1 2 3 4 5 10 13 | bottom
Quote# 126570

Earth is flat in Quran and so shall it be?

sibertooth, youtube 6 Comments [4/22/2017 12:16:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126567

Jesus is The Life! To say that evil is a branch of Life is to say that Jesus Christ had an evil side to Him. As Jesus the man was also The Christ, or God, it is blasphemy to say that a perfect God, our Creator, has evil in Him. The Yin-Yang symbol is a lie.

AmbassadorHerald, Deviantart 5 Comments [4/22/2017 12:10:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Speed demon

Quote# 126566

What are some of these 'Doctrines of Devils'? Here is a short list of a few that come to mind:
Theistic Evolution (Evolution period),
Vatican II (Catholics),
The Emerging Church (Purpose Drivenism),
Book of Mormon (Mormonism),
Pre-Tribulation Rapture,
Sodomy (Gay/Lesbian),
Wicca (Witchcraft),
Good works gets you to Heaven,
Etc . . .

AmbassadorHereld, Deviantart 8 Comments [4/22/2017 12:10:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Speed demon

Quote# 126561

[=Context: Part 3 of Anne Kennedy's rant against Jory Micah=]

So, yesterday I chattered away about all the annoying possibilities for women in the church–the Duggar Option, the Ray Romano Option, the Giving Up Option, the Backing Furtively Away Option. I started with three but it looks like it morphed into four. We needn’t worry too much about how many there are and what to call them. The fact is, since that long lost edenic landscape, men and women have never been able to comfortably sort themselves out. Some millennia or other we’re going to notice this and lower our expectations.

I am going to get to the other annoying option for women in the church–showing her her place–but before I do that I want to talk about Tone, which means the other one will have to wait.

In the Land of the Internet–that great vast playground of everybody saying and being whoever they want to be–it’s very natural that we would want to bubble wrap ourselves in protective layers no matter what the conversation is. As human discourse has become technically easier, it seems to have become exponentially more tetchy. Anyone can talk, therefore we are all much quicker to have our feelings hurt.

This being so, I have some friendly counsel. I think if women want to be taken seriously in whatever sphere they hope to inhabit, it would be helpful for them to set aside many of their trigger warnings.

For example, one of the jarring thing about reading so much Jory Micah in one day is the vague feeling that she has Definitely Overcome. She has been victimized by the church and everyone, but she has gloriously overcome all the hideous persecution to forge a better and more enlightened way for herself, a way that actually fractures the body of Christ because she’s going off to start a new one. But me noticing this in the public writing that she is publicly doing, will doubtless bring cries of ‘don’t be so mean!’ Which shuts down the conversation. Either you can say something publicly, and have people respond to it publicly, or you can go hide in your cupboard. But we like to have it both ways.

As we are increasingly offended and hurt, the church becomes an impossible place to actually sort things out. What set of men will want, reasonably, to talk to women about anything, let alone what women can do, if the women are poised and ready to cry Foul at every turn? Men, for all they are so evil, are not usually spoiling for a fight. They want the women to be happy so that they will leave them alone sometimes. I jest…sort of.
What I’m trying to say is, the victimization tone needs to go away. There are some true victims in the world–lots of them actually, more of them women and children–but being in a church that doesn’t think you should, because of the Bible, preach the sermon, does not make you into an oppressed woman. And when you insist that it does, it actually only serves to close off other avenues where you might be useful in the kingdom of God.

If women want to be taken seriously in any sphere by men, I think it would be awfully helpful if they set the tone of the conversation in a more Gospel centered posture–with wisdom, grace, humility. I actually think this is already how things are trending. But the specter of hurt feelings mingled with the muddy heritage of feminism is always hovering.

Likewise, for the men, not assuming that every woman who isn’t squatting over her cooking pot adjusting her veil is the same as Jory Micah would go along way towards calming troubled water.

Someone has to be willing to leap in and talk through what might be seriously uncomfortable issues. Do we want to return to a golden, if not actually real, past? Where women stayed at home and men earned the check and little Beaver Cleaver pulled up to the dinner table in his collared shirt and his cheerful attitude? Where June was so taken with Ward and he was so clever and her pearls were so perfect? (Actually, I would not have minded this. Especially the air brushing.) Or shall we go back further still to the yet more glorious past where the man was probably cobbling the shoes in the front room and the woman was cobbling the meat pie in the back and when they went to church they knew it had been great when that nice bell rang?
Or, maybe we could start from where we are, with women and men both in the work force, women in even greater numbers in university programs, and children expected to all be geniuses by age three. None of these various ways of being are perfect. But we have to account for where we are, and we need to let go of the foolish ideals of utopia. And we need to center our gaze back on the scriptures. And if we want to really go forward we need to stop getting our feelings hurt every few seconds. I say we but I am obviously just talking about you. (JOKE)

Anne Kennedy, Patheos 3 Comments [4/22/2017 12:05:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Christopher

Quote# 126560

Canada, I am, the Thursday-and E ( "Iodine-huh-huh-hook") and Joshua (Iho-Jesus ) give you this warning: Do you follow your sisters! You call yourself North America, now you carry the name I despise. If you do not repent and do not move away from the sins of America - the fate of America will be yours.

Elisheva Eliyahu , Almighty Wind 10 Comments [4/22/2017 12:05:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126555

you made incest seem like it's "wrong" or bad. Incest that is not consensual can be damaging, I will agree to, but consensual incest, when both people are okay with it, is not hurting anyone and they should be allowed to be together. Even though it is considered "wrong" and causes most people to have a knee jerk reaction of "ick," love is love and who are we to say who people can and can't love?

give-me-a-name, Deviantart comments section 17 Comments [4/22/2017 12:01:11 PM]
Fundie Index: -3

"Most Likely To Be A Serial Killer" Award

Some people like vanilla. Some people have kinks. And some people are straight out of a psychological horror story.

Quote# 126549

(A paleoartist drew a horrifying picture of a human being eaten by Megalania -- a giant prehistoric lizard that lived in Australia --- and a vorephile shows up and gets butthurt because the other commenters don't think it's hot. At first I thought this guy was a troll, but after looking at his profile, it was apparent that, unfortunately, he's being 100% serious)

I'm fapping to this right now you hateful close minded jerks! I bet a lot of the haters are either repressed or have fetishes of their own that that won't admit to. Conformist squares aren't better than [vorephiles], even though they continue to think they are better than them just to deny how repressed and boring they, their lives, and their contribution to the human condition is.

wormsign2k, Deviantart comments section 28 Comments [4/21/2017 11:28:07 AM]
Fundie Index: -5

Quote# 126545

Yes, magic is as real as the air we breathe. True, in the movies it is all faked, but they portray real stuff. If you so wanted to, you could learn all that evil stuff, but I advise against it. You’d be one who would be included in above verses. Fortunately God is giving grace now, thanks to Jesus. But it won’t last forever. When your life on Earth is finished, you are out of time. Got Jesus’ blood covering you, you get Heaven, don’t have it, you get hell. Choose before you die.

AmbassadorHerald , Deviantart 10 Comments [4/21/2017 11:23:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126544

Narnia verses Harry Potter

A while back, I encountered a question on Yahoo Answers where someone inquired as to why some people have a negative attitude toward the magic displayed in Harry Potter but seem to have no problem with the magic displayed in the Chronicles of Narnia. I decided to submit an answer for this question, but as it happened, my answer turned into more of an essay, and the topic was closed before I submitted it. However, for those of you who have wondered the same thing, I decided to post it here with some minor modifications. Just my two cents, but I think there’s some food for thought.

To begin, despite some claims from other posters on Yahoo Answers, C.S. Lewis was a Christian and the similarities between Narnia and items in the Bible was intentional. They are not strictly allegory, where one thing in Narnia equals something else in the Bible. They are called “supposals.” The basic idea was that Lewis wondered what would happen if God had created another world and chose to die and rise again to save that world as He did ours. Note that the magic in the Chronicles is almost always coming directly from Aslan if it portrayed as good (There are a few exceptions to this), so it could be considered a metaphor for the miracles of God. The witch and her magic are depicted as evil.

On to Harry Potter. These books are very well written and J.K Rowling’s style is fun and witty. They are definitely entertaining books...but I do have some difficulty with them, and only part of it has to do with the magic they contain. The difficulty is actually threefold:

1. The Magic:
The difficulty with the magical elements in the Harry Potter books is that the magic is being portrayed as being a skill that can be learned by children in our world, if they possess the predisposition for it (Yes, I know this statement is vastly simplified). In the Chronicles, the children almost never practice magic themselves, and once when Lucy tries to, in Voyage of the Dawn Treader, she ends up probably destroying one of her friendships. Humans aren’t meant to practice magic.

2. The Violence:
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (or Philosopher’s Stone, in England) started out mildly enough. The final confrontation is a bit eerie, but nothing too horribly violent, though we do have an instance of a human being possessed by a malevolent spirit (but that fits more into category #1). By Book Two, Chamber of Secrets, we have a young girl (also possessed) killing chickens (not to eat), and quite a bloody confrontation in the climactic scene. Skip on to Book Four, Goblet of Fire, and any semblance of these being child-appropriate books seems to be lost. We have a teacher casting illegal spells, including murder and torture (albeit on a spider) in a classroom, apparently with the benevolent headmaster’s consent. We have the murders of several characters, one another student from the school; Harry’s blood being taken for a foul piece of magic (which, at least, is depicted as being evil in the scene); a servant cutting off his hand as part of the same piece of sorcery...the violence in this book keeps getting worse...and books Five and Six don’t ease up on it much (In Six Harry accidentally casts a spell that essentially has the same effect as repeatedly stabbing another student). At the time of this article, Book Seven has yet to be released. Is there violence in the Narnia books? Yes, but you will notice it is tempered. Possibly the most terrifying scene in the series is the sacrifice of Aslan, but you will note that the girls look away at the moment the witch actually kills him.

3. The Morality:
Quite apart from magic or violence in either story, is the morality that is being taught in either series. I have heard the Harry Potter series heralded as books with incredibly strong morals, but a quick examination of the books reveals this statement to be patently false. Harry consistently lies, to his teachers, to his friends, to Dumbledore the headmaster. He and his friends steal potions ingredients from Professor Snape (But who cares? We don’t like Snape, so it’s ok, right?). In fact, he’s rewarded for the first rule he breaks. When the entire class is told they will be expelled if they try to fly on their broomsticks without a teacher present, Harry takes off on his broom after Draco Malfoy, who has stolen something from a friend (But hey, it’s ok for a kid to risk life and limb for a noble cause, yes?). Not only is he not expelled, he’s REWARDED, given a prestigious place on one of the school sports teams.

Not convinced? Well, how about Professor Lupin, who neglects to mention to the headmaster that a convicted murderer is quite possibly sneaking into the school disguised as a dog? Why doesn’t Lupin say anything? Because it would be EMBARRASSING to him, and lose him some of the headmaster’s trust (which he doesn’t actually deserve because he’s been lying to the man for years anyway). But hey, it’s only Harry’s life and the lives of other students that’s at stake, and the convict has only gotten into the school twice already...so no big deal.

So what’s the difference? Don’t kids in the Narnia books get up to mischief, too? Of course they do. Digory, one of the children, does something incredibly foolish, awakens an evil witch, and brings her into Narnia with him, ruining the newly creating world before it’s a day old. But there are consequences. He has to face Aslan and explain exactly what happened. He’s required to complete a task to help mend the damage. When Edmund sides with the White Witch against his family, he’s almost killed for it (They left that bit out of the movie, but the concept was there.), and Aslan has to die in his place. The kids in Narnia make mistakes, but there are always consequences, consequences which are frequently and curiously lacking in the Harry Potter stories.

When I have kids, I want them to know that God is the only acceptable source of supernatural power in this world. I don’t want to expose them to violent scenes before they’re old enough to deal with them. And I want them to know that there are consequences to the choices they make.

AmbassadorHerald, Deviantart 11 Comments [4/21/2017 11:22:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126542

"I do not believe in evolution. I do not choose what I believe. I am compelled to believe what I believe by the presentation of evidence which leads only to one logical conclusion. ...That is why we believe it."

Look at your words: "I do not believe...what I believe...what I believe...that's why we believe." Evolution is completely faith-based. It's a belief. Nothing is observable without having to exercise a blind faith.

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 18 Comments [4/21/2017 11:19:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 126538

[Anonymous asked: What don't you like about homosexuals?]
Homosexuality serves no purpose, it is inherently degenerate and narcissistic. They have higher amounts of sexual partners (bordering on absurdity) more stds, are disproportionately pedophiles, and are often perverted sadly because they are molested as children. It is unnatural and shouldn’t be normalized in society. The worst of all is when I see children at these pride parades next to men groups of men that are totally naked or leashed up like dogs. I can’t stand it, Russia has the right idea with the anti gay propaganda law and Kadyrov dindu nuthin wrong

the-orthodox-autocrat, Tumblr 11 Comments [4/21/2017 11:13:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 126537

Both evolutionists (usually atheists) and Creationists (Biblical Scientists) need faith. Jesus said so. The difference is one has faith God is an illusion; the other has faith in God. The problem is one is justified, the other not. Science confirms God’s existence. Let me explain.

The First Law of Thermodynamics says that matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed. Based on this law of science you must conclude the universe has always been here in some way, shape or form.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that all things are going downhill and decaying, going from more usable energy to less usable energy. We call this Entropy. Based on this law you most conclude that in an eternal universe, like the first law requires, we would now be in a heat death where all usable energy is no longer usable and everything is in a standstill. You’re forced to conclude this because in an eternal universe there has been infinite time before the now and it takes far less time than infinity to use all the energy. It only takes finite time.

So, if the universe cannot be eternal due to the second law, but it must be eternal based on the first law, then there is only one explanation: something, or someone who is outside the laws of this universe created it. That person has to be God.

For more, go to [link] .

AmbassadorHerald, Deviantart 10 Comments [4/21/2017 11:13:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126536

Hate speech laws can’t be used against progressives because nothing we say is hate speech.

Visceral, Daily Kos 15 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 126533

You've been decieved. Same-sex members are only for friendship, loyalty, brotherhood, and sisterhood and nothing else. You don't fall in love with kids or kins and therefore not with same-sex members, either. It is as unthinkably disgusting and lawless as feeling appetite for fellow human beings or dog meat. The Western powerfuls are trying to enslave mankind by bending God's truth and human conscience and ignoring science.

"No, YOU'VE been deceived. If you're not attracted to people of the same gender, you're not really in a position to know that they cannot fall in love like everyone else."

Tell that to pedophiles and cannibals. You are wrong. Homosexuality means sex with anything; it's giving up on being human. The Western culture is violating the human rights by equating the colored people and sexually depraved people and prohibiting morality this century. Endorsement of homosexuality is a slavery to sin. You need to repent of the support of depravity.

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian News Network 15 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 126532

On the topic of magic, the hell is right on. Magic is demonic power. Yes, God isn’t the only supernatural power, but His power is not the same as magic. Magic is the devil's copy of God’s power. God is God and can do anything; satan is not god but thinks he is. Satan is after God’s throne and every time magic is used he gets a taste of it, as you are worshiping him instead of God. This is known as blasphemy. Idol worship. It is sin, and without Jesus’ forgiveness, it is punishable by death in the lake of fire.

AmbassadorHerald , Deviantart 8 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126531

As for believing what people will, it is of course the truth. You have rejected the notion of having a Savior who loves you. You have rejected the notion that you will die a sinner in the Lake of Fire for eternity unless you admit you have sinned to God and repent. The door stands ready to receive you, Jesus wants to hug you and call you a Son of God. Accept or turn away, your only options. But, don’t say you were not warned.

AmbassadorHerald , Deviantart 6 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126529

[Commenting under "Bodo League Massacre 100,000 to 200,000 Communists removed from South Korea"]

Posted by Metecury

Chances are if the government kills your parents for being communists you are going to become a communist and hate anyone who acted to prevent communism because that killed your parents.


So it's Ok to kill children ?

Posted by Metecury

Not from a moral stand point of course, it's not ok but in the context op talked about it was not done for the sake of committing an immoral act, it was done for practical purposes. Does that make it ok? Not really, no.


Posted by Metecury

Take ISIS, they are training and indoctrinating children from the age of three/four, they will most likely grow up to be terrorists and kill people, as a matter of fact child soldiers are a thing and they do not have to wait that long because they are used in executions and war actions.

Is it wrong to kill them because of their age? Would it be moral to let them grow up knowing that one day they will kill people? Because that is a given, they are being raised in the ideology by their parents who are fighting the west, they will never be functioning members of society.

Is it their fault or decision? Not really, the poor bastards were born into that nonsense but this does not make them any less dangerous or any less of a problem for us all.

Now on the case at hand, on top of the fear of the children of communists becoming a threat, which makes sense, there is also the intention to cause fear in those who would join the ideology and attempt revolution by making an example of those who did. It was not slaughter for the sake of slaughter.

Is it morally right? Not really but then again politics has little to do with morals and it is not the most righteous side that wins.

To let the children of communists go free and become communists later in life would be irresponsible as not stomping out the revolution would be. Then again, some would argue that there is a chance at reintegration and that an alternative could be possible, which I agree with by the way; however a civil war is a nasty business which often sees atrocities on both sides, I feel that a moral judgement is not exactly possible or advisable.

Posted by 125_

I think I can agree to everything you've said, thanks for replying :)

Metecury, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 4 Comments [4/21/2017 11:08:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 126523

Military technology displaces alpha shitlords from service. The more advanced and remote the killing tech, the less need for high T men to wield the weaponry. A black ops room or navy ship decked out with precision targeting systems can be manned by homos and pregnant 90 pound women. Sad!

Heartiste, Gab 18 Comments [4/21/2017 11:03:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126519

[Pretty much the perfect illustration of how the alt-right went so far right it somehow ended up rejecting Randian competition and individualism]

Globohomogenization is human id accelerationism, corrupting natural human emotions and desires — envy, anxiety, female hypergamy — into monstrous deformations that ultimately dehumanizes as it propels people to emotional brinkmanship that exceeds the carrying capacity of their amygdalae.

Instead of the manageable stress of fitting into a social scene that might extend four town blocks and maybe one town over, the average globalized Westerner has her brain tricked to perceive competition with the global village hordes — millions of people, including those who occupy the farthest right and left tails of the human worth bell curve, from high SMV celebs to freakish cross-dressers, christcucks, and lactating men — and she simply isn’t equipped to handle that social input load without getting depressed and hooked on Big Pharma’s poison pills.

Out of Nod makes a good point about envy being pathologically amplified by globalism. One of the motivating drivers of the Acela-class affluent SWPL rootless cosmopolitan shitlib demand for Zero Border Control and embrace of GloboHomoism is so that they have an ever-broader avenue to access their need for a winner-take-all social status whoring competition in which they see themselves coming out on top of the global order. The White shitlib truly thinks herself morally and intellectually superior to all others (don’t let her Black Lives Matter shuck n hivemind act fool you) and what better way to finally prove that superiority than by winning on a world stage?

A “winner” pushes for more competition. Only “losers” would want to restrict or regulate competition (so the shitlib and deracinated cuck rationalizes). “Winners” don’t fear global competition because nothing could possibly threaten their winning station in life (largely paid for by imported cheap laborers). The religion of GloboHomoism thus becomes a social status marker for credentialist suckups whose lucky talent for abstract thinking has served them well in the post-scarcity data-driven borgonomy.

But it’s an ego-warped illusion. The more shitlibs push for globohomoism, the more they hitch their nation’s fate to inevitable decay and widespread poverty. And there are only so many gated communities to run to before the swarm engulfs its sponsor. Even now there are stories of frazzled urban hypercredentialist white libs cracking under the pressure of the Asian onslaught to their kids’ schools and colleges. The blight of despair won’t be contained to BadWhites alone. Meth ameliorates the pain of dispossession for rural Whites; Xanaz and yoga and Salon articles do the same for urban Whites.


So the embrace of Globohomoism by effete, low T White shitlibs has less to do with a principled Randian stand for no-holds-barred worldwide competition than it does with globalism’s neat trick of removing all reason and accountability from the shitlibs’ sphere of activity. Globohomoism essentially turns the economy into a woman. Shitlib Whites aren’t so much succeeding in the global economy as they are enjoying its superficial privileges while passing the consequences of their unaccountable failures onto future generations.

Globohomogenized envy encourages people to eat their nation’s seed corn in the impossible quest to become a member of the 0.0001%ers at the commanding heights of the new global order.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 7 Comments [4/21/2017 11:02:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126513

This is just sickening folks. Some apostate Bible publisher thought they'd cash in big by marketing The Martin Luther King Remembrance Edition Bible. It is a trustworthy King James Version, which makes it even more insulting to God. How dare anyone exploit the Word of God to honor such a wicked, Christ-rejecting, unrepentant man as Martin Luther King. Few American realize that Martin Luther King Jr. was a Communist, involved in at least 60 known Communist front organizations.

Martin Luther King was an unsaved heretic, who openly denied the Virgin Birth, the Bodily Resurrection and the Deity of Jesus Christ. These are all fundamental doctrines of the Christian faith. You can read King's very own blasphemous writings in The Papers of Martin Luther King Jr. If king is to be honored, then why not publish The Adolf Hitler Remembrance Edition while you're at it? . . . or The Hugh Hefner Remembrance Edition?

One of the saddest days in American history was when a holiday was established to honor Martin Luther King. Why would the American people want to honor a Communist? In case you didn't know, Communism is synonymous with moral decay and subversion, which explains why abortionists, homosexuals and feminists have all made King an icon. King's widow, Coretta Scott King, spent the remaining years of her life advocating rights for homosexuals. Real Christian huh?

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 35 Comments [4/20/2017 11:43:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 126510

If you say your Christian, BUT you vote Democrat (or Independent with Democrat favor), you are most likely not a Christian at all. Being Christian and Democrat is like oil and water, they don't mix...

Eden Decoded, Facebook 17 Comments [4/20/2017 11:42:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 126509

Someone You Know May Be A Devil In Disguise

[2 Corinthians 11:14-15] "And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their actions."

Some of the biggest freaks - and some of the biggest whoremongers are in the Church. This is not a guess, this is a FACT!

If you're a Christian who's trying to live right, you owe it to yourself to not be naive and to be completely aware of the different personality types that are in church today.

The church is like a sheep's pen. It's where the sheep gather and congregate to do sheepy things. But where there's sheep there's bound to be predators. And predators today have gotten smart.

Church sheep attract church wolves. And just because they don't look or act wolfish doesn't mean they're not!


1. Showing slackness when it comes to living out an authentic salvation experience.

2. More worldly acting than they are Christian. In fact, they're so worldly that you wouldn't know they were a Christian unless they directly told you. There's no other identifying behavior that connects them with the saints. These would be your believers who are still running out and getting tatted up - still attending secular music concerts - still drinking and getting high. And when challenged on these obvious sinful practices, they'll pull out the 'judge not' card. Or they'll say that Jesus places everything under the blood, therefore there's no need for them to stop sinning. I call these 'Christian sinners' (and yes, that's an oxymoron).

3. Mixing of Christianity with Hinduism, Buddhism or New Age beliefs.

4. The use of phrases such as 'judge not' and 'God knows my heart.'

5. Always the victim of someone or some church that 'did them wrong.'

6. Acting as if they're too holy or too spiritual to be bothered with the rest of us mere Christian mortals.

7. Claims to be saved yet has a very elementary understanding or very little knowledge at all of holy scriptures. (How you gon' claim to love God - yet hate His word???)

8. Goes to church every time the church doors are open - yet continuously living in sexual sins, won't stop fornicating, cheats on their spouse with other church wolves (members), masturbates without guilt, dabbling in porn, etc. ***People like this are really dangerous, because they've been thoroughly inoculated against God's saving power, and are virtually guaranteed to bust hell wide open when the time comes. Steer VERY clear of such wolves in sheeps clothing - lest you find yourself on that bus trip to hell along with them!

I could write an endless list here. Perhaps you can even think of a few to add in the comments stream. Bottom line is, just because they claim to be saved doesn't mean they have been.

I warned you before and I'll keep doing it:There are many demons on assignment hiding out among the saints! And it behooves you if you're serious about your salvation in Christ to know who's on God's team and who's not. How can you tell the difference? It's simple:

"Beware of false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thisles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit." Matthew 7:15-17

Always check for their fruit! That's how you will recognize them.

Mack Major, Eden Decoded 29 Comments [4/20/2017 11:42:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 126507

Thanks, I actually missed talking to you and our other friends when I had to lay around with my foot propped up! Oh, It makes me so indignant when I hear people say "Birds are the closest living relatives to dinosaurs!" Kentucky Fried T-Rex? I think not!! They even faked fossils to have feathers to prove their point(not the first time that was attempted, either,as in the case of the infamous "Piltdown Man")And it is true that "fowl" in the Biblical sense is a broader term than how we define it now.Just as some other herbivores are called "cattle"not just bovines.

galacticdragon , Deviantart 16 Comments [4/20/2017 11:33:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126506

Homosexuals and sexual deviants by definition are weak people who live solely for self-gratification.

They lack the moral fortitude to defend themselves and will always get rolled by whoever ambles over to punch them in the face and take their lunch money.

Always. Without exception.



Rome was conquered by the barbarians because Romans were weak, degenerate and valued hedonism over defending their empire.

France and Germany are being conquered because the French and Germans are weak, degenerate and value hedonism over defending their nations.



There are plenty of people who will defend their nations in the name of God (or the gods), their families, their blood, and their cultural patrimony.

There isn't a single person who has ever gone to war to defend their country's abortion rights or freedom for gays.

It just doesn't happen.



A polite reminder: despite the outreach Trump and his supporters did for gays, despite the Orlando nightclub shooting, and despite Hillary Clinton taking money from "homophobic" Saudi Arabia, 80 percent of LGBT voters supported Hillary.

Hedonists are dead weight with no place in the movement.


Matt Forney, Gab 23 Comments [4/20/2017 11:33:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126505

Earlier this month, Family Research Council senior fellow Robert Maginnis appeared on SkyWatchTV to discuss “the occult influence on D.C. elites.”

Maginnis warned that even the most well-intentioned people who go to Washington, D.C. to work in public service are susceptible to the evil forces that he said dominate the city, citing both witchcraft and homosexuality.

“If you look around Washington, you have Dupont Circle, famous for being the center of homosexuality in Washington, you have all sorts of activities down there that are pretty souring,” he said. “You have a lot of witchcraft. You have a lot of hedonism. You have all the issues that—when I think of Sodom and Gomorrah, I often think of Washington, D.C. in the same thought.”

Maginnis, who previously said that witches “advise the senior leadership of the country,” urged viewers to pray for President Trump to ensure that he doesn’t give in to corrupting influences.

Robert Maginnis, Right Wing Watch 13 Comments [4/20/2017 11:33:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
1 2 3 4 5 10 13 | top