1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 21 | bottom
Quote# 129810

Please, what kind of an excuse is that? Whether you are 'Schreibtischtäter' or just fueling the machine doesn't matter, does it? When you signed up, you made a choice about being ok with killing people for your government. And by maintaining your position in the military you maintain this very choice. Please stop pushing the narrative that those are just normal jobs, as those may be normal jobs in the business of killing/terrorizing/oppressing fellow humans.

See, I really get that the american society sometimes creates social situations where joining the military is a very easy, maybe the only solution to survive and make a living (kind of a fucked up social welfare instance), but that fact doesn't make the decision morally right. Living this way still comes at the cost of thousands suffering or dying.

ForFunAndDiscord, r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns 2 Comments [7/27/2017 1:53:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129803

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Conservatives Celebrate Trump for Transgender Military Ban"

Yes, we ARE VERY PLEASED with president Trump's stand against sexual immorality and insanity invading our military ranks. Good call sir. We salute you!


Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 4 Comments [7/27/2017 1:53:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 129801

[Texas is considering a bill that would revoke the medical licenses of doctors who perform abortions, with the exception of those deemed “necessary” to save the life of the mother or to save another baby when the mother is pregnant with multiples.]

I hope the bill is double soft for wiping with that gaping hole, it ain't worth much more than that.

Oboehner , Christian News Network  0 Comments [7/27/2017 1:52:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 129786

[Science] is propaganda. Period.

the-little-seagull, Deviantart 6 Comments [7/27/2017 1:52:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 129774

Anonymous, Whisper 4 Comments [7/27/2017 1:52:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 129773

Anonymous, Whisper 2 Comments [7/27/2017 1:52:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 129764

President Donald Trump has just announced a total ban on transgender service members in the U.S. military. Via Twitter, the Commander-in-Chief, with absolutely no warning, said:

"After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you."

Estimates vary, but there are up to about 10,000 transgender people honorably serving in the U.S. military, as NCRM reported earlier this month. A policy accommodating new trans service members was scheduled to go into effect July 1, but at the last minute, Secretary of Defense James Mattis postponed the change for another six months.

"We will use this additional time to evaluate more carefully the impact of such accessions on readiness and lethality," Mattis wrote, announcing the delay. He added, "this action in no way presupposes the outcome of the review."

If Trump's tweets are to be taken verbatim, the military would in theory discharge about 10,000 Americans. Expect legal challenges to the new policy soon.

Vice President Mike Pence, who has been working for the ban, is likely the main reason for Trump's announcement.

Foreign Policy magazine Tuesday afternoon reported Pence "and his staff have been working quietly to get Congress to roll back the Defense Department’s year-old policy covering medical procedures for transitioning service members, according to sources."

Family Research Council's President Tony Perkins has also been working to bar transgender service members.

Donald Trump, The New Civil Rights Movement 9 Comments [7/27/2017 1:51:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 129763

We have determined, as a society, that sex with a person under the age of consent is unlawful, and we have delegated this decision to those whom we allow to draft the laws. Thus, certainly in a democracy, we have agreed, at least implicitly, that no such sexual acts are allowed.

And yet some children who are pre-pubertal flirt like crazy, or are in some way alluring, perhaps sexually attractive. It is not wrong to be attracted to them, though it is unlawful to do more than be attracted in a very passive manner. I surmise that almost all adult males and many adult females have found at least one child in some manner sexually attractive and that none of them will admit it for fear of reprisals.

I argue with your words "Sexual Preference" on the simple basis that sexuality is an orientation. I happen to be homosexual. My preference would be to be heterosexual. Orientation and preference are by no means the same thing even if they occupy the same part of the spectrum of sexuality. Homosexuality is inconvenient in so many ways, though I am stuck with it. I would far prefer to be heterosexual for all of those reasons. But I am aroused by the male not the female.

As puberty takes hold the child turns into the man or the woman they will become, slowly. The animal in us wishes to mate with those relevant to our orientation. The society member in us chooses, usually, to allow time to pass until they pass legal age. But our instinct to mate is something we have to suppress actively. Schoolteachers must have an amazing amount of self restraint.

Timmy, It's Only Me From Across The Sea 2 Comments [7/27/2017 1:51:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 129762

I find Timmy's experiences rather interesting, for they show a child or a young adolescent does not need to be seen necessarily as a "victim" even in the presence of some sort of titillation or groping. More generally, kids discover sexuality mainly through the changes in their bodies and through interaction with their peers and they can mostly evaluate either by themselves or collectively what they do or do not wish to do sexually, although sexual discovery implies necessarily progressive traumas (in terms of pushing boundaries, not of violence).

I find the idea of an age of consent absolutely disturbing, as if desire could be restrained by law, which is something that belongs to totalitarian regimes, although democracies seem to advocate it in order to protect kids.

In most cases the law does not protect anyone, it actually creates occasions for molesters to act in the dark and abuse their power in order to obtain sexual favors from someone who is underage. Actually, being able to express love for a 13 or 14-year-old kid openly will protect him much more, for most of the psychological blackmail that takes place in these cases and takes advantage of embarrassing secrets would have no reason to exist.

I think the body will tell the boy whether he wishes to explore sexual acts or not and if the act is not socially stigmatized and the adult respects the limits of the boy's wishes, then for me there is no issue at all. We seem to see sex as something problematic just because Eros is a very powerful drive but most people do not see that it is repression to damage people, not sex.

aschenbach, It's Only Me From Across The Sea 1 Comments [7/27/2017 1:50:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 129745

If you say that Jesus wasn't dead, then the claim that on Easter Sunday he was fully recovered (He couldn't have walked to Emmaus with two of them having been flogged and crucified three days earlier) must be false. However, lies have been dismissed due to (1) the honesty displayed in the New Testament accounts and (2) their refusal under torture to deny their claims.

Spud, Religion and Ethics 4 Comments [7/27/2017 1:49:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 129738

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Signs of Demon Possession?: Non-binary gender-neutral pronouns"

My heart broke as I read that the enemy has manipulated the lost into addressing confused people that struggle with sexual immorality, individually (single person) as "they" (plural). The unclean demon-possessed man in the tombs in Gadarenes was identified in the plural form because he was possessed by a legion of demons. Why would a normal rationale person address a single person in plural form? Demon possession...

Thank God that He (God) heals broken hearts and that His word is true. The GOOD NEWS is that Jesus Christ delivered the demon-possessed man and so there is hope in Jesus Christ for those who are caught up in sexual immorality (homosexuality, those who demand to be addressed as something/someone else other than what they are, etc.):
Mark 5:1-20 (KJV)

5 And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes.
2 And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,
3 Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains:
4 Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him.
5 And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.
6 But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,
7 And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.
8 For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.
9 And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.
10 And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.
11 Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding.
12 And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them.
13 And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea.
14 And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done.
15 And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.
16 And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine.
17 And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts.
18 And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him.
19 Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee.
20 And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 2 Comments [7/27/2017 1:49:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 129737

Lady Checkmate's headline: "The Truth About Homosexuality, biblically"

There are a lot of individuals living an alternative lifestyle that visit our channel seeking help. Many lurk nervously in the background reading and seeking the only Truth. Others attack the only Truth. Those individuals are desperate for truth and need Jesus Christ so I'm posting this OP with them in mind. I know it's hard to turn away from sin, especially one you think you like...I've been there before (we all have), but not only is God greater than sin and can deliver us from sin but He is also grater than our hearts and even if/when our hearts forsake us God is greater than our hearts. I've found this message very enlightening and biblically sound proof. It's long, but worth the read. You're in my prayers guys <3.



Bert M. Farias, founder of Holy Fire Ministries, is the author of The Real Gospel and co-host of the New England Holy Ghost Forum. He is a missionary evangelist carrying a spirit of revival to the church and the nations.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 3 Comments [7/27/2017 1:49:16 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 129726

There is no friendship between a muslim and kafir, it is impermissible. how can you have love for one who doesnt love Allah swt? by all means show kindnesses and invite to Islam, but as for taking them as a friend, eating with them, asking from them, joking with them and having alliance in any way is clearly impermissible. As mg says, you may on the face of things get on but you dont know what is in their hearts, never will a kafir love a muslim, never, not if you are truly upon the haq, but they may indulge a munafiq (not referring to you fa), even in my family, i can tell deep down in peoples hearts there is not love for the muslims, May Allah swt guide them to the straight path,there is emnity and disavowal between us, as Prophet Ibrahim (as), says in Qur'an, until the last day, this is clear manifest proof of the issue.

Umar`, Ummah 0 Comments [7/27/2017 1:49:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129723

[Highlights from a conversation about Fundies Say the Darndest Things on Kiwi Farms, where the OP challenged people to "find shit on there and their super spergy posts."]

chimpburgers: Haha these guys again.

They can shove their tranny communist white knighting right back where it came from as far as I'm concerned cause that's what this site looks like to me.

Proof of the blatant communism over there. Their pussy spines crackle when they hear about Trump.


AnOminous: It used to be actually about fundies. Now it's about them REEEEing at anything that triggers their euphoria and causes their fedoras to fly off.


NotCobalt: Yeah. But back then they actually made fun of the lulcows, known as fundies. Both sandniggers and jesustards were fair game.

I remember this fag was a huge target:


StarvingAutist: One of the comments linked in the OP called us an "alt-right/GamerGate safe space", probably because he falls into the "if you complain about SJWs then you're a racist" bullshit.


NotCobalt: [in response to a user making a list of quotes from the topic] What list? The one of "people you want to have sex with" or the one "These exceptional individuals used to belong to an ancient forum with like perhaps 500 active members, so they probably know each other, and I wish I had been a part of that cool kids club back when, but instead I was too poor to afford internet, so I just cried all day instead"?


sikotik: The site started going down hill as early as 2008 when every other user became a tranny &/or easily triggered furry.


TimeToTurn: Never knew Marjan got banned, but I can assume he would with the new administration. Distind only banned spammers and shit. The new administration seems intent on making it a "safe space". Even though they always made fun of other websites like Free Republic and Rapture Ready for "suppressing free speech". I can't post shit messing with them (or I could, if I had a day to waste). So Marjan/caamib/whatever he calls himself can't do the same. I'd assume Marjan might be back at some point, but I don't really care to investigate. They really hate TOR, too, nowadays.

David J. Stewart I'm sure is as crazy as always, but him getting any crazier would take divine intervention and I'd just await either reports of his death (guy's a painkiller addict) or more dealings with the Guam government.


Dr W: The problem was that they didn't branch out into mocking SJWs. That's what kept Kiwi Farms rather politically inert. Instead, they allowed a core of crazy tranny furry dipshits to eject fecal matter everywhere.

Damn shame, I used to love that site.


rianzi: Shame how the site became infested by SJWS. It used to be a nice place where you could laugh at religious loons.

chimpburger, AnOminous, et. al., Kiwi Farms 6 Comments [7/27/2017 1:48:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Salami

Quote# 129720

(Story on Northwestern University opening a gender-neutral multi-stall restroom)

FoJC: How is it designed? Is the wash area completely separated from the urinal section? Are the stalls completely enclosed allowing for total privacy, or are they designed with the traditional stall sectionals? From images I've seen, they aren't completely private.

This is just a step toward public nudity being accepted and practiced among the general population.

Follow Jesus, find Wisdom.

Amos Moses: are the stalls sound proof ..........

Sisyphus: What does sound proof have to do with anything? Are you offended by the sound of flatulence? It's really pretty natural for all genders?

Amos Moses: not private then .... is it ........

Sisyphus: Embarrassed about the way your "god" crafted your bodily functions?

Amos Moses: mans fallen state ..... is mans rejection of truth ...... and what you describe is the results of that rejection ..............

TheKingOfRhye: "what you describe is the results of that rejection" The noises certain bodily functions sometimes make????

Amos Moses: yep ......... results of the fall of man ........... the results of the rejection of God and the truth ....... the result of the embrace of sin and its effects on our lives and deaths .........

Amos Moses, FoJC, Christian News Network 6 Comments [7/27/2017 1:48:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: KingOfRhye

Quote# 129813

This is fundamentally a question about illegalism. And there are two questions nestled in here: why do you personally choose to work wage labor instead of crime, and why should people submit to wage labor instead of committing crimes?
When the term “wage slavery” entered the vernacular, it was contemporary with American chattel slavery. It wasn't socialists, or Marxists, etc. that used it. It was slavery abolitionists. Two prominent examples are Frederick Douglass and Harriet Beecher Stowe. While Africans and African descendants were being whipped and killed, some of those who escaped would turn around and compare their previous condition as chattel slaves to their new condition as wage slaves. Thus, it's not a new term, it isn't something invented by academics, socialists, anarchists, or modern anti-capitalists. It was originally a statement that wage relationships are literal slavery. I want everyone to keep this fact in mind, to help frame where I am going with this.

Further, when I say “choose” in the title I don't mean it in the pseudo-choice “voluntaryist” sense, as if either crime or wage slavery are free, peaceful, or voluntary arrangements. But I do mean it in an absurdist or existentialist sense, in that you can in fact wake up one day and decide to go to work at Subway or choose to rob Subway. Alternately, you can choose to lay in bed for days at a time, or hang yourself by a rope in your closet. This does not deny the material conditions that influence one decision over the next (e.g. the consequences of working at Subway versus the consequences of robbing Subway), but rather affirms what Jean-Paul Sartre called “radical freedom.” You don't have to submit, although there may be consequences for not submitting.

I actually don't expect the few illegalists here to answer, and I might even discourage it. I don't want anyone to implicate themselves in a crime. I want you to keep going strong. I'm interested in hearing why people have chosen to submit to wage slavery versus crime. To go back to the first framing point: there were slaves who submitted to slavery, and there were slaves who started insurrections, fought masters, got beaten, got killed, or ran away and escaped. Why are you in the first category (the wage slave who submits) and not the second category (the slave refuses to submit)? If we truly believe that wage slavery is slavery, why are so few anarchists willing to reject wage slavery in full, throw it off, and lay down their own lives (or at least take the high risks of crime) instead of enduring slavery?

In an earlier comment on a different topic I said that I didn't trust anarchists who had not been arrested. This was unpopular. Probably because most anarchists (especially the American Reddit demographic) are not criminals, are not illegalists, and have not been arrested. However, I don't mean this to be a personal attack. The purpose of direct action/illegalist/insurrectionist groups is criminal. You have to be able to trust those people. And a good way of knowing if someone can be trusted, of knowing if someone can handle the inevitable interrogation and criminal justice ringer, is if they've caved under pressure or resisted in the past. If someone has been arrested and they didn't snitch, that's a good sign you can trust them. Further, if someone has been arrested and they did snitch, you've weeded them out. This does not even need to be a political/social/anarchist crime. It reflects upon how well someone is able to cope with arrest and provides an indication of their trustworthiness and dependability.

This is not “who is a better anarchist.” It's a practical tactic for forming illegalist, insurrectionist, and direct action groups with people you can trust.
(I wont go into people who are arrested and become informants, unfortunately you just may not know. And so there are some limitations here. But, in most cases, if someone is arrested and snitches you will find out during the legal discovery process or the street grapevine.)
There was one response that said I “glorify crime,” “romanticize crime,” or something to that effect. Friends, if you've read any illegalist literature, it all glorifies and romanticizes crime. The act of crime in and of itself, be it illegalist (e.g. for your own financial gain to avoid wage slavery) or insurrectionist (illegal, but for political/anti-political and without lucrative purpose), is supposed to be liberating. In fact, every time someone posts a picture of a riot, a burnt police car, calls an arrested anarchist a hero, etc. they're glorifying crime. Look at Bonanno's "Armed Joy" - does this not glorify crime?

Now, there is no glory and nothing romantic about prison. Prison sucks. There is nothing glorious about a lynched slave. But this does not mean that crime itself is neither glorious nor romantic, nor liberating, nor joyful, nor beautiful. We don't blame the anarchist criminal here for being a victim. We blame the prisons. We blame the lynchers. The anarchist criminal is not at fault. The state, the prisons, and the police are. As a minor footnote, in anarchist revolutions past and present (Spain and Rojava), “martyrs” were/are glorified and elevated. In Spain, militias were named after anarchists killed in heroic attacks on fascists. In Rojava, there are murals painted and walls plastered with the pictures of revolutionaries who died fighting Daesh.

There's nothing great about getting killed, either. But this does not mean that getting killed – or going to prison, or getting arrested – is not the inevitable consequence a heroic revolutionary act. In fact, it's something you have to accept as a revolutionary, an illegalist. It's something everyone who fought in Spain, or who are currently fighting in Rojava, have accepted. Thus it is both an inevitable and necessary act of individual and collective revolutionary struggle. We should treat the anarchist martyr, the illegalist, or the prisoner, the same way we we would treat the failed runaway slave, or the failed slave revolt leaders, who are ultimately caught and killed by slave hunters. They were brave, they tried, they didn't make it, but maybe someone else will. Who condemns the runaway slave for trying to escape?

Why, then, is there so much opposition to crime from anarchists? Not necessarily in word (although also, unfortunately, a lot in word), but in deed. And why do so few anarchists seem to be criminals (at least in the USA)? What is holding you back, exactly? Why isn't illegalism a real trend – and not only a trend, but the most prominent trend – for anarchists?

CapitalKiller, r/Anarchism 4 Comments [7/27/2017 11:28:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129812

If cops genuinely fear the people's power to punish them for their crimes, then they will be deterred. It's unfortunate that the death penalty was inflicted on the wrong individuals, but that's exactly the kind of collective accountability you should expect when you join a uniformed military loyalty-cult.

Killing cops is justified if it makes them aware that their total impunity has evaporated, and thus prevents some of the hundreds of murders by police that go unpunished every year.

PiranhaJAC, r/Anarchism 5 Comments [7/27/2017 11:27:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129809

You didn't choose to be trans, but you did choose to be a pig.

Don't expect respect when you're working for the people that oppress us and other minority groups, as well as the entire working class. Not only are you a class traitor, but you're a traitor to trans people as well. I hope you sleep well at night knowing that.

sosmoll, r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns 4 Comments [7/27/2017 10:45:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129804

[From "A Template For The Future: Turkey Holds Mass Trials Accusing Journalists Of Terrorism"]

I obviously don’t like Erdogan and hold him as an enemy for his hostile actions against Europe, but at the end of the day I RESPECT him far more than I respect many of the weak beta males dominating Western politics.

Erdogan, knowing he had enemies within his own regime, helped to formulate a coup against himself (not technically confirmed but almost certain) that was crushed within twenty-four hours – a catalyst for a purge the likes of which we should hope to emulate one day in our own nations.

Following this, Erdogan turned on the Turkish media, which by a quick study of the facts seems to be inundated with much of the same subversion and Fake News that we in America have grown to understand quite clearly in recent months and years.

But the Turkish Final Solution of the Media Question does not consist of angry tweets at 4 AM, nor does it involve a constant reshuffling of Executive personnel tasked with battling corrupt talking heads day in and day out.

No, it involves brutal beatdowns by loyal military and police, arrests by the dozen, and treason trials that aim to prove that the accused journalists are equivalent to bloodthirsty terrorists.

Brilliant, Reccep.


I can just imagine rats like (((Jake Tapper))), (((Wolf Blitzer))), and (((Rachel Maddow)))) claiming the same as they are hauled into courts in the most humiliating way imaginable – I wouldn’t even let them have belts for the far-too-large pants that would be issued.


This could be done rather easily (or with a serious effort) here in the States if those in power (yes, Trump, I’m talking about you) actually decided to shatter the treasonous media for their despicable actions.

It could probably best be done by pushing an “Un-American Activities Act” or something of the sort – much like what was done back in the middle part of the last century to root out Communists and their sympathizers throughout the country.

Now that would be something helping to #MAGA, that’s for sure.

Marcus Cicero, Occidental Dissent 13 Comments [7/27/2017 6:35:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 129802

(Commenting on an article posted entitled "The Shocking Doomsday Maps Of The World And The Billionaire Escape Plans" [https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimdobson/2017/06/10/the-shocking-doomsday-maps-of-the-world-and-the-billionaire-escape-plans/#6ebb75524047], and in response to another member who wrote, in part: "I've had suspicions about something like this for a long time, although my idea of their reasoning has been different." BOLDFACE mine)

To Robert, if you became a Christian, you would never have to worry about how the earth will come to an end. You wouldn't be around to watch it happen. You would be raptured out of here before the wrath comes.

The earth isn't going to be destroyed by an Asteroid. People won't need to worry about don't need to worry about finding a rich man or woman to help you get into a bunker. They wouldn't let you in anyway, unless you wanted to be their slave, but I am sure they already have someone in mind for the jobs they will dish out.

The earth might get hit with some HUGE hailstones that have fire attached to them, but the plagues and loss of water will kill people long before the hailstones start killing people. People will want to be killed by that time.

The rich man's water and food will never last long in their bunkers. Especially when the Anti-Christ finds them and takes away everything they have in those bunkers.

During the first 3 1/2 half years of the 7 year Tribulation period...... people will be celebrating that the Christians are gone, so they can become socialists, communist, Muslims, homosexuals, pedophiles, prostitutes, whatever they want to be, but when the Anti-Christ and his followers takes total control of the world and the people have to take a MARK on their forehead or right hand in order to buy and sell things go down hill REAL fast .

It is going to be very bad for those left behind during the LAST 3 1/2 years of the tribulations.

During that time..... comes the wars...where all nations will turn against all nations, especially the Jews, then comes the lack of electricity, cell phones, computers where technology will no longer work due to each nation using their electromagnetic pulse weapons against the grids .....then comes the plagues like they saw during Moses Day.. plagues that will devastated the whole earth....with frogs, locusts, knats, flies, boils/sores, lifestock dying, darkness, plants dying, earthquakes, hailstones with flames of fire, intense heat, no water.....Mark 13, Matthew 24, Luke 21, Rev 11, Rev 16......then there will be BLOOD in the seas, lakes, rivers as well as blood flowing down a 200 miles canyon that is as high as a horses bridle, right outside the city of Jerusalem. Some have estimated this much blood would require 1 BILLION people destroyed all at once in this one area....THOSE people are the armies who are standing outside of Jerusalem ready to attack the Jews and Jesus and his army......... Rev 14:20....

Millions and millions of people if not BILLIONS are killed, thrown in jail or die from the plagues, earthquakes, hailstones.

They will WISH the Christians were still on the earth, due to the fact that Holy Spirit IN the Christians is what was holding back the Anti-Christ and the end times tribulations.

2 Thessalonians 2:4-7
He (Anti-Christ) will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.6 And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. 7 For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he (Holy Spirit) is taken out of the way.


dlo_3us2001, Realabortiondebate 12 Comments [7/27/2017 6:06:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 129800

Fellow objectively facially average incels, what the fuck is wrong with us?

Blame social anxiety, autism, social retardation, etc.?


Blame height, weight, frame, etc.?


Blame voice, thin wrists, thin neck, etc.?


What the hell is left to blame? At least if I was straight up ugly I would know what to blame, it's just frustrating suffering and not knowing what to blame.

Averagecel, /r/incels 15 Comments [7/27/2017 4:11:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Dark Side Award

Fear the revenge of Darth Incel!

Quote# 129797

Never forgive the people who have wronged you.

Keep your hate close to you. Nuture it. Furnish it. Don't let them win.

dilapidatedincel, /r/incels 28 Comments [7/27/2017 4:11:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 129793

Why are they tip toeing around the elephant in the room? Transgenderism is a mental illness. We simply cannot have known he/she’s running around causing all kinds of disruption with a known mental illness in our armed forces. They do remember the key word is “armed” in armed forces right?

I bet there aren’t any tranny’s who are not seeing a shrink. They are all confused about their gender which is the first thought they have in the morning and that continues until they fall asleep then they dream about it. Tranny’s are and will always be preoccupied with their gender confusion. They have no place in the military. If some company wants to hire them in the civilian world; good for them. The military is not a social experiment.

Boomer, Free Republic 14 Comments [7/27/2017 3:36:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129792

Yes, great news. Transgenderism is a mental disorder and should be treated like it. We cannot have folks in the military battling their own demons when trying to battle Americas. We need to call it like it is.

Furthermore, homosexuality is a mental disorder as well. Doesn’t mean we should trample their rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but we shouldn’t act as if it is normal. It is not.

It is against God, but even if you didn’t believe in God, it is against natural law. If anyone disputes this fact, present them with another. If all of civilization decided to turn to homosexuality rather than natural relations, that civilization will after a period of time cease to exist thus halting all homosexuality. Pretty simple really.

servantboy777, Free Republic 14 Comments [7/27/2017 3:36:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129791

Abortion is always a sin...

She wont be in danger or her life in jeopardy...

she is more likely to die from an abortion or have her body so screwed up she cant ever get pregnant again or has miscarriages...

She doesn’t need to “bear a child” they can do a C-Section...

the point is she can have counseling and recover from the rape with her soul and mind intact but if she murders her baby she will have to live with the blood of an innocent child on her hands...knowing she sinned against God...

murdering one child in a vain attempt to “save” another will not work...

she might be young not but one day she would know just what she did and it would destroy her...

as for her body it was old and mature enough to get pregnant so it is old enough to carry that child...

plus even though shes 12 she may be my size or bigger...

I was 5’ 2” 110 LB when I had my children...

and kid you are not “strongly opposed” to abortion at all...

and you call the baby a “fetus” pro-life people don’t call an unborn child a fetus...

the girl is carrying a BABY...

Toss your own covers much ???

Tennessee Nana, Free Republic 11 Comments [7/27/2017 3:36:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 21 | top