1 2 3 4 5 10 15 16 | bottom
Quote# 125553

My issue with non-offending pedophiles is that the only thing differentiating some of them from offending ones is lack of opportunity and/or threat of incarceration.

Who says? I'm a non-offending pedophile and I've had more opportunities than I can count. Threat of incarceration is part of it, but not that big of a part.

The main reason I don't offend is because morally I will never hurt I child. I love children, I don't want to hurt them or cause them pain. I never so much as raise my voice to a child.

The only condition under which I would even consider having sex or sexual contact with the child is if I believed that the child wanted it (of their own free will) and would enjoy it (and probably also only if the child initiated it). I have never had that occur. If it did I would not consider it molestation and I would have no moral issues if I had sex with the child, but I probably would not do so for fear of incarceration (and also from concern that the child would be harmed in the long-term by societies negative views and perceptions of child sexuality and adult/child sex).

If you ever touch a child, even if you think they want it for whatever fucked up reason you can conjure up, I hope said child's mother finds you and puts a bullet in your skull.

You aren't human.

Many children are sexual (this is widely acknowledged by child psychologist), many (most) children participate in sexual play by themselves and/or with other children.

It is not unthinkable that a child would be interested in sexual play with an adult. I don't have to conjure up reasons when it is well known fact that many children are interested in sex.

I am just as human as you, and apparently a quite a bit more accepting human at that.

pfta2a, reddit 9 Comments [3/19/2017 3:50:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125552

IAMA exclusive non offending pedophile.

I'm am attracted to girls 3-13. I'm not attracted to all girls, there is a certain type that I am mainly attracted to, just like with any other attraction. Some guys like blondes and others like brunettes. The emotional connection comes if I get to know the girl. There is a weird thing that if I'm in a shitty mood and I see a girl being cute, skipping or doing something else, it like instantly makes me feel better. But that isn't a real emotional connection at all.

If by "not crossing societies lines" you mean not molesting a girl. That easy. Just because I have this attraction doesn't mean that I don't know right from wrong. I know that acting on my urges is wrong and only leads to harming girls and that is the last things I want. I don't ever want to be the cause of a girl being hurt.

Society would say that just being around kids in general is crossing the line. If that is what you are meaning, well I don't follow that. I spend time with girls that are in my life, whether they are my family or my friends children or whatever. I'm not this devious person who only wants to harm a girl. I do truly care about the girls that I have a close relationship with. I love being a part of their life and being a good influence on them so they can mature and develop into successful women.

To be honest, I'd be uncomfortable if you were around my daughter but I suppose that's my own hang up. This subject is very interesting to me and I'm very grateful for your willingness to be open.

I'm sure a lot of people would be uncomfortable, but there are some that wouldn't be uncomfortable too. In my case only my parents know, that I like little girls. They know who I truly am and know I would never harm anyone.

But the girls I mostly am around, well their parents do not know at all. I fear that at this point in time, if they knew it would only cause the girls more harm. They would be questioned about everything I have done and most likely told that I every genuine nice thing I have done, was done to groom them. Where in reality, all the nice things have been done out of goodness and just myself being a nice person.

Who do you want to fuck, even though it would be a really bad idea

My friends 9 and 12 year old daughters

throwawayama10, reddit 11 Comments [3/19/2017 3:50:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125550

in response to a woman finding out her boyfriend is a pedophile

His sexuality probably can't be changed. But that doesn't mean he is a threat. Many men find woman attractive and are not found attractive by those woman. They don't go and rape them. So, your boyfriend isn't a threat to children just because he is attracted to them.

Remember, it isn't wrong to be attracted to children;

howlinggale, reddit 4 Comments [3/19/2017 3:48:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125548

It would be of big importance what kind of pedo's he is going after, if he is going after any pedo regardless of what kind, thats well beyond something I am ok, or indifferent about, cause ya know people that actually don't harm children but say look at loli **** can and sometimes are considered by law to be pedos and they really arent hurting anyone. Also there is the whole evidence thing.

That being said, on one hand I don't like kiddie fiddlers, but on the other hand I believe in basic human rights and more importantly fair legal treatment and the whole innocent until proven guilty thing. Also don't like vigilantes outside of cases where the law is doing NOTHING about a problem, like the rapeugee **** and the whole sex slave **** in Rotherham or w/e it was.

child porn, of any kind, even loli hentai type stuff, is illegal in several places across the world. Still I don't want someone getting murdered for not actually hurting anyone, and I know people will argue that they are contributing to the harm of children, which is a dangerous mind set in of itself, as the person in question that is just looking at the stuff is not doing it.

Looking at child porn is one of them grey zone on the fence kinda thing, I don't like the idea of a child being abused for that ****, but at the same time I'm not going to blame the person viewing it for the abuse, it gets a little more one sided with pay for content type **** but still its hard for me to side either way on this and there are a ton of different ideals fighting against each other over it for me, specially when you consider that the outcome is someone's life is pretty much ruined if convicted for simply watching the ****.

arkis, funnyjunk 10 Comments [3/19/2017 3:47:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125547

The issue is that the mind is ever developing until we hit a peak and decay, like most things in a body, for a female peak fertility is probably 16-29. After that aging catches up and eggs start to run out. A woman has limited time to reproduce most healthy. To begin with the way it works. During puberty all the eggs start getting released, they basically freeze and unfreeze over time, problem is, the longer they stew the more chance for genetic errors, resulting in increasing rates of birth disorder or miscarrages as women get older. The idea that adults are 20+ and marriage even further hitting 30s, is not just bad for marriage rates, but bad biologically.

This is reality and we all have to live in it. Women are naturally attracted to older mates and men naturally attracted to younger ones. Being reasonable is important but I think the acceptable range is higher than most people think and irrelevant beyond a certain point.

We wouldn't hit puberty so early if nature didn't design **** that way and actually we're hitting puberty sooner and developing faster than ever before. And the average age varies by race but on average starts at 11.5. The idea that you're not an adult until almost a decade later is ludicrous.

There's almost no point at which something stops growing, and in reality, adulthood is actually the point at which the body begins to degrade and that's what aging is. We may have "long lifespans" but the reality is our minds don't.

You're literally looking at just the reproductive side of things. Nature also didn't intend for us to be monogamous or to wear clothes, or to **** in a toilet. If you're advocating for some 30+ year old creep to **** 11 year olds then move to Saudi Arabia. As I already said Physically ready to pop out kids does not equal mentally ready. Naturally we develop faster because a normal life span before modern technology was 30, we aren't meant to live as long as we do.

The BRAIN being "not finished" is always used as an argument but the BRAIN doesn't live long. By twenties it's literally all decline. 13+ but by 16 I say it's all fair game for both men and women, in fact I think we should graduate high school by 16 and gain basic legal rights, by 20ish we might graduate an average college run with no hicups. Then start a family bin the mid 20s. society, I repeat, cannot continue to push adolescence further and further the United States birthrate is already 1.8 Japan whose population is literally dying off is 1.4
The BRAIN being "not finished" is always used as an argument but the BRAIN doesn't live long.
By twenties it's literally all decline.
13+ but by 16 I say it's all fair game for both men and women, in fact I think we should graduate high school by 16 and gain basic legal rights, by 20ish we might graduate an average college run with no hicups. Then start a family bin the mid 20s.
society, I repeat, cannot continue to push adolescence further and further

the United States birthrate is already 1.8
Japan whose population is literally dying off is 1.4

infinitereaper, funnyjunk 14 Comments [3/19/2017 3:47:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125546

Harry Potter revolves around witchcraft. Whether real or pretend, the bible is clear on witchcraft. Have nothing to do with it. Whether you think it's pretend or for real. The bible doesn't differentiate between that, and neither should you. I understand it may be difficult to let go, I have had to let go of things I loved so that my walk with God would continue to grow well. But honestly, the sooner the better

Daring Handsome, TheRebulation 17 Comments [3/19/2017 3:47:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125545

(Heavily edited version of a recent overly long post I saw on FDST. From looking at the comments, I can tell that I am not the only one who has a problem with the original's length, so I felt that making an abridged version was necessary and perfectly justified):

The dictionary defines fable as: "fantasy/fiction/falsehood dependent for effect on strangeness of setting (as other worlds or times) and of characters (as supernatural or unnatural beings); the setting is usually in a non-existent or unreal world, the characters are fanciful or unreal, or the conflict focuses on physical or scientific principles not yet discovered or contrary to present experience."

Fantasy is especially dangerous for children. While most children in the 1970s knew enough truth to place divination in the forbidden realm of the occult, today's children -- who often feel more comfortable with occult games than Biblical truth -- see nothing wrong with pagan practices...Most true Christians would recognize fantasy, such as the movie Star Wars, as being extremely wicked (in this case, sorcery -- "The Force" being equivalent to black magic and white witchcraft)...Isaiah 32:6 describes error against the Lord. All lies are against God (1 John 2:21; John 8:44). Satan is the father of lies. Since fantasy is not true, then it is a lie!

Fantasy is an attack on the very core of one's being as a follower of Christ! If a Christian is loving the Lord with all his MIND (imagination), he will be dwelling on truth, reality, His Word, and Him, NOT FAIRY TALES AND FANTASY! Fantasy typically is filled with evil. What should be the Christian's perspective of evil (Rom. 16:19)? If we love the Lord with all our MINDS, then we will not only avoid taking any pleasure in fantasy, but we will hate it. Because fantasy is anti-reality, it is against godliness, it opens the door to deceit, and is an affront to the very core of your being as a Christian.

Anonymous, rapidnet.com 16 Comments [3/19/2017 1:56:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125544

Is this BS story back again? More of the rewriting of history to make this stupid teenager from up North in Chicago a martyr instead of a fool who was warned by his cousins to leave her alone and not to be whistling at her. He was also bragging he had a white girlfriend back home. There was a PBS Special called the American Experience where they already did this his story and went into full detail of the events leading up to this murder. PBS being Progressive would have changed it to make him look like a totally innocent person in his death.

I suspect this co@cky teenager would have grown up to be a rapist of a white women or a Pimp back home in Chicago if he had lived.

Jake West, CBS News 12 Comments [3/19/2017 1:53:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 125539

Another aspect of the whole 'spirit husband/spirit wife' phenomenon that I've previously written about doesn't involve demonic spirits.

It involves witches and warlocks (male witches) who have mastered the ability to travel on the astral plane through astral projection, and enter into people's bedrooms while their victims are asleep. In such a vulnerable state the victim is subject to sexual, psychic and even physical assaults.

You might recall older folks who would talk about witches riding their backs at night. Or a hag sitting on their chest so they couldn't breathe. This is what they were referring to.

Many Christians scoff at or make light of witchcraft and occult power. They treat it as if it's not real or does not exist. Let me assure you that witchcraft and the occult are very real. And it can be used to bring much harm into the lives of those who are unaware or unprotected against such attacks. Including believers.

What leaves a believer vulnerable to attacks from demonic spirits and witches? SIN! Sin is the devil's legal right to bring destruction into your life. This is why sin must be acknowledged and confessed (not hidden) in order to prevent the enemies of the cross from bringing havoc into our existence.

"Confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The earnest prayer of a righteous person has great power and produces wonderful results." James 5:16

When a Christian is living right and keeping themselves on the path of righteousness, the devil has no legal grounds on which to successfully attack them. He can try, but he cannot succeed. The same goes for his agents.

"Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Draw near to God, and He will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded. Grieve, mourn, and weep. Turn your laughter to mourning, and your joy to gloom. Humble yourselves before the Lord, and He will exalt you." James 4:7-10

So if you're a believer who likes to frequent bars and nightclubs: you're playing on dangerous ground. Those are demonic hangout spots - no matter how much you may have enjoyed going there for the drinks and music. And when you're in such an environment you make yourself subject to spiritual attacks.

I talk about more of this in my upcoming ebook 'Diva Goddess Queen 2: Rebirth of the Mother-Goddess.' I'm writing this book because believers in Jesus Christ must become astute about satanic weaponry! We cannot continue acting as if the devil is not real.

This is not something to become mystified or transfixed about the way Hollywood attempts to do. Believers in Jesus Christ have a power that's far greater than all occult power.

We operate with the highest level of divine wisdom, protection and authority that exists: the kind that no witch or demon can successfully stand against nor resist.

But we do need to be aware of how our enemies operate.
If you haven't done so yet now's the perfect time to pre-order the upcoming ebook. And if you're still holding out on getting the first edition of Diva Goddess Queen: do so now before tomorrow night prior to midnight. That's when the sale is officially over and the price goes up to what it should be. Just follow the link below.

Mack Major, Facebook 16 Comments [3/19/2017 1:52:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125538

[Comment under '"Paris, once known as Europe's city of romance is now an Islamic terror hot bed. France, save yourselves in the upcoming elections!"']

Who are they going to elect that will not only stop kebab but remove kebab? All kebab must be removed - men, women, children.

JonathanLamppost, Reddit - r/The_Donald 14 Comments [3/19/2017 1:52:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125536

Regarding the talk about FAKE NEWS, remember: the two greatest FAKE NEWS items permeating the culture are molecules-to-man evolution and millions of years.

The claim that the universe and life arose by natural processes is one of those FAKE NEWS items that permeates education and the culture.

The ministry of Answers in Genesis, Creation Museum, and Ark Encounter exist to help overcome the FAKE NEWS and disseminate the truth of creation and the gospel message. “Have you not known? Have you not heard?The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth” (Isaiah 40:28).

Ken Ham, Ken Ham's Facebook page 14 Comments [3/19/2017 1:51:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 125534

My conclusion. I don’t need any gigantic penis and 8-packs. All I need now is my own immortal body that can fly. I wanna meet Jesus in the air. And, in the New Millennium, I can ask Jesus to go naked swimming with me in an island in the Pacific. I really would rather peek Jesus’ immortal gorgeous penis bumping and jumping just like a very extremely gorgeous pendulum swinging backward and forward in a really fast way when we both go naked playing volleyball on pearl-white sands of beach. I don’t need a huge jumbo walking HIV in human form with 8-packs and a gigantic penis, earthly and fast aging and dirty and deadly and very poor and very stupid. Bear in mind. I’m an extraordinarily smart Bella Boy, and I’ve found my Edward, Lord Jesus. I’m taken. So, any earthly Jacob with 8-packs and a gigantic penis is simply just a huge jumbo walking HIV in human form to me. Don’t bother me and get lost.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 6 Comments [3/19/2017 1:51:15 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 125533

Do you know why I love Twilight? Because I’m Bella. I’m 100% Bella. Bella is I. Her mind and her loyalty is my mind and my loyalty. My lover doesn’t have to be 6 or 8 packs with a gigantic penis. I’m a very extremely Bella Boy. I’m Bella. I’m very extremely Bella-like. Only one exception, I’m a Christian and she is an atheist. The way Bella talks is my way when talking. The way Bella thinks and ponders in her mind is my way when go thinking and pondering. I’m Peter the Bella. When I see Bella, I see me, I see myself. This is the key crucial and the only reason why I love Twilight series.

The way Bella loves Edward is my way I love Jesus, unconditionally and irrevocably. All I want is I can sink and squeeze my immortal head into and on His big Chest and on His Shoulder in my eternal life. I wanna hear Jesus’ Heart Beat when my ear is stuck on His big Chest. I wanna feel Jesus’ body temperature when being hugged tight in Jesus’ Arms. I wanna hold tight His Hand walking, chatting, talking, laughing on the beach on the earth with the sunset, the sky and clouds radiating in orange glory as the background, just Jesus and I, both smiling and hands holding tight with each other. I wanna dine and eat breakfast with Jesus every day. I wanna see Him face to face. And when He is occupied by other His beloved saints, I can wait.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 17 Comments [3/19/2017 1:51:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 125471

A "huge warrior angel" protect a group of Christians from Muslim extremists who entered their place of worship shouting "Allahu Akbar," determined to kill them.

The Christians, all converts from Islam, were worshiping at a church in Central Africa when a mob of Muslims, angered by the recent evangelistic efforts of the believers, stormed the church, according to a report from Bibles for Mideast, an underground Christian ministry that distributes Bibles and conducts evangelism in Asia, South Africa and the Middle East.

The mob, brandishing swords and iron bars, shouted "Allahu Akbar" - "Allah is Great" - while destroying the church and ripping off the church roof. Then, they turned to the Christians, determined to kill them for their faith. One man stabbed the pastor's neck with a large sword.

Suddenly, Pastor Musthafa, the leader of the church, felt an invisible person - who he later identified as a "huge warrior angel" - pull him away from the blade.

The attacker, unable to regain his composure or aim, ended up injuring himself with his own sword. Furious, the attackers began beating believers.

Amid the chaos, heavy rain and blustery winds unexpectedly formed with thunder and lightning, swirling around the church and surrounding area. Massive drops of rain fell on the attackers like stones, throwing them into disarray.

Miraculously, the believers stayed dry and protected from the downpour - and suddenly, everyone then became aware of a large cloud overshadowing the church, shielding believers from the rain. The Christians then saw the Lord Jesus in the cloud, and fell to their knees before Him. Terrified, the Muslim extremists fled, fighting to run through the hailstorm.

Leah Marieann Klett, Gospel Herald 19 Comments [3/19/2017 1:50:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: zipperback

Quote# 125162

ippy...It doesn't matter if you don't believe. :) That is just your path of development. You will also get there like everyone else. Maybe in your next birth you will be a Yogi living in the Himalayas...you never know! ;)

Making someone understand is very difficult. Taking the simple instance of the moon landing deniers. How can you possibly convince them that people have actually landed on the moon? Anything you argue or show them could be mocked and dismissed. That is the way their mind is programmed and that will not change easily.

Similarly, if someone does not believe that there is anything beyond the mundane realities of the body, earth and so on, there is nothing anyone can do to convince them that there is something. All philosophy and detailed spiritual teachings are for those who accept them in the first place.

Sriram, Religion and Ethics 7 Comments [3/19/2017 1:50:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 125530

A 19-year-old aspiring model was killed by a train during a photo shoot at the tracks.

Heartbreaking? Reports released in 2 successive days for what? An unmarried pregnant 19 year old from a broken family who was working on her second child with a 25 year old bum outside of Houston gets run over by a BNSF freight train for lack of common sense. Great story. Next!

American Citizen, Yahoo! News 20 Comments [3/18/2017 6:21:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 125528

Jesus is immortal white, which means He must be very extremely gorgeous and, of course, yummy and tasty when eating Him, and He is the Creator of mandarin, my real Ancestor and Origin. Oh, baby, right now, I am on the peak, on the climax, on the pinnacle, of love towards Jesus. Now, absolutely, on the ultimate peak, climax and pinnacle. I’m gotta strip Jesus’ clothes off, just shirtless, not completely naked, whenever He hangs out with me in my own mansion He gives to me. I’m gotta be so speechless and joyfully stunned and submerge myself into His ultimate beauty of His immortal white skin plus a little bit sun-tan, a perfect mix, my ultimately favorite skin color, and all immortal, and His big chest and immortal 8-packs. My Sugar Daddy and Darling.

usachinanukewar, All-out US-China nuclear war, looming, to wipe out one-fourths of the earth 22 Comments [3/18/2017 6:20:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 125526

Royce continues to insist that Jesus is named in the Constitution, and has expended several days defending this position by insulting people, telling them to look it up, or calling them lies, but has not simply shown us where it is.

[Posts the full text of the entire United States Constitution, in its entirety, except the signatures.]

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Thank you for showing and proving that it is YOU that is dishonest and most likely a Liar because I doubt VERY much that you accidentally just happened to leave out the one section of the Constitution that PROVES you wrong!!

See folks, go read this section for yourself and then you will see how dishonest and deceiving these Deceivers are.

Yes, you are dishonest and a deceiver. I have shown that I am honest. I have left out nothing of the text of the US Constitution. I stated at the top that I did not include the signatories, and that is because they are not relevant.

The only person that is dishonest here is you. You have not been able to show anywhere in the text of the US Constitution where the words "God", "Christ", or "Jesus" are mentioned.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
LOL. Actually you've proved and continue to prove by that very statement that it is YOU who is dishonest and a deceiver. YOU are the one who posted the INCOMPLETE Constitution with the obvious intent to deceive by leaving out the VERY part of the Constitution that PROVES you wrong.

"I stated at the top that I did not include the signatories, and that is because they are not relevant."

More deception and distraction!! You and I both know that the signatures are NOT the only thing you left out. Again, anyone can go look for themselves now and you will be revealed for exactly who you are.

"The only person that is dishonest here is you. You have not been able to show anywhere in the text of the US Constitution where the words "God", "Christ", or "Jesus" are mentioned."

More deception and distraction. Unfortunately for you, you quoted my exactly words previous stated and when one goes and reads the Constitution you slide-of-hand will be revealed.

[Again reposts the entire text of the Constitution.]

"God, Christ, Jesus is clearly stated in the Constitution." WHERE? If it does not use those words it's not there!

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Oh sheesh, another ignorant, lazy, cretin with an anti-Jesus avatar that proves their either uneducated and don't understand how to read and understand simple English or to much of a God-hater and too fearful to actually go look for the Truth for fear of what they'll find.

Thank you. I appreciate you showing that to everyone!

Jenny Ondioline:
I just went looking. He is right. No mention of Jesus or Christ in the Constitution. That's a lot of names you just called somebody for stating the truth. I wonder how many names you will call me now for pointing this out.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
Well, ya better go look again because it's right there in black & white. Well, let's see, since you just told a lie what name do you think fits? Whattaya call someone who tells lies openly in public? I'm guessing you're not blind since you seem to have no problem in choosing to come here and repeatedly and regularly repeat your lies and other nonsense.

All you pointed out is that you either are knowingly and intentionally lying in order to deceive or simply ignorant and have no grasp at all on the English language.

It's right there in the Constitution and every single Signer of the Constitution publicly and permanently acknowledged that Jesus Christ IS Lord.

Thanks for proving the Word of God true by saying the exact same thing that many have said here before on this very sight (and others) and been proven wrong. It only goes to prove Eph. 2:1-3 true and that y'all are being led around by Satan like a dog on a leash. Just regurgitating the same old lines over and over and over again. All the while making fools of yourselves.

Royce E. Van Blaricome, Christian News Network 16 Comments [3/18/2017 6:20:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125524

Royce continues to insist that Jesus is named in the U.S. Constitution, but refuses to show where.

"Ever watch Bill O'Reilly when he gives the "Word of the Day"? If so, you'll be familiar with "Go look it up. If someone gives you the answers you don't learn anything and you don't remember it.""

No, I do not watch Bill O'Reilly, or any similar show. And I have looked it up. I have read through the US Constitution and its Amendments numerous times. Your claim is unsupported.

"Thank you for posting the website address for all to go to. I appreciate that. I actually went there and I appreciate you proving yourself wrong."

Actually, that site proves that you are the one that is wrong.

"It's right there on that very site you gave in black & white, MUCH APPRECIATED!!"

Then state the Article or Amendment, Section, and paragraph. You made the positive assertion, so you need to support it. Or do I need to post the entire text of the US Constitution to show that you are wrong? Nobody else sees what you claim is there.

You are the only one that is showing himself to be blind. Or more likely, dishonest.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
"No, I do not watch Bill O'Reilly, or any similar show. And I have looked it up. I have read through the US Constitution and its Amendments numerous times. Your claim is unsupported."

Well, maybe you should. Might learn something. And thanks for showing that you're just as blind as the other yahoo's on here who deny what's right there in black & white.

"Actually, that site proves that you are the one that is wrong."

Nope. Just proves your either outright lying, too ignorant to read, or so steeped in your own delusion and denial that you can't see what's right before your very eyes. But hey, take comfort. There have been many others who were in the same boat and ALL have been proven wrong as well. So you're not alone.

"Then state the Article or Amendment, Section, and paragraph. You made the positive assertion, so you need to support it. Or do I need to post the entire text of the US Constitution to show that you are wrong? Nobody else sees what you claim is there."

I don't need prove squat to you. As I've repeated said here, you people can't read black & white right before your eyes so cutting and pasting it here isn't gonna help you!

You wanna post the "entire Constitution" to show me I'm wrong - have at buddy. I look forward to seeing you prove yourself a Liar and deceptive in public. Just as you did with your false statement that nobody else sees it. Others most certainly have.

"You are the only one that is showing himself to be blind. Or more likely, dishonest."

Take a chainsaw to that Giant Sequoia Tree sticking outta your eye socket and maybe you'll see better and not be so blind.

Sorry, but I am not the one that is blind. Unlike you, I do not need talk show hosts to learn things. I can research the subject on my own. And despite your claims, I am extremely literate, honest, grounded in reality, not in denial, and I can easily see what is in front of me.

You have not proven me wrong. You have been committing logical fallacies right an left. You have been trying to shift the burden of proof, probably because you cannot support your claims. You have been engaging in ad hominems for the same reason. You have also engaged in a few more logical fallacies.

Unlike you, I am not delusional. I cannot see what is not there.

You have made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. That is a positive assertion, and you have been challenged to support your claims. You have not even been asked to post the exact text, just the location of it. You have refused to do so repeatedly. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a liar. You cannot support your claims, and thus you have been defeated.

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
You're sorry, alright. And you are blind - spiritually-blind.

If you're so doggone literate, honest, and grounded in reality, then STOP telling lies and do the honest thing - cite the WHOLE Constitution right here so everyone can see you're lying!!

And now you lie openly. I never made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains 'multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. Anyone can go back and see exactly what I said. Nice attempt at the typical Liberal tactic of Distraction & Diversion.

" You have refused to do so repeatedly. Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a liar. You cannot support your claims, and thus you have been defeated."

ROTFLMBO!!!! So you think that's a reasonable conclusion? LOL When what I've said and maintained all along is 1) Go read the Constitution yourself, and 2) It would do me NO good whatsoever to actually copy & paste it here because it would still be in Black & White which you EVIDENTLY can NOT read!! LOL

I have supported my claims and you have NOT. Because you CAN'T!! The B&W text proves you wrong EVERY time!!!!!!!!! LOL

Defeated? Ha ha ha LOLOLOLOLOL It's easy to see who's been defeated. YOU and all the others who can't read and understand plain English! LOL

"You're sorry, alright. And you are blind - spiritually-blind."

Actually, I see very clearly. I removed the blinders that you wear decades ago.

"If you're so doggone literate, honest, and grounded in reality, then STOP telling lies and do the honest thing - cite the WHOLE Constitution right here so everyone can see you're lying!!"

I have not been telling any lies. And I have cited the entire Constitution and shown everyone that you have been lying.

"And now you lie openly. I never made the assertion that the USA Constitution contains 'multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in its text. Anyone can go back and see exactly what I said. Nice attempt at the typical Liberal tactic of Distraction & Diversion."

Actually, I have been telling the truth all along. It is usually a Conservative tactic to Distract and Divert the conversation, since you have been the one that has been engaging in that tactic, not me.

As far as when you claimed that the US Constitution contained multiple references to "God", "Jesus", and "Christ" in the text, you should really review your own posting history before making such a challenge. Its child's play to show that you are lying again.

[Reposts the conversation so far.]

Royce E. Van Blaricome:
[Calls each post dishonest, or lies, but offers no refutation.]

Royce E. Van Blaricome, Christian News Network 9 Comments [3/18/2017 6:20:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 125522

Amos Moses:
"Maison recently decided to have her breasts removed and changed her name to Eric."
"“How society views me and my relationship—I don’t care, they don’t live in my house. Us and our children are the only ones who matter,”"

mmmmm .... still a woman ......... breasteses does not make you a woman nor does their removal change you what you were born as ..... rebellion to the truth and nothing else ...... the DNA is not altered by fat removal ........... even rebellion to science and common sense .... /SMH .......

Ambulance Chaser:
Okay, what is this person's DNA sequence?

Amos Moses:
more straw for your strawman, sir? ...................... maybe we could stuff it in like the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz .............

Ambulance Chaser:
So, you have no idea. Got it.

You're going to opine long and loud about how a certain person's "DNA" makes them a woman, but you don't know what his/her DNA sequence is.

Do you know what DNA is in general?

Amos Moses:
no ... you have a strawman argument that HAS NO STRAW .....

Ambulance Chaser:
Let me try this again, since you don't seem to be grasping it:

"the DNA is not altered by fat removal"

So I'm asking you: What is her DNA, since you seem to be the expert on it? And while you're at it, what is it about her DNA that makes her female?

I'm simply asking you to back up your own statements.

Amos Moses:
You serious?

[Posts video of sardonic laughter]

Ambulance Chaser:
Yes, I'm serious. Now answer the question.

Amos Moses:
no .... you are not serious ............ strawman ...... flame on torch ............ *crackle, crackle, crackle* ...............

[Posts video of burning a strawman]

you can borrow my crayon to connect the dots .............

Ambulance Chaser:
Do you know what a strawman is? You seem to be having trouble with that too.

Amos Moses:
"A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man"."

That be you .............

Amos Moses, Christian News Network 21 Comments [3/18/2017 6:18:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 125503

Christians Should Support The Travel Ban

Hypocrisy and false narratives are expanding in this brand new year under President Trump’s control. Thank God this man is keeping his promises to the American people who are tired of empty rhetoric. President Trump just issued an executive order a few days ago that banned immigration and refugee travel for 7 countries labeled as sources of terror by the Obama administration. Somehow taking Obama’s own notation of these countries containing terror cells is racist: the hypocrisy is laughable. You also never saw the Left crying and screaming when Obama banned Iraqi refugees for six months or when Jimmy Carter banned Iranian refugees for a period of time. I can handle hypocrisy, but I cannot handle the personal attacks against Christians that are not lined up outside of the White House or airports acting like fools with the rest of the Left.

The Left and their faction of liberal Christians have used Leviticus to push the narrative that if you support the travel ban, then you are not a Christian and have no compassion. Let me quickly educate you on why this is not only false, but very offensive. Leviticus talks about how foreigners that reside in your country should be treated fairly and kindly as you would your own brothers and sisters. The Left is twisting this to say that we are obligated to go against the warnings of our national security advisers, who say that ISIS and other organizations will infiltrate the refugee population, in the name of compassion and tolerance. The Bible does not say to show compassion at the expense of your own safety.

LPTREY, Th3 Platform 8 Comments [3/18/2017 6:17:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 125502

A pastor in a fundamentalist Christian sect that rejects doctors and drugs has been charged in the death of a child -- his own granddaughter -- from medical neglect.

The novel prosecution is raising hopes among some advocates that it might spur change in a church that has resisted it.

Faith Tabernacle Congregation has long told adherents to place their trust in God alone for healing. As a result, dozens of children, mostly in Pennsylvania, have died of preventable and treatable illnesses.

Church members reject modern medicine as a bedrock tenet of their faith, even as some have faced manslaughter charges in child deaths dating back 35 years.

Until now, though, no leader in the sect has ever faced charges.

With a routine course of antibiotics, 2-year-old Ella Foster would have almost certainly beaten the pneumonia that took her life in November. But her parents refused medical care, and she succumbed shortly after they asked the Rev. Rowland Foster to anoint her.

Foster, 72, pastor of a Faith Tabernacle Congregation church district in Berks County, was charged with a felony this month under a state law requiring clergy members, teachers and other "mandated reporters" to turn the names of suspected child abusers over to authorities for investigation.

The law makes no exception for clergy who happen to be related to the abused child, as Foster was to Ella.

Most states have similar laws that require clergy to report abuse.

"He was well aware of the fact that this child was in need of medical treatment and he never reported it, nor do I believe that he ever had the intention to report it," Berks County District Attorney John Adams, whose office is prosecuting Foster, said in an interview.

Cathleen Palm, of the Pennsylvania-based Center for Children's Justice, said she hopes the prosecution, at a minimum, will spur action in the Legislature to protect children whose parents don't seek necessary medical care based on religion.

Neither the Rev. Foster nor his attorney returned calls for comment.

Ella's parents, Jonathan and Grace Foster, were charged earlier with involuntary manslaughter and await trial. Police have said Jonathan Foster attributed Ella's death to "God's will."

The reclusive sect, founded in Philadelphia more than a century ago, does not give media interviews.

At the Faith Tabernacle church and school campus in Mechanicsburg, where Rowland Foster is the pastor, an Associated Press reporter who entered the building was quickly ordered to leave. An older man who accepted a letter seeking comment from church officials promised to shred it.

Faith Tabernacle Congregation, Lehigh Valley Live 14 Comments [3/18/2017 6:17:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125479

Pagan drunk leprechauns. God hates your idol St Patrick's Day. Jesus is God, not homosexual St.Patrick.

KJVwarlord, Twitter 19 Comments [3/18/2017 6:10:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125478

We shouldn't be too contemptuous of the Venezuelans, though. They fell for socialism. We fell for feminism and civic nationalism. All three concepts are equally stupid, as all three fly completely in the face of our current understanding of the relevant sciences as well as thousands of years of written human history.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 5 Comments [3/18/2017 6:10:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 125477

Congressman Steve King [R, Iowa] believes dog fighting should not be illegal in in the United States.

His explanation for this baffling statement? Since humans are allowed to fight, why not allow dogs as well? ‘It’s wrong to rate animals above human being’ King opinatined during an interview at a town hall.

‘There is something wrong with society to make it a crime to watch dog fighting, but there is no law that bans somebody to watch people fight’. (An audio recording of his statement can be listened below in the video).

[Commentary by the author removed]

Unfortunately, Mr. King has a lot to catch up. I have also learned that this is not the first time Congressman King has sparked outrage in the animal rights community.

1. In February 2010, King tweeted that he chased and shot a raccoon because the helpless animal had tried to get into his house during a powerful storm.

2. In July 2012, King strongly opposed the McGovern amendment (in connection to the 1012 farm bill) that would have established penalties for knowingly attending an animal fiht and for bringing underage children to such events.

3. King was also one of the members that voted against an upgrade of penalties for transporting fighting animals across state lines in 2007.

Steve King, Doggies 18 Comments [3/18/2017 6:10:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 16 | top