1 2 3 4 5 10 15 18 | bottom
Quote# 126398

[Putting this in Fundies by default, feel free to move this to CSTDT if appropriate]

Once you realize that the invasion of Normandy only happened because communists infiltrated the U.S. government---militarily, the smart move would have been to let the Nazis and Soviets destroy each other on the Eastern Front---it makes it impossible to enjoy any World War II book/movie/game.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/7037135]

...

World War II was not about making the world safe for democracy, saving the Jews, or fighting the evil Nazis.

It was about helping communism take over Europe.

All D-Day accomplished was taking the heat off the Soviets and allowing them to annex all of eastern Europe.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/7037181]

...

Patton had the right idea when he started putting ex-Nazis in charge of the area he controlled as a military governor and saying that the Soviet Union was the real threat.

Eisenhower was a Soviet asset and had Patton assassinated so the people wouldn't figure out the truth.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/7037231]

...

De-Nazifying Germany was horrendously stupid since most lower-level Nazi functionaries weren't wedded to the ideology at all and actually knew what they were doing.

Removing Germany's entire leadership class was a communist plot to weaken Germany and empower the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/7037262]

...

Future historians are going to remember World War II as the biggest fraud perpetrated on the white race and the world.

The U.S. and U.K. were manipulated by communist agents every step of the way.

The end result of WWII was to turn the dirt-poor, backwards Soviet Union into a superpower.

[https://gab.ai/mattforney/posts/7037327]

Matt Forney, Gab 5 Comments [4/28/2017 1:51:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126397

The left has decided that they no longer want to live among people who share different views than them. They are plugging their fingers in their ears while yelling racist, fascist, Nazi, and Hitler. They are refusing to yield, compromise, debate, or even accept that their political positions are starting to lose in democratic elections despite suspected cheating that aids them. This has put us squarely in the middle of a cold civil war where both sides of the political spectrum are warming to the idea of killing each other.

A confirmation of the left’s defeat is apparent when you see how their maniacal behavior converts more people, especially moderates, against them. The biggest recruiting tool against the left has become the left. Every time they protest, riot, screech against white people, or show their vulgarity, the remaining mentally sane of America realize that the left’s platform has become so out-of-touch that it no longer represents the basic ideals of the country. The non-cucked right needs to merely show up after temper tantrums and say “Look how crazy they are” for the converts to come pouring in.

The left is out of options

Many people are wondering why the left has become a recruiting agent for the right by promoting or engaging in violence. First, they simply don’t know what else to do. When a parent tells a child that he can’t eat candy for every meal, and the child doesn’t have a logical argument about the merits of eating that candy, what does he do? He cries, stomps his feet, threatens to run away, throws out insults like “meanie” and “jerk,” and may even hit his parent to get his way. Donald Trump and his supporters are the parents who won’t yield to an emotional child.

The second reason why the left is hurting their cause with violence is because its billionaire controllers, particularly George Soros, want to divide America to such an irreparable extent that a hot Civil War is forced, giving them an opportunity to increase their power. Soros wants to create so much hate, animosity, and chaos that any resulting conflict has a chance of him holding absolute power, compared to the current situation where he has “only” a moderate amount. In other words, he rather take the chance of war to solidify his grip further.

The leftists that Soros sponsors in the Woman’s Marches and the antifa outbursts may also want a Civil War, but a quick look at their physiognomy shows they would struggle to even go one day without electricity, and that they possess the same psychological directive as the child who is angry that he can’t have candy. Soros is the creepy old neighbor who promises them the candy they crave because he wants to build their trust and get them alone. The child, naive about the extreme danger that lurks behind the likes of Soros, decides to follow him into a van parked in the alley to spite its own parents and their righteous authority.

The reason the right has been reluctant to respond with violence is because they’re winning. Violence comes not from a position of strength, but desperation, when every other option has been extinguished, and should serve as a signal to you of what the real score between the left and right really is. Without violence, the left currently has a 100% chance of losing, continuously and humiliatingly, for at least the next eight years. All the gains that took them decades to achieve will be lost if we ravage and rape their power structures.

With a hot civil war, the left has a 25% chance to win, a bet they are willing to take even though there is a high chance they will be among the first to die in the conflict. A logical person would ask why they would push for a conflict that is sure to destroy the infrastructure of the urban centers they live in, and one where food, water, and other basic necessities would be lacking. The answer comes upon realizing that a child does not realize that eating candy every day will make him sick. The child must therefore be commanded for its own good, because it does not have the capability to take care of itself or understand the consequences of its actions.

We all lose in a hot war

Before the warrior in you gets excited at the prospect of crushing the left in a hot war and killing antifa members with high-powered weapons as they wield sharpened mop handles at you, understand that any war in the United States would quickly become a proxy war involving all major military powers, particularly China and Russia, who would rush to spend billions of dollars to have ultimate control of the country. It would be protracted and match the first civil war in terms of brutality, where 2% of the population died.

With the current population, a 2% death rate would result in over 6 million deaths. Compared to the 3,000 that died on 9/11, which was seen as the greatest national tragedy of modern times, a hot war would effect every single American in a profoundly negative way. No sane person with a family would wish for this outcome, which further highlights the insanity of much of the left in pushing for this very result. They rather see millions of people dead and the country ruined than accept a democratic process where their crazy ideas lost.

Even if we avoid a hot war, the underlying problems are not solved. The left will constantly subvert against the country in hopes of achieving a hot war, use both economic and physical violence against those on the right whom they disagree with, and inevitably descend into terroristic violence that rivals ISIS. It’s intolerable for things to proceed as they are, but if we remove a hot war from the table, what option is left?

1-800-DIVORCE

I recommend the long divorce option, which has three components. The first is extreme law and order. Starting with the Federal government, every single instance of leftist threats, intimidation, and violence must be investigated, prosecuted to the maximize allowable by law, and publicized. The left have been getting away with their illegal acts for too long, to the point where violent protesters don’t even fear arrest, thanks to Democratic mayors and police chiefs who allow it. The FBI must uphold the law and punish those who break it, and municipalities or universities that allow illegal acts must be punished through withholding of Federal funds. This will immediately shrink the number of violent agitators on the left and limit the power of their institutions.

The second component of the long divorce option is to excise the left from all centers of cultural power so that they cannot actively convert the youth. The fake news, already on its last legs, must be replaced by organizations that are not so vehemently anti-American, academia must be purged, and all globalist traitors working in government, both on the Federal and state level, must be removed from positions of power.

The media is hemorrhaging money and viewers, millions of citizens are getting red pilled to the subversiveness of the academic system (particularly its anti-male and anti-white agenda), and Trump has begun to right the ship in the Federal government, which will certainly trickle down to the local levels. Because the leftist establishment is losing control over their narrative, the younger Generation Z is already showing signs of rightward thinking thanks to being raised on 4chan memes more than TV programming. This means that we simply need to remove millennials from power and wait for them to die of old age or AIDS while preventing them from causing further damage to American institutions.

Halting immigration is the third component of the long divorce option. The left has not been able to show how immigrants benefit American citizens besides more diverse restaurant options, and emotional pleas of “human rights” and “compassion” is not sufficient enough to turn the United States into a big welfare office. Open-borders immigration is hurting existing citizens, serving as a cynical means for leftists to gain more votes in elections while browbeating their enemies with “hate speech” codes that demand you love non-Americans more than Americans.

We must also advocate for a white population that increases from where it currently stands, because America is no longer America if that number dips below 50%, and will instead look something like an international airport. Once immigration is stopped, and illegal citizens are deported, it will become monumentally more difficult for open-borders politicians to win nationally again. This can be absolutely ensured if woman’s suffrage is repealed, a proposition that I know many find unpalatable, but one that would usher in an era of permanent winning.

[Submitters note: trying to repeal women's suffrage is probably why the hypothetical leftists want to kill you Roosh]

For us to win without a hot civil war, we have to retake the reins of power and peacefully co-exist with bitter leftists over the next fifty years while the culture slowly heals itself. Once institutions are purged of anti-American leftists, the new left will exist in more of a classical liberal form and believe in nominally nationalist ideas while accepting cultural values that are shy of traditional. The long divorce option will not excite you because of the length it takes to see a resolution, but it’s one that will preserve life and the existing infrastructure of the United States.

Four future outcomes

There are four outcomes that can proceed from the juncture of which we stand. The first is a globalist resurgence at the polls thanks to demographic changes that push the vote far to the left, starting in 2024. If this happens, we will have a president that is more authoritarian than Hillary Clinton. The boot will come down on all facets of American life, especially speech, and we will essentially be living in an open-air prison.

The second outcome is a hot war where we win. The country will be ravaged and millions will die, but at least most of the deaths will be leftists.

The third option is a hot war where we lose because of foreign involvement. Not only are we much more likely to die in this engagement, but the globalist boot will come down with such a viciousness that those on the right who survive may hope that they had died in the war.

And the fourth option is the long divorce, one that we will easily win if the recommendations I made above are taken. Very few people die and life can proceed with high stability and prosperity for the majority of the country.

The globalist left has so damaged the country from the decades they’ve been in power that there is no quick fix, and those of us who are alive today will likely not see a resolution that can be argued as “complete victory” during our lifetimes. I understand the frustration that many on the right have, and the desire they have to be immediately cured of poisons that the left has unleashed, but we must carefully analyze any outcome that results in the deaths of our loved ones and even ourselves. There is a time and place to die for what you believe in, but I hope I have convinced you that we have not yet reached that critical moment and that we can avoid the downsides of a hot civil war and the globalist boot by taking on the option of the long divorce to still win in the end.

The laws we have on the books are enough—let’s enforce those and allow the country to focus on itself instead of empire building and policing while the media and universities collapse upon the weight of their own lies and degeneracy. Besides, the entertainment value in watching the left screech and yell for the next several decades is sure to bring us reams of pleasure. That’s a better outcome than outright war.

Roosh, Roosh V 8 Comments [4/28/2017 1:51:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126383

"It's hard to give up a good party," added Daniel Melia, UC Berkeley professor of Celtic languages. "Satan is a Christian notion. This is a pre-Christian celebration."[5]

He was wrong about Satan. The Old Testament mentions Satan fourteen times, and that doesn't include all his other names. From beginning to end, the Bible shows how Lucifer has always been stirring rebellion against God and hatred for His people. But then as now, the good news outshines the bad: the evil one could never cause more trouble than God would allow.

Berit Kjos, Crossroad.to 6 Comments [4/28/2017 1:50:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126354

[Comment under "This "Periodic Table of Dictators, Despots, and the Despised" rates Stalin's "evil" as a "9/10" - more than all 94 others on the table except Hitler"]

@Onlyinmizzou:
you can't be simultaneously pro-secret police and pro-democracy. as a socialist, it is unacceptable to be anti-democracy.


nonsense. the point of proletarian dictatorship is that it's dictatorship for the capitalists, democracy for the workers. what you are talking here, is liberalism, is nonsense, is bourgeois equality. i will quote lenin at length to back this up.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/nov/06.htm

The second anniversary of the Soviet power is a fitting occasion for us to review what has, in general, been accomplished during this period, and to probe into the significance and aims of the revolution which we accomplished.

The bourgeoisie and its supporters accuse us of violating democracy. We maintain that the Soviet revolution has given an unprecedented stimulus to the development of democracy both in depth and breadth, of democracy, moreover, distinctly for the toiling masses, who had been oppressed under capitalism; consequently, of democracy for the vast majority of the people, of socialist democracy (for the toilers) as distinguished from bourgeois democracy (for the exploiters, the capitalists, the rich).

Who is right?

To probe deeply into this question and to understand it well will mean studying the experience of these two years and being better prepared to further follow up this experience.

The position of women furnishes a particularly graphic elucidation of the difference between bourgeois and socialist democracy, it furnishes a particularly graphic answer to the question posed.

In no bourgeois republic (i.e., where there is private ownership of the land, factories, works, shares, etc.), be it even the most democratic republic, nowhere in the world, not even in the most advanced country, have women gained a position of complete equality. And this, notwithstanding the fact that more than one and a quarter centuries have elapsed since the Great French (bourgeois-democratic) Revolution.

In words, bourgeois democracy promises equality and liberty. In fact, not a single bourgeois republic, not even the most advanced one, has given the feminine half of the human race either full legal equality with men or freedom from the guardianship and oppression of men.

Bourgeois democracy is democracy of pompous phrases, solemn words, exuberant promises and the high-sounding slogans of freedom and equality. But, in fact, it screens the non-freedom and inferiority of women, the non-freedom and inferiority of the toilers and exploited.

Soviet, or socialist, democracy sweeps aside the pompous, bullying, words, declares ruthless war on the hypocrisy of the "democrats", the landlords, capitalists or well-fed peasants who are making money by selling their surplus bread to hungry workers at profiteering prices.

Down with this contemptible fraud! There cannot be, nor is there nor will there ever be "equality" between the oppressed and the oppressors, between the exploited and the exploiters. There cannot be, nor is there nor will there ever be real "freedom" as long as there is no freedom for women from the privileges which the law grants to men, as long as there is no freedom for the workers from the yoke of capital, and no freedom for the toiling peasants from the yoke of the capitalists, landlords and merchants.

Let the liars and hypocrites, the dull-witted and blind, the bourgeois and their supporters hoodwink the people with talk about freedom in general, about equality in general, about democracy in general.

We say to the workers and peasants: Tear the masks from the faces of these liars, open the eyes of these blind ones. Ask them:

“Equality between what sex and what other sex?

“Between what nation and what other nation?

“Between what class and what other class?

“Freedom from what yoke, or from the yoke of what class? Freedom for what class?”

Whoever speaks of politics, of democracy, of liberty, of equality, of socialism, and does not at the same time ask these questions, does not put them in the foreground, does not fight against concealing, hushing up and glossing over these questions, is one of the worst enemies of the toilers, is a wolf in sheep's clothing, is a bitter opponent of the workers and peasants, is a servant of the landlords, tsars, capitalists.


https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1918/dec/23.htm

But why not reach this goal without the dictatorship of one class? Why not switch directly to "pure" democracy? So ask the hypocritical friends of the bourgeoisie for the naive petty-bourgeois and philistines gulled by them.

And we reply: Because in any capitalist society the powerful tell lies to either the bourgeoisie or the proletariat, while the small proprietors, inevitably, remain wavering, helpless, stupid dreamers of "pure", i.e., nonclass or above class, democracy. Because from a society in which one class opposes another there is no way out other than through the dictatorship of the oppressed class. Because the proletariat alone is capable of defeating the bourgeoisie, of overthrowing them, being the sole class which capitalism has united and "schooled", and which is capable of drawing to its side the wavering mass of the working population with a petty-bourgeois way of life, of drawing them to its side or at least "neutralizing" them. Because only mealy-mouthed petty-bourgeois and philistines can dream — deceiving thereby both themselves and the workers — of overthrowing capitalist oppression without a long and difficult process of suppressing the resistance of the exploiters. In Germany and Austria this resistance is not yet very pronounced because expropriation of the expropriators has not yet begun. But once expropriation begins the resistance will be fierce and desperate. In concealing this from themselves and from the workers, the Scheidemanns and Kautskys, the Austerlitzes and Renners betray the interests of the proletariat, switching at the most decisive moment from the class struggle and overthrow of the yoke of the bourgeoisie to getting the proletariat to come to terms with the bourgeoisie, achieving "social peace" or reconciliation of exploited and exploiters.


in fact, you yourself make this point, so i do not understand why you say that you cannot be for secret police and for democracy now!

Every state that has ever existed has forcibly silenced its enemies. It is unavoidable. In the same way the the US silenced labor unions and socialists who sought to subvert the government in the early 20th century, socialist countries silenced western-backed counter-revolutionaries. Others can provide more detail into how specific socialist countries dealt with dissent, but I hope that at least shows you why this argument is dubious at best.


@Onlyinmizzou:
but stalin's legacy was, in my opinion and in the opinion of many leftists, mostly counterproductive.


you would call the ending of the NEP and the building of a planned economy, the liberation of europe, unprecedented achievements in healthcare, education, literacy, space, farming, the supression of revisionists, counter revolutionaries, kulaks, etc etc - counterproductive?

it is not "great man theory" - it is looking at history as it actually was! the only liberalism here is to disregard stalin, to deny facts, to refuse to look into the actual situation! the USSR is like a machine - you cannot pick and choose which bits you want to praise, you must take it in it's entirety. you cannot simply call some crucial elements "bad, counterproductive".

infact i will ask directly - what do you think was "counterproductive"? what actions? what specifically

BuddyDogeDoge, Reddit - r/ShitLiberalsSay 3 Comments [4/28/2017 1:49:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 126296

[i][In the thread][/i] FAQ for newcomers: Yes the cucks are literally brainwashed. Yes by zionists. Yes they actually in their heart of hearts think marxism will prevail. No, it never will. Yes they require physical removal. Yes you can handle that. posted by hinduyankee]

Posted by BadGoyWithAGun

• Yes, physical removal means the physical removal of globalists, international cliques and rootless cosmopolitans misruling our peoples

[Posted by revenjack]

I can handle it! Removal Approved

hinduyankee, BadGoyWithAGun and revenjack, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 4 Comments [4/28/2017 1:46:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 126290

Irrationalwiki is a liberal apostate website that is funded through means such as Media Matters and George Soros. They have managed to be even to the left of Wikipedia, and in doing so have created a place that denies the divinity of Jesus Christ and supports Darwinism. They ban anyone who dares to oppose Darwinist propaganda without any question whatsoever. They are an offshoot of Conservapedia and created this cesspool because they are awkward nerds who love video games and science fiction and can't hold a job or do anything productive in life. Therefore, lonely young white males mope around about the growth of real Christianity around the world thanks to true evangelicals.

James Wilson, New Testament Baptist Church 10 Comments [4/28/2017 1:46:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126288

Speaking about his recent trip to Poland on his “WallBuilders Live” radio show today, Religious Right pseudo-historian David Barton said that his visits to sites of Nazi atrocities showed him that “every evil that’s ever appeared in the world also occurs in every generation.”

The evil spirit that was responsible for the Holocaust, Barton went on to say, is now at work today advancing the “homosexual lifestyle.”

“It does not change over time,” he said. “The evil that’s there, it still works in the same deceptive means today, it still has that nice smiling face and, you know, a homosexual lifestyle, it’s such a wonderful lifestyle. Yeah? Why don’t you look at the medical stats and see if that’s really true? And so it always disguises itself in different ways, it comes through different means. We see it all the time. So, what I learned is what I already knew, and that is human nature does not change and if you don’t have the impact of religion to change a heart you will end up like the Nazis. These are guys who had no conscience and that comes from not fearing God.”

The Nazis were “pagans,” Barton claimed, and “you see what happens when you have a secular, God-free society … and that’s what Poland proves is the good stuff is Bible based, Jews and Christians, the bad stuff is secular pagan.”

David Barton, Right Wing Watch 3 Comments [4/28/2017 1:46:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 126269

It's interesting to see that the core concept of Infogalactic is Sir Tim Berners-Lee's horror scenario:

"I talk about the horror scenario of going to a candidate's webpage and depending on who you were you get a different message and that is just marketing 101 for the political websites out there. So we need to rethink the way we have built society on top of the web."

But why shouldn't people see what they prefer to see? Why should they be forced to see what Sir Tim, or the 512 Wikipedia admins want them to see?

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 3 Comments [4/28/2017 1:44:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126268


The leftists’ two pet scientific theories are AGW and Darwinism; however, it seems pretty clear that you can’t have both (as I noted in my post Evolution or Global Warming: You Can Pick Only One); if humans are responsible for global warming or climate change (or whatever the accepted term is this week), then there should have been no marked climate change prior to the Industrial Revolution. And if there was no climate change (though we know from the fossil record that there have been multiple Ice Ages followed by global thaws), then there can’t possibly have been evolution (even Darwin said that species adapted to environmental changes such as global warming and cooling). Darwin was insistent in The Origin of Species that environmental adaptation was required for survival of the species: so why, if humans evolved from monkeys due to an unacceptable environment, are there still monkeys? Species simply don’t evolve in a static environment, nor do the faulty species who did not adapt and evolve survive the inhospitable environment that first prompted evolution of that unfit species. Or if they do, Darwin was wrong. So you see the conundrum for addled lefties.

[aside: The progressive/communist 100-year war on Judeo-Christian values is at the heart of forcing acceptance of evolution to the exclusion of creationism in our schools and society. Communism cannot work on a religious people, a people who have anything above the state; they know this, that’s why they use “science” to strip away parts of our religious foundation.]

This Catch-22 was compounded by the ClimateGate emails and the revelation that the earth is not only not warming but is now cooling and that we are again headed for another catastrophic Ice Age. Uh huh. (by the way, if you haven’t read Delingpole’s Watermelons, you really should.) These findings led to the die-hard climate hysteria nutters changing “Global Warming” to “Climate Change” (it’s just so much better to cover all your bases when you’re trying to stoke unfounded fear, create panic, and take over the global economy), but it hasn’t caught on fully, so we still see the schizophrenic posts and articles about “global warming” that talk about the coming Ice Age. Why, yes, Virginia, the warming planet causes the formation of ice sheets. Go figure. But to leftists this makes perfect sense. Somehow.

Fuzislippers, Fuzzy Logic 7 Comments [4/28/2017 1:44:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Yesell

Quote# 126265

[Emphasis not mine]

(I wish more dudes wore eyeliner, honestly)

No that’s weird man. No dude is trying to do this. Please don’t be creeps.

If some dude wants to do this well do you, but don’t be surprised when people think you’re a homosexual.

(“No dude is trying to do this” lol what

How is this being a creep?

Dude, it’s just eyeliner. Everyone looks fantastic in eyeliner. Disagree if you want but like chill a bit maybe?)


Probably not and you should maybe not trying to limit speech. We’ve seen that around here a lot of lately from people on the “right”. That’s what progressives do, complete cuck sjw moves. We can tell you’re not a free speech warrior, that’s for sure.

I believe in 100% liberty, freedom and the individual can do what you want. I know like maybe two guys who do this, and more power to them, nevertheless I’ll advise nobody to do this. The attack on masculinity, traditionalism and man is insane in our cultural marxist culture. This is some bullshit I would see in a Laci Green or Reily J Denis cringe You Tube video.

Everybody is a victim these days and so offended by EVERYTHING. Get off the internet if you can’t handle a comment on a public platform on the internet.

Welcome to the assault on free speech in 2017




next move *They Block You*

Italianguy617, Tumblr 9 Comments [4/28/2017 1:43:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 126256

The surge for people of the same gender to be married now seems unstoppable in many parts of the world, and I have no doubt that the homosexual activists will not rest until they achieve this same victory wherever possible.

Just as “wearing a ten gallon hat don’t make you a Texan” and “saying you’re the King of England don’t make you the King of England.” So saying you’re married don’t make you married, or at least you may be married in the eyes of the state, but you’re not married in the eyes of God…not that most people will care about that.

What if you said you were a zombie and you were going to marry another zombie? You even went through the ceremony, but that doesn’t mean that zombies were married. It was all pretend.

You could say the pretend stuff is just fun, and why not let people have their fun? Okay, let them have their fun, but when it’s all over forgive me if I remind folks that zombies aren’t real, and neither is such a thing as a two men or two women marrying each other.

Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Patheos 9 Comments [4/28/2017 1:42:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126255

Harry Potter was perhaps the first major shitlib touchstone to vault willing cuckoldry into the wider culture as some kind of moral imperative; it was beta orbiter Snape, a man with the worst case of oneitis imaginable because he was in love with a dead woman who when alive wanted nothing to do with him, who vowed to look after Harry, (the child of his oneitis by another man Snape hated), out of a misplaced sense of loyalty and maybe hope for an afterlife consummation.

Literally “alpha fux and beta bux” from beyond the grave. What independent, empowered modern woman wouldn’t love that?

Heartiste, We Hunted The mammoth 8 Comments [4/28/2017 1:42:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 126233

If Christianity didn't exist, there would be no reason for being alive.

PoppyCorn99, DeviantArt 13 Comments [4/28/2017 1:41:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 126227

Should a marriage in an infidel country be segregated?

Family refusing to have a segregated wedding

What would you do if your parents and/or your prospect refuse to have a segregated wedding because it's an alien concept in your country and they don't want to make the guests uncomfortable? Would you call the wedding off or is it something that can be compromised?

Avice follows . . .

It is a test of prioritising ppl's wishes over Allah's requirements...your level of iman will determine who wins...

I personally wouldnt go for a man who prioritises ppl over his love and respect for Allah.... who knows, if you find a lady with the same mindset you'll both insist on your choice and make it happen! Having similar mindset can save lots of future troubles...

1. As you're the male, your parents do not have a right to tell you how to get married. You're old enough to get married, that means, you old enough for responsibilities, so you respect your parents as in you be nice to them, but that doesn't mean they control/own you.

2. Why would you want to get married to someone who doesn't understand something as basic as segregation?

3. If segregation is an alien concept in your country, does that mean Islam is also an alien religion in your country?

4. If Islam is an alien religion in your country, I don't think you have a choice in that case, unless you move out of that country and go into a country to get married where Islam and segregation are not alien concepts.

5. Or do you live in a country where people just call themselves Muslims but don't follow Islam?
...............

Segregation as prescribed by Islam is definitely an alien concept in certain Muslim cultures.

...................

Get an Islamic marriage, but that's it. Don't have your little party afterwards if people insist on you sinning.

........................
We're talking about culture here, most people never give up on their cultural beliefs, so I feel you're fighting a losing battle, a battle you can't win. I feel the only way you can win this battle is to not fight it, but instead sidestep it, as in, if you leave the entire culture, leave the country, and move to a country which doesn't have similar cultural beliefs. To fight a battle based on culture is extremely difficult and lonely!

.....................

I would like to comment too. As told by my beautiful people.
Just think that whom you want to invite for your marriage function Angels by true Islamic way of marriage or shayateen by nowadays cultural weddings which are totally against islam. Choice is yours that how you want to start your new life by blessings of angels or with in shayateen's presence. I believe nowadays divorce ratio is high because we are so much in to displeasing Allah swt and inviting shayateen instead of angels.
...................................
Follow the link for more fundie



various, ummah.com 5 Comments [4/28/2017 1:40:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 126735

Republican Congressman cries as he begs God to ‘forgive’ America for gay marriage

An emotional Republican Congressman sobbed his way through a speech begging God to forgive the “sins” of equal marriage.

Randy Weber is a member of the United States House of Representatives, and has represented Texas’ 14th congressional district since 2013.

He made an appearance last night at an ultra-conservative religious event, titled ‘Washington – A Man of Prayer’. A video appears below.

At the event, Weber led a prayer begging for God’s “forgiveness” for America’s sins, openly weeping as he addressed same-sex marriage.

He said: “Father, we have trampled on your holy institution of holy matrimony and tried to rewrite what it is and we’ve called it an alternate lifestyle.”

Welling up and beginning to cry, he said: “Father, oh Father, please forgive us!”
Advertisement

The lawmaker continued to sob as he begged for God’s forgiveness for abortion, saying “Father, we’re killing our descendants and we’re calling it a choice. Oh Lord, forgive us.”

He continued: “Lord, forgive our sins. Help us to get back on your path, to a true understanding of ‘blessed is the nation whose god is Lord’.

“Let that please be us. Don’t remove your hand of protection from us, Father, please.

“Forgive us our manifold sins, and bring us back to your mercy, father, I beg of you. I plead with you.”

Weber has a long anti-LGBT history.

He previously backed a bill called the ‘State Marriage Defense Act’, seeking to limit federal recognition of gay weddings after the Defense of Marriage Act was struck down.

Explaining the bill, he said: “Maybe [there will] be a groundswell where people can get behind this and say, ‘Look, we’re tired of activist judges just systematically destroying the foundation of the family by throwing out a lot of these laws that people have voted for.’

“You’ve got to be watching the absolute insanity out of some of these judges across the country… they have just thrown the entire country, in my opinion, into turmoil with a lot of these judges saying, ‘Well, it’s a right, the people of those states cannot choose what they want their state to look like’.”

Republican Congressman Randy Weber, Pink News 26 Comments [4/27/2017 10:48:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 126733

christian or maybe YOU are ignorant and dont see it from his side because your atheist. one thing is, what is the point of bringing a bible or any religious item when all you have is things thrown at you like "WE EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS" and "EVERYTHING WAS CREATED FROM A GIANT BANG" so if thats not from your religion then the kids get confused and dont know whether to trust their parents or their teacher. Trust in your parents is important. Also instead of parent's children learning about their religion, the child learns that their religion is a lie. The bible is against gays because a man is supposed to be with a woman and says that being gay is not love, its sin in disguise. Also if being gay was okay, then when Adam was created, instead of creating a woman, why didnt he create another man? it started out sexist, because Eve (the first woman) was the first to disobey god AND got Adam (the first man) to disobey god as well. Because of that, Women were punished. You may be asking "why not just punish Eve?" well what about Hitler? when he became the leader of Germany, was he the only one affected by him becoming leader? no he wasnt! Because of him becoming the leader, it set off a chain reaction the resulted in 12,000,000 deaths! So when Eve disobeyed, is set off a chain reaction that resulted in all women being punished. Also what about America? America has been racist, supported slavery, Still doesnt support gays, sexiest and filled with so much violence and your little "evolutionist" also has MORE plot holes! But you still put faith in them, don't you? If you say- or think you don't your wrong. because if you didnt have faith in America, why would you support their schools? and if you didnt have faith in evolutionism, then why would you go against creationism? Right now your arguments about sexist, hating gays, etc. isnt looking to good?

Fire Gamer, youtube 17 Comments [4/27/2017 10:47:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 126732

The Most High has stood me up to be a messenger for Him and to tell you to ...
Say NO to Vaccinations and Flu Shots. The Bible Forbids Vaccinations!

Sherry Shriner, They Want You Dead 19 Comments [4/27/2017 10:47:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126728




(Name erased), Sheologians Facebook 7 Comments [4/27/2017 10:46:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126723

What about the fact of biology? There are only two genders and you can’t change the knee you’re born with. cutting off you dick and calling yourself a woman is a mental illness, nothing more.

arigoldstein, polygon 14 Comments [4/27/2017 10:38:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126720

I think my wife is a demon

My wife thinks she has the Mendella effect.

She started to read the Bible non stop.

She swears she's trying to find God and he isnt in her reality.

I heard her crying the other night she said she saw a golden woman come through the Bible and hold her.

Right back at it the next day I find her.

And the room was swarmed with spirits. The Bible was on fire she said the words were changing and she was begging for the golden virgin to bring God back. It was the most horrific experience in my life.

She said God told her she was a whore and his prisoner and now she has to find a green tree that guards the golden virgin who has a key to the dimensions we come from.

I think she opened the gates of hell and ushered in the apocalypse. Every day I go home I'm afraid she's going to do that again.

The clocks stopped in our home until whatever she did went away.

I'm not really familiar with the old testament and I've been all over online.

I need to get her back to reality and I don't want to lock her up. I have to admit whatever happened was freaking real.

What is the golden virgin? Where is she getting this from? Is it a demon? She's convinced the green tree is a lion with a dragon it doesn't make sense. She says she's reading the Bible and it's behind the words and the portal i saw came from the words when they locked in place. All I know is all the words on everything were moving till something came and sent the spirits away.

I've seen posts on here about the Mandela and since none of you know me I'm going to just lay it down.

I just want whatever she has done to stop and things to go back to normal. I'm scared she's demonic.. I never heard anything about the stuff she's telling me. Chemistry and physics aren't in the Bible. The Golden Virgin green tree and bees.

Anyways glad I could tell someone.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 22 Comments [4/27/2017 10:35:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126717

Gays and lesbians prey on children. If you behaved ethically, you would not be hated. Teaching people to accept those who prey on children is a bad thing. This is about the normalization of pedophilia, so stop playing innocent. We're onto you.

"Gays and lesbians have no sexual interest in children, it's pedophiles you are thinking of. Stop making them out to be the same thing, for one thing it's dishonest, and for another you reveal yourself to be nothing resembling a Christian by saying it."

You are a liar, as usual.
Gay couples who preyed on their own adopted children. You people have no morals at all.
Run these names on Google. You won't because you don't want to acknowledge the truth.
Frank Lombard Duke adopted son sex
George Harasz Douglas Wirth adopted sons
Peter Truong Mark Newton adopted son
Ian Wathey Craig Faunch abuse children
Carl Herold Charles Dunnavant son sex
Cesar Gonzales-Mugaburu foster boys
David Cannon John Scarfe son sex
Christian Jessica Deanda Eraca Dawn Craig torture
Rachel Stevens Kayla Jones son abuse
Pauline Moreno Debra Lobel son
Aric Babbitt Matthew Deyo
Robert Owen Justin Jarvis Indiana 2017

"Even if that list was true (and I'm not saying it is - most of it is highly suspect), congratulations on identifying twelve people who are homosexual pedophiles. How about being honest now and giving us a list of the disproportionately huge list of heterosexual pedophiles?"

You said gays are NOT pedophiles. I'm giving you the names of gays who ARE pedophiles.
You scared to Google those names - chicken?
You people are pathological liars.
Gays DO prey on boys. You are a liar.

Malleus, Christian News Network 17 Comments [4/27/2017 10:30:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 126711

Jesus is STD-FREE. Jesus is HIV-negative. Jesus is a virgin. Oh, baby. I’m gotta love Him and kiss Him for eternity. I wanna massage His immortal big chest and 8-packs with my Twister Tongue licking at a lightning speed. I can be the excellent Service Boy with the Tongue, and also the hottest Tongue Boy, the Massage Boy. But, I only have one client, one customer, one guest, that is, Lord Jesus Christ, in our sharing eternal life whenever He comes to hang out with me in my own mansion He gives to me. Jesus is my Darling, solely, only, and always for eternity.

Usachinanukewar, Wordpress 23 Comments [4/27/2017 4:19:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 126707

I feel there really isn't any such thing as a "woke" man. Black or otherwise.

Betty Middleton, Facebook 25 Comments [4/26/2017 11:32:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126705

Nothing but homosexuality and adultery goes on here in Babylon. This place deserves nuclear fire

Asar'el Ben Israel, Facebook 15 Comments [4/26/2017 11:31:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126704

Regarding Idaho faith healing laws that allow parents to deny their children lifesaving medical care

State Rep. Christie Perry, R-Nampa, looked at it from the parents’ point of view.

“They are comforted by the fact that they know their child is in heaven,” Perry said. “If I want to let my child be with God, why is that wrong?”

Christie Perry, The Spokesman-Review 30 Comments [4/26/2017 11:19:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 18 | top