Quote# 125301

SAVAGE or whoever the hell this maggot is certainly is an uneducated man when he belittles the greatest first lady this nation has ever had. Even JACKIE KENNEDY doesn't come close for she was an adulterer. Michelle OBAMA should be in a freak show for she has a penis. Nancy REAGAN was a smart alec and insulted the Russian President's Gorbachev's wife. SAVAGE YOU ARE THE SMARTEST OF ALL OUTHOUSES. SET AN BE SILENT WHILE THE FLIES FEAST ON YOU.

Gaylon Barrow, Sarah Palin 34 Comments [3/11/2017 8:19:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 125300

"For objective morality to exist, a God is not necessary." No, not really. Aristotle argues it quite well as does Plato. We know that humans all desire happiness and that happiness is found in the good. From there, we can deduce things that are good. That is why there is a tradition in Christian moral theology of the Natural Virtues: Prudence, Patience, Temperance, Justice, and Fortitude. The ability of reason to apprehend what is good and act on it is reflected in Dante's Divine Comedy. Virgil, personifying the limits of human reason, can only guide Dante through Hell and Purgatory. It take theological virtues, specifically Faith informing Reason, to be able to apprehend heaven at all. Take a look at pagan conceptions of the afterlife. Not very joyous places. Elysium is pretty cool but the best they can come up with is that you don't have to work anymore.

What I was suggesting is that you approached the conversation with a complete disregard for the actual position held and created a hilarious straw man.


Master Samwise, Disqus - Religion 12 Comments [3/11/2017 8:18:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 125299

People always trip me out with these!

I was going through my weekly 'hate mail' and came across this one here. It stood out to me because this person went out of their way to send a personal email.

Commenting on my page is a privilege - not a right. I don't have to entertain someone else's bull or negative opinions about what I do - and I won't.

There's no Bible verse you can point me to that tells me 'Thou shalt allow others to bully you into hosting their stupid comments on your Facebook page!'

I go out of my way NOT to delete or block people - against the better wishes and advice of my team - because I do believe in open dialogue. But I refuse to debate scriptures with novices, neophytes or those who are just plain are dumb when it comes to the things of God.

I won't waste a single brain cell on you.

Word to the wise: when someone tells you to get lost, it's best to just leave. Blocking someone is about the clearest hint you can give that you don't wish to dialogue with them.

It's really weird when they feel the need to email you like this nutjob here, simply because you won't entertain their retardation.

Lastly, there's an entire movement of so-called 'believers' out there who think it's their mission in life to go around policing what other believers are doing in their work or ministries. They call themselves having an 'exposing' ministry; and some refer to themselves as apologists.

But many of them are really just jealous of the success they perceive other believers to have - a success they cannot duplicate in their own lives.

When you start counting another minister's money or wishing ill on their success, you are WAY out of line. That's actually covetousness: the very thing Christ and the writers in the NT warned us about as it relates to money.

The 'love of money' doesn't apply to those who know how to honorably get it. It applies to those who make it their business to count someone else's money as if it's their divine right to do so.

God despises such behavior, because behind it are the spirits of greed, hate and murder. Which is why these individuals go around assassinating the characters and work of other ministers and believers.

They are less like Christ and more like Cain; and true godly repentance and a baptism of genuine love provides the only cure for the covetous heart.

Anyway, I'm done. Just wanted to use this individual and their goofy baseless comment to point out a few things that seem universal in the body of Christ these days.



Mack Major, Facebook 14 Comments [3/11/2017 8:18:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 125298

Dont these SJW know that normalizing pedophilia is whats next on the agenda? You might wanna go check Vox, CNN, and Huffington Post. How else are they going to learn to live with the muslims in Europe?

Anyway Marie could pass for under 18, its why everyone likes her, its why she is on the cover of the game, its why she was voted number 1. Why dont you go buy your worthless asses some plane tickets to the UK and protest in Rotherham if you give such a f*** about children and stop crying about a video game produced by the cleanest society on earth when you all live among the most vile.


I'm not sure I'd call Japan the cleanest society, especially when, in the case of the Pokémon Anime, they did definitely depict the female characters as sex objects even when they were canonically 10 years old, and besides which, Japan is actually one of the biggest distributers of child porn: http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheistic_Japan_and_child_pornography

However, you are right about one thing: legalizing child porn is next on the SJW's radar whether they know it or not

True pedophiles would, you know, be attracted to people who were literally underage, like, I don't know, those people who actually hit it on with May or Dawn or Serena from Pokémon (who are quite explicitly 10 years old). In fact, Masamitsu Hidaka would qualify as a pedophile since his interview made it VERY clear that he views the girls in Pokémon, all of whom are 10 or younger, as just being sexualized meat for the audience, and with May and Serena, it's extremely obvious due to their having massive breasts.

'all keep waving around MR's manufactured age as if that's proof of non-pedophilia. When at best, it's proof of law-abiding pedophilia.

You're attracted to a character who:
- Looks like a child
- Dresses like a child
- Sounds like a child
- Speaks like a child
- Acts like a child
Etc. The overwhelming number of people meeting these characteristics are children. In fact, these characteristics are what separate children from adults. You're attracted to the things that make children "children." That makes you a pedophile.


*However*, you slam on the brakes if the potential object of your attraction is under age. 14-year-old looking and acting like MR: No go. Exact same person with an earlier birthday: Full steam ahead. That proves you understand and respect the law. Which is really all we can ask of people.




My primary concern is if they are literally children, ie, even their age is indeed 10. I would consider those who hit it off to May, Dawn, Iris, Serena, heck, even Misty from the Pokémon Anime when they are explicitly 10 years old to be pedophiles, NOT those who crush on Marie Rose, who at least is 18 years of age.

At most, Marie Rose would qualify as a manchild, which still doesn't make those who crush on her pedophiles. It's like saying girls who crush on, say, Kefka Palazzo must automatically be pedophiles just because he acts like a child and speaks like a child (literally in this case, since in the Japanese version, he uses the pronoun "boku-chin" which is generally appropriate only for very young children). And bear in mind, Kefka's in his thirties, and it's extremely obvious in Dissidia Final Fantasy that he isn't even close to a child anyway (though since he is somewhat diminutive in Final Fantasy VI, he could look like a child in the latter game).

eric_otness, gamefaqs 5 Comments [3/11/2017 8:18:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 125297

“We are very disappointed in the failure of the public to recognize the existence of a divine Deity walking among them,” the church’s founder Pauline John Andrews stated.” Deity’s often walk the Earth in their flesh form. Beyonce will transcend back to the spirit once her work here on Mother Earth has been completed.”

“As our congregation continues to swell, we ask that you consider what is more real; an invisible spirit on high, or a walking, talking, breathing Goddess who shows you her true form daily? Beyonce’s spirit is entrancing. We know that she was sent to this place to spread love, peace, and joy. While we do not believe Beyonce to be the Creator, we recognize that she still sits among the throne of Gods. There is a lot of false information being spread about our beliefs, but we will correct all of the vicious lie-tellers. As Beyonce spreads her gospel through song and dance, her message provides uplifting, loving, and many times real-life happenings. We humbly ask you to respect our beliefs, just as you want those to respect yours. Open your mind to new possibilities and you will see, just as we did, that Bey is a true higher power. Surfbort!”

National Church of Bey, Tumblr 8 Comments [3/11/2017 8:18:31 AM]
Fundie Index: -2
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 125296

Recently it was also revealed that Disney’s live action version of their masterpiece BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, taken from a traditional fairy tale, will introduce the sidekick of the antagonist to be a sodomite whose wish is not to serve and aid the object of his admiration, but to kiss and caress. This is aimed at a general audience, including children.

Now, as a means to promote a change of opinion, no one book or film is likely to accomplish much, and these things are sure to lose customers and create ill will among their loyal customers, including me. So money is not their motive.

There is a message to the fiction. The message is this: the normal male friendship that obtains between Sancho Panza and Don Quixote, Frodo Baggins and Sam Gamgee, D’Artagnan and the Three Musketeers, Robin and Batman, is now defined as unreal. There are two kinds of love recognized to exist: family love, which is very commonly used now to refer to strong bonds of friendship between team mates, and sexual love, which includes everything else. There is no room for friendship.

John C. Wright, John C. Wright's Journal 14 Comments [3/11/2017 8:14:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: David

Quote# 125295

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1470/9688/products/mockup-bee5d2f8_grande.jpg?v=1486960672

This design pays tribute to The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), which was was created in 1938 to investigate alleged disloyalty and subversive activities on the part of private citizens, public employees, and those organizations suspected of having Communist ties. A perfect design to show subtle disdain for leftists.

Right Wing Death Squad, Right Wing Death Squad 4 Comments [3/11/2017 8:13:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125291

Blood is not thicker than religion. You should get Christians out of your family and your life as quickly as you can. They're corroding and destructive influences on your atheism, and they're always trying to deceive you.

EricNeoMatrix, Friendly Atheist 62 Comments [3/10/2017 6:54:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 125281

I have simply claimed that the conscious will of my soul is responsible for the posts I make on this forum, because I can't envisage any other feasible explanation.

You claim that if my spiritual soul exists, whatever it does will be deterministic in the same way as physical brain activity. But if my free will actions are derived from my soul, you must at least admit that they will have a different origin (being spiritual) to anything produced from physical brain activity. So can I repeat my request for you to say what defines the ultimate source of my posts (and yours). This is not a distraction, but a fundamental issue concerning what drives the conscious free will of human beings.

Alan Burns, Religion and Ethics 12 Comments [3/10/2017 12:30:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 125280

BeWhoYouAre:
I've had an issue with this idea that we choose hell since I first heard it expressed out loud. It's above all dishonest because it's actually a self-righteous Christian saying "you disagree with my belief which is the only thing that can save you, so you are instead choosing hell." When it's entirely reasonable that you might simply reject hell as a concept entirely. The other side doesn't like that answer so they dish back this thing of "yes hell is real and it's there and you don't believe me so you must want to go there then."

Master Samwise:
I think your disconnect is that you seem to disbelieve in an objective moral order. I mean, let's just put the God question aside for a moment and look at the underlying philosophical difference here. For a person who believes in an objective moral order i.e. right and wrong are objective principles that are discovered through reason, not created by it. From this perspective, you comment about the supposed self-righteous Christian would seem laughably insane. Whether or not you agree or disagree does not change the reality that violations of the objective moral order occur. It is like saying that you won't die when you jump off a building because you don't believe in gravity.

This is where, I think, atheists and agnostics and anyone else trying to play gotcha with Christian goes wrong. You are trying to argue against a whole system of metaphysics that, believe it or not, can go on for days about morality without a mention of God without actually engaging the first principles of that system. It would be like a scientist trying to disprove Newton without ever studying Newton beyond his laws of motion.


Master Samwise, Disqus - Religion 7 Comments [3/10/2017 11:24:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 125279

The Main Course



President Trump rips the press again. Many have waited their whole life to see somebody put the media in line the way Trump can. Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

A.F. Branco, Comically Incorrect 25 Comments [3/10/2017 11:23:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 125277

[Comment under "TIL of Ossip Bernstein, a famous chess grandmaster, who was sentenced to death by the Bolsheviks in 1918. While he was facing the firing squad, a russian officer that heard his name offered him the chance to prove his identity in a game of chess. He beat the officer and was released."]

@IndigoCup:
bankers and landlords starve people


There is no evidence and this doesn't even make sense, because they would lose money if their employees died

Collectivized farming is a failure and killed millions


But you're perfectly okay with this...?

Really makes you think ??


Ends justify the means. The USSR became a superpower under Stalin, with average lifespan and standard of living massively increasing.

Stickmanville, Reddit - r/todayilearned 10 Comments [3/10/2017 11:22:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 125271

Degenerates, Communists, and The Left make Fascists.
That's what I absolutely adore: the utter idiocy and inability to avoid the same mistakes over and fucking over again. People have gotten so obsessed with painting Hitler as the Ultimate Evil and obscuring any actual in-depth analysis of his Rise To Power that even the same people who whine about being "doomed to repeat history" are ironically dooming history to repetition.

Firstly the Communists: they go out of their way to hurt as many people as humanly possible and get giddy at human misery, period. We have quotes of Lenin celebrating the fact that his "fellow" Russians were dying of famine because it would weaken the Tsar's grip and get people to abandon their faith in their King and Country. We have Peter Hitchens admitting when he was a Trotskyite that his and his companions constant haranguing for more immigrants wasn't out of any kind of "solidarity", but rather the desire to see his country and the traditional institutions within it destroyed.
You even have people on this very subreddit admitting that they support mass-immigration ultimately to undermine the electoral process by getting a horde of voters in to blindly pass whatever the fuck they want.

Then you have the violence. Communists in Spain murdered innocent Catholics, they killed civilians and butchered businessmen. In Germany they launched a bloody "revolution" at the worst possible moment, thereby ensuring that Germany was that much more weaker at the bargaining table.

Germany is honestly the most ironic example, given we've got this idiotic narrative pushed by anti-fascists that Hitler was essentially "unopposed" in his rise, as if he could say whatever the fuck he wanted and no one would raise their voice: in truth their predecessors, the various red militias in Germany, were wreaking enough habit and threatening him enough that the SA could form fairly easily, and the narrative of the omnipresent "red menace", the violent thugs seeking to destroy Germany, was only reinforced.
And so today you have the far-right rising again; though unlike what the whining left says so far, they aren't fascist--at least not yet.

Fascism is ultimately born when the humiliation, the degeneration, the utter soulless materialism and corruption grows too much for society and it needs an intensive chemo treatment in the form of a dictator.

As for the rise of the alt-right, which is Fascism-lite in my opinion, all you have to do is simply look at the news and come to understand that a not-insignificant group of White Men realized that they had to argue for their peoples continued existence.

The media successfully painted a narrative that White men are evil, and whilst that might be fine for non-whites, many Whites realized that their government has been acting in the best interest of this amorphous blob called "The Nation" rather than simply for "The White Race", and in fact has been catering to Non-Whites for decades in spite of those various minority group's continued failure to reach economic parity with Whites.
Not only that, but The Left is quite honestly the most institutionally privileged "group" (for lack of a better term) in The West: their radicals can attempt to murder people with no legal ramifications, they can destroy property, they can ruin peoples lives and laugh at it whilst being lauded as heroes while their moderates can spew their disgusting ideology on the news, in the classroom, and at work without having to fear the slightest ramification.
Let me ask everyone here why the fuck would anyone want to be some meek little "Conservative" or "Republican" in this environment? If you're moderate you'll be met with violence, expelled, called Racist, Fascist, be humiliated, and if you raise your voice the same institutions which privilege The Left will try to annihilate you.
It reminds me of an old story in the death throes of the Qing Empire: essentially two generals would be late to a meeting due to flooding. One general turned to the other and asked "What's the penalty for being late?" "Death." Replied his peer. The first general pondered for a moment and asked, "What's the penalty for rebellion?" "Death." His peer replied again, and so they weighed their option and decided rebellion was the better choice.

The Left expects The Right to be smeared as hate mongers, as pure evil, to be willingly attacked, to have no sense of job, social, or educational security, and to do all that while being bashed for not grovelling enough... and then its shocked when The Right turns to fascism.
Can anyone provide any decent fucking argument for why Whites shouldn't turn to racial identarianism and race-based hatred? Can anyone provide any single reason why anyone on The Right should give a fuck about Fascism?
"Democracy"? The Left undermined it for centuries, it decided it wasn't going to work for votes, just drag in a bunch of minorities and give them free shit. You have people on this sub openly admitting that.
"Equality"? That quite honestly just means chasing the last white person down and murdering them.

"Treat others the way you wish to be treated"? Why is that always used as a one-way street? Blacks have been howling for blood constantly. Muslims murder people out in the streets. The Left has been treating The Right, even the moderate right, as Satan, and then they sputter and claim that The Right should treat others the way they want to be treated because...? Are we meant to imply that they have been treating us as not the way they wished to be treated themselves?
"Because its Fascism"? Fascism, Racism, Sexism, these words have been abused so-fucking much that Racism means anything from telling a Black chick her hair is curly to lynching blacks in the 60s, what's the worst that can happen if someone actually becomes a Fascist? They're a "double-fascist"?

The Far-Right is on the rise, and The Left has thankfully wrapped a noose around their own neck.

Moprollems, Reddit 14 Comments [3/10/2017 11:09:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 125269

Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL) got into a battle with Rep. Mike Doyle (D-PA) Thursday during a House Committee on Energy and Commerce hearing for the healthcare bill.

While discussing the GOP’s new bill, Doyal asked what Shimkus could possibly have a problem with that is mandated in Obamacare. He rattled off some of the things Americans have said they like, kids being able to stay on their parents’ insurance until 26, not being kicked off for pre-existing conditions or stopping caps on benefits.

Shimkus replied that men shouldn’t have to pay for prenatal care.

“I’m just — I — is that not correct?” Shimkus stuttered. “Should they?”

Doyal seemed so dumbfounded he couldn’t find his words either. He reclaimed his time. “There’s no such thing as ala cart insurance, John,” he explained.

Shimkus said that was the thing he had a problem with. “That’s the point! That’s the point!” he exclaimed. “We want the consumer to be able to go to the insurance market and be able to negotiate on a plan that –”

“You tell me what insurance company will do that,” Doyle interrupted. “There isn’t a single insurance company in the world that does that, John.”

John Shimkus, Raw Story 15 Comments [3/10/2017 10:54:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125263

Why Cant Women Admit that 99% of them are Attracted to only One Man???

Tall, Muscular, Handsome........................99 % of them want this. If Incels looked like this 99% of women wud want them.......

Incels looks restrict them to a very small percentage of women if any at all and the women may reside half way around the world.

Whilst most women are attractive to most men. Even fat ugly women have a harem of men after them even decent looking men.......

Which Sadistic God created this Unfair Sexual Marketplace and why Cant women admit the truth??????

jackville07, /r/incels 24 Comments [3/9/2017 6:04:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 125262

"I've said it before. Any religion that invents a god that invents hell is an evil religion. Think about it. It's practitioners are saying that not only will you go to hell but that you DESERVE hell. You and everyone you love."

It's practitioners are saying that not only will you go to hell but that you DESERVE hell... Not really. It is more that you desire hell and God, being obliging, lets you have your way. Basically, if you choose to have a life apart from God, then He doesn't compel you have one. Granted, life apart from God is bad, but can you blame God for people actively choosing with full knowledge of the intellect the wrong thing? That would be like saying doctors are to blame for people who refuse treatment and die. Sure, they may have lived if they went with the doctor, but they are to blame if their denial of the good causes them suffering.

Master Samwise, Disqus - Religion 21 Comments [3/9/2017 6:04:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 125257

in response to this post


The issue I have with this post is that for the purposes of who it’s appropriate for you to be dating you’re 30, not 17 ,always. To go ‘oooooh which is the age you should be judging the morality of my relationships by 30 or 17 it’s impossible to say!’ you’re implicitly telling people that there’s some ambiguity as to whether having headmates who are minors as an adult means your relationships should be judged as a minor’s relationships. There is not. This is the main point of this reblog and tbh it’s something you need to speak on. Arguing for age gaps between adults being okay shouldn’t be done in ways that could be used to justify child abuse, and that’s a responsibility you take on when you speak on the issue.


We have spoken on it. Repeatedly. And… no, you’re dangerously leaving out an important nuance there: A system member who is a minor, even in an adult body, is still a fucking minor and so probably should not “have their relationships judged as an adult” - they shouldn’t be entering into adult relationships at all. Yes, this leaves an awkward spot where there’s basically no ethical way for some system members to date at all. Again, we’ve spoken publicly on this very issue before, including in direct response to this post.

.You’re not allowed to ignore age completely whether you’re a singlet or not. The age of your body absolutely determines, at least, the minimum age of the people it is ethical for you to date and I don’t know why you continually dance around whether or not you agree with that because you have made it unclear.

.”mental age” is measured in a lot of different ways by a lot of different people, unlike chronological age which is objective and it’s often used to tell disabled people what they can and cannot do so I think it’s up to her to decide the age of the people she is comfortable dating, depending on what exactly she is using the very ambiguous term “mental age” to convey, and her chronological age.

.It’s actually pretty dangerous to a wide variety of people to respond to people saying “23 year olds and 30 year olds shouldn’t date” with but ‘I’m a system and therefore using age as a measure of the morality of a relationship is flawed.’ Like were the “antis” you’re discussing even talking about a relationship that involved systems in any way?

.Also “think carefully about your answer” look it’s so unsettling how you’re conducting this conversation like SEE IF YOU CAN SOLVE THIS PUZZLE I”VE CONCOCTED like people are trying to talk to you about how something you said had some really uncomfortable implications and you should at least try to treat our concerns in a way that’s honest and self-critical and not be trying to like get us to say something wrong so you “win”that’s not how this works.



What SM was arguing in the OP - what we have argued consistently - is that chronological age does not equal narrative age for multiples. SM split in a trauma event 17 years ago. So yes, it is 17 years old. But believe it or not, we aren’t born quite like you. It didn’t need to learn to walk and talk and use a toilet again. It came into existence as a teenager, in a teenage body. It continued to age in real time, so despite having existed for 17 years, it has a narrative age in the mid-30s.
This information has already been explicitly provided to you.
So… your argument is that a system member with a narrative age in the mid-30s, with a body in the mid-30s, is the victim of a gross predator… because she’s in a consensual relationship with someone younger. Because you are utterly fixated on dictating to multiples instead of listening to us about our experience and how your rules get really fucked up and ableist when you apply them to us unilaterally.
What’s even more fucked up is that you’re making this argument after repeatedly arguing that a system member with a narrative age of fourteen should be allowed to date adults because they happen to be in an older body.
Like. Do you have any idea how many different levels of fucked up you’re being here?
Re: mental age: If you know that, then maybe you know better than to apply it to other DD people without their consent? No? What a surprise, consideration for other people’s boundaries and differing situations is not your strong suit.



You seriously could have just said that you’re 30 and your girlfriend is 23 and it’s a healthy relationship without doing all this bullshit
.‘checkmate people who disapprove of relationships between 30 year olds and 23 year olds, I’m also 17’ is an inherently dangerous sentiment, deflecting criticism of your relationship based on the age of your body by bringing up your chronological age of your alter absolutely cosigns some pedophiles’ justifications
.



2. Well, there’s the aspect that we’ve brought up repeatedly and you literally just acknowledged: Basing your decisions solely on the age of the body opens up two loopholes for the abuse of children.

I have never seen someone so determined to allow for the abuse of children in my life.

2.5. They weren’t just calling it “inherently predatory,” they were calling it “pedophilic.” That is the absurdity I was responding to. There is no, repeat no, way for a relationship between two adults to be pedophilic.

3. I could’ve done a lot of things. I chose to write a quick snarky post to vent some of my frustration. This is just tone-policing a mentally ill woman for not responding to ableism politely enough for you. Fuck off.

4. “Your expressed policies paint me as simultaneously predator and victim of the same person, this is absurd” is not an inherently dangerous statement. I wasn’t deflecting criticism of my relationship - I was responding to criticism of a fictional relationship and the fact that it leaves zero room for me to exist. And I wasn’t bringing up the age of a system mate. I was talking about myself. I am an adult who happens to have existed for 17 years. This is a thing that happens, and maybe if you could stop being an ableist fuck for like half a second you’d be able to understand that.

This is not cosigning anybody’s justification for the abuse of children. This is saying “Your rules have a blatant and ugly failure case; better rules are needed.” I have, repeatedly, offered better rules which - unlike yours - do not simultaneously paint someone as predator and victim or allow for the exploitation of children.

Seriously. I said “Hey, there’s a problem with your policies, here’s a policy that better protects children.” And you are trying to pretend I am cheerleading for child molesters, like the ones who fucking raped us, because I did so a bit snarkily (after already having been the target of multiple smear campaigns by antis for daring to actually listen to experts and evidence).

No part of this is honest disagreement. You are doing exactly what I have always objected to in the Anti Squad - reaching as hard as you fucking can for any excuse to portray anybody who disagrees with you as a supporter of child molesters. You are actively harming CSA survivors and mentally ill people and allowing child molesters to go unchallenged, and that is beyond disgusting. Get the fuck off our post with that shit.






wetwareproblem, tumblr 15 Comments [3/9/2017 3:22:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125255

I'm pro-multiculture, but for stupidity like this, even I am tempted to say "If this doesn't fit you, you can get out of here!".


Now you know why some people are anti-muslim. I used to go to a muslim convention every year and this crap was everywhere. That is in addition to what I see at muslim sites on the internet.

Consider this: Muslims are not pro-multiculture. Islam must reign supreme. There are lots of muslim refugees in Sweden. What are the implications for your multicultural self?

Mister Spak, FSTDT 28 Comments [3/9/2017 3:18:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 125247

If the Bible was written by men, then why does it prompt us to seek forgiveness from a Divine Creator? Why would men write such a fairytale condemning all of humanity to Hell? Has anyone ever written a book such as the Bible? Archeologists and explorers have been discovering thousands of scrolls, tablets and fragments of the Bible for centuries.

People have uncovered all of these findings in scattered places throughout the Middle East, in multiple languages. Can any book throughout history claim such remarkable exposure? And if men did write the Bible without ant Divine inspiration, then how did the forty Biblical writers, over 1,500 years of history, manage to complete such a seamless masterpiece of prophecy? The Quran can not claim this, it contains no prophecy.

God is Amazing! I am always intrigued, captivated, and stand in awe when I consider the universe. What was God thinking? Did He really create all of those stars (the nearest star to earth being 4.24 light years away) just for mankind to have a night light? (Genesis 1:14-19). Yes, that is what the Bible teaches. God gave us the sun, moon and stars. This is why mankind will NEVER find any intelligent life in the universe apart from the earth. God created it all for us.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 24 Comments [3/9/2017 3:10:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125246

Although the Supreme Court in 2015 made it legal for same-sex couples to get married across the United States, several lawmakers in Arkansas are trying to challenge that ruling with a new bill that would rescind their state’s recognition of same-sex marriages.

The New Civil Rights Movement notes that GOP Arkansas Rep. Stephen Meeks has introduced a new bill that would make it state policy to only recognize marriage as being between a man and a woman.

“Marriage shall be only between a man and a woman. A marriage between persons of the same sex is void,” the bill reads. “It is the public policy of the State of Arkansas to recognize the marital union only of man and woman… Marriages between persons of the same sex are prohibited in this state.”

Additionally, the bill would not recognize the marriages of same-sex couples who move to Arkansas from states that do recognize same-sex marriages.

Meeks has attracted 20 additional Republican co-sponsors for his bill so far.

Arkansas GOP, Raw Story 24 Comments [3/9/2017 3:09:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125245

When certain families raise their children in today’s culture to be God-honoring, productive, respectful young adults, it’s an astounding accomplishment.

It still happens, praise God, and many of you are still trying to do this.

But the forces allied against such happy outcomes are growing, metastasizing through the disease of secular American culture.

To keep protecting our children, we must recognize honestly what’s going on, even if it is a deeply sobering, heartbreaking picture.

It’s all-out war, one that God is possibly allowing for a time as part of judgment on America.

The left calls the transformation of America “progress.”

But no, it is instead an insane race toward the crumbling temples of ancient barbarism, leading our children by the hand as the sacrificial victims brought willingly to the pagan feast.

Can God “turn the hearts of the fathers back to the children”? (Malachi 4:6)

It may be a divine consequence, if not judgment, of America’s callous slaughter of 60 million unborn lives. God has a habit of giving us what we want.

We are reaping the fruit of abortion: marriage abolition via the homosexual and gender confusion agendas. “Don’t want the blessing of faithful husband/wife love – new human life? OK, take the emptiness of fruitless pleasure instead.”

Sexual promiscuity and cohabitation before marriage were just the beginning. The severe spiritual disorientation that results in the disintegration of male and female norms is being visited on the next generation as we fail to guard their hearts, their eyes, their bodies.

Corruption is “cool”; protectiveness is stifling. The bar of “education” in sexual matters is moved ever lower until Ph.D.s in anti-Christ mythology are dragging youth through a gutter of horrific abominations in grade school. Students are tutored in masturbation as a child, then mutual masturbation as a pre-teen, then experimentation in all directions as a teen. Abortion is always a “health care” option.

And sometimes, adults break a sacred trust and violate children themselves.

The result? More children who exhibit the classic signs of demonic oppression.

Many are behaviorally unhinged, some unaccountably anxious. Others are perennially dissatisfied, proudly rebellious, even self-destructive through cutting, drug use, eating disorders. And then there are those with violent impulses – teen rapists, looters, vandals.

Gender anarchy is one of the last stops on this nightmare trail, a natural outcome of rejecting the sanity and beauty of male and female God-designed identities. Homosexuality was the stop before. And while homosexual desires arise from some level of gender confusion, many stop short of a complete repudiation of the anatomical reality of masculinity and femininity. Or at least, they used to.

Satan is not done with our precious sons and daughters yet. He wants us to hand our children over willingly, believing it’s for their own good, and scream in outrage at any who try to issue warnings.

It’s now “cruel” not to let boys dress in skirts and eyeliner and disrobe in the female locker rooms at school.

Watching this descent into the hell of child corruption for four decades, it’s difficult to understand why more people who call themselves Christian are not radically upset. Some are – that’s our hope and promise.

But for instance, America’s most fervent pro-life activists often avoid any stand on this issue. It may be fear, or it may be that they resist connecting the dots about where decades of sowing disrespect for the fruit of marriage takes us.

After killing millions of our own offspring, Americans are jaded and desensitized to the sexual corruption of our children. Many believers now contend, unbiblically, that it’s un-Christian not to cooperate with these diabolical delusions.

This blindness may also be God’s judgment.

We are more afraid of the worldly label of “hate” than the divine label of “unfaithful.”

Parents allow schools to teach children detailed elements of sexual perversion in sex education. Should 11-year-olds learn, inaccurately, that anal sex is a manageable “genital” activity? Do we not weep in despair at the smashed innocence in a sensitive child?

Friendly librarians hand our children “young adult” literature selections that include pornographic passages. Parents trust that what a school recommends will have no negative effect. This category of literature has exploded in the last 15 years – complete with rape scenes, homosexual sex, masturbation, oral sex, gender fluidity – only because parents are not the watchdogs they used to be. The healthy skepticism that once accompanied parental oversight is quickly vanishing.

So we have porn-obsessed boys who crave sex with other boys – but are willing to accept sex with a predatory adult male.

We see teen lesbians who hate males flirt with witchcraft and think abortion is a sacrament.

And highly disturbed middle schoolers are exploited by social media and radical teachers and threaten suicide unless parents support them in identifying as the opposite sex and beginning hormone “treatment.”

Does any parent bring a baby home from the hospital and proclaim, “Oh, I can’t wait until he is a 17-year-old drag queen who begs to have castration surgery!”

Do any parents pray that their adorable baby girl grows into a foul-mouthed, tattooed “gender-queer” who damages her breasts permanently through chest-binding?

Of course not. America is drowning in parental tears. “I never thought this would happen!” “What did I do wrong?”

Sometimes parents do bear some responsibility. But sometimes it’s the corrupt world that is increasingly impossible to screen out.

We must change it.

What can America do to turn this around? First, we must face the war that is being waged and search our own hearts, with repentance and conviction.

Read and study Scripture about the nation that turns from the Lord:

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.
Because you have rejected knowledge,
I will also reject you from being priest for Me.
Because you have forgotten the law of your God,
I also will forget your children." ( Hosea 4: 6, NKJV)

Can we save our children? Yes. But first, we must save ourselves.

Linda Harvey, WND 14 Comments [3/9/2017 3:09:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125243

Last month, “respected prophet” Cindy Jacobs preached at a church in New Jersey, where she prophesied that God wants Christians to be rich so that there will be a “great harvest” of Jewish conversions when they see their Christian neighbors becoming “profoundly wealthy.”

“What the Jews have, we have,” Jacobs proclaimed. “However, we have more when we’re in Christ because the Holy Spirit is inside us, empowering us to do the good works we’re called to do.”

“I want to say to you,” she continued, “that one of the things I believe that’s going to bring a great harvest of Jews is the Christians becoming so profoundly wealthy … that it’s going to make them jealous. The wealth and the riches that we’re able to obtain is going to make them jealous.”

“Do you think our poverty is going to make a Jew jealous?” she asked. “Come off it! No, we are meant to prosper. Why? Because they understand, in their culture, that obedience to God brings blessing.”

Cindy Jacobs, Right Wing Watch 19 Comments [3/9/2017 2:56:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125242

Porn stars belittle all women. As long as men look at women as a sex object, we won't get the credibility we deserve.

Sharon Gebur, Facebook 24 Comments [3/9/2017 2:56:32 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 125241

It is true, as survivors said it was. Under a small patch of grass by a playground in Tuam, County Galway, Ireland, the bodies of the children who died in the local Mother and Baby home lie in unmarked graves. The Mother and Baby homes of Ireland – the last of which closed in 1996 – were run like punishment hostels for unmarried pregnant women. Their children were taken for adoption, fostering or the horror of the industrial schools, or they died in their thousands, of malnutrition and neglect. In some cases the bodies were used for dissection in medical schools.

This was veiled until two years ago when an amateur historian, Catherine Corless, learnt that 796 children had died at Tuam between 1925 and 1961; but where, she asked, were the graves? An inquiry was established and has now partially excavated the Tuam site. (The home has been replaced with a housing estate. Hence the ghoulish – and preposterous – playground.) Remains of children aged from those prematurely born to three years old have been found; Corless, then, is vindicated.

You might say that, for survivors, stonewalled and ignored by the Irish state and Catholic church for decades, denied their birth records and medical histories – essentially, their identities – and thwarted in their attempts to find their families, this is a victory.

[...]

The inquiry will deal with the 35,000 inmates and children of the nine homes, and a small number of associated institutions operated by various religious orders on behalf of the state – plus a few county homes. Some of these orders – such as the Sisters of Bon Secours and the order of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and Mary – are still active, and thriving; the Bon Secours, for example, is wealthy enough to hire a public relations consultant who, two years ago, denied the existence of the burial pit at Tuam. But there is a second web of institutions that also removed children from their mothers. These included private nursing homes, public hospitals and so-called holding centres and orphanages for children who were not orphans; or, if they were, the state had made them so.

Other children were taken from private homes, or by small adoption agencies and societies. One – the Catholic Rescue and Protection Society – operated in the UK under the auspices of a Dublin priest. Its job was to return fleeing pregnant women to Ireland, and the homes. One woman made this journey at full term. If you seek evidence of the physical welfare of these women and their children, look only to her testimony, and the burial pits.

[...]

Catholic Church and Irish State, The Guardian 12 Comments [3/9/2017 2:56:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Indicible

Quote# 125240



Catholic Nationalist, Facebook 12 Comments [3/9/2017 2:56:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: JeanP
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | top