1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 45793

Dinosaur bones are found buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. It's obvious to me they were deposited there by the great flood.

Pilgrim, Yahoo Answers Religion and Spirituality 32 Comments [8/24/2008 9:31:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Gorgeoustxwoman

Quote# 45803

[this guy should be fired, stat!... wtf!]

Dr. Paul C. Vitz, professor of psychology at New York University and a former atheist, is the author of Faith of the Fatherless. In this thought-provoking book, Vitz diagnoses the root causes of atheism and agnosticism. In studying the biographies of many of the leading atheists of the past three centuries, Vitz concludes that virtually all had an absent, distant, harassed or abusive father early in their childhood — often before 18 months of age.

Dr. Paul Vitz, James Dobson's: focus on the family website. 61 Comments [8/24/2008 9:37:41 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: senorchipotle

Quote# 45727

For anyone who is Christian or has a close relationship with God...please help.?

how do you deal with athiest people?...i mean i dont argue them and i respect their view points but i just want to lead them in the right way if you know what i mean...it hurts me to see people who are athiest...any suggestions to "how to guid them in the right direction?"...like idk what to say when their like "i dont get how people can belive that God came out of no where, but the universe cant?"...I tell them...God didnt just come out of nowhere, hes always exsisted..but they dont listen...they all seem to be so close-minded!...but i guess just talking to them about it plants a seed? right?...and thats the first step, isnt it?.....what are some good ways to plants seeds you guys??? and to maybe convince a nonbeliver to belive?

Casey F, Yahoo Answers 35 Comments [8/24/2008 10:10:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Lola Flores

Quote# 138909

Life ends in your late 20s

There are no experiences worth having beyond this point. Life is just slavery, whether you're an incel or normie. The only difference is who we serve. Beta males will dedicate the rest of their cucked existence to their (((jobs))), ungrateful roastie wives, and Chad's kids. JFL if you envy them. JFL if you want to be grown.

I don't think we were meant to live this long. Youngcels, enjoy the small amount of freedom you have now because youth is everything.

fukmylyf, incels.me 14 Comments [7/16/2018 7:38:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138818


Children simply lack the maturity to make sexual decisions. Our bodies may have evolved to be sexually mature by age 13, but the average person only lived into his thirties in prehistoric times. Just because the body is ready doesn't mean the mind can make mature decisions in today's world.

But they have the maturity to make traffic decisions as they walk to school or ride a bicycle? As I was suggesting to Brian, you seem to think sex is a dangerous thing. Its a wonder humanity survived if so.

Another strange thing about your point here is that you seem to think its harder to get by in today's world than prehistoric times! Therefore, more maturity is required with regards to sex! How completely preposterous! We can prevent pregnancies with drugs and condoms. Most diseases can be cured with a shot. STD testing can be done to ensure partners are disease free. I scarcely understand how more maturity is needed now than in the past.

I also don't see why sex has be such supreme danger. With an attitude like that, its a wonder you would let a 13 year old cross the road by themself.

Sex has real consequences that can change or end lives -- STDs, pregnancy, and emotional damage are all among them.

Well, I already addressed pregnancy and STDs. (And I still don't think they hold a candle to getting run over on a bicycle). But emotional damage? Where do you get this stuff?

Is it illegal for teens to have sex with eachother? No. So what of the emotional damage? Again, you seem to be saying that sex is extremely dangerous. Pah! You want emotional damage? Divorce. Death in the family. Moving away. Paralysis from a cheerleading accident.

For me, sex and sexual things have always been emotionally soothing. From playing doctor when I was a kid to bonking with my girlfriend today.

I wonder if you ever in your life considered the emotional damage of NOT having sex. I experienced plenty of that before I got out of college. It was a very painful time. I am grateful for every childhood and teen sexual experience I had, but I did not have nearly enough. Both my childhood and teen sexual experiences involved adults (though I wanted but did not have actual sex). The only thing that hurt me was have to wait for months and years before the next experience. Surely I am not alone.

If you ask me teens especially are being harmed emotionally by being cut off from the rest of the humanity in this way. I blame this state of affairs for things like smoking, binge drinking and runaways. Used to be a 13 year old could expect to be married soon. Now they are forced into celibacy essentially. Its inhuman cruelty and no wonder teens are viewed as being unstable when they are treated like this.

Maybe stoning is too harsh, but I'd have no problem seeing pedophiles castrated, if they're more than a few years older than their victims.

This sentence is mixed up 8 ways from Sunday. I have to assume that since you said pedophiles and victim, that you mean the younger party is twelve at the outside, since that is about average for puberty. A few years older would be 15. So you would not only call a 15 year old with a 12 year old partner a pedophile, you would have them castrated?

You also assume the younger party is upset or harmed and is a victim out of hand. And further you don't seem to realize that most age of consent violations are not committed by pedophiles.

Like BrianLewis, your viewpoints are based on unfounded assumptions that are very negative about sex and that have been feed to you by a sex negative society. Your viewpoints are contradictary and you don't seem to have examined anything in much depth at all. Yet it seems you have firmly made up your mind despite those horrible failings.

I had a couple friends, one girl of 14 and a man of 20. They fell in love. Their relationship was approved by her father, a man who is very strict and very protective of his children. Last I heard, they got married. I ask you, would you have my friend castrated?

---------- Post added at 02:37 ---------- Previous post was at 02:11 ----------

RolandtheHeadless said:
Amen. Adults who have sex with children are exploiting them, and they're rapists because children lack the capacity for consent.

Can a child consent to surgery? Can a child consent to eating mashed pototoes? Either could be life threatening. I find it strange where capacity to consent is touted as the end-all-be-all argument for sex issues, but completely ignored for pretty much all other issues.

I was a child once. I consented to a lot of things. I knew who I liked and who I didn't. I was very interested in sex and I knew who I would like to have sex with and who I wouldn't. I did not lack capacity. I lacked experience and knowledge. You don't gain either for doing nothing.

My view of your philosophy is that you first enforce ignorance. Then you say they can't consent because they are ignorant. Its extremely backward thinking.

I also don't like that you would call someone a rapist and exploiter just because of age even though they may well be kind and caring and generous to their sex partner, and would not dream of harming or tricking them. Rape has a real and serious meaning, and you dilute it with ideas like that.

It is preposterous to decide such issues on age alone at the expense of a million other details, including and especially the sentiments of the child or teen in question.

Pedophiles who act on their perversion make me want to punch their lights out.

They said the same of gays 50 years ago.

The only real perversion is asexuality.

Mark of Zorro, Japan Reference forums 6 Comments [7/16/2018 2:40:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 45785

If you don't believe God created all living things, male and female, in 6 days....
How many millions of years was it between the first male and the first female?

Unknown, Missing Universe Museum 38 Comments [8/24/2008 11:56:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By:

Quote# 45770

And most cultist are fully convienced they have the right faith. So anything must be done in Love, with respect, and with God's Word.

Wally, RaptureReady 38 Comments [8/25/2008 12:19:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 138918

I find this show the most horrible on earth. I am also disgusted at how bad of a person Chris Hansen is. He knows he's (basically) ending another man's life and he's just sitting there calm about it. I'm all for them getting their punishments etc., but not censoring their faces/voice and airing their name for the entire world to see is just wrong.

It's not like any of the people on the show is actively looking for 13 year olds because in reality, there is no 13 year old cute girl in adult chat rooms looking for a 45 year old perv to lose her virginity to. They're just putting out dream-come-true scenarios that are too good to be true with young cute girls willing to do anything for free, and some dumb guys falls for it. So far, has there even been 1 single guy on this show that had any record of previous sexual charges against minors? I don't think so.




Rape is sexual intercourse without the other party's consent. Children can't consent. All sex with children is rape, you sick fuck.


Shut the fuck up you dumb fucking douchebag. Rape=/=Child sexual abuse. She wanted it, it's still illegal, I know. But quit saying "raping a child". And besides, he wasn't going to rape a child, he was going to talk to Christ Hansen.

Shut the fuck up, you're so retarded it hurts. I honestly wish there was a retard-lock for reddit so that people like you would get the fuck away. But RES block function will have to do the job for now, bye you dumb fucking loser. :)

xHPx, Reddit 7 Comments [7/16/2018 12:54:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 45783

"Reason is Faith's greatest Enemy," i saw this on a church billboard sign in front lawn and?

wanted to know what you guys thought about this statement?



Answer :Reason is not the enemy of faith unless your "reasoning" conflicts with the Word of God. God is always right.

Frankly in order for a person to be an athiest he has to set reasoning aside and accept it in faith.

Athiests reject the laws of thermodynamics. The laws of thermodynamics make it clear that someting can't just pop into existance from absolute nothing with absolutely no cause yet atheists claim that this is the way the universe came into being. Athiests also claim inanimate matter just began to live even though this has never been observed in a laboratory

Buddy R, Yahoo Answers 33 Comments [8/25/2008 2:31:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: J Arcenas

Quote# 45807

So, basically, do you believe in evolution? If that's so, you are believing that two apes mated, came out with some hairless freak baby with a really large head, and magically, some other horny ape couple within a reasonable distance had an equally freakish child that by some miracle is of another gender. Those two children must have found each other and mated having at least two more children of multiple genders. Next, those two must mate and have surviving children without birth defects from in breeding, to continue the race. Which, I'll assume is human.........

Yea, evolution sounds REALLY possible. Not to mention the fact that this would have had to occur thousands of times, since, according to evolutionism, we started as single celled organisms. Yet, scientist have yet to find a non divine way for life to begin.

Guns Bovolt, BattleOn Forums 28 Comments [8/25/2008 6:28:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Jay-sus

Quote# 138928

Well, I know that, like a cancer-cell torments surrounding cells with short, sharp, wild and uncontrollable shock tactics, a bully will torment the nervous energy out of their neighbours, as well, forming a nasty tumour of like minded people who go around in gangs creating havoc, even death, because they to live by wild and uncontrollable laws. Now, don't you think that it is scientifically conceivable that Jesus Christ knew this as well and, using his Godly knowledge, was showing and teaching us how to keep our genetic health soothed and calm...because its a certain fact that since the populations have been so wildly and hysterically manipulated that the occurence of cancer has gone through the roof...and so, perhaps, Jesus had the answer all along. His accurate word, that is, not the iniquitous versions that many are so fond of.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 3 Comments [7/17/2018 5:53:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 138924

The Creator sets the standards of what is right and what is wrong - whether we fallen human beings like it or not. This also applies to how we should handle our sexual relationships. Thus, His standard is Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve or Madam and Eve.

To reject God's standards is to reject God Himself and those who reject God will be rejected by God with ultimately eternal consequences. Whether or not we interpret that as loving, the fact is that this is what God has revealed about Himself. He is God.

Watcher, Premier 9 Comments [7/16/2018 12:58:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 138803

Nobody on the left in California likes to talk about how the gay marriage ballot referendum was mostly shut down by blacks and Hispanics.

Sometimes I think they are being disingenuous but then sometimes I think the white left really is this dumb.

I encourage intersectionalism because it will inevitably be the left’s undoing.

Their leadership and funding is gay, white and Jewish while their voter base is composed of minorities who hate gays and whites. Sounds like a good plan guys

Shister6022, Reddit 3 Comments [7/12/2018 12:26:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 45800

[On a debate about evolution.]

i dont believe in evolution. i really think its useless, unsupported and silly, i dont have much else to say.

[Other post by him after someone asked him if he believes in creation.]

i do believe in creationism, i find nothing funny about it

Redneck Ninja, BattleOn Forums 21 Comments [8/25/2008 3:47:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jay-sus

Quote# 138899

I never said bikini's signified consent. However, if you're 14 years old with breasts just popping out of your chest and you're running around in hooker boots and booty shorts where half your ass hangs out (No, not just short shorts, I mean booty shorts where half your ass really IS hanging out) and a bikini top or some other fragile excuse for clothing, and you get spoken to with disrespect, and you get treated with disrespect, then my point is that they can't really place the entire blame on the other party. The disrespect began with themselves.

Again sorry, this does not signify disrepect on the part of the girls or the apropriatness of a fifty year old man to offer his services.



I suppose it depends on the individual, really. There's the girls who are simply too young & ignorant, and rather unfortunately have parents who simply don't care... they usually grow into young adults who also don't care, it has a rather snowball effect. There's also the 'rebels' ...the girls who do come from perfectly good homes, who rebel against their parents morals and do so by being as scantily clad as they can without getting arrested for public indecency. Women and girls who dress "nicely" are fine. Women and girls who dress "slutty" and "Skanky" are not so fine. I do not look at them & think "Wow, they look fine!" although you as a male perhaps are doing so without even realizing how shockingly low these girls self-esteem truly is. Healthy sexuality does not mean that they have to sleep with everybody who pays them a compliment, nor does "slut" equal healthy sexuality. A girl who wears a "slut" t-shirt and takes a 50 year old guy up on his offers, isn't healthy. I rather prefer the girls who can actually realize the inappropriateness of the fifty year old man offering his services that you mentioned, than the ones who don't. Both types of girls exist but when they dress the same way, how is the 50 year old guy supposed to be able to tell them apart? Get it yet? Its a learning curve. 50 year old guy has probably learned that he has better luck with skanks than classy women, so those are the ones he offers his services to.

Persiana, Canadaka 5 Comments [7/15/2018 1:30:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138919

If your pastor teaches that it's not enough to see yourself as a guilty sinner in God's holy eyes to be saved (Romans 3:19); but also, he says you MUST turn away from sinful living and forsake the sinful bad habits in your life, and surrender all to Jesus to live for Him, then you are in a CULT!!! You DON'T have to invite Jesus into your life to be saved. You can do that and go straight to Hell when you die. You DON'T get saved by turning over a new leaf, nor do you get saved by ceasing from bad works to do good works. The world's churches are saturated with religious hypocrites, who are doing their best to abstain from sinning because they love God; yet they are going to split Hell wide open the very second they die and BURN FOREVER AND EVER!!!

Why you ask? It is because no amount of good works or human effort can erase the sins we've committed throughout life. I am a horrible sinner! You are a horrible sinner! We are all sinners by nature and by choice! We all commit wickedness!!! We all deserve to go straight to Hell—Do not pass go, do not collect $200, go directly to jail (remember the fun board game Monopoly?). Well, Hell isn't a game, and it won't be fun. There are no parties in Hell. You won't be with your friends in Hell. You don't have any power over your horrific conditions. In Hell, you are in God's torture prison, where there is no rest day nor night, no mercy and the smoke of your torment rises up forever from the fiery furnace (Revelation 14:11). Why would you want to go there? There are no winners in Hell, only big time losers for all eternity. If you choose to go to Hell by rejecting Christ Jesus as your personal Savior, then you will be the eternal loser.

Only a complete fool would reject God's free gift of eternal life (Ephesians 2:8-10). Tragically, most people won't come to Jesus to be saved, either because they feel safe while blinded in their false religion (like Roman Catholicism, Judaism and Mormonism); or else because they love their sins and don't want anything to do with the Holy Spirit who convicts people of their sins (John 3:20). If you go to Hell, you won't just be the lonesome loser, you'll also be the loneliest loser for all eternity!!! The choice is yours alone to make.

Revelation 21:8 lists a group of people who will be cast into the Lake of Fire and Brimstone, which is the Second Death. The first person listed is those who are timid, fearful. Hell will be filled with people who wanted answers but were too afraid to ask. God won't allow you to slide on Judgment Day.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 10 Comments [7/16/2018 1:00:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138903

What's wrong with marijuana?

(The author argues against marijuana legalization. She says that marijuana is getting more potent, that it can cause disease, that "users showed an increase in violent and aggressive behavior," and that it doesn't really have medicinal qualities. Then she finishes with this as her closing point.)

A Physical and Spiritual Sin — Controversy over marijuana seems partially from confusion on the subject. Effects differ from person to person with the same amount of the drug and even occasion to occasion in the same individual. Some emphasize this and the pleasure of the high, to argue that everyone should be "free" to use cannabis. To clear the confusion, we have to open our Bibles.

(1 Corinthians 6:20) Scripture reveals that our bodies and minds are not our own to abuse. God commands us "Glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God's." An incredible, eternal future awaits each of us when we turn to God to let Him develop our minds and character. Intoxicating ourselves on the "pleasures of sin." (Hebrews 11:25) and the "lust of flesh" destroys this incredible human potential. (Galatians 5:16, 1 John 2:16). If you have a problem with drugs, you can beat it! Philippians 4:13 says all things are possible with Christ strengthening us. "Come boldly unto the throne of grace that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need." (Hebrews 4:16)

Margaret Brackett, Newberry Observer 8 Comments [7/16/2018 1:48:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 138905

At a certain point we have to stop blaming people for their success. White people are in power because they were able to colonize non-whites. They were able to do that because they had better technology and military. How are either of those things bad? Better yet, aren’t both of things worthy of praise?

Matthew Manning, Quora 11 Comments [7/16/2018 1:50:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 45796

I've got two questions for Dr. Bradley. Comparing Stalin and Hitler's death camps to Christ's justice of hell is ludicrous. God is a divine being made into the flesh to suffer and feel our pain so He can be a more compassionate and loving God. So how can you compare Hitler and Stalin's judgments with God almighty, the creator of man? Should not Satan be condemned to hell for his pride? How can man try to set himself up as God, above God? Two questions.

Random Psychopath, Craig-Bradley Debate 25 Comments [8/25/2008 1:32:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Bill O'Rly

Quote# 138831

(=Progressive vs Homophobic Christian=)

Jon Davis: Still missed it!! Jesus addressed this DIRECTLY. Right here!
Matthew 19:4-5
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]
One only need to reference THE DESIGN to understand THE PERVERSION.

blind poet38: Not necessarily true. Translated into English, the Bible condemns homosexuality. But looking at the original text, the Hebrew word that is used is very vague. And Jesus never said that gay people couldn't get married, but it was just God's design that they don't get married.

Jon Davis: "Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable" is not a word, it is a description to eliminate the confusion.
Jesus didn't need to say that "gay people can't get married", he referenced the design and that settled it. One only need to reference THE DESIGN to understand THE PERVERSION.
Penis is designed for vagina. *blush* Vagina is for penis. *blush* Anus is for pooping. *pffrrt*
It's not homophobia. It's basic biology.

blind poet38: If it is basic biology, how is it that scientists have found over 1500 animal species that practice homosexual acts. You are just assuming homosexuality is a sin. But the Bible really does not say that. And I am a Christian by the way.

Jon Davis: It is basic biology because that is how we procreate, and to do things differently promotes bad health (bleeding butts anyone?) and is not conducive to humankind's continuity.
Animals do all kinds of disgusting things. Dogs eat poop. Cats pee on clothes. Are you just an animal? No. Mankind was made in God's image.
As for everything else you just said ("You are just assuming homosexuality is a sin" etc) you're obviously trolling. I just quoted the text that called it "detestable". And while neither Old nor New Testaments use the term "homosexual" (a term that modern English coined) they both describe the sexual act and describe it with disgust and contempt.

blind poet38: You can think I am trolling if you want to, but you have to understand that the original Hebrew uses terminology that is not as clear-cut as people think it is when it deals with condemning homosexuality.

Jon Davis: Read the OP. Matthew 19:4-5 has no dependency upon Leviticus 18:22; indeed it goes the other way around. You're barking at the wrong argument. I myself was trolled by actually responding to it.

blind poet38: Sorry dude, I don't get your point. All I am saying is that in the original Hebrew, the word that is used is not as clear-cut as people think it is to condemn homosexuality.

Jon Davis: Now you're spamming. Stop repeating yourself. Even if it was true, it's irrelevant, and I already explained why. Now go read Romans 1:18-32 (originated as Greek, not Hebrew), study it with an exhaustive study Bible which provides insight on the original language, and come back when you've studied more than the ridiculous false "truths" and FUD you've found on the Internet.

blind poet38: You can be dismissive all you want, and that is fine. But why is it irrelevant? We are talking about homosexuality and the Bible aren't we?

blind poet38: It is obvious you have no answers to anything. I have already done the research.

AskariStudios: But God Said that all sex outside of Marriage is wrong. Since Marriage is in between only a man and a women. this makes homosexuality wrong. in no way shap or form has marriage ben said to take place between a man and a man or a woman and a woman. ONLY a MAN and a Woman.this has been stated numerous times in the bible. Not only this but in Levitcus, it is clear stated that homosexuality is an abomination. clear cut. in Jude, it its written that Sodom and Gomorrah gave themselves up to sexual perversion (homosexuality) and where thus made an example of. So with Just Common Logic, and the fact that through multiple translations, the same wording has shown up., its clear that the bible is against homosexuality.

blind poet38: The Bible never says that sex outside of marriage is a sin.

Jon Davis: "Fornication" is quite elaborately spoken against. That you would say such a thing speaks volumes about modern society being so casually hedonistic; sex outside of marriage was universally taboo and expected to be everyone's struggle, it didn't need to be spelled out in detail like it spelled out homosexuality, it was simply referred to as "fornication".
http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Fornication/
http://www.openbible.info/topics/fornication
http://www.gotquestions.org/sex-before-arriage.html

AskariStudios: 1 Cor 7 states : "Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: t“It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband." Its clear that Paul(I do believe he wrote this) implies that Sex before marriage is sexual immorality and that do to this temptation, a man should marry.
want more proof? look up : (Acts 15:20; 1 Corinthians 5:1; 6:13, 18; 10:8; 2 Corinthians 12:21; Galatians 5:19; Ephesians 5:3; Colossians 3:5; 1 Thessalonians 4:3; Jude 7) and Hebrews 13:4.

blind poet38: The only sexual sins that are mentioned in the Bible are adultery, incest and sex with animals. Fornication means "sexual sin." Which sins? Adultery, incest and sex with animals. Premarital sex is not mentioned as a sin.

Jon Davis: "Fornication" does not mean "sexual sins in general". It means "extramarital sex". If you want to discuss Greek or Hebrew, say so, but you didn't. Look up the word and stop speaking assertions about our English words when you don't even know your own English language.

blind poet38: Fornication does not mean "extramarital sex." That is what someone told you it means. Fornication means "sexual sin." Learn the facts.

Jon Davis: There's a fine line between idiocy and trolling. That line is knowledgable intent. I'm not sure what you're doing in your case. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fornication

blind poet38: OK Jon, you are right. Translated into English, premarital sex is a sin, despite the fact that Solomon and David and Samson, etc etc etc all did it and were never punished for it in the Bible. But the question is in the NT,, what does porneia mean? That is not the Greek word for adultery or any specific sexual sin. It generally means any kind of sexual immorality. And what is sexual immorality in the Bible? Adultery and incest and sex with animals.

Jon Davis: what do you mean "they weren't punished for it"? OT figures who engaged in fornication took a pounding for it. Most of their stories are used as case lessons for the hell people go through when they do it.
To answer your question: Fundamentally, in the Bible there are only two types of sex: sex within marriage (one man and one woman) and sexual immorality, porneia. Read the OP in this thread if you don't understand.

Jon Davis, Youtube 2 Comments [7/15/2018 6:42:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 45859

[After another poster commented that they could not bring themselves to attend the future wedding of their niece and their niece's lesbian partner ...}

No, it's not fun having a family member upset with you or angry at you. But at least you know you're doing the right thing by not attending their wedding. When it comes down to it, what's more important? Your niece's feelings or the Word of God?

Jubilee on Earth, Rapture Ready 39 Comments [8/25/2008 2:25:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 45801

[Our buddy's Tom's thoughts on what should be done about "evolutionists" {PDF}]

?? Labor camps. Their fellow believers were high on these.
But, my position would be that most of them have lived
their lives at, or near the public trough. So, after their own beliefs, their life should continue only as long as they can support themselves in the camps.

?? Require them to wear placards around their neck, or perhaps large medallions which prominently announce "Warning: Evolutionist! Mentally Incompetent - Potentially
Dangerous." I consider this option too dangerous.

?? Since evolutionists are liars and most do not really believe evolution we could employ truth serum or water-boarding to obtain confessions of evolution rejection. But, this should, at most, result in parole, because, like Muslims, evolutionist religion permits them to lie if there is any benefit to them.

?? An Evolutionist Colony in Antarctica could be a promising option. Of course inspections would be required to prevent too much progress. They might invent gunpowder.

?? A colony on Mars would prevent gunpowder from harming
anyone but their own kind, in the unlikely event they turned
out to be intelligent enough to invent it.

?? All options should include 24-hour sound system playing
Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris
reading Darwin's Origin of Species, or the preservation of
Favored Races by Means of Natural Selection. Of course
some will consider this cruel & unusual, especially since
they will undoubtedly have that treatment for eternity.

Tom Willis, CSA News 53 Comments [8/25/2008 4:19:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Orlor

Quote# 45812

Here's where I get that if you have committed one sin, you have committed them all, God judges all sins equally, mk. This is easy to see since He is all Holy and sin against Him deserves eternal punishment, and since everything is His creation, any sin is also against Him, you with me so far? Now if God judges all sins the same, then murdering someone gets you the same punishment as adultery. This is logic, I understand it is hard for us humans to understand since we "rank" crimes, but to God, all sins are just that, sin. Plain and simple.

SpecterSparten, Youtube Commets 32 Comments [8/25/2008 6:31:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Malkavian Jeff

Quote# 45835

Family tree charts are illustrations that show the supposed connections between species and their ancestors. Here are some questions to consider:

* Do these charts show transitions from one specie to another, or are there distinct gaps between kinds?
* If the connecting lines are erased, is evolution evident, or are we left with a picture of fully functional life forms?
* Are any "transitional" forms shown really "mosaic" forms?



Notice at the bottom that there are millions of missing links between the microscopic life forms and the thousands of fully formed creatures that appear suddenly without any ancestors!

See the same chart below with all of the imaginary connecting lines removed.



Now look at the same chart with all of the imaginary lines removed.
All you see are fully formed creatures with no transitional forms whatsoever.
The very thing that would prove Evolution (transitional forms) are conspicuously absent!
This is a picture of completely different species that could have lived at the same time.

Unknown, Missing universe Museum 57 Comments [8/25/2008 6:32:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Larty

Quote# 138914


It all begins and ends with an invisible, superabundant, dynamic energy...that has always been and always will be, Stranger. Not unlike dark energy and dark matter, but with a much bigger bite. If you can't get your head around that then you won't get your head around anything I say...but Almighty God, endorsed by Jesus Christ, says clearly...look into the heavens, who put them all there, with the superabundance of his dynamic energy/mighty power, not one is missing...and everyone is identified and catalogued, according to the same verses, in Isaiah, if your interested.

Now...if you hit upon the correct science you can identify all things that have a scientific footprint...and Jesus Christ and Almighty God made those footprints.

NicholasMarks, Religion and Ethics 1 Comments [7/16/2018 12:49:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: NearlySane
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top