1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 138940

Virginity age meter for male and femoid

Male:
Virgin under 11: Fine. If you're not virgin here it's because your village priest raped you.
Virgin between 11-13: Unless you're giga Chad it's normal
Virgin between 13-16: It's not over yet, even most normies are virgin at this age but if you haven't even kissed you should worry.
Virgin between 16-18: You're getting late, average males lose their virginity at this ages
Virgin between 18-21: Pretty much over
Virgin older than 21: OVER FOREVER

Femoid:
Virgin under than 11: Fine. If you're not virgin here it's because your uncle raped you
Virgin between 11-13: Mostly Stacys and ghetto bitches lose their virginity at this age
Virgin between 13-15: Average femoid loses their virginity at this age so you're late
Virgin between 16-18: You're ugly or have 0 social skills but don't worry some desperate dude will fuck you
Virgin older than 18: Error 404 not found

thespanishcel, incels.me 6 Comments [7/17/2018 3:48:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138965

Just Along For The Ride


Fine, as soon as women drop the 'men are sex-hungry, mindless rapist pigs' ethic. And really, how are you supposed to flirt if now more than ever a woman can get you thrown in jail with ease (cuz' we #believewomen) if you so much as look at her wrong? I know incels are delusional dickheads, but unfortunately the notion that males are increasingly discriminated against while women get a free pass on more or less everything is not all that far-fetched. You can see it wherever you look...sexist jokes against women? Huge taboo. Sexist jokes against men? A-okay, encouraged even. Men being shallow and entitled? How dare they. Women being shallow and entitled? They're strong and independent who refuse to bow to the patriarchy. So on and so forth. It's just that nobody is willing to discuss this in a mature way, because as soon as a male brings it up, he's immediately drowned out by a chorus of 'AH THE WIDDLE MANBABY IS UPSET ABOUT NOT GETTING HIS PEEPEE WET' and 'oh, you're no longer free to harass women without consequences, poor you'. And if a woman brings it up (which very rarely happens, because let's not beat around the bush, most women are more than happy to milk their eternal victim status coupled with their newfound priviliges for all it's worth), she's labeled and 'internalised misogyinist' and 'gender traitor'. This whole gender war stopped being about equality a long, long time ago. Now it's pretty much all about female supremacy.

Anon, SSTDT 7 Comments [7/18/2018 3:06:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138963

First of all women have been given the same rights as men in modern society. But the problem is they can't handle responsibility. When something doesn't go right women blame the patriarchy. But it was men that gave the vote to you. You'll never accept that women are inferiour. If we gave planet earth to women and all men left to mars or colonised some planet in the future, the would probably go back to stone age. I'm not joking. Where are all the scientist women?? If you continue this disrespect of man's achievements you only strengthen our arguments for why we need to make women obsolete using technology. (ie automation)?

It's illegal for women to abort without PERMISSION from the FATHER where I live :). I love how you think getting pregnant means women invented physics LOL, btw you carry the baby but the DNA is half of the man's who impregnates the woman. So nice fucking try. I bet you think men should have to pay for half of the abortion when you think it's all the woman's choice and body? Do you have any capacity to understand philosophy or is that part of your brain taken up by shoes and makeup??

YOYOYO meneayem, YouTube 2 Comments [7/18/2018 3:03:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138966

[Context: Infamous Lolcow ADF/Isabel Araujo/Ahuviya Harel/Phil apparently got SRS surgery, this is in a KF thread about a picture of the results 7 weeks post-op. A few other posters show some ignorance, but this guy was the most fundie about it]

Why in society have we come to accept instead of helping people with body dis-morphia through mental stability, instead we give in to these unnatural desires to mutilate their genitals? What is this madness?

[on the next page]
Are you telling me that turning your dick inside out into your guts is not the most natural sounding vagina? What are you a Nazi?

[now a couple pages later a user called NoFeline Says]
Isn't Phil's made out of a piece of his colon? Yeah. Despite how nasty that sounds, it's much less of a horror show than inverting the penis...and the botch-jobs on that are much, much worse.

[To which our fundie says]
Are you so desentizied or "tolerant" that you find inverted your penis and mutilating it NOT botching your fucking body?

[bananaliquerelips says]
unpopular opinion (I guess) but its an okay vagina for a fake one. At first glance it doesn't appear abnormal. upon further inspection, sure, but once anyone gets to 4th base if thats not what they're expecting then they're deluded.

it does look smelly though. douche daily is my advice.

[Zippy responds]
How about not mutilating your genitals because of a mental illness? How about that?

[User Ginger Piglet quotes Zippy]
For people who are TRUE AND HONEST trans, i.e. not Phil, and suffer from actual gender dysphoria, this is the treatment for that illness. However because of its very nature (viz. this thread), that's why they have piles of "gatekeeping" in front of it.

[Zippy posts again]
The treatment is to lead to life that most likely will make your mental state worse than before, look I was liberal and "free-thinking" like you once, but it's common sense that this is in their head. They are the sex they are born with and that will never change.

[GP again]
If you are Phil, or one of the many other transtrenders we cover, yes. However. The trans people that actually put the effort in to pass and go through all the steps and so forth are generally fairly well adjusted.

Basically, if you want to gauge how truly and honestly trans someone is, think about this - how quickly can I clock them? The shorter a time it takes, the more likely they are to screech at some quack until he wolverine-claws a segment out their groin.

[ZZ again, getting more agitated]
You people are insane, you have given these mentally ill people the go through to fuck up their lives forever because you think sex is a social construct. Will someone just nuke the Western world already?

[A moderator named Ravenor shows up, quoting Piglet]
There is also the Kiwi Statistic, we have a disproportionate number of Transpeople involved in the forums who are active and respected members of the community we don't hate transpeople far from it, we just have a distate for people using being Trans as an excuse for doing a runner from responsibility or accountability.

[ZZ again, this time getting sassy with the mod]
Kiwifarms has a disproportionate amount of crazy people? Who woulda thunk?

But yeah to state for the record I don't "hate" trannies, I just think they are insane and they created this disgusting degenerate culture that has even poisoned children. That you can just be whatever sex you want because there was that one time you put on a dress, or you play with boys toys. I hope they get actual help instead of these horrible procedures.

ZippyZoopa, Kiwifarms 1 Comments [7/18/2018 3:28:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138962

Best of matriarchy: relative peaceful village living. No electricity, no modern conveniences... no modern man made inventions, life expectancy short...

Best of patriarchy: you go to the moon.

Seriously, you shouldn't hold this dieing sub culture on a pedestal. It's nothing to be proud of.?

It reminds me of chimpanzees and bonobos. Chimps are patriarchal, larger, more intelligent, and live longer than bonobos. While bonobos are a hair away from extinction. The only reason bonobos and their matriarchal ways have ever even existed is because there is a river separating the two. If a chimp troop ever made contact with a bonobo troop it would be a slaughter. Even without violence, the bonobos wouldnt be able to compete with the chimps. Matriarchy.?




Dragon, YouTube 5 Comments [7/18/2018 3:02:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138912

Why would a girl want an ugly face between their legs? A female will crush their own son with their thighs during childbirth if he is sufficiently ugly, the fuck do you think they will do to a complete stranger?

@Creep:
Why do you keep mentioning he is a tyrone? You saw his pic?

He is black and thus Tyrone.

(Emphasis added)

VisVoy, incels.me 6 Comments [7/16/2018 7:38:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138938

Incels as a solution to the Drake Equation

Most of you have probably been exposed to the concept that is the Drake Equation. All of the variables that contribute to the probability of the number of intelligent civilizations in the Universe capable of radio transmission, etc. etc. From this has been been generalized the notion of the Great Filter to account for the seemingly non-existence of detectable alien life forms. What if incels are this Great Filter? In every life form on Earth that reproduces sexually, there tends to be a power imbalance between the sexes, favoring one or the other as selected for by the environment and evolution over great time periods. In humanity, this phenomena waxes and wanes over much shorter time periods with the changing conditions of our civilizations, accelerated by the plasticity of language, culture and other higher-order emergent social structures. During the early stages of civilization, life is difficult and this favors the traits of men. As men build civilization and develop or rediscover technology, life becomes easier and ultimately leads to women being given the advantage.

What if every late-stage alien civilization that procreates through sexual reproduction and has advanced to the point of early space travel snuffs itself out due to neglecting the needs of its incels, who either effectively pull out the rungs holding up civilization causing an immediate collapse and/or are persecuted to the point of being rounded up and killed, resulting in a civilizational plateau and slow dysgenic decline (as civilization is geared entirely to the short term needs and desires of the female sex and ugly & dumb 5/10s ride imprisoned Chad's cock) from which there is no recovery? We see localized evidence of this in our own history, such as the Bronze Age Collapse and the Mycenians, for example.

I'm not sure what can be done about this. I don't think we can escape this trap politically, at least here in the West. We can do it technologically through AI/robot companions, eugenics, genetic engineering, but here we see feminists encroaching on this field through political means of control.

What options do we have? What strategies can we adopt

mviper, incels.me 3 Comments [7/17/2018 3:46:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138937

Why do people reject the blackpill, and when will they accept it?

People want to fuck beautiful people. Even ugly people want to fuck beautiful people. Everyone seems to accept this part.

What the mainstream cannot accept is that women only want to fuck beautiful people, and that women would rather go without sex than to fuck someone ugly. They only accept ugly guys for money and security. This, to me, is obvious. I figured out all of this before I heard of the blackpill.

Is this some catastrophic idea? It's plainly evident that some people have all the money, while others have none; it shouldn't be anymore hard to accept that the same disparity is also true of sex-partners.

Maybe women lie to themselves so well about their nature, that they can convince men of that lie too (the soul-mate idea). Maybe this type of all-or-nothing sex distribution has not been this intense in western society for a long time, and people are slow to catch on to the paradigm shift. Maybe people feel uncomfortable equating sex with money.

When do you think the blackpill will be accepted by the mainstream?

The End, incels.me 3 Comments [7/17/2018 3:46:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138926

Now High Schools are teaching young girls that the difference between "flirting" and "sexual harassment" is totally based on how it makes a woman feel. ie: If Chad talks with her = Flirting, If Incel talks with her = Sexual Harassment.



(WalkinWaski1)
"Just put yourself out there, bro! Just go and try with her, you got nothing to lose except your virginity, haha!"

Go to jail for sexual harassment

([deleted])
I mean that was always the case, but to see it become official teaching material... just fucking unreal.

(Toolman890)
imprison whoever wrote this

(ALovelyPlace)
How can anybody deny the blackpill now? Just approach females bro, it's a numbers game bro.

(Sudden_Pear)
I think any woman would feel insulted by me speaking to her. I’m 5’4 and ugly as hell, if I talk to a woman she thinks that I think I have a shot with her. That means she’s genetically inferior and within my reach. I shouldn’t even talk to women according to this chart.

(Waqui98)
Incel: Hello, may i say you look absolutely stunning today.

Her: You feel bad that a genetic subhuman complemented you.

Chad: Ayy girl bring that phat ass ova here!

Her: You feel good that a chad noticed your booty.

(DaiMiVsi4ko)
Wtf is wrong with this society. It's all getting worse and worse by the minute.

(UramiSan)
I can feel the equality in this book, boys!

(snatcher9)
Wow.. soon it will be a federal crime for an ugly male like me to approach women at all.

various commenters, r/Braincels 7 Comments [7/16/2018 12:59:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138944

MGTOWs are destroying the roasties and cuck on /pol/
I noticed on /pol/ recently (at 4chan not 8chan), there are more and more guys who are going MGTOW and are even blacpilled incels who are going their own way (like me). Great news, since /pol/ is very influence, far more so than pretty much any subreddit and far more than Sluthate or any other incel site.

With luck the number of blackpilled men who are incel or MGTOW and know the truth about women will accelerate, as social media has allowed women to show their true nature and completely destroyed blupilled ideology that women want nice, caring guys. And completely destroyed cuckservative ideology that guys should just get married and start a family with some thot who can accuse you of rape with no proof and get you sent to prison for years, or fuck outside the marriage, get knocked up and then ask the husband to pay child support for a kid that isn't even his for 18 years.

Soon these feminist and cuckservative pussy worshipping SIMPS will run out of bluepilled cucks to exploit. Soon being MGTOW or incel will be a point of PRIDE (it already is for me) rather than targets of derision and degradation as they are for so much of modern, liberal, feminist, western, multicultural society. LONG LIVE MGTOW!! And also blackpilled incels who are spreading the truth about bitches, you just need to swallow the final blackpill that getting married/dating women is not worth it in the long run, especially if you're an omega male who women don't like.

dsar9012, Sluthate 1 Comments [7/17/2018 8:42:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138946

Women aren't meant to be educated.

They don't do anything with the information anyway. Their only passion is power and prominence. Teaching women how to read/ write/ etc. is like teaching a priest science. They may use it on their day to day, but they won't really use their learnings as a launchpad for anything valuable. They'll just twist it to their designs, and tune out what isn't in their sphere of agenda.

They don't have any attention span for information (for broad knowing's sake) to even be told anything esoterical about their own primality/ dark nature. So you really can't do shit.Knowledge can't fix anything.

Eugeniker, Sluthate 6 Comments [7/17/2018 8:43:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138872

One of the best, most liberating feelings you can get as a feminist is to just stop giving your father the respect he doesn’t deserve but you’ve been conditioned to give him since childhood.

Fathers are our first oppressors. They’re the men who value us less because we weren’t born with a dick so we won’t pass on their lineage. They react to our births with disappointment, they raise us feeling burdened by our existence. Fathers teach daughters that we don’t deserve as much as our brothers do, that we come second. Fathers destroy our hopes and dreams by telling us how we were born to be sweet and nurturing, that our emotional feminine brains ensure we won’t be as great at science or math as a boy would be.

Fathers rely on us for emotional support, especially as we get older, but they’re also the first men to teach us how much our feelings don’t matter, that we “should” be feeling a different way, that we are “hysterical” and “over emotional”. Our fathers teach us to accept being dismissed, to disrespect ourselves, to disconnect ourselves from our own interpretation of reality and rely on a male opinion.

Fathers abuse our mothers and set up our low expectations for male behavior. Fathers teach us what level of abuse is acceptable. Fathers teach us to prioritize males.

Stop giving this man the respect he doesn’t deserve after what he did to you.

respectthefemalebody, Tumblr 6 Comments [7/15/2018 6:48:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138886

Sugarstacies are the polar opposite of Incels

The disparity in life experience is maddening a lot of the time, but this one takes the cake, in my opinion.

Most of us have lived our life in almost complete isolation. We not only have a hard time finding a woman, but also finding friends. People hate being around us so much, that we're fired, or ostracized heavily at work. If people could pay us to go away for ever, they would probably do that. I don't even like talking to people because I feel like I'm bothering them.

Meanwhile a Sugarstacy has never had trouble finding friends or men. She realizes the effect she has on people, and is liked so much that the thought occurs to her "People love me so much, I should be paid for my company." Imagine being fed so much validation all your life, that you have the *arrogance* to even have the thought in the first place, but then to *actually act on it*??? Once they act on it and start getting paid to go on dates, they have achieved the ultimate validation.

I remember when I still tried, I would be careful with every word I used, worried I would say the wrong thing. But these women? They can be the most selfish person ever and insist on gifts and money. I'm so lonely and disliked, that I would never in a million years have the thought to demand compensation for my company.

TheIncelStaresBack, incels.me 4 Comments [7/15/2018 8:38:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138916

Re: Benevolent Sexism Attractive To Women, Study Shows

(hirayama_ronin)
Just a comment to posters, why post studies without a comment of your own?

The purpose of the following observations is to situate what counts as benevolent sexism, according to the study's authors. The purpose of the study is to meet research into what is called benevolent sexism (the definition of which the authors may or may not agree with), with "parental investment theory."

However, the definition of "benevolent sexism" is eye-watering.

The following is quoted in the article, word for word from the study.

“Hostile sexism (HS) encompasses overtly prejudiced attitudes, whereas benevolent sexism (BS) involves subjectively positive attitudes (e.g., “women should be cherished and protected by men”), chivalrous behaviors, and attempts to achieve intimacy with women.”

Benevolent sexism includes attempts to achieve intimacy with women. This is either an Andrea Dworking-style, "all sex is rape" definition of sexism, that categorically places normal gendered behavior into a politically hostile ghetto (of rape or sexism), or it's a very poorly worded definition on the part of the study's authors.

There isn't a single example of benevolent sexism offered in the introduction that would situate the author's definition. It moves immediately to supposed consequences of BS (a convenient short-hand).

Here are the studies in support of this idea:

Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764-779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491

I don't have access to this literature to see how their work grounds this definition.

Here are some examples found in the "Supplemental Materials" section at the end of the study:

Study 1a, BS condition

He feels that, no matter how accomplished he is, he is not truly complete as a person without the love of a woman. He thinks that a woman should be set on pedestal by her man. He is convinced that in general women are more pure than men and they tend to have a superior moral sensibility. Mark thinks that women should be cherished and protected by men. In case of a disaster or emergency situation, he thinks that women should be helped before men.


Study 1a, non-BS condition

He feels that he can be truly complete as a person without the love of a woman, especially if he is personally accomplished. He doesn't think that a woman should be set on pedestal by her man. He is convinced that neither sex is superior with respect to purity or moral sensibility. He thinks that women should not necessarily be cherished or protected by men. In case of a disaster or emergency situation, he thinks that a person's sex should not be a factor determining who is helped first.


Despite the “romantic” undertone, researchers noted, benevolent sexism still reinforces the notion that women are inferior.

In Study 2a, we find BS in how a man might help a woman. The study participants were offered two men, Robert and John, who were identical in every way, except in particular behaviors:

Robert/John and John/Robert are both colleagues of yours. You have got to know them both a bit because you have often worked in pairs with one or the other and you have attended a few meetings and short business trips with each of them. They both look about the same physically and they are both about as competent at their job as each other.

You have noticed that they behave slightly differently at times though. For example, on one occasion when you were attending a short business trip with Robert/John, you had to get from a train station to the hotel where your conference meeting was being held. The taxi had not turned up so you decided you had to walk in order to get there in time. It was December and it was very cold. [BS condition] After saying something about how cold it was, Robert/John took his coat off and gave it to you, even though he only had a thin suit jacket on underneath. On another occasion later that same month, you had been on another short business trip with John/Robert. It was still very cold and you were walking from the train station back to your office and it was about the same distance you had to walk in the cold last time. [non-BS condition] After saying something about how cold it was, John/Robert, who was wearing a thin suit jacket under his coat, did not offer to give you his coat.


Reading into this, I assume "attempts to achieve intimacy with women" means "attempts to charm women (into intimacy) by giving them preferential treatment."

Discussion

What feminism-driven research is attempting to do, which the authors of these studies is disrupting, is to position the preferential treatment of women as politically damaging treatment. This is actually a position I tend to agree with. I personally believe men's preferential treatment of women makes them weaker, lazy, less desperate to achieve success, thus less successful.

The problem is that feminism allows women to problematize the preferential treatment shown to them (turning a prima facie positive into a subtle negative), while benefiting from preferential treatment. It's grabbing resources, attention, and affirmation from men, while punishing men for offering those resources, attention, and affirmation, packaging it up as a form of political oppression (patriarchy), which men are solely responsible for.

Studies like this cut through the nonsense. It says: benevolent sexism may have negative consequences, but it's desired by women:

We propose an alternative explanation drawn from evolutionary and sociocultural theories on mate preferences: women find BS men attractive because BS attitudes and behaviors signal that a man is willing to invest.


If women express this unconscious bias toward BS men, even when they have conscious knowledge of the supposed negative effects of BS upon women politically, feminists can no longer claim BS is a product of male supremacy. It is a joint product of deep reproductive politics, for which women must take their share of the responsibility, as they take their share of the benefits of being placed on the pedestal.

As always,

feminism == equality + pedestal =/= equality.

(SophisticatedBean)
personally believe men's preferential treatment of women makes them weaker, lazy, less desperate to achieve success, thus less successful


Not doing so appears to cause PMS though.

feminism == equality + pedestal =/= equality


I guess we can shorten that to feminism ? equality.

Women will always be on the pedestal because men are hardwired to care for women and women are not hardwired for reciprocity. Instead, they are hardwired to exploit and to be unwilling to settle with a partner of lower rank. (The alternative would also be unstable anyway as a stronger male in her mating pool would be able to threaten her decision if she decided for a weaker male.)

So the patriarchy is exactly a means of counteracting this innate anti-(beta)-male bias; it is basically egalitarianism. It basically artificially makes men more attractive by rituals, affirmative action (e.g. boys-only domains/clubs), strict rank enforcement and economic dependence such that women more likely feel like actually having a valuable/high-status partner. This should also allow women to experience more orgasms in a monogamous society as they orgasm more the higher the economic status and confidence of their partner is. Not doing so should theoretically make monogamous bonds unstable and we are indeed seeing a growing divorce rates. Another prediction is that more men should be rendered unable to impress a woman by their relative socioeconomic rank; and fewer males should be motivated by classical courtship and incentives for achievements of founding a family, both of which should reduce overall reduce cultural drive, which we are likely seeing too (incels, Hikikomoris, opioid crisis; though all of those have an economic component).

Now, one might expect the negative utility listed above might have been canceled out by the utility of an improvement of women's lives, but it looks like feminism has not even made women happier as career-oriented women seem to often find themselves in positions in which they are not very satisfied because they cannot find a satisfying mate or because their career conflicts with motherhood. I also suspect feminism even increases BS, because men are being raised to be so agreeable, intimidated and soft that they fulfill any wishes. There is positive utility in shape of increased economic productivity, but it's questionable to which extent that has actually made us happier. Positive emotion is mostly associated with goal pursuit (cocaine, emphatemine), and as goals are becoming diffuse, gender-incompatible or unattainable, it obviously makes us less happy.

.
.
.

That said, the study posted by OP surprised me since even self-described feminists preferred the explicitly sexist hypothetical male.


Some women are sneaky like that. I think it is a result of the lack of true female-male or female-female competition. We are seeing the same in the lack of true competition due to declining economic growth in the West: things start to become corrupt, improper and sneaky because the free market does not eliminate behavior and assumptions that are misaligned with reality. The raise of bullshit jobs. Women are basically chronically in this position because they are mostly always desired by men for their reproductive organs largely irrespective of their behavior and assumptions. Which does not mean that this expresses in all women to pathological degree or that men do not have their own gender-specific pathologies, but feminism, even though it probably had the intention of improving this has actually made it worse by making men more feminine/agreeable and by eliminating corrective feedback targeted at women.

hirayama_ronin & SophisticatedBean, r/BlackPillScience 4 Comments [7/16/2018 12:52:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138892

Dickpill is underrated

We know we are incels and we are not slaying et al, but when the action comes, how will a dick smaller than 6'' satisfy a woman? It Will likely not



See, the average penis isn't capable of sarisfying a woman to the fullest, and even when having 6''ish, women as always want more, and Will always praise 7''s and 8''s like Gods

The point that I'm trying to make here is that most people should know It never even began, because most Will never truly satisfy a woman, want more? Her ex-chad-bf probably had a bigger cock, most probably she Will always remember the sensation and thus never be satisfied with anything under really

Men need looks, height, money, status and dick, and most of them lack all even, JFL at this live

averageblokecel, incels.me 8 Comments [7/15/2018 8:39:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138906

The thing I hate the most about women...is that to them, the most attractive traits are things that men cannot change: Height. Race. Hair (type). Facial bones. Frame. Eye Color. These are things that cannot be changed without devoting thousands of dollars into potentially life threatening surgery.

Meanwhile, women literally only need to be relatively slim (even a little chubby) to get attention from men. They'll deny it all day long saying how "weight isn't a choice" and "muh body positivity", but anyone who's done a few seconds of research into fat loss knows that these morons are making excuses for laziness.

Women have it so fucking easy it's a joke. This right here is why I'll never have any sympathy for fat women, either. Only a handful of men are considered attractive to women, and the reason for that is because they're attracted to the traits that men cannot change. Only a handful of men were lucky enough to be born with the traits that women find desirable. Pass me the fucking rope.

genetic_scrap, r/Braincels 7 Comments [7/16/2018 7:38:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 138910

Thank god i'm incel and not a beta provider

Rest assured, she let Chad fuck her in the ass, just one hour after matching on tinder. While her beta provider/husband will have to wine and dine her 3 times before he might go in for a kiss.

(I!'m glad I partied and did crazy shit when I was super young cause now all I wanna do is be a wife, make cute babies and just have a beautiful life")

BlackOpsIIcel, incels.me 2 Comments [7/16/2018 7:38:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138917

my girlfriend of a little over a year was raped 3 or 4 years before I met her. I didn't know for a while until she mentioned it to me once, and she explained that she was drugged at a party and raped. She knows who did it and never pressed charges or took any action against him because she was so ashamed.

I love her to death. I don't think any differently of her and the intimacy issues that come from her experience are minor enough for us to work through without any real problems. But god damn to I not want to find that son of a bitch and choke the life out of him with my bare hands, whispering her name into his ears so he remembers and realizes why he's dying by my hands.

This will probably get buried but it was kind of cathartic for me to get this out, I've never really talked to anyone about it.


She probably give him the "come on", while she was inhibited, then realised it was wrong, and decided to tell a lie instead of facing up to her own cheating.

Be careful - it happens more than you might think, and then some innocent bro gets a beating he didn't deserve.


SarahC, Reddit 8 Comments [7/16/2018 12:53:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138913

(On cunnilingus)

(Evil Genius)
Eating pussy is so cucked lmao, I'd still do it though if it got me laid.

(Leucosticte)
Girls are supposed to be the ones putting their mouths on our genitals.

(EyesSoCold)
No, girls are submissive and only likes to serve(chad only).

Evil Genius, Leucosticte and EyesSoCold, incels.me 9 Comments [7/16/2018 7:38:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138888

(Cerebral hypoxia)
Professional rapists and breaking in a girl

I was reading about Chicago crime during the 1920s. To stock brothels, gangsters used to kidnap girls and lock them into rooms

From there they'd be "broken in" by "professional rapists". After a couple days, they would obey and then eventually would become completely willing prostitutes. They'd even enjoy it and compete with the other girls to seduce the johns

I'm sure 1920s Chicago wasn't the only place this was done and it's probably done now somewhere too.

(BabilKrali)
okey. I like that. Where should I send my CV for job application.

(7339er)
they only use chads to make these girls into whores. sex with an incel would make them suicide

(Jackson14)
Jesus Christ, could you imagine being the "break in" guys...

(Cerebral hypoxia)
@Jackson 14:
Jesus Christ, could you imagine being the "break in" guys...

They even got paid for it. Honestly I could never dream of doing something like that. Rape isn't a turn on because half the appeal of sex is actually being desired tbh tbh

(WarriorSkull)
@Cerebral hypoxia:
They even got paid for it. Honestly I could never dream of doing something like that. Rape isn't a turn on because half the appeal of sex is actually being desired tbh tbh

People imagine all rape is the type where some blonda stacy gets jumped by some man in the park while she was jogging alone and is beaten half to death and then raped while in her coma. These women were all scared and refusing until the pro rapist pulled out his big, plump and juicy Chad cock and the women's eyes grew big and their mouths began to water as much as their cunts.

(AfrikanCel)
JFL. I would do that if I were in the 1920s.

Various incels, incels.me 6 Comments [7/15/2018 8:38:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138887

Women should be arrested for wearing tight clothing
It serves no purpose except sexual seduction.

Fontaine, incels.me 5 Comments [7/15/2018 8:38:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138845

[Note: They are reacting to a report of an incident where a gang of 4 women attacked and beat a man unconscious]

Group of ‘women’ attack a man

(Dragoncake)
The violent stampers look male to me.

(Jorah)
These are not biological women.

(deydododatdodontdeydo)
Are they definitely "women"?

(Jorah)
why would the report even say that they were women? Because they have long hair and mini skirts?

(Branleuse)
fucks sake. they're not women

(Lysimachia)
Is Madam JoJo's still open? If it is they look like they are on the way there. I used to work next to that place and would often get on/off Leicester Square tube with drag queens and cross-dressers.

(LaSqrrl)
Those broad shoulders?
Most oppressed group on the planet?

No. And no.

(SpartacusVonWaitrose)
The thing that worries me most about self-ID is the effect it might have on crime statistics, masking male violence so we are unable to name it, talk about it, and stop it.

(sundaynamechange1)
I wonder what the crime statistics will go down as if they get charged ?

(AngryAttackKittens)
Huh, funny how I've never seen a group of women on a night out beat the living shit out of a man like that. I wonder what could possibly account for this unexpected event.

(gendercritter)
I found that intimidating just watching it. It was vicious.

Those are trans people, not women. And yes I'm very concerned too that male crimes are being masked in how they are reported.

(MsBeaujangles)
Whatever the natal sex of the attackers, this clip highlights the need for a system of categorising people by natal sex so nobody is in any doubt about a person's sex when they are committing violent acts. IF the attackers are male, this seems to be being reported and possibly recorded as a violent attack by women.
I fully accept that some people do not want to be defined by or referred to according to their natal sex. I have no problem with not highlighting people's sex or alluding to it in contexts were sex-based patterns of behaviour and / or sexed bodies are not significant.

(poopsqueak)
That is shocking. Completely shocking. I was watching thinking 'only men usually fight like that' and then 'oh....right'

I sincerely hope this doesn't go down as women on men violence.

(SirVixofVixHall)
That is horrifying. WHY the insistence in the article that the attackers are women ? WOMEN. They didn’t even bother with the prefix of trans. Surely they are drag queens anyway ? This is the issue with single sex space. Imagine the reaction from them if you looked at them askance in the Ladies.

various mumsnet commenters, Mumsnet 10 Comments [7/13/2018 1:53:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138870

foids are EXTREMELY boring people to have around unless u're a low IQ normie cunt

have u ever had a conversation with a young foid that was legit interested without the help of your dick?

I haven't or it was so long ago that I don't remember it. Probably when I was a kid.

all foids are essentially ultra-normies falling for ALL mainstream concepts

they are constantly sniffing blue powder while completely deluding themselves of the reality they live in

they are also hard-wired to be followers

WOMEN CANNOT BE LEADERS.

The same way a fucking horse cannot have the character of a dog.

Women are incapable of making the profound CONCLUSIONS and SACRIFICES needed to become a leader.

All rebels are MEN.

Not only because of physical strength and abilities but because of MEN'S DEEPER understanding of life too

A foid will never ever fight the status quo unless it becomes a mainstream thing.

They will fake it by being punks, drilling their ears, gettings tattoes, but in the hearts - they will remain normies.

There's a reason why there are fewer foids in jail...and it's not just the law.

It's because foids are MORE obedient and incapable of sacrificing their normie life for the greater good.

(Emphasis original)

uninstall, incels.me 8 Comments [7/14/2018 9:31:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138840

"If you weren't so misogynistic girls would like you!"

This is sheer and utter bullshit. Cucks and femoids have it completely fucking backwards; we are "misogynistic" because girls don't like us (and because society in general treats us like shit). Many if not most of us were once bluepilled. We dreamed about the loving waifu, the white picket fence and all that... Only to have our dreams shattered and our hopes crushed by reality.

Show me a "misogynist" and I'll show you the women who made him that way.

Redpill Robert, incels.me 5 Comments [7/15/2018 6:44:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 138871

“if feminists want equality they should support women being drafted!” is one of the best examples of why it’s bad that feminism is misconceived as being about equality to men rather than liberation from men. men create war, men created the draft, we don’t want anything to do with it. i don’t want equal opportunity to be sent to war to harm women in other countries.

happy-terf, tumblr 7 Comments [7/15/2018 6:47:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top