Quote# 28343

There is truly nothing new under the sun- these atheist liberal dolts think they're being novel in their approach to villify Christianity? Here's a wake-up call God-Deniers- you've failed for centuries and will continue to fail right up until the point the Christ returns to paint the streets with your spilled blood.

CottShop, Free Republic 89 Comments [8/22/2007 1:11:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 12922

Let's call a spade a spade. Homosexuality is perversion, exactly like mental retardation. A homosexual is just like someone with down syndrome, and they need mental help. I don't hate a gay guy any more than I would a mongoloid...

Davidoff, Myspace 50 Comments [7/10/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: clemsecon

Quote# 75122



My husband has sadly predicted for a long time that the homosexuals would get a case such as this before the Supreme Court and that they would win, with the Supreme Court citing the "full faith and credit" clause as the reason. I fear he is right. I honestly don't want to live in a country that doesn't recognize traditional marriage as between one man and one woman. If the homosexuals win on this issue, I predict that things will go downhill rapidly.

I also think that if they win, the next thing that homosexuals will do is sue churches that refuse to marry them. Christian pastors may have to resort to marrying Christian couples at private homes so that the homosexuals cannot prove how many marriages are taking place or where they are taking place because they won't be performed publicly at the churches.



sherriemae, Rapture Ready 64 Comments [8/12/2010 6:55:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 60

Quote# 94375

This is what I feel should be done about the homosexuality problem:

1. Repeal all gay "marriage" laws. They make no sense from a logical, legal, semantic, or philosophical standpoint. You can't have male hens and you can't have gay marriage.

2. Eliminate "civil unions" - see above.

3. Draft a Constitutional amendment preventing either of the above 2 points from ever being issues anywhere in the country.

4. Nullify all existing gay "marriages" and "civil unions". To allow them to continue to exist undermines the entire agenda.

5. Work to eliminate the arbitrary stigma toward reparative therapy.

6. Make said therapy mandatory for first-time offenses of displaying homosexual behavior in public.

7. Train all school counselors - from pre-K to college - in said therapy.

8. Make any public displays of homosexual misconduct a misdemeanor after the first.

I think this would really eliminate a lot of the problems homosexuals are causing. If you have any other ideas, let me know.

Vlad III, FSTDT Comments 57 Comments [5/18/2013 4:19:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 48

Quote# 94374

A feminist in the strict and proper sense may be defined as a woman who envies the male role.

By the male role I mean, in the first place, providing, protecting, and guiding rather than nurturing and assisting. This in turn involves relative independence, action, and competition in the larger impersonal society outside the family, the use of language for communication and analysis (rather than expressiveness or emotional manipulation), and deliberate behavior aiming at objective achievement (rather than the attainment of pleasant subjective states) and guided by practical reasoning (rather than emotional impulse).

Both feminist and nonfeminist women sense that these characteristically male attributes have a natural primacy over their own. I prefer to speak of "primacy" rather than superiority in this context since both sets of traits are necessary to propagate the race. One sign of male primacy is that envy of the female role by men is virtually nonexistent — even, so far as I know, among homosexuals.

Normal women are attracted to male traits and wish to partner with a man who possesses them. Healthy societies are marked by a cooperative reciprocity between the sexes, but an unequal one in the sense that it involves male leadership of the female, somewhat as in ballroom dancing.

The feminists' response to the primacy of male traits, on the other hand, is a feeling of inadequacy in regard to men — a feeling ill-disguised by defensive assertions of her "equality." She desires to possess masculinity directly, in her own person, rather than partnering with a man. That is what leads her into the spiritual cul de sac of envy.

And perhaps even more than she envies the male role itself, the feminist covets the external rewards attached to its successful performance: social status, recognition, power, wealth, and the chance to control wealth directly (rather than be supported). She tends not to give much thought to the great mass of men who struggle to fulfill the demands of their role without ever attaining the rewards of superior performance.

F. Roger Devlin, Thornwalker 28 Comments [5/18/2013 4:18:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 94372

I've heard stories about abortionists playing with the bodies of dead babies (like holding them up like dolls and making them "talk") and all kinds of other crazy crap that goes on in your regular run of the mill abortion clinic.

Rubystars, JTF.org 43 Comments [5/18/2013 4:18:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 94329

It's not our products or materials that make America great. I'm not throwing in the towel with those who have made a choice to disown their heritage and have chosen to forget the ideals that make up the great country we live in. hussein obama is hitler, a disaster, a toxic substance dredged up from the pits of hell made to look like every grifter's, revenge artist's and loser's savior and friend. America didn't forget itself----hussein obama spoke to the basest, most self centered desires of human beings. He plays and dotes on corrupting all that is good and decent. Those who chose him and chose to cheat for him have their reward. Most Americans are still good people who love this country. I don't believe that we are "done" or have forgotten who we are. I just don't buy it. And I don't buy the last "And it did." I've become very suspect of posters who at the end of their diatribe seem to be saying, It's all over, Give up!" Perhaps that's not what you intended, but it seems that way to me.

amerigal1, American Thinker 63 Comments [5/15/2013 6:22:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: Hasan Prishtina

Quote# 94390

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) lashed out at Democrats over the issue of abortion on Monday just minutes after a jury returned a guilty verdict in the high-profile case of an abortion doctor accused of multiple homicides.

“Democrats do not want abortion to be safe or rare,” Stockman said in a statement. “Democrats oppose even the most basic of health and safety standards for abortion mills. Democrats don’t care how many women are maimed, infected with diseases or die on the routinely-filthy abortion mills. Democrats worship abortion with same fervor the Canaanites worshipped Molech.”

Kermit Gosnell was found guilty of three counts of first-degree murder on Monday in Philadelphia and could face the death penalty. Gosnell was accused of performing partial-birth abortions and killing one woman.

Prosecutors believe he was involved in dozens of illegal late-term abortions, forcing the live births of fetuses up to eight months old, and in some cases “snipping” the spines of the babies that survived the abortion attempts with scissors.?? Media reports say some of the babies were born breathing and screaming, and that body parts were kept in jars around the filthy blood- and feces-stained clinic.

Gosnell was charged with partially delivering seven babies that were 24 weeks or older, although prosecutors say the actual number is far higher. He was also charged with the death of one of the mothers who went into cardiac arrest during a procedure.

No Democrats defended Gosnell’s crimes, and many denounced him. However, Stockman on Monday sought to tie Gosnell to the pro-abortion rights stances of many Democrats.

“The courts call it murder. Democrats call it ‘health care,’” Stockman said. “Despite the blood-soaked horror of Gosnell’s clinic, Democrats refuse to loosen their embrace of unrestricted, unregulated, taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.”

“Even more chilling, as an Illinois state senator Barack Obama voted several times to make Gosnell’s inhuman crimes the law of the land,” he added. “I hope this verdict moves him to look into his soul and change his position.”

Rep. Steve Stockman, The Hill 48 Comments [5/19/2013 4:31:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 2708

now no offense to catholics but is it ok for a christian girl to marry a catholic guy??

Heavenlierealm, Rapture Ready 23 Comments [8/22/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 94342

Quantum~learning is holographic image fledging of holographic~flux mind.

"Doug, what do you mean by 'image~fledging?'" Simply, quantum~imaginationings.

Doug assumes quantum~reality issi quantum~holographic. What we colloquially refer 'The Matrix,' is actually a (many, any) hologram(s) of holograms. Our best clue to this is conjecture by David Bohm and Karl Pribram. Another clue is sentient sensing qua. Our eyes sense photons. Photons are quantum~packetized holograms. Our hearing of phonons is similar. Our olfactory smell omnistinguishes effervescent holographic packetized molecules. And so on...

Now we can choose, via being students of quantonics, to view all those sensory packets as holographic images which our quantum~holographic minds 'store' and learn in a mental hologram of holograms. This quantum~process we may choose to call "quantum~cognitive imagination." Once cognized any holographic imagination's potentia for quantum~recognition becomes stochastically significant.

Doug will provide more omniscussion here on many relevant topics, including:

*neurons,
*energy wells (a la Jeffrey Satinover in his Quantum Brain)
Doug is working on novel graphics of H5W energy wells may be modeled.
*quantum~waves as packetized sensory energy holograms,
*Doug's novel hermeneutics of peaqlos to describe 'content of energy wells,'
*Autiot's fractal~recursive~energy descriptionings of a 'real learning' lesson as shee'oor. In Autiot, right to left: Raysh~Vav~Ayin~Yod~Sheen. There is much to write here.
*etc.

As you can see, there is much to omniscuss here.


Doug Renselle, Quantonics 89 Comments [5/16/2013 3:28:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 73
Submitted By: aebars

Quote# 94394

[On president Obama calling to congratulate Jason Collins for coming out about his sexuality but not calling Tim Tebow to congratulate him for being Christian]

“We’ve got Tim Tebow who will kneel and pray to God on the football field. Meanwhile we have a professional athlete that decides he’s going to announce his sexuality and he gets a personal call from the United States to highlight the sexuality of a professional ballplayer. These are ways that the culture gets undermined, where it gets divided. The people over on this side take their followership from that kind of leadership. One notch at a time, American civilization, American culture, western civilization, western Judeo-Christiandom are eroded.”

Rep. Steve King, The Nation 45 Comments [5/19/2013 4:32:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 94380

Why do European and Negro Scholars in mainstream academia continue to run with the claim that Homosexuality existed among indigenous Africans prior to foreign contact.
I have yet to see legitimate untainted archeological anthropological and oral sources that detail homosexuality being practiced among our ancestors prior to colonization. Even RAPE was virtually unheard of in Africa prior to colonization.
So the question is why do these so called scholars keep running with this BLATANT LIE?
THEY ARE TRYING TO PUSH AN AGENDA!!

Mfon Amun Ptah, Tumblr 65 Comments [5/18/2013 4:20:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 18877

I put my faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Let's take a look at what evolutionists put their faith in:

1) Evolutionists put their faith in a mysterious primordial swamp that produced life from non-life.

2) Evolutionists put their faith in the fact that fish can morph into amphibians...that amphibians can morph into reptiles..that retiles can morph into mammals...that apes can morph into humans.

3) Evolutionists put their faith in thousands of common ancestors that have never been found.

4) Evolutionists put their faith in beneficial random mutations which have never proven to be random.

5) Evolutionists put their faith in natural selection, which has never even been tested.

6) Evolutionists put their faith in flawed dating techniques.

7) Evolutionists put their faith in the hopes that humans are actually apes.

8) Evolutionists put their faith in the hopes that a monkey can morph into a human simply by hopping down from tree branches and walking out into wide open spaces.

9) Evolutionists put their faith that a giant explosion could produce order.

10) Evolutionists put their faith that DNA could self-organize from randomly arising chemicals.

westernjoe, Christian Forums 105 Comments [1/3/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: David

Quote# 94305

Evodelusionism is the religion of atheists, sex addicts, murderers, Monsanto, big pharma, socialists, communists, liberals, whores, and perverts...basically all those who are destroying all life on earth like evolution.

You think you are a scientist, but you are just the spokesperson for the most disgusting religion that has ever plagued humanity.

There are three absolutes in the DNA RNA process that cannot be overcome by evolution. Therefore evolution is a myth.

1/ RNA cannot make DNA without DNA to produce the original coding. They are simultaneously needed to produce eukaryotic life. There is no physical evidence of any RNA only creature making DNA.

2/ It is impossible for the human immune system to evolve when the pathogens that destroy digest human cells already existed before the first "human" cell.
It is impossible for any of the original life forms to exist based on this. The creatures needed to be built having an integrated immune system to deal with all pathogens and even radiation from sunlight that causes cancer cells that need to be destroyed.
Cancer is an immune deficiency disease.
Here is a video of how cancer cells are supposed to be destroyed by the immune system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJSrxzatNzY

3/ DNA only shows genetic degradation and nothing else. Science does not operate differently in the past than now. Science has no magic in it.
http://evolutionsciencenow.blogspot.com/2013/04/are-humans-getting-better-what-is.html

Every year 30.4 million people die from Evodelusionism and immorality.

James Arjuna, Amazon Atheist Forum 117 Comments [5/14/2013 3:36:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 47

Quote# 94385

When Jesus said there would be signs in the sun, He didn't say that power grids would be knocked out or that solar flares, gamma rays, electromagnetic storms would always face the earth, and at times they will, He just said there will be signs in the sun.

So to me this is just another sign indicating that Jesus is coming very very soon!

raptureholic, Rapture Ready 37 Comments [5/19/2013 4:11:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: dylanstrategie

Quote# 94376

[Bastardization? Really? How am I corrupting these texts? Please feel free to explain because frankly its quite simple. God says babies are innocents. God says killing innocents is murder. God killed innocents. Fact fact fact based on your texts, all three. It looks like rather you are dissatisfied with my conclusion that your god committed murder.]

Dissatisfied sums it up, yeah. Can you not see how you cherry picked two unrelated sentences and forced them together to prove your point? The logic is clear... God has the capacity to know and judge fairly where you do not. Given the whole concept of fallibility as accepted by Christians and Jews, your idea that children are innocents is unfounded and unbiblical. Simple as that.

fr0d0, Atheist Forums 40 Comments [5/18/2013 4:19:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Stimbo

Quote# 77098

In a thread regarding astrophysics, distance and star light

Here is a question you.

So a light year = the distance light travels in a year.

You mentioned the figure 11 million light years away.

So my question is how are we observing this light 11 million light years away now?

I'm not 11 million years old, i'm 20.

---------------------------------------------

Later on he goes on to say...

If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth, how can i see it now? I'm only 20.

If it takes 11 million years to travel to earth then the viewer would need to be 11 million years old.

---------------------------------------------

And it continues with...

I don't believe light travels at all, i've looked at various models and worked on many but none of it works. The basics of visual perception is often overlooked. When we look at something what is actually going on? The emission theory states that the light emits (not a travelling speed) from our own eyes not from the object we look at. The intromission theory states the opposite.

The emission theory is the most common sense, so i don't believe there is any speed of light. The 'Starlight Problem' has never been a problem for me and the YEC model. The earliest Church Fathers (2nd-4th century AD) who believed in emmision theory also had no problem with starlight and a young universe.

Cassiterides, Evolution Fairytale Forum 244 Comments [10/25/2010 7:04:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 425
Submitted By: Flatland

Quote# 94325

Your defense of homosexuality is without merit because it has destroyed every civilization it has touched and that is shameful.

Ken Hutcherson, Chrisitan Post 87 Comments [5/15/2013 3:31:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 47
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 94363

(response to the question of when he chose to be straight}

AT BIRTH..i will answer that GOD thru nature made me a male with all the bodily characteristics of a man...with that comes the compatability to the female gender to unite and procreate...its a wonderful gift...to goe AGAINST that natural process and wonderful gift is when YOU make that desicision... its going against the instruction book that innate to our species...

nofanofobama, The Augusta Chronicle 37 Comments [5/17/2013 3:27:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 94371

(On Minnesota's state senate passing a law to legalize gay marriage)

I love seeing the comments restarted...somebody must have had a good argument why SSM shouldn't be legalized. Something like incurring more to the states Debt to cover SSM benefits, lawsuits against churches for discrimination, that a small percent of Minnesotans get to redefine a term for the majority, that were passing laws just so we don't hurt someone's feelings, that the majority of MN's don't want SSM (which is a completely different argument than putting it in our constitution), It violates DOMA. If it does pass, I wonder what's next from the bullies and incompetent legislature?

justusecnn, startribune.com 30 Comments [5/18/2013 4:09:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Jason_the_Cripple

Quote# 93089

I am talking about the anti-Christian, anti-white, anti-man, pro-gay, pro-immigrant mentality that we are seeing today. Lately I have seen young people talk (aged like 17-20 years old), and they scare me to death. These kids were heavily brainwashed by liberal propaganda since a young age, and they really seem to believe this crap. Not only that, but they are extremely intolerant and they have a propensity for violence. If you say anything they consider not acceptable by their cultural marxist standards, they will call their 200 friends and intimidate you. Also, they constantly make protests and harass people. Luckily, these people have not real power, but it might be coming soon. They are able to restrict freedom of speech more and more every day, by making protests and complaining each time someone in the medias say something they don't like, and everyone is bending over to their demands. It's ridiculous now.

This is getting out of control. Personal attacks, bullying, intimidation from cultural marxists is a daily occurrence. I can see how these people will try to gain power and make a bunch of restrictive laws to restrict speech and opinions. Are we going to soon live into some sort of cultural marxist dictatorship?

What do you think?


I_Fail_at_Life, love-shy.com 55 Comments [3/13/2013 3:50:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: Saney

Quote# 94324

Actually, I think that 2015 is the deadline by which anyone who could become red pill, will.

More and more of our content is out there, and more mainstream people are talking about it (James Taranto, Dr. Helen’s book, Walter Russell Mead). It will no longer be possible for any man under, say, 60 to still be on the fence. He either has to become a red-piller or a mangina/whiteknight.

Andrew Johnston is an example of what I have said for a long time, that a single man practicing Game deprives 10 or more manginas of what little scraps they were getting. Game is highly asymmetrical, and hence Andrew Johnston represents the effect a mangina experiences when more men learn Game.

However, a mangina only knows how to react in one way : doubling down. Manginas will soon be paying $1000 on a first date with a 5….. as they should, since it is the natural order for manginas to bear the costs (that is why nature created them). Our job is to make sure the costs get transferred to manginas.

TFH, The Spearhead 102 Comments [5/15/2013 3:25:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 60

Quote# 94327

“I had a teacher who was talking about abstinence, [Elizabeth Smart, a rape victim] said, ‘Imagine you’re a stick of gum and when you engage in sex, that’s like getting chewed, and if you do that lots of times, you’re going to become an old piece of gum, and who’s going to want you after that?”

Unnamed teacher, The Raw Story 86 Comments [5/15/2013 3:31:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: Hertzyscowicz

Quote# 94334

So, now we know that the water in the Moon rocks came from Earth. And we already knew that the Moon rocks came from Earth. At what point is it going to become sufficiently obvious that the "Moon landings" were filmed on Earth?

What more is required, signed confessions from Stanley Kubrick and Neil Armstrong?

There is no scientific evidence that Man landed on the Moon, after all. Since the scientific evidence points quite clearly to the various "lunar" objects having a terrestrial origin, then must we not, as good rational scientific materialists, conclude that Man never landed on the Moon?

Vox Day, Vox Populi 54 Comments [5/16/2013 3:09:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 44

Quote# 3957

While he is learning evolution in school, how about renting or buying some tapes that teach the truth? Kent Hovind has a series of tapes... he tells the truth about creation and explains the biblical facts with scientific evidence.

Mrs. Hoppes, Rapture Ready 16 Comments [9/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9