through the vascular system without a pump and an oxidation system already in place, right? You need a set of heart & lungs which are the basis of the cardio-pulminary system -- an incredibly complex integrated structure made up of countless essential components such as the -- (well, you get the point -- we can go on forever with this --)

So, let’s take it from the top, boys and girls. All of the following complex elements must come into place at the same time in order for digestion to work:

oral cavity, teeth, gums, jaw-bone, skull, saliva, mucous, tongue, hyoid bone, muscles, ligaments, pharynx, membranes, more muscles, and esophagus, more muscles, stomach, digestive enzymes, gastric mucosa, duodenum, small intestine, large intestine, more enzymes, pancreas, ascending colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum, anal canal, anus, diaphragm, liver, gall bladder, spleen, cecum, more muscles, more glands, more ligaments, more bones, kidneys, renal arteries, renal veins, urinary tracts, collecting ducts, bladder, pelvis, blood, veins, arteries, capillaries, cardio-pulminary system, a bunch of other intregrated items and systems too numerous to list here and a partridge in a pear tree!

Each necessary component "blindly" evolved and integrated with all the others by itself --- one at a time, without design? Ha ha ha. --- "Intelligent and educated," my foot!

This mind-boggling complexity, -- which cannot be reduced by even a single element lest the species cease to exist -- becomes even more integrated and more complicated when studied on a molecular level --- the complex "4-digit" DNA “computer coding” behind it all. The mere suggestion of these integrated systems blindly “evolving,” one component at a time, independent of one another, in an “imperceptible” manner over millions of years is absurd on its face. As a matter of fact, St. Charles Darwin himself, in a pathetically futile effort to explain away the “problem” that integrated parts posed for his theory, admitted that his idea sounded “absurd in the highest degree.”

From his Origin of the Species:

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."

After objecting to his own theory (so that he can control the debate), Darwin proceeds, in the very next paragraph, to lamely explain away the "absurdity" of attributing the integrated complexity of the eye to random evolution. But his "solution" to the problem amounts to nothing but a diversionary debating trick.

“When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science."

Darwin is using an old lawyer's trick here. He states the objection, then casually explains it away by using a bizarre and totally irrelevant analogy to astronomy. He also adds a theatrical touch of Latin mumbo-jumbo to impress the easily-impressed. We're not talking about the sun and the earth and "Vox populi," Chuckie! The subject here is your admittedly "absurd"-sounding claim that the integrated complexity of organisms and body parts came about blindly, randomly, and one element at a time without any intelligence involved. Explain it for us!

Plato warned us to be on guard against the type of empty diversionary rhetoric that Darwin used to explain away the massive holes in his goofy theory of self-creating life coming blindly from non-life, and then putting its own integrated parts together.

Darwin continues:

"Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.”

More slick sophistry and silly semantics -- An "if", followed by another "if," then a "can be," then an "if further," then a "should be," and a "could be," then a "though," and finally a "should not be." If elephants could fly -- If I could live forever -- If dogs could speak. If, maybe, perhaps, and, though, coulda, woulda, shoulda, mighta, but, but but, if, if, if... This then is what the academic cool-kids club refers to as "science?" This non-observable and wild speculation about "numerous gradations" of the eye's integrated components amounts to pure rhetorical manipulation -- not true science. Read it again closely. Darwin totally dodges the question and explains NOTHING to solve the mystery of complex integration -- a mind-boggling phenomena that is observable in all living creatures and even "simple" single-cell organisms.

As it is with the many essential integrated systems of an automobile -- each one absolutely necessary for the car as a whole to function -- (engine, transmission, wheels, axle, spark plugs, gas tank, battery, hoses, belts, ignition, alternator, steering wheel, gear shift, accelerator, carburetor, braking system, drive shaft, oil, coolant / anti-freeze, transmission fluid, containers for fluid, radiator, chassis, pistons, nuts, bolts, welded parts, etc.) -- only the existence of an eternal designing force without origin, permeating and communicating through every living cell of existence, possessed of freakish intelligence and power, and far beyond our lowly human "pay grade" to ever fully comprehend, can adequately explain the complex integration of multiple systems that neither Darwin nor his sci-fi cult of diploma-decorated dick-heads have ever been able to, and never will be.

Can you?

1. The 20th Century discovery of DNA codes which program our physical traits makes Darwin's problem of explaining away integrated complexity a million times even more complex. 2. Imagine car parts blindly "evolving" one at a time and "randomly" integrating themselves during a billion-year tornado. That is essentially what "educated" evolutionists, without a shred of observable precedent, believe to have happened in the living world. 3. You may be a whiz at mathematics and rhetoric, professor. But you're as bloody frickin' stupid as you are crazy!

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 20 Comments [4/15/2017 11:12:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126321

End multiculturalism. Close borders. Remigration of all intruders. End affirmative action. End no fault divorce. End persecution of white men in divorce courts. Anti-miscegenation law. End abortion for whites unless mother's life in danger. End Feminism.

Elizabeth , Eurocanadian 20 Comments [4/15/2017 11:11:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126320

[ on a 21 year old dating a 12 year old]

oh and i forgot to say something about the drama with @dazed-visions
I graduated high school at 14 and graduated again at 16 because no college would accept me at that age.
People from that age can understand consequences and the like, and since she is CLEARLY consenting and is aware of everything and is going about this maturely, we should leave it to her.
The relationship doesn’t seem abusive or anything, and they’re both having a voice in this. So how about you get off your high horses and reason a bit, alright?
Where I come from, people are married at 12. I’m used to this shit. I was simply against my own marriage for the fact that I wanted to choose and that I felt as if I had more in my life. The other girls? Well, depending on the family but nowadays most of them choose, so they’re good.
The average age gap between a older man and a younger woman as a married couple is 6. Which means @dazed-visions has that exact same age gap but at a younger age.
Call me a pedohpile supporting piece of shit all you want fuckers, but I don’t see much wrong.

princessmugi-for-peace., tumblr 14 Comments [4/15/2017 11:11:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126319

Ken Ham, Good Read 10 Comments [4/15/2017 11:10:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126317

Trump on Obamacare: "Losers" Are Chuck Schumer And Nancy Pelosi, "Let It Explode"

President Trump makes a statement after the health care reform bill he supported was pulled ahead of a vote in the House. He said that speaking politically, things couldn't be better for him.

Trump thanksed Paul Ryan for his hard work and noted that Democratic Leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were the "losers" of the whole affair.

"I've been saying for a year and a half that the best thing we could do --politically speaking-- is to let Obamacare explode, it is exploding right now, many states have big problems. Almost all states have big problems," the president said.

"So Obamacare is exploding, with no Democrat support we couldn't quite get there, we were just a few votes short, in terms of getting our bill passed. A lot of people don't realize how good our bill was because they were viewing Phase One. Phase Two, which was mostly the signings of Sec. Price... and you add Phase Three, which I think we would have gotten, it became a great bill... but that is okay."

"I think what will happen is Obamacare, will, unfortunately, explode. It is going to have a bad year. Last year you had over 100% increases in various places... Many places 50-60-70%... This year should be much worse for Obamacare," he added.

"What would be good, is if the Democrats, when it explodes, got together and worked with us and got a real health care bill. I would be totally open to it and I think it is going to happen. I think the losers are Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, because now they own Obamacare, 100% own it. It is not a Republican healthcare, it is not anything but a Democrat healthcare, and they have Obamacare for a little while longer," he said. "This is not our bill, this is their bill."

"I want to thank Paul Ryan," the president said. "He worked very, very hard. Tom Price and Mike Pence... everybody worked hard. I worked as a team player, and would love to have seen it pass."

"We learned a lot about loyalty, we learned about the bill process, we learned a lot of arcane rules in obviously both the Senate and the House, so for me it has been a very interesting experience."

Donald Trump, Real Clear Politics 11 Comments [4/15/2017 11:10:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 126316

A university student in Pakistan accused of blasphemy against Islam has been killed by a mob of fellow students on campus, police say.

Many students have been arrested after the brutal attack in the northern city of Mardan, and the campus has been closed.

Reports suggest that two young men were accused of posting offensive content on Facebook. One survived with injuries.


The murdered student has been identified as Mashal Khan, who studied journalism. Some reports say he was shot, while others say he was beaten to death with planks.

"He was badly tortured after being shot at a close range... He was beaten with sticks, bricks and hands," senior police official Niaz Saeed told the AFP news agency.

Hundreds of people were involved, the officer said. Graphic video footage of the incident has emerged online.

Police had not been investigating the two accused men, nor had any case been filed against them, and the mob appeared to have acted on rumours, the Dawn newspaper reports.

Last month Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif voiced his support for a wide-ranging crackdown on blasphemous content on social media.

In a statement on his party's official Twitter account, he described blasphemy as an "unpardonable offence".

An official at Abdul Wali Khan University who spoke on condition of anonymity said Mr Khan was disliked by other students for his liberal and secular views.

At least 65 people have been murdered in Pakistan after being accused of blasphemy since 1990, a recent think tank report said.

Nawaz Sharif, Abdul Wali Khan University students, BBC News 7 Comments [4/15/2017 11:10:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 126315

Jason Salamone, Facebook 8 Comments [4/15/2017 11:09:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 | top