Quote# 126325

Muslim men are allowed to hit their wives if they disobey them and domestic violence is a 'beautiful blessing', according to the women's branch of a radical Islamic group.

Sydney primary school teacher Reem Allouche told the women's arm of hardline political group Hizb ut-Tahrir that men are permitted to hit women with sticks.

During the 30-minute discussion at a meeting in Sydney's west, Ms Allouche and fellow panellist Atika Latifi - who are both wearing headscarves - describe how beating women is a 'symbolic act'.

At one point they even demonstrated how to use a small stick called a 'sivaak' to hit 'disobedient' women.

In a video of the debate, which has been posted on Facebook, Ms Allouche says men should use the sivaak to punish their wives.

She then uses one of the sticks to hit Ms Latifi while the pair laugh.

Other permissible methods to punish women involve using a twisted scarf or piece of fabric, the women say.

Ms Allouche says the act is 'symbolic', while Ms Latifi claims it's 'a beautiful blessing'.

The women agree that they should only be beaten if they are caught 'committing sin' - pointing out that this means seriously disrespecting Allah or their husbands.

'Disobedience to the husband. Immoral acts or cheating. Admitting anyone to the home that the husband doesn't like,' Ms Latifi explains.

Ms Allouche smiles as she adds that does not mean a man can beat his wife simply for not cooking dinner, with the women agreeing that violence should only be used to 'promote tranquility'.

The pair agree that men have the right to beat their wives because husbands take a 'leadership' position within the family.

'It goes hand in hand that he would have the right to undertake disciplinary ­measures,' Ms Allouche says.

Ms Latifi adds: 'He is permitted - not obliged, not encouraged - but permitted, to hit her. That is what everyone is talking about. It should not cause pain. Not harsh.'

During the debate, Ms Allouche says wives who disobey Muslim teachings could face a beating from their husband, but only because 'he loves his wife, he fears for his wife'.

'It's almost a natural consequence,' she adds.

'He's not responding through anger or frustration or rage. He's responding in obedience to Allah's commands, in a measured and staged way, because we know when people talk about violence against women, often it happens in the heat of the moment, in anger, in frustration and what-not, whereas here, it's managed.'

Ms Latifi claims violence should be a last resort for husbands, saying they should admonish them first.

If that does not work, he should 'refuse to share the bed with her, not being intimate with her'.

Finally, if that does not work, he 'is permitted to hit her'.

'And what a beautiful blessing, that he said not to take the steps at the one time, but one after the other,' she continues.

'And what is the third option all about? What kind of hitting? It should not cause pain.'

The all-women meeting was held in Lakemba in Sydney's inner west, The Australian reported.

The government considered banning Hizb ut-Tahrir in 2007 but eventually deemed it to be a political group.

Islamic leader Keysar Trad apologised at the weekend for saying hitting women was a 'last resort', admitting to Sky News presenter Andrew Bolt that he had made a 'slip up'.

Reem Allouche and Atika Latifi, The Daily Mail 11 Comments [4/15/2017 11:13:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126356

Dinosaurs never existed, it's all a fabricated lie to fool the world into thinking God doesn't exist. There were never any dinosaur bones found, not one society who's job entailed excavating the earth, ever found dino bones, but all of a sudden, in the 18 hundreds a supposed dino tooth was found.
All these supposed dino skeleton's are nothing but the mixed bones of other animals mixed with mammals. The whole thing was started by a bunch of Freemasonic Satanists and it's funny that it happened around the same time as Satanic Charles Darwin another freemason.?

David Fleming, youtube 8 Comments [4/16/2017 4:51:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126368

Saving The Middle Class

Trump’s agenda includes reviving the middle class from the damage of the last 8 years, but not if Schumer can stop him. Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

To see more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

A.F. Branco, Comically Incorrect 13 Comments [4/16/2017 4:54:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 126367

“How do you explain the millions of children that He lets perish from starvation?”

If you are an atheist, He doesn’t let any children starve to death, because He doesn’t exist. If you believe in evolution it’s simply a matter of survival of the fittest.

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 23 Comments [4/16/2017 4:54:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 126372

The left is no doubt going to escalate.

At the next battle, they're going to bring knives, possibly guns.

Fortunately, the right is learning, adapting to antifa tactics, and beating them black and blue.

I'm not worried anymore.

In fact, I'm hopeful for the future.



The left should be scared shitless right now.

Nathan Damigo and Based Stick Man are heroes to 60 percent of Americans.

The average American is being trained to see antifa and leftists as worthless scum deserving of a beatdown, possibly mass execution.



This is why I'm not worried about Trump.

If he wants to be the American Heinrich Brüning, he'll just get eclipsed by a genuinely right-wing leader.

Americans are not only becoming more open to the idea of a "fascist" government, they CRAVE one.

Every street brawl pushes them right.



The left will start stabbing right-wingers at events like Berkeley.

They'll start shooting them and intimidating/assassinating the family members of nationalist leaders.

And when they do, they'll be giving the rest of America the justification we need to physically remove them.


Matt Forney, Gab 43 Comments [4/16/2017 4:57:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 126355

Henry Johnson and Joe Tylor, Omniology.com 6 Comments [4/16/2017 4:50:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126369

ROOT: As bad as United Airlines scandal is...not even close to Obama's IRS scandal. Trump needs to compare 1 person mistreated & abused vs. thousands of Republicans targeted, persecuted, punished, intimidated by govt agency by orders of President Obama for their political beliefs. Biggest scandal EVER. Buried by media. Makes United Air scandal look like joke.

Wayne Allyn Root, Wayne Allyn Root's Facebook page 9 Comments [4/16/2017 4:56:39 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 126374

[After someone joked that they would obviously leave those dying be and not save them because they are an atheist who must have no moral values.]

You obviously think (Christians think)atheists can’t be moral -They can.
You obviously think (Christians think)atheists don’t know morality-they do.
Some atheists live better moral lives than Christians.SHOCK!

What Christians are saying is there is no moral or immoral,just or unjust,or good and evil unless God exists
Atheists can’t JUSTIFY objective morality.
Atheists can theorise about HOW we know Murder is wrong(for example),BUT atheism provides NO OBJECTIVE STANDARD that establishes WHY Murder is wrong- UNLESS THEY STEAL FROM GOD!!

billpuntonsghost, Iron-Bru 17 Comments [4/16/2017 4:58:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 126395

There's really no reason to be alive if one were in our situation

The lack of sex, intimacy, validation, and companionship will break you. Every day is a struggle. You can't even get things done because of the sadness. Life, women, sex, they're all pointless to us.

ASS_F, /r/incels 22 Comments [4/17/2017 8:12:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126384

YOU, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com, your time is always ready! But let us imagine a happier place for you...

#2452 Struck By Lightening
Bible Truth Publishers

[The name of the subject in the following message has been changed from the original that we might imagine a better outlook for the Usenet user posting as "burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com"]

It was Sunday afternoon, and the good news of salvation had just been presented to young people in the gospel hall. Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com hurried out with the preacher's words still ringing in his ears: "He, that being often reproved [stiffens] his neck, shall sud-denly be destroyed, and that without remedy" (Proverbs 29:1).

Many times in his life, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com had definitely been "reproved" by the Spirit of God--"convinced" of his sinful nature, of his complete lack of righ-teousness, and of the judgment that would result if he continued in his present direction. Parents who honored and respected God and read the Word of God every day had brought him up. He knew that his parents prayed earnestly every day for his salvation.

Satan, the enemy of our souls, was quick to re-mind Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com, "If you admit you are a sinner and be-lieve in Jesus as your Saviour, think of all the good times you will have to give up. You are young... wait until you are older!"

And Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com did wait. Deliberately smothering the still, small voice of his conscience, he headed down to the lakeshore. There the usual Sunday af-ternoon visitors strolled around or sat on the grass. Some were reading newspapers and books, and others chatted with friends. Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com avoided looking for any friends this time. Instead, he sat by himself looking out over the lake.

He noticed the white caps riding on wind-whipped waves. As he sat, black clouds rolled up from the horizon, covering the afternoon sun and rapidly hiding the clear blue of the sky. A storm was quickly approaching. Zipping up his jacket against the rising wind, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com quickly got up and hurried along the walkway.

Farther on was a big oak tree that he could stand under for some protection from the imminent storm. As he headed to the leafy shelter, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com saw two men hurrying toward the same tree, evidently also looking for shelter.

Jagged flashes of lightning and the clap of thun-der made Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com break into a run. As he ran, he re-alized that sitting and watching the approaching storm instead of heading home had been unwise.

Suddenly, with an instantaneous lightning flash and an ear-splitting crash of thunder, the storm broke. Half blinded by the sudden downpour, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com ran for the tree where he had seen the two men take shelter. Were they still there? Would there be room for him under the tree? Straining to see through the blinding rain, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com could not see them until he was almost upon them.

What he saw was chilling! Flat on the ground at the foot of the tree lay the body of one man, killed instantly by the bolt of lightning. Kneeling at his side and sobbing was the other man.

The last part of the Bible verse the preacher had read earlier that day flashed across Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com's mind: "Shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy." Suddenly the full importance of his own narrow escape burst into his mind. Supposing he had reached the tree and stood in its shelter, in-stead of this man now lying lifeless on the ground! In all honesty, he had to admit that if he were in this man's place--suddenly swept into eternity-- his soul would have been lost, because he was still in his sins. Broken down but grateful, Burn_your_bible@imagine_NO-religion.com thanked the Saviour for sparing him so that he could accept the salvation that is made possible by Christ's payment on the cross.

As you finish reading this true account, we re-mind you that your life has no guarantee. The next heartbeat may be your last. Are you ready to meet a holy God?

He gave His dear Son to die in your place. Christ died that you might live. Will you accept this gift of salvation that He is offering to you right now?

"Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation" (2 Corinthians 6:2).

"The wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord" (Romans 6:23).

"It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: so Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for Him shall He appear the second time without sin unto salvation" (Hebrews 9:27-28).

The White Missionary, They should have killed Jesus in the Manger 15 Comments [4/17/2017 1:12:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 126413

I have American centered myopia, but I can grudgingly admit, that in the face of their persecution and impending genocide, non-democratic racist apartheid was far preferable for the Afrikaners. Abandoning it really was a naive betrayal of their own people. At the level of existential conflict, the only morality that matters is your own survival and loyalty to the tribe. The Afrikaners have been there as long as whites have been in the United States. Under the same rubric we should be forced to give up all our belongings and property to Native Americans or blacks. I'd much rather kill or die than do that, whatever moral argument you could come up with, legit or not.
It's humiliating, but in many ways, I'm sure the Africans were better off economically under apartheid, and without European colonialism they would still be small scale agriculturalists or hunter-gatherers. I might differ in that I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but I'm not sure modern South Africans are willing to pick up the spear again, and they're obviously in many ways dependent on whites to maintain the infrastructure of modernity.
Perhaps the ultimate lesson is, it's a bad idea in the long term to place yourself as a domineering minority where you will have to exploit an alien majority to enrich yourself and maintain order...especially across racial lines...eventually there will be some kind of uprising. And if you must, there's no sense in being half-way evil, "humane" oppression will still be unforgiven.
Any prospect for a breakaway, self sufficient Afrikaner secession, like a large scale Orania, even if it means ceding massive land tracks? Without that, looks like they're shit out of luck.

Cretus clawfinger, Reddit  15 Comments [4/18/2017 12:53:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 47657

Wow, you're such an idiot it's sad. Sarah Palin is a hell of a lot more qualified than Obama. Or wait... is it Osama or Obama? I forget the difference...

Abortion IS wrong. A life is a life. If someone raped you, it's not the baby's fault, what wrong could an innocent baby do? Abortion is murder. These days your mother probably wishes she had an abortion with YOU!

And Palin doesn't hate homosexuals for their personality, etc., she just isn't fond of what they're doing in that "homo" part. Some people just don't know what to think and don't know what to do with themselves, if people were actually "gay", there would've been a lot more gays years ago. It's just a modern day fad because people (like you) are STUPID

?Annie, Lindsay Lohan's MySpace blog 50 Comments [9/16/2008 11:02:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 126323

The great and the good of the “intelligentsia” assure us that all “educated” people accept Charles Darwin’s Evolution as a indisputable fact of science that is "not open for debate." Oh those superstitious "straw-men" bible-thumpers portrayed in the propaganda film Inherit the Wind may have a hard time accepting it, but even the slightest doubt can never be tolerated within the elite confines of the academic cool-kids club. Woodrow Wilson Warmonger of World War I fame, a former Princeton professor himself, put it this way:

“Of course, like every other man of intelligence and education I do believe in organic evolution. It surprises me that at this late date such questions should be raised.”

And yet, neither Darwin, nor Wilson, nor the Communist ACLU Attorney Clarence Darrow (played by Spencer Tracy), nor any other “scientist” (bow your head in solemn reverence when you say that word) has ever adequately addressed the gaping holes of Darwin’s Dogma. The best rebuttal the "smart people" can muster consists of scorn, ridicule, charges of "stupidity" and even government force -- but never any true scientific substance. Many of these holes are blown wide-open in the book: “God vs Darwin: The Logical Supremacy of Intelligent Design Creationism” (by yours truly). But for this particular piece, let us focus on what is perhaps the single biggest flaw of all regarding trans-species “Evolution” – which should not be confused with minor variations / adaptations of existing characteristics already present in a gene pool (Darwin’s finches, peppered moths, stickleback fish, "super rats" etc.) We refer to this gaping hole as the “complex integration” of multiple parts that is found in all living organisms (even “simple” single-cell bacteria).

Darwin and his deluded devotees maintain that tiny “imperceptible” and "innumerable" blind and random mutations, favored by environmental circumstances, added up over very long periods of time to the point that an evolved species (such as us humans) became unrecognizable from our direct lineal “ancestors” (single-cell oceanic bacteria). Apart from the obvious fact that none of these transitions from millions of years ago were observable, how do the Evolutionists explain away the “complex integration” of our body parts? One part of any given creature could not have blindly “evolved” without so many other parts coming into existence at the exact same moment in time. How can hundreds or even thousands of complex parts -- functioning in sync with one another in a scientific symphony in which each component can only function if all the others are in place -- have “blindly” appeared, without intelligent guidance, one piece-of-the-puzzle at a time, over “millions of years?”

To better illustrate this problem, let’s have a closer look at the integration of the digestive system.

To start the digestive process, we need an oral cavity -- that is, a mouth to put the food in. The mouth needs teeth, both upper & lower sets, deeply anchored into our gums, which are attached to a jaw-bone, which is attached to a skull which is etc., etc., etc., Without all of this in place at the same time, the first step of the digestive process comes to a halt. But our gums and 32 perfectly-matching teeth alone, which come if different shapes and sizes for certain functions, won’t ensure survival. We still need saliva to begin the breaking down of the food, as well as the preservation of our teeth and the gums which hold them. And we also need mucous producing cells in the mouth to help form the saliva mix.

Remove any of those elements (oral cavity, teeth (upper & lower), gums, jaw-bone, salivary glands, mucous) and humans (and many other animals) never make it out of the box. Each of the elements is part of an integrated system in which one element cannot function, and serves no purpose, without all of the others already in place. Then of course there is the tongue – a complex multi-faceted organ in its own right, which is vital for chewing and swallowing food. In the back of the mouth, the tongue is anchored into the hyoid bone – which itself is anchored by various muscles and ligaments. Once swallowed, the pre-digested food passes through the pharynx (part of the throat) -- which is lined by more essential membranes and muscles – and moves down to the esophagus (food pipe).

Let’s review the pre-digestion process: oral cavity, teeth (upper & lower), gums, jaw bone, skull, saliva, mucous, tongue, hyoid bone, muscles, ligaments, pharynx, membranes, muscles, and esophagus. That’s 15 systems in all, each of them also highly complex, and each of them integrated with the other systems. Remove just one, and there can be no digestive system and hence, no species. Therefore, the elements of this grand orchestra had to have come into play at the same time – which implies, no, proves deliberate design. But we’re just getting started.

1. Just the individual contents of the mouth alone form a complex integrated system in which each part is useless without all others in place. 2. Complex Integration: Remove just component, and the whole structure becomes non-viable. 3. For that reason alone (although there are many other flaws) Darwin's ridiculous paper gets an "F."

Moving right along, gravity and contraction (more muscles) push the mix into the stomach where digestive enzymes really begin to break down the food. To block these powerful enzymes from literally “eating” the stomach itself, membranes called b]gastric mucosa[/b] produce a protective coating of mucous which lines the stomach. How genius is that? On to the duodenum -- the first section of the small intestine which leads to the large intestine. Along the journey there are more enzymes produced by the pancreas. Then it is down to the colon, (there is an ascending colon, a descending colon and a sigmoid colon) rectum, anal canal and out the anus -- where Darwin's stinky work-of-fiction truly belongs. Assisting the expulsion of bodily waste is the diaphragm -- a sheet of internal skeletal muscle made up of no fewer than a dozen different parts. Though it is mainly part of the respiratory system, the diaphragm also generates the pressure needed for waste disposal.

Key contributions to the process are also rendered by the liver, the gall bladder, the spleen, the cecum, and many more muscles and many more glands to numerous to name. And holding those muscles in place are a complex system of more ligaments fastened to more bones which are fastened to other bones etc. etc. etc. As for the liquids that we ingest, that speaks to a whole other complex integrated system of complex integrated systems involving [b]kidneys, renal arteries, renal veins, urinary tracts, collecting ducts, bladder, pelvis etc[/b. Of course, all of this digestion is pointless without blood-flow to carry the food's nutrients throughout the body – which means that even more complex systems had to have been be put in place at the same time: blood, veins, arteries, capillaries. But the nutrient-carrying blood can’t flow through the vascular system without a pump and an oxidation system already in place, right? You need a set of heart & lungs which are the basis of the cardio-pulminary system -- an incredibly complex integrated structure made up of countless essential components such as the -- (well, you get the point -- we can go on forever with this --)

So, let’s take it from the top, boys and girls. All of the following complex elements must come into place at the same time in order for digestion to work:

oral cavity, teeth, gums, jaw-bone, skull, saliva, mucous, tongue, hyoid bone, muscles, ligaments, pharynx, membranes, more muscles, and esophagus, more muscles, stomach, digestive enzymes, gastric mucosa, duodenum, small intestine, large intestine, more enzymes, pancreas, ascending colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum, anal canal, anus, diaphragm, liver, gall bladder, spleen, cecum, more muscles, more glands, more ligaments, more bones, kidneys, renal arteries, renal veins, urinary tracts, collecting ducts, bladder, pelvis, blood, veins, arteries, capillaries, cardio-pulminary system, a bunch of other intregrated items and systems too numerous to list here and a partridge in a pear tree!

Each necessary component "blindly" evolved and integrated with all the others by itself --- one at a time, without design? Ha ha ha. --- "Intelligent and educated," my foot!

This mind-boggling complexity, -- which cannot be reduced by even a single element lest the species cease to exist -- becomes even more integrated and more complicated when studied on a molecular level --- the complex "4-digit" DNA “computer coding” behind it all. The mere suggestion of these integrated systems blindly “evolving,” one component at a time, independent of one another, in an “imperceptible” manner over millions of years is absurd on its face. As a matter of fact, St. Charles Darwin himself, in a pathetically futile effort to explain away the “problem” that integrated parts posed for his theory, admitted that his idea sounded “absurd in the highest degree.”

From his Origin of the Species:

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."

After objecting to his own theory (so that he can control the debate), Darwin proceeds, in the very next paragraph, to lamely explain away the "absurdity" of attributing the integrated complexity of the eye to random evolution. But his "solution" to the problem amounts to nothing but a diversionary debating trick.

“When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science."

Darwin is using an old lawyer's trick here. He states the objection, then casually explains it away by using a bizarre and totally irrelevant analogy to astronomy. He also adds a theatrical touch of Latin mumbo-jumbo to impress the easily-impressed. We're not talking about the sun and the earth and "Vox populi," Chuckie! The subject here is your admittedly "absurd"-sounding claim that the integrated complexity of organisms and body parts came about blindly, randomly, and one element at a time without any intelligence involved. Explain it for us!

Plato warned us to be on guard against the type of empty diversionary rhetoric that Darwin used to explain away the massive holes in his goofy theory of self-creating life coming blindly from non-life, and then putting its own integrated parts together.

Darwin continues:

"Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.”

More slick sophistry and silly semantics -- An "if", followed by another "if," then a "can be," then an "if further," then a "should be," and a "could be," then a "though," and finally a "should not be." If elephants could fly -- If I could live forever -- If dogs could speak. If, maybe, perhaps, and, though, coulda, woulda, shoulda, mighta, but, but but, if, if, if... This then is what the academic cool-kids club refers to as "science?" This non-observable and wild speculation about "numerous gradations" of the eye's integrated components amounts to pure rhetorical manipulation -- not true science. Read it again closely. Darwin totally dodges the question and explains NOTHING to solve the mystery of complex integration -- a mind-boggling phenomena that is observable in all living creatures and even "simple" single-cell organisms.

As it is with the many essential integrated systems of an automobile -- each one absolutely necessary for the car as a whole to function -- (engine, transmission, wheels, axle, spark plugs, gas tank, battery, hoses, belts, ignition, alternator, steering wheel, gear shift, accelerator, carburetor, braking system, drive shaft, oil, coolant / anti-freeze, transmission fluid, containers for fluid, radiator, chassis, pistons, nuts, bolts, welded parts, etc.) -- only the existence of an eternal designing force without origin, permeating and communicating through every living cell of existence, possessed of freakish intelligence and power, and far beyond our lowly human "pay grade" to ever fully comprehend, can adequately explain the complex integration of multiple systems that neither Darwin nor his sci-fi cult of diploma-decorated dick-heads have ever been able to, and never will be.

Can you?

1. The 20th Century discovery of DNA codes which program our physical traits makes Darwin's problem of explaining away integrated complexity a million times even more complex. 2. Imagine car parts blindly "evolving" one at a time and "randomly" integrating themselves during a billion-year tornado. That is essentially what "educated" evolutionists, without a shred of observable precedent, believe to have happened in the living world. 3. You may be a whiz at mathematics and rhetoric, professor. But you're as bloody frickin' stupid as you are crazy!

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 20 Comments [4/15/2017 11:12:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126338

AIG, Answer In Genesis 20 Comments [4/15/2017 11:23:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: P.E..T.F

Quote# 6989

Psalm 139:13 finds David specifically stating that God knits us together in our mother's womb. This is clearly an statement against any theistic version of evolution. How can humans be knitted together in the womb is we evolved from lower life forms?

apologetics, Theology Web 24 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 7272

Let's all tell ourselves that Jesus is coming this very night and then go out and talk to at least one person about Him. I'm on my way now!

Jacinth, Rapture Ready 14 Comments [5/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126361

Over the last several weeks, Christians angry and upset with me for not supporting Donald Trump have emailed to tell me my wife has lung cancer because I am opposing God's chosen candidate. The other day I got an email from a man who wrote, "I have come to learn after listening to so many prophesies that God DOES have his hand on DJT! You, of all people, who are studying the Bible, KNOW about CYRUS, DAVID, SAUL OF TARSUS, etc. were used for God's purposes! God can even use a donkey." The all-caps were his. I agree with him that God can use even donkeys, just like Hillary Clinton.

Various e-mailers, Townhall 8 Comments [4/16/2017 4:52:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Hu's On First

Quote# 14598

[Replying to another poster's opinion that people who not only claim not to be gay, but vehemently hate homosexuals in general, are probably homosexual too]

Your opinion as a homosexual is worthless. You are engaging in criminal, abnormal and sociopathic behaviour and have no credibility. You need to be institutionalized in a facility for the criminally insane.

Gallus07, IMDb 91 Comments [9/5/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 5495

[On gay marriage]its not right thats ALL there is too it there is no need for explanation it is just not right not that hard to understand really.

BleakBassPlayer, POD Warrior Forum 13 Comments [12/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 41041

I have few questions for you.
Does big bang mades cars?
Does big bang mades Buildings?
Does big bang mades Songs?

Only a divine creator created this beautiful world we live in.
Satan ruin by trick Even and Adam to bring sin in this world.

God's orignal plan was walking among the humans and talk to us like we are his friends.
Thanks to Satan. Jesus had to die to open a new door way to talk to God the Father.

LoneWolf1984, deviantART 78 Comments [6/15/2008 3:25:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 126375

I don't care if you wear makeup and have fake boobs, or if you have your hair cut short and breast removed.....if you still have your penis or vagina use the restroom your bottom half pertains to.

Tara Johnson, Facebook 20 Comments [4/16/2017 4:58:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 42941

[On what will happen if gay marriage is expanded to more states]

"Lets see, there's a divorce rate of around 50 percent, social permission for men to experiement in homosexuality, along with the women's movement to kill their babies, instead of honor God's will for them as mothers. And psychopathically frustrated young men murder a dozen fellow students every year or so in the public schools. Gee, I can't see any affect upon healthy marriage and family, can you?"

Anonymous Commenter, OneNewsNow 43 Comments [7/16/2008 4:45:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By:

Quote# 12918

so ur a muslim? thats dumb.

piter400, Gaia Online 33 Comments [7/10/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 1262

Isn't Mickey mouse a wizard?

Mickey mouse and harry potter are both damned. And kids enjoy watching them. There is something wrong with that.

Deaga, Rapture Ready 27 Comments [11/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 10555

[On why God helps her, but not the people in Darfur.]

God does not ignore the problems of other people. He tries to help them, and most of the time He can't get through to them because they either have never heard of Him or reject Him.

JoJo!, Myspace 37 Comments [4/3/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 25 30 35 40 | top